Cluster B - Dramatic Personality Patterns: Impulsive, Unstable, and Self-Focused

UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 22.3 Free with a free account

Cluster B - Dramatic Personality Patterns: Impulsive, Unstable, and Self-Focused

Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 22: Personality Disorders: Rigid Patterns That Impair FunctioningSection 22.3 · lesson 86 of 9714 min · free with a free account

← Cluster A - Eccentric Personality Patterns: Suspicious, Detached, and OddNext lesson: Cluster C - Anxious Personality Patterns, and Why Diagnosing Personality Disorders Remains Complex →

Earn 3 college credits for Abnormal PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 180 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Abnormal Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

The strongest treatment evidence - and the most clinician stigma.

  • Describe borderline, antisocial, narcissistic, and histrionic personality disorders
  • Distinguish borderline presentations from bipolar disorder and complex trauma
  • Describe the evidence-based treatments and their shared ingredients
  • Recognize the service responses that harm, and what to do instead

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,772 words). Read along, or search it.

Personality Disorders: Rigid Patterns That Impair Functioning

Cluster B: Dramatic, Emotional, Erratic

This section covers Cluster B, the dramatic, emotional, or erratic grouping. Borderline, antisocial, narcissistic, and histrionic personality disorders. We distinguish borderline presentations from bipolar disorder and complex trauma, and describe the evidence-based treatments. And we look closely at how services respond, because some responses help, and some cause harm.

Before You Begin

Treatable, and Most People Improve

This material is educational and clinical. It is not a basis for self-diagnosis, or for diagnosing anyone else, including people you find difficult. Some viewers may find it personally affecting. If you are affected, please speak with a qualified professional. And these statements belong at the outset. These conditions are treatable. Established treatments exist. And most people no longer meet criteria after some years.

Cluster B as a Grouping

The Same Condition, Twice Over

Cluster B's four conditions share, loosely, emotional intensity and interpersonal difficulty. As with the other clusters, the grouping is descriptive, with limited empirical support. This section carries more of the chapter's weight than the other two, for two reasons. It contains the condition with by far the strongest treatment evidence. And it contains the condition that attracts the most clinician stigma. Those are the same condition.

Borderline Personality Disorder

Instability in Relationships, Self, and Emotion

Borderline personality disorder is a pervasive pattern of instability in relationships, self-image, and emotion, with marked impulsivity, present from early adulthood and across contexts. The difficulties fall into recognizable domains. Emotional responses are intense, and settle slowly. Relationships are unstable, often alternating between idealizing and devaluing the same person. Self-image is unstable, which is what identity disturbance means. Impulsivity appears in categories like spending, substance use, driving, and sexual behavior, named here as categories only. Fear of abandonment is prominent, along with a chronic sense of emptiness, and difficulty with intense anger. And under stress, transient dissociative or suspicious experiences may occur.

Self-Harm and Suicidal Behavior

Clinical Features Requiring Professional Care

Self-harm and suicidal behavior are clinical features of this condition. They require professional assessment and care. Nothing further about them appears in this course. No method, means, frequency, severity, or account of what they involve. The clinically relevant point for a student is not what happens. It is how services respond. These behaviors are frequently misread by services, in ways that make things worse. At the level of concept, they are understood within the emotion-regulation account we are about to describe. That is the whole of what is said about their function here.

The Manipulation Misreading

A Contingency, Not a Character

This diagnosis attracts more clinician stigma than almost any other. People with it are often described in pejorative terms by staff, in handovers, notes, and conversation. That is documented. And it produces worse care. Distress is attributed to personality rather than assessed, people are excluded from services because of the diagnosis, and co-occurring conditions go untreated. The word that does the most damage is manipulative, and it is worth taking apart. Behavior described that way is better understood as a learned way of getting needs met, when direct routes have failed, often repeatedly and over years. A person who has found that stating a need plainly produces nothing, and that escalation produces a response, has learned what the environment taught. That describes a contingency, not a character. And contingencies can be changed, while characters cannot. That is why the reframing matters practically, not only ethically.

The Biosocial Model

Sensitivity Meets Invalidation

The leading developmental account is a biosocial model. It proposes an interaction between temperamental emotional sensitivity, meaning responses that arise easily, run intensely, and settle slowly, and an environment that repeatedly treats those responses as invalid. Neither element alone produces the outcome. The model is about what happens when they meet, repeatedly, across development. Invalidation is not blame, and families are not the cause of this condition. An environment can be invalidating for a highly sensitive child without anyone behaving badly, simply because responses that suit most children do not suit this one. And families are among the most useful resources in treatment, which is a good reason to handle this material with care.

Figure 22.3.1

The Biosocial Model

Here is the model drawn out. Emotional sensitivity on one side. An invalidating environment on the other. They meet in repeated interaction across development, and the outcome is difficulty regulating emotion. Look at the two boxes on the left. In this model, neither leads anywhere alone. That is the whole of its claim, and it is why the point about blame is part of the content, not a disclaimer.

Course and Outcome

The Permanent View Was Wrong

On course and outcome, the plain statement. Borderline personality disorder is treatable. Several evidence-based treatments exist, and most people no longer meet criteria after some years. The historical view that it was a permanent condition was wrong. One qualification belongs alongside the optimism. Functional recovery, meaning work, relationships, and a life the person wants, often lags behind symptom remission. So treatment that stops at symptom reduction stops early.

Table 22.3.2

Borderline or Bipolar? Timing, Not Intensity

Distinguishing a borderline presentation from bipolar disorder is the most consequential differential in the chapter. The treatments differ substantially, and misdiagnosis in either direction is common. The distinction rests on timing, not intensity. In a borderline presentation, mood shifts within hours, or across a day. In bipolar disorder, episodes are sustained over longer periods. Borderline shifts usually follow an interpersonal event. Bipolar episodes often arise without an identifiable trigger. The borderline pattern is continuous, while bipolar disorder returns toward a baseline between episodes. And identity disturbance is definitional in borderline presentations, while self-image is generally stable between bipolar episodes. Complex trauma presentations overlap heavily, and whether the two are genuinely distinct is disputed. We return to that in the next section. ADHD also involves impulsivity and emotional reactivity, and developmental history settles it. And substance-related instability requires a period of stability before assessment.

Antisocial Personality Disorder

Not a Synonym for Criminality

Antisocial personality disorder is a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others. It requires evidence of conduct difficulty before adulthood. Two corrections are essential. First, it is not a synonym for criminality. Most people who commit offenses do not meet criteria for it, and most people who meet criteria are not violent. Second, psychopathy is a related but distinct research construct. It is not a diagnosis in the classification, and the popular use of the word describes neither. Overt behavior often diminishes with age, though difficulties in relationships and functioning may persist. On treatment, the honest position is that evidence is limited, and outcomes so far have been poor. And some group-based and confrontational approaches can worsen outcomes, as with young people. So doing something is not automatically better than doing nothing.

Narcissistic and Histrionic

Fragility, and a Doubted Category

Narcissistic personality disorder is a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy. The everyday use of narcissist as an insult should be set aside entirely. It is a social judgment, not a clinical condition. The clinical picture typically involves fragile, not robust, self-esteem. A grandiose presentation shows overt self-importance and entitlement. A vulnerable presentation shows hypersensitivity to slight, shame, and withdrawal. Both manage the same fragility differently. People with this pattern rarely present for it. They present when the conditions sustaining it collapse, like a career reversal, a relationship ending, or illness, and the presenting problem is usually depression. Histrionic personality disorder is a pervasive pattern of excessive emotionality and attention-seeking. It comes with a substantial validity criticism. It has weak empirical support, overlaps heavily with other categories, and has been criticized as encoding gendered expectations about how much emotion is appropriate, and from whom. It was proposed for removal, and should be applied with extra caution.

In the Clinic

Staff Language Changes the Care

The chain from staff language to care is short, and well documented. A word in a handover, like manipulative, attention-seeking, or well known to services, sets the next clinician's expectation before the person is seen. That expectation shapes whether new distress is assessed, or attributed. Attribution means physical and psychiatric problems get missed. And the person notices, which affects how they present next time, and confirms the original description. What interrupts it is treating language as a supervisable clinical matter, and asking in supervision what a word is doing. And requiring notes to record what was observed, not conclusions about character. Two assessment points are specific to this cluster. Assessment during or just after a crisis is unlikely to be valid, yet that is when these diagnoses are most often made. And a diagnosis recorded once tends to persist in records, unexamined.

Table 22.3.3

Evidence-Based Treatment Models

Several established models have good outcome evidence. They are described here by generic type, and all are delivered by trained clinicians. A skills-based behavioral model targets difficulty regulating emotion, teaching skills in regulation, distress tolerance, interpersonal effectiveness, and attention. It has the strongest evidence base. A mentalization-based model strengthens the capacity to hold in mind what oneself and others may be thinking and feeling. A schema-focused model targets enduring beliefs formed early, with a smaller evidence base. And the final row is often overlooked. Structured clinical management, which needs no specialist model at all, performs comparably to the specialist treatments in several comparisons. That suggests the models share their active ingredients. Structure, consistency between clinicians, a clear frame, an agreed approach to crises, support and supervision for clinicians, and enough time. Services that cannot provide a specialist model can often provide those.

Table 22.3.4

Service Responses That Harm

Some service responses predictably cause harm, and each has an alternative. Inconsistency between staff means the person cannot predict what will happen, so testing the environment becomes rational. Instead, have one agreed plan that every clinician follows. Punitive responses to crisis confirm that need is met only through escalation. Instead, agree a crisis plan in advance, and apply it without alteration under pressure. Excluding people because of the diagnosis removes access to treatment for a treatable condition. Instead, have an explicit policy against it. And attributing new distress to personality leaves problems unassessed. Assess first. Pejorative language in notes sets the next clinician's expectation. Record observations, not conclusions about character. And communicating pessimism contradicts the evidence, and removes the reason to engage. Notice that each response is a failure of the service, not of the person.

In the Clinic

Boundaries as Structure, Not Punishment

Boundaries in this work are often misunderstood, in both directions. Applied as restriction, with contact reduced as a consequence, or rules introduced during a crisis, they are punitive, and reliably make things worse. Applied as structure, they are agreed in advance, explained, and the same on a bad day as a good one, from every clinician. Then they are among the most containing things a service can offer. The test is simple. Was this boundary agreed in advance, and would it be the same today if the week had gone differently? No medication treats these conditions themselves. Prescribing addresses co-occurring conditions, described by class only, with decisions resting with a prescriber. Medications accumulated across crises call for review, not addition. And co-occurring conditions, like depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and substance use, are the rule. Each needs treatment in its own right.

About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study

Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study

Understand mental health disordersAbnormal Psychology covers how psychological disorders are defined, assessed, explained and treated. It is a core course for psychology majors and useful for nursing, social work, counseling and criminal justice.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Cluster B - Dramatic Personality Patterns: Impulsive, Unstable, and Self-Focused

What is the biosocial model of borderline personality disorder?
The biosocial model, the leading developmental account, proposes that borderline personality disorder arises when temperamental emotional sensitivity meets an environment that repeatedly treats a person's emotional responses as invalid. Neither element alone produces the outcome; the result of their repeated interaction is difficulty regulating emotion. Invalidation is not blame, since an environment can suit most children but not a highly sensitive one without anyone behaving badly.
How do you tell borderline personality disorder from bipolar disorder?
The distinction rests on timing, not intensity. In borderline personality disorder, mood shifts within hours or across a day, usually after an interpersonal event, and identity disturbance is part of the pattern. In bipolar disorder, mood episodes last longer, often arise without an identifiable trigger, and the person returns toward a baseline with a generally stable self-image between episodes. Misdiagnosis in either direction is common, and treatments differ.
Is antisocial personality disorder the same as psychopathy?
No, psychopathy is a related but distinct research construct and not a diagnosis in the classification. Antisocial personality disorder is a pervasive pattern of disregarding and violating others' rights, and it requires evidence of conduct difficulty before adulthood. It is also not a synonym for criminality: most people who commit offenses do not meet its criteria, and most people who meet criteria are not violent.
What therapies work for borderline personality disorder?
Several therapies have good outcome evidence. Dialectical behavior therapy, a skills-based model teaching emotion regulation, distress tolerance and interpersonal effectiveness, has the strongest base. Mentalization-based treatment builds the capacity to understand one's own and others' mental states, and schema therapy targets early-formed beliefs. Structured clinical management performs comparably in several comparisons, suggesting shared ingredients such as consistency, a clear frame and an agreed crisis plan.

About the Abnormal Psychology course

How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 97 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 97 lessons total about 24 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.

97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Abnormal Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Abnormal Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →