UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 6.2 Free with a free account
Practical CBT Strategies: Thought Restructuring and Behavioral Activation
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 6: Cognitive Theories in Abnormal PsychologySection 6.2 · lesson 25 of 9711 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Evaluating the Cognitive Model →← How the Mind Works and the Cognitive FrameworkNext lesson: Evaluating the Cognitive Model →
In this lesson
Thought restructuring, behavioral activation, and why accuracy beats positivity.
- Describe the structure and collaborative style of cognitive-behavioral therapy
- Explain cognitive restructuring and what separates it from reassurance
- Explain behavioral activation and the rationale that makes it work
- State the evidence in both directions, including the awkward findings
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,549 words). Read along, or search it.
Cognitive Theories in Abnormal Psychology
Practical CBT Strategies
This material is educational: it explains how these methods work, and why. It is not a protocol, not a basis for diagnosis, and there are no blank forms to fill in. The completed examples are teaching illustrations of finished clinical work. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is planned and delivered by a trained clinician. And the reason is structural rather than formal. A substantial part of the method is one person doing what the other cannot do alone. Pacing the work, and holding a formulation the person's own biases work against. We cover the structure, the stance, restructuring, and behavioral activation. And the evidence, including one finding that is awkward for the model.
Structure
Four Features That Define the Method
Cognitive-behavioral therapy is time-limited and goal-focused. A person and a clinician work from a shared formulation. To change the maintenance cycle we described in six point one. Four features define its structure. Time-limited. A number of sessions is agreed at the outset. And the ending is planned from the start rather than arrived at. Goal-focused. Specific stated targets replace an open agenda. Agenda-led. Each session begins by agreeing jointly what will be covered. Which stops the hour drifting toward whatever is most recent or most distressing. And between-session practice, which is a defining feature rather than a supplement. It is where most of the learning happens, for the same reason exposure needs it. Adherence to it is among the better predictors of outcome.
The Stance
Why Direct Disputation Reliably Fails
Collaborative empiricism is the working stance of this therapy. The clinician and the person treat beliefs as hypotheses to investigate together. Rather than as errors for the clinician to correct. Guided discovery is how that stance is enacted. And reach their own conclusion, rather than being told what to conclude. The reason for this is empirical, not a matter of courtesy. Directly disputing a belief reliably fails. Tell someone that's not true, you're very capable, and one of two things happens. Or they produce counter-evidence and become more convinced. Argument recruits the person to defend the belief. A conclusion the person reaches themselves does not have that structure. Which is why this therapy cannot be reduced to arguments printed on a page.
Getting Started
The Model, the Formulation, and What Catches a Thought
Psychoeducation gives the person the model itself. The maintenance cycle. The idea that appraisal mediates. So that they can use the reasoning, rather than merely receive an intervention. The shared formulation is their own difficulty drawn in the model's terms. This situation, this thought, this feeling, this behavior, this consequence. It gets checked against their experience, and revised where it does not fit. It makes the difficulty intelligible, which is itself relieving. Then self-monitoring. Recording situations, thoughts, and feelings as they occur. Automatic thoughts are automatic, so nothing examines them until something catches them. And recall at the end of a week is subject to mood-congruent bias. The downward arrow asks, repeatedly, what a thought would mean about the person. It is used later in treatment, and sparingly, with judgment about when to stop.
Illustration
A Completed Thought Record
Here is a completed thought record, shown as a teaching illustration. The situation: a report sent to a manager on Tuesday, with no reply by Thursday. The automatic thought: there's something wrong with it and she can't tell me. Anxiety rated eighty out of a hundred. Some shame, at fifty. Evidence for the thought is gathered first. She usually replies within a day. The report was written quickly. Then evidence against, which is where the work happens. She has not said anything critical. Two colleagues also have not had replies. And in six years she has raised concerns directly every time. Never by silence. Now the balanced alternative. It does not say the report is fine, or that she will be pleased. It says the evidence does not support the original conclusion. Anxiety is re-rated at thirty-five, and shame at twenty.
Restructuring
Five Steps, and One Thing They Are Not For
Cognitive restructuring examines a thought against the available evidence. And arrives at an appraisal that fits the evidence better than the original did. First, the thought is stated specifically enough to be examined at all. Second, evidence for the thought is gathered. And doing this first is deliberate. It signals that the belief is being taken seriously rather than dismissed. Third, evidence against, including evidence the person has not been attending to. Fourth, alternative interpretations. Plural. Fifth, a balanced alternative is formulated, and the emotion re-rated. The aim is accuracy, not positivity. Where the evidence supports a negative conclusion, the accurate appraisal is negative. And the work then moves to what can be done about the situation.
Two Techniques
Decatastrophizing and Behavioral Experiments
Decatastrophizing targets the severity component rather than the likelihood. It considers the worst case, the best case, and the most likely case. And then asks how the person would actually cope with the worst, if it happened. That second half is the part that does the work. Catastrophic thinking treats an outcome as unsurvivable. And it typically stops at the moment of disaster. So work through what they would actually do: who they would tell, what would follow. That frequently reduces distress more than adjusting the probability does. A behavioral experiment is a planned test of a prediction in the real world. The person states what they expect, does the thing, and records what happened. Experiential disconfirmation changes a belief more than a verbal argument does. Notice the continuity. This is exposure with a prediction attached.
Activation
Enter the Cycle at the Behavior
Behavioral activation is the systematic scheduling of activity, for low mood. The reasoning is a cycle. Withdrawal reduces contact with rewarding experience. Now notice where the treatment enters that cycle. At the withdrawal, not at the mood. Mood cannot be changed by deciding to change it. Behavior can. Since the mood follows the activity rather than preceding it, waiting to feel like doing something keeps the loop turning indefinitely. Activity monitoring records what is actually done, and how it affects mood. Graded scheduling plans specific activities at specific times. Scheduling too much is the commonest error, and it produces failure. And mastery and pleasure are tracked separately, because in low mood they come apart. Activity comes first, and motivation follows. Not the other way round. One evidential point: activation alone can match full protocols for depression.
The Rest Of A Course
Problems, Beliefs, Endings, and the Third Wave
Not every difficulty is a distorted appraisal. Problem-solving is included as a component for exactly that reason. Define the problem specifically. Generate options without evaluating them. Skills training is included on the same reasoning. Where a skill is genuinely missing, the person's negative appraisal may simply be accurate. Work at the level of core beliefs comes in later phases, and deliberately so. The person needs the skills first, before applying them to something absolute. And many people improve enough that the deeper work is not required. Relapse prevention closes the course. The stated aim is that the person becomes their own therapist. Finally, third-wave approaches alter the relationship to a thought rather than its content.
The Techniques
Every One Has a Characteristic Error
Every technique in this section has a characteristic error attached to it. Self-monitoring fails when too much recording is asked for. The downward arrow fails when it is used too early. Restructuring fails when it produces a positive statement rather than an accurate one. Decatastrophizing fails when probability is argued while the fear is about not coping. A behavioral experiment fails when its outcome would not clearly disconfirm anything. And activation fails when too much is scheduled, producing failure. Notice the pattern: how many of those errors involve doing too much. The treatment's failures are more often failures of pacing than of technique. Two more practical points. Practice is agreed, not assigned. And non-completion is examined rather than chased.
The Evidence
Stated in Both Directions
Now the evidence, stated in both directions. Cognitive-behavioral therapy has one of the strongest evidence bases in the field. Substantial randomized trial evidence across depression and anxiety presentations. And it is recommended as a first-line psychological treatment in many guidelines. That is a strong claim, and it is accurately stated. It is not equally effective everywhere. It is not first-line for psychosis or bipolar presentations, where its role is adjunctive. Dropout is a real problem, and the demands of the treatment are part of why. A substantial minority who complete do not respond. Trial effects are typically larger than those achieved in routine services. And component research is awkward for the model. That raises a real question about whether cognitive change is the active ingredient.
Composite Cases
Sam, 42, and Rosa, 55
Two composite cases, constructed for instruction. Neither describes a real person. Sam is forty-two, four sessions into treatment for social anxiety. The belief under examination is that if he speaks up, people will think he's an idiot. Notice what the clinician did not do. Tell him it was untrue, or offer reassurance. Instead, questions. How much do you remember of what colleagues said last month? Sam concluded, himself, that he holds others to a standard he does not apply to himself. His conviction in the original thought went from ninety to forty-five. Notice that no fact was supplied by the clinician. Every piece of evidence came from Sam. Rosa is fifty-five, and has been depressed for seven months. Cognitive work was not started first. Her concentration was too poor to gather evidence. And her thought, nothing I do makes any difference, currently fits the evidence. Activation changes the evidence available, and only then can the thought be examined. Where a negative appraisal is currently accurate, change the situation, not the appraisal.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Practical CBT Strategies: Thought Restructuring and Behavioral Activation
What is cognitive restructuring in CBT?
What is behavioral activation and how does it work?
What is collaborative empiricism in cognitive behavioral therapy?
What is a behavioral experiment in CBT?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →