Purging and Bingeing Cycles and Recurrent Overeating Disorder: Signs, Characteristics, and Recovery

UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 16.2 Free with a free account

Purging and Bingeing Cycles and Recurrent Overeating Disorder: Signs, Characteristics, and Recovery

Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 16: Eating Disorders: Psychological and Physical DimensionsSection 16.2 · lesson 59 of 9712 min · free with a free account

← Restrictive Eating Disorder: Symptom Profile and Long-Term OutlookNext lesson: Classifying Sexual Dysfunctions, Their Root Causes, and Historical Evolution →

Earn 3 college credits for Abnormal PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 180 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Abnormal Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Hidden conditions, long delays - and good responses to treatment.

  • Describe bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder, and distinguish them
  • Explain their maintaining cycles, and why restriction sustains them
  • Explain shame, secrecy, and weight stigma as barriers
  • Describe treatment, and the rest of the eating disorder family

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,635 words). Read along, or search it.

Eating Disorders: Psychological and Physical Dimensions

Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder

This section covers the two eating disorders defined by recurrent episodes involving loss of control. Bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. We describe each clinically, and distinguish them. We look at the cycles that maintain them, and at the barriers that keep them hidden for years. Then we name the rest of the eating disorder family, and close the chapter with treatment and support.

Before You Begin

Treatable, and Recovery Is Common

First, some framing. This material describes these conditions clinically, so they can be recognized and understood. It is not a basis for self-diagnosis, or for diagnosing anyone else. Some viewers may find the subject personally affecting. If you are worried about your own eating or someone else's, please speak with a qualified professional. These conditions respond well to established treatment, and recovery is a common outcome. One theme runs through this whole section. These conditions are hidden. They are hidden by the people who have them, for entirely understandable reasons. And they are hidden from services by assumptions about what someone with an eating disorder looks like. The delay between onset and first treatment is typically measured in years.

Bulimia Nervosa

Episodes, Compensation, and Self-Evaluation

Bulimia nervosa involves recurrent episodes of eating an amount that is unusually large for the circumstances, with a sense of loss of control. These are followed by recurrent compensatory behavior, and both occur regularly enough, and for long enough, to form an established pattern. And self-evaluation is unduly influenced by weight and shape. Compensatory behavior is named here only as a category. No form of it is described in this section. That is deliberate. What matters for understanding is the function of that behavior within the cycle, which we will come to, not its form. The pattern requirements exist to distinguish an established difficulty from an isolated occurrence. But a person just below a threshold is not a person without a difficulty. Services that treat thresholds as entitlement criteria cause real harm.

The Defining Feature

Loss of Control - and the Secrecy Around It

The feature that defines an episode is not the amount involved. It is loss of control. That means the experience of being unable to stop, or to influence, what is happening once it has begun. People describe it as the episode proceeding without them. It is the part they find hardest to convey, and most distressing to remember. Because the subjective experience defines it, an outside observer cannot tell from what they see. The person's own account is the key information. And that places assessment on ground that shame and secrecy make hard to reach. These conditions are typically concealed. The behavior is experienced as shameful, and as a personal failing, so disclosure feels like a confession. And because the difficulty is not visible, nobody asks. So the cycle runs, and consolidates, for years. When a person does disclose, they are often saying something aloud for the first time. The response they receive at that moment matters disproportionately.

Binge Eating Disorder

Not Overeating, Not a Weight Problem

Binge eating disorder involves recurrent episodes with the same loss of control. It comes with marked distress about the episodes, and an established pattern. What distinguishes it is that regular compensatory behavior is absent. Two corrections need making, because both errors are widespread, and both cause harm. First, it is not simply overeating. Eating more than intended on some occasions is an ordinary human experience. The disorder is defined by loss of control, marked distress, and an established pattern. Treating it as ordinary overeating means telling someone to try harder, which is neither treatment nor useful. Second, it is not a weight problem. Binge eating disorder is a psychological condition, and it is classified as one. Framing it as a weight problem misdescribes it, points treatment in the wrong direction, and is a documented clinical error.

Compared

Where the 2 Conditions Diverge

Here is how the two conditions compare. Both involve recurrent episodes with loss of control, and marked distress. They differ in what follows the episode. In bulimia nervosa, a compensatory response follows, and is part of the cycle. In binge eating disorder, it does not. And overvaluation of weight and shape is definitional in bulimia nervosa, while in binge eating disorder it is often present, but not required. Each has a common misreading. Bulimia is misread as a matter of willpower. Binge eating disorder is misread as ordinary overeating, or as a weight problem. The difference matters because it changes which link in the cycle treatment targets first. It does not mean one condition is more serious than the other.

Appearance and Stigma

You Can't See These Conditions

Both conditions occur across the full range of body sizes. There is no appearance that indicates them, and no appearance that excludes them. Clinicians hold the assumption that you can see an eating disorder as firmly as anyone. So people who do not match the expected image are asked less, believed less readily, and referred less often. Men, older adults, and people outside the expected picture are affected most. Weight stigma is a documented barrier in its own right. A person whose eating difficulty is met with advice about weight, instead of assessment, learns the service has not understood. And they often do not come back. That advice usually involves restriction, which, as we will see, makes further episodes more likely. When someone discloses, receive it without visible surprise, and without reassurance about appearance. Ask about distress, and how life is being affected. And say plainly that the condition is common, and responds well to treatment.

Figure 16.2.2 (a)

The Bulimia Nervosa Cycle Runs on Rules

What began these conditions, and what keeps them going, are different questions. Treatment is built from the second. In bulimia nervosa, the maintaining cycle runs on rules. It begins with rigid personal rules. A rule is broken, and that is experienced as total failure rather than partial. An episode with loss of control follows. A compensatory response brings brief relief, and that relief is what reinforces it. Then distress and self-criticism follow, the rules are tightened, and the cycle is primed to run again.

Figure 16.2.2 (b)

The Binge Eating Disorder Cycle Runs on Emotion

In binge eating disorder, the cycle is organized around emotion, not rules. An emotional state intensifies, and an episode follows. Distress and shame follow the episode, and then concealment and withdrawal. And the person's ways of managing emotion narrow further, which makes the next episode more likely. Both are closed loops. They differ in what follows the episode, and that decides where treatment enters first.

The Central Principle

Restriction Makes Episodes More Likely

One well-supported principle underpins treatment for both conditions. Restriction makes later episodes more likely, not less. So trying to prevent episodes by restricting more tightly strengthens the very cycle it is meant to break. That holds physiologically and psychologically, whether the restriction is self-imposed or recommended. That is why regular, structured eating, rather than tighter control, is the foundation of treatment. It is why advice to be more disciplined is not neutral. It is actively counterproductive. And it is why treating binge eating disorder as a weight-management problem fails for a reason. There is a mechanism behind the error, not just a framing problem.

Contributors and Risk

Causes, and Real Medical Risk

As with restrictive presentations, no single cause is established, and contributions interact. There is a substantial genetic contribution, and impulsivity and emotional reactivity appear more often in these presentations. Overvaluation of weight and shape contributes, and so does difficulty regulating emotion, which is central to binge eating disorder. Adverse experience and sociocultural pressure are common contributors, but neither is necessary nor sufficient. Both conditions also carry real medical risk. That is true regardless of a person's body size. No signs, thresholds, or mechanisms are given here, because that detail carries risk and adds nothing to understanding. The one practical point is that medical assessment belongs in every case. A person who appears well has not thereby been medically assessed.

The Rest of the Family

Other Feeding and Eating Presentations

A few further presentations complete the family. Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder involves restriction without concern about weight or shape. The motivation lies elsewhere, in aversion, lack of interest, or a fear unrelated to weight. That absence distinguishes it, and it changes the treatment plan. Rumination disorder and pica are distinct feeding presentations, each defined by its own features. Pica requires medical assessment. And other specified presentations are those that do not meet the full description of any category. They are common. The point to hold onto is this. A presentation below a diagnostic threshold is not a less serious difficulty. Distress and impairment are what justify treatment, not reaching a threshold.

Treatment

Good Responses - If People Can Reach It

The typical picture is a long delay before presentation, followed by a good response to treatment. That deserves to be stated as plainly as the risks. The leading evidence-based treatment for both conditions is enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy. It targets the overvaluation of weight and shape, the restriction that drives the episodes, and the maintaining cycle. Guided self-help is used as a genuine first step in stepped care, especially where specialist services are limited. Interpersonal approaches are an established alternative, working through relationships rather than the cycle directly. Medication has a role in some presentations, alongside psychological treatment, and decisions rest with a prescriber. So the main obstacle is not whether treatment works. It is access to it. Shame, secrecy, thresholds, misdirection toward weight management, and waiting times account for most of the delay. And most of those are properties of services, not of the people affected.

Supporting Someone

Distress and Functioning - Not Body and Food

Supporting someone follows the same principles as in the last section, with two points specific to these conditions. Because the difficulty is concealed, a person who tells you about it has made a decision that took time. How you respond matters. And because these conditions carry so much shame, keep your concern on the person's distress and functioning, away from body and food entirely. That includes reassurance about appearance, which relieves briefly and strengthens the need to ask again. The route is simple. Express concern about the person. Do not comment on body or food. And help them reach a professional assessment, offering to go with them. These conditions are common, they are treatable, and recovery is a common outcome.

About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study

Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study

Understand mental health disordersAbnormal Psychology covers how psychological disorders are defined, assessed, explained and treated. It is a core course for psychology majors and useful for nursing, social work, counseling and criminal justice.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Purging and Bingeing Cycles and Recurrent Overeating Disorder: Signs, Characteristics, and Recovery

What is the difference between bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder?
Both bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder involve recurrent episodes of eating with a sense of loss of control and marked distress. In bulimia nervosa, the episodes are followed by recurrent compensatory behavior, and overvaluation of weight and shape is part of the definition. In binge eating disorder, regular compensatory behavior is absent, and overvaluation is often present but not required. Neither condition is inherently more serious than the other.
Is binge eating disorder just overeating?
No, binge eating disorder is not simply overeating. Eating more than intended now and then is an ordinary experience, while the disorder is defined by recurrent episodes with loss of control, marked distress and an established pattern. It is also not a weight problem; it is classified as a psychological condition and occurs across all body sizes. Treating it as overeating or a weight issue points treatment in the wrong direction.
Why does restricting food make binge eating worse?
Restricting food makes later binge episodes more likely, not less, both physiologically and psychologically. In bulimia nervosa, rigid food rules are broken, the lapse feels like total failure, an episode follows, and the rules are then tightened, priming the cycle again. For this reason, regular, structured eating rather than tighter control is the foundation of treatment, and advice to diet or be more disciplined is counterproductive.
What is the best treatment for bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder?
The leading evidence-based treatment for both bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder is enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy, which targets overvaluation of weight and shape, the restriction that drives episodes, and the maintaining cycle. Guided self-help is a genuine first step in stepped care, and interpersonal therapy is an established alternative. Medication has a role in some cases alongside psychological treatment. Both conditions respond well, and the main obstacle is access to care.

About the Abnormal Psychology course

How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 97 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 97 lessons total about 24 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.

97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Abnormal Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Abnormal Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →