UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 17.4 Free with a free account
Sex Therapy in Practice and Defining Paraphilias: Core Methods and Applications
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 17: Sexual Health, Gender Identity, and Atypical Sexual BehaviorsSection 17.4 · lesson 63 of 9712 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Voyeuristic, Frotteuristic, Pedophilic, and Sadomasochistic Behaviors: Clinical Overview →← Orgasm-Related Difficulties and Pain Associated with Sexual Activity: Management and TherapyNext lesson: Voyeuristic, Frotteuristic, Pedophilic, and Sadomasochistic Behaviors: Clinical Overview →
In this lesson
Methods within a frame - and the line between atypical and disordered.
- Describe sex therapy's principles, methods, and frame
- State where the outcome evidence is strong, and where it's weaker
- Define paraphilia and paraphilic disorder precisely
- Explain why consent is the organizing principle
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,592 words). Read along, or search it.
Sexual Health, Gender Identity, and Atypical Sexual Behaviors
Sex Therapy and Defining Paraphilias
This section has two parts. The first is sex therapy in practice. Where it came from, the frame it is delivered within, its core methods, and what the evidence honestly supports. The second defines paraphilias, and draws a precise line between an interest that is atypical and a condition that is disordered. That line, and the role of consent in drawing it, sets up the next section.
Before You Begin
Clinical Material, Not Instructions
First, the framing, which matters especially here. This is educational and clinical material. It is not a basis for diagnosing yourself or anyone else. None of the methods described is set out as steps to follow. Sex therapy is delivered by trained clinicians, within a therapeutic frame. And anyone with concerns about their own sexual thoughts or behavior should seek confidential professional assessment. That help exists. And seeking it is always preferable to acting on urges.
Part 1: Sex Therapy - Origins
Brief, Focused, and Measurable
Modern sex therapy came from a specific change. Open-ended general psychotherapy had treated sexual difficulties as expressions of deeper conflict. It was replaced by brief, focused, behaviorally grounded treatment, aimed at the difficulty itself. What that achieved was practical. Treatment became shorter, and its aims could be stated in advance. Its results became measurable, which made it possible to find out what actually worked. And it made treatment available to people who would never have entered years of analysis.
The Therapeutic Frame
The Frame Is the Safety Mechanism
Clarity about the frame matters more here than almost anywhere else in clinical practice. The subject is intimate. The power difference between clinician and client is substantial. And the scope for harm through ambiguity is large. So confidentiality, and its limits, are stated at the outset, not after something has been disclosed. There is an absolute prohibition on physical contact or demonstration of any kind. Sexual contact between therapist and client is prohibited without exception, and causes serious, documented harm. Boundaries on scope are explicit. What will be discussed, what will not, and what happens between sessions. And the clinician attends to the power difference, including its effect on a client's ability to decline anything proposed. New clinicians often treat all this as preamble. It is closer to the reverse. The frame is the treatment's safety mechanism. It also makes treatment work. A client unsure of the boundaries manages what they disclose, rather than giving an account.
Individuals, Couples, and Goals
Whose Goals, Whose Framing?
Work may be individual, or with a couple. Individual work suits difficulties formulated within the person, including those with a strong anxiety or belief component, or where there is no current partner. Couple work suits difficulties that are relational, which, as we saw, includes most desire discrepancies. Where partners' goals conflict, the clinician's task is to make the conflict explicit, not to settle it. The most common failure is accepting one partner's framing of the other as the patient. That looks like neutrality, and it is not. Goals are set in the person's own terms, not against a norm, which guards against repeating the field's history. And psychoeducation is often the most effective early component. A person who understands what is happening is less frightened by it.
Table 17.4.1
Core Methods: What Each Targets
Here are the core methods, named with what each one targets. None is described as steps, and none should be attempted without a clinician. Sensate focus and non-demand approaches target the performance element. Removing the expectation of an outcome removes the pressure that suppresses response. Communication and negotiation work targets what partners are able to say to each other. Anxiety reduction and attentional work target spectatoring. The support here is strong, and the mechanism is well specified. Cognitive work on beliefs targets expectations, and the meaning attached to a difficulty. It is often the largest single component. Graded, clinician-guided approaches target avoidance. The pacing is set by the clinician, because unguided attempts can entrench the difficulty. And mindfulness-based approaches target attention. They are promising, with a smaller evidence base. Notice the pattern. The best-supported components target attention and information, not performance.
Practice, Diversity, and Evidence
Honest About What Works
Between-session practice is a structural feature of the model, not an optional extra. Most of the work happens outside the room, and sessions plan and review it. Combined psychological and medical care generally does better than either alone. Cultural and religious frameworks are worked within, not against. And orientation, relationship structure, and disability are never assumed, because assumptions show in how questions are phrased. On evidence, the honest position is mixed. Outcomes are good where expectation, anxiety, and avoidance are the main maintaining factors. They are weaker for desire difficulties. Some methods are used because they are plausible and safe, not because they are established. And access and cost are substantial practical limits. Specialist provision is unevenly spread.
Part 2: Defining Paraphilias
2 Definitions, Held Precisely
Part two. Defining paraphilias. A paraphilia is an intense and persistent sexual interest outside the typical range of interest in consenting, physically mature, human partners. That is a descriptive definition, and nothing more. It says an interest is atypical. It says nothing about whether anything is wrong. A paraphilic disorder is a paraphilia that currently causes distress or impairment to the person. Or one whose satisfaction has involved harm, or a risk of harm, to others. This distinction has to be held precisely, because almost every popular treatment of the subject collapses it. An atypical interest is not a disorder. Consensual activity between informed adults is not disordered because it is unusual. What makes something clinical is distress, impairment, or non-consent. And nothing else does.
Figure 17.4.2
2 Routes From an Interest to a Diagnosis
Here are the routes laid out. Start from an intense, persistent, atypical interest. The first route to a diagnosis is distress or impairment in the person. The second route is harm, or a risk of harm, to someone who has not consented, or cannot consent. Either route is sufficient on its own. Now look at the third branch. An atypical interest that produces neither distress nor harm reaches no diagnosis at all. That branch is not an exception to the system. It is a central part of how the system is designed to work.
Why It Was Formalized
Narrowed Deliberately - and Still Debated
This narrowing was deliberate, and it responded directly to the history we traced earlier in the chapter. Earlier classifications treated the interest itself as the disorder. People were diagnosed, and sometimes treated against their wishes, for consensual activity that harmed nobody. That harm is documented. It is the same pattern that classified homosexuality as a disorder. One criticism is that the narrowing did not go far enough. Keeping categories defined by the content of a consensual interest, it argues, leaves room for social disapproval to return as clinical judgment. After all, a person may be distressed largely because of how others regard them. The counter-argument is that distress from any source is still distress. A person who wants help should get it, without first proving their distress has an approved origin. Both positions are serious, and this section does not resolve them.
The Organizing Principle
Consent Divides the Field
The sharpest division in this area is not between one interest and another. It is between conditions defined by distress in the person, and conditions defined by harm or non-consent to another. The first group raises the questions this course has asked throughout. What is causing the distress, and what would help? The second raises further questions about protecting others, safeguarding, and legal obligation. That division structures the next section. Two specifiers apply. A controlled environment specifier records that opportunity is restricted, because the absence of behavior in such a setting carries little information. And a remission specifier records a sustained period without distress, impairment, or relevant behavior, in an uncontrolled setting. Both exist to stop circumstance being mistaken for change.
Table 17.4.3
The Categories, Named Only
The recognized categories are named here, and nothing more. Voyeuristic, exhibitionistic, and frotteuristic disorders, and pedophilic disorder, are defined by the harm or non-consent route. Sexual masochism disorder, fetishistic disorder, and transvestic disorder are defined by distress or impairment to the person. Sexual sadism disorder can reach the threshold by either route, depending on the presentation. Their clinical treatment, which is itself tightly constrained, is covered in the next section.
What Is and Isn't Known
Skewed Samples, Unproven Explanations
What is known here is limited, and the reason is structural. Reliable prevalence figures are unavailable, because these interests are concealed. Almost all the data come from forensic and clinical samples. People who were detected, prosecuted, or referred. Such samples are unrepresentative by construction. Generalizing from them, to everyone with a given interest, is one of the most common errors in this literature. Explanatory accounts include conditioning and learning accounts, developmental accounts, and neurobiological findings. Each is a proposal with an evidential status, not an established explanation. And none of them, on any reading, reduces responsibility for harmful action. That is stated now, so the explanations are never read as excuses.
Assessment and Help-Seeking
Help Before Harm
Finally, assessment, which differs sharply between two contexts. In a clinical context, the person has come for help, and the question is what would help. In a forensic context, the assessment is for a court or legal process. The client is not the person being assessed, and disclosure carries legal consequence. The strong professional position is that the two roles should not be combined. That matters for help-seeking. A person distressed by urges they have not acted on, and who wants not to, reasonably fears the consequences of disclosure. That fear keeps people away from help at exactly the point where help is most useful. Such a person is not disclosing an offense. Treating the disclosure as though they were guarantees that the next such person does not come. So the clinician needs clarity about their own obligations, to state the limits of confidentiality accurately at the outset. Accurate limits stated early make disclosure possible. Vague reassurance, followed by an unexpected obligation, destroys it.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Sex Therapy in Practice and Defining Paraphilias: Core Methods and Applications
What is sex therapy and how does it work?
What is sensate focus in sex therapy?
Why are boundaries so important in sex therapy?
What is the difference between a paraphilia and a paraphilic disorder?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →