UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 8.2 Free with a free account
Community Networks and the Role of Social Support
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 8: Sociocultural Influences on Mental HealthSection 8.2 · lesson 30 of 9711 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: How Gender, Sexuality, and Cultural Norms Influence Psychological Functioning →← The Sociocultural Approach, Social Labels, and Role ExpectationsNext lesson: How Gender, Sexuality, and Cultural Norms Influence Psychological Functioning →
In this lesson
Why counting the people around someone tells you almost nothing.
- Separate network structure from support function
- Distinguish the five types of support and how each fails
- Compare the buffering and direct effect accounts
- Explain why loneliness and isolation come apart
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,620 words). Read along, or search it.
Sociocultural Influences on Mental Health
Community Networks and the Role of Social Support
Here is a question that sounds like it has an obvious answer. How much social support does this person have? Most assessments answer it by counting people. That approach will produce confident conclusions, and many of them will be wrong. Because the number of people around someone tells you what is possible. It does not tell you what actually happens. This section separates those two things, and keeps them separate. We will look at five types of support, and how each of them fails. At two competing accounts of how support works at all. At the cases where support makes things worse. And at why loneliness and isolation are not the same measurement.
Two Different Things
Structure Is Not Function
A social network is the set of people someone is connected to. Plus the pattern of connections among them. That is structure. You can describe it by counting. Size, density, and the strength of each tie. Social support is what those connections actually provide. That is function. And you can only describe it by asking what passes along each tie. Keeping these apart is the first analytic skill here, because they come apart constantly. Someone can have a large, dense, highly active network that supplies almost nothing they need. The members may all be people who expect things from them. Meanwhile a person with three ties may be comprehensively supported. One note before we continue. This material is educational, and is not a basis for diagnosis.
Five Types
Support Is Not One Substance
Support is not a single substance delivered in varying amounts. Emotional support is being cared for, listened to, and accepted without conditions. It fails when reassurance arrives so fast that the difficulty is never actually heard. Instrumental support is concrete practical and material assistance. It fails when help is delivered in a way that leaves the person feeling incapable. Informational support is facts, guidance, and knowledge about options. It fails when the advice is wrong, out of date, or was never asked for. Appraisal support helps a person judge whether their own reaction is reasonable. Companionship is shared activity and ordinary company, where nothing has to be explained. Now here is the clinical payoff of the whole list. A network can be dense in one type, empty in another, counterproductive in a third. The right quantity of the wrong type is why well-connected people feel unsupported.
Believed Or Delivered
The Belief Predicts Better Than the Help
Now a second distinction, and this one is genuinely surprising. Received support is the help actually provided over some period. Perceived support is the person's belief that help would be available if needed. And the consistent finding is that the belief predicts outcome better than the help. There are several separate reasons for that, and they carry different implications. Receiving help is not unambiguously good. It can arrive at the cost of privacy, competence, or a sense of obligation. Believing help is available changes how threatening the situation looks in the first place. It alters the appraisal before anything has to be received at all. And here is a methodological trap. Received support is measured highest when things are worst. So a simple comparison can make receiving help look actively harmful.
Two Accounts
Buffering, or a Continuous Benefit
How does support influence outcome? Two models make genuinely different predictions. The buffering hypothesis says support protects specifically under stress. It works by changing how a stressor is appraised, and how well it can be managed. And a large difference when stress is high. That prediction is a statistical interaction. The direct effect hypothesis, also called the main effect model, says something else. Support benefits well-being continuously, whether or not anything stressful is happening. Its prediction is two additive main effects, and no interaction at all. Cohen and Wills reviewed this in nineteen eighty-five, and found something instructive. Which pattern appears depends on how support was measured. Functional measures tailored to the stressor tended to produce buffering effects. Measures of network integration tended to produce main effects. That is why both models are still in use. Do not treat either as settled fact.
Both Directions
Difficulty Erodes Networks Too
It is tempting to conclude that support causes good outcomes, in one direction. It does not run in one direction. Psychological difficulty erodes networks. Withdrawal reduces contact. Irritability strains the contact that remains. Reduced reciprocity means the person cannot return what they receive. And most relationships are sustained by exchange, whether or not anyone says so. The thinned network then supplies less. Which worsens the difficulty. Which drives further withdrawal. That loop is why low support so often appears alongside difficulty without having caused it. And it explains something practical about timing. The loop is much easier to interrupt early, before ties lapse. Repairing a network that has already closed is a far larger job.
Not Automatic
Five Ways Support Makes Things Worse
Support is not automatically beneficial, and assuming it is produces bad advice. Over-involvement is help that exceeds what is needed. It takes over decisions the person could manage, which erodes confidence and removes practice. Criticism is persistent negative comment about conduct or character. It is among the better-established predictors of a poor course. Unwanted advice is informational support supplied where emotional support was sought. It communicates that the difficulty is a problem to be solved, not an experience to be heard. Then there is help that undermines competence. And finally indebtedness. Help that cannot be reciprocated generates obligation and shame. That is why some people refuse assistance they plainly need. It should not be read as irrational. It is a calculation about cost.
Expressed Emotion
A Finding That Must Not Be Used as Blame
Expressed emotion is a measured characteristic of a household environment. It comprises critical comment, hostility, and emotional over-involvement. Note how it is assessed. From a structured interview with the relative. The work began with Brown and colleagues in the nineteen sixties and seventies. Vaughn and Leff reported a replication in nineteen seventy-six. People returning to households rated high on these features relapsed more often. Now three qualifications, and leaving them out turns a useful finding into a harmful one. First, this is an association, and the direction is not settled. Second, high expressed emotion is not a moral failing or a sign of an uncaring family. It arises predictably in people who are frightened, exhausted, and given no information. Third, the response is family psychoeducation, not removing the family. Use the finding to direct help toward families. Never to assign blame to them.
Two States
Loneliness Is Not Isolation
Objective social isolation is a measurable shortage of social contact. It is the subjective distress arising from a gap. The gap between the relationships a person wants and the ones they have. Robert Weiss set out that distinction in nineteen seventy-three, and it has held up. The two overlap only partially, and the mismatches are clinically informative. A person can be surrounded by people and profoundly lonely. Because the contact available does not supply what is wanted. Weiss went further and split loneliness in two. Emotional loneliness is the absence of one close attachment. Social loneliness is the absence of a wider group. These are separately remediable, which has a practical consequence. Supply a group to someone missing an attachment, and the deficit is still there.
Where Ties Live
Family, Community, and People Who Have Been There
For most people the family is the densest, longest-running part of the network. It is where support is most reliably found, and most reliably complicated. Families operate as systems. They allocate roles and reorganize when circumstances change. So one member's difficulty is never contained within that member. Responsibilities get redistributed, often invisibly, and often onto one person. Beyond the family sits a layer that is easy to overlook. Neighborhood cohesion is trust and willingness to act on one another's behalf. It is associated with better outcomes, independently of individual characteristics. Losing a job removes all four at once, which is part of why unemployment matters so much. Peer networks connect people by shared experience rather than prior relationship. They supply appraisal support that families and clinicians structurally cannot. Only someone who has been there can say with authority that a reaction is ordinary.
Online And Blocked
Mixed Evidence, and Barriers That Are Not Choices
Online contact is part of most networks now, and the evidence is genuinely mixed. It clearly enables connection that would otherwise be impossible. For people who are housebound, remote, working incompatible hours, or caring for someone. Against that, outcomes depend on what the contact replaces. Interaction that substitutes for in-person contact looks less protective than interaction that supplements it. Passive consumption of other people's lives is associated with worse outcomes than active exchange. So the clinical question is the same functional one you would ask of any tie. What does this connection actually supply, and what is it displacing? A person who lacks support is not a person who failed to seek it. Anxiety about social contact makes reaching out the exact thing the difficulty makes hardest. Other barriers are structural, and not modifiable by the individual at all. Shift work, transport, caregiving load, and the plain cost of ordinary social participation.
Two Composites
Find the Missing Function, and Resource the Household
Two composites, to show what the analysis buys you. Maya is thirty-one, and has been caring for a parent with a progressive illness. And she cannot understand why she feels so alone. Nobody in a network of more than twenty people supplies informational or appraisal support. No one has told her what to expect as the illness progresses. Or whether her exhaustion and resentment are an ordinary response. Now Tomas, twenty-four, home after a hospital admission. His father comments frequently that he could do more if he tried. His mother gave up her job, checks on him through the night, and answers for him. That household rates high on both components of expressed emotion. And both responses originate in exactly the same place. Neither parent was told what to expect, and both of them are frightened. So the response is to resource and inform the household. Not to remove the person from it, and not to hold it responsible.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Community Networks and the Role of Social Support
What is the difference between a social network and social support?
What are the five types of social support?
What is the difference between the buffering hypothesis and the direct effect hypothesis?
What is the difference between loneliness and social isolation?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →