UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 4.3 Free with a free account
Jungian Psychology: The Psyche, Symbolic Dreams, and Archetypes
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 4: Psychodynamic Theories and Therapeutic PracticeSection 4.3 · lesson 16 of 9711 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Key Psychodynamic Techniques →← Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial GrowthNext lesson: Key Psychodynamic Techniques →
In this lesson
The least testable model in the chapter, presented accurately - including about its status.
- Describe Jung's model of the psyche and its three regions
- State what archetypes are claimed to be, and their evidential status
- Explain the Jungian approach to dreams and to individuation
- Separate what entered mainstream psychology from what cannot be tested
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,629 words). Read along, or search it.
Psychodynamic Theories and Therapeutic Practice
Jungian Psychology: The Psyche, Dreams, and Archetypes
Every model in this chapter has evidential problems. This one has the most, and it is worth saying so before anything else. Several of its central claims are not merely unproven. They are stated in a form that no observation could count against. That is a different and more serious problem, and we will come back to it. So why teach it? Because it is widely encountered and historically important. And presenting it accurately includes being clear about what it is. We will cover the break with Freud, the psyche, complexes, and archetypes. And one note throughout. This material is educational, and is not a basis for diagnosis.
The Break
Three Disagreements That Made a New Model
Jung was, for several years, Freud's closest collaborator and expected successor. The split came around nineteen thirteen, and it was personal as well as theoretical. First, the nature of libido. Jung reconceived it as general psychic energy, available for any pursuit. That single change removes drive theory from the center of the model. Second, the scope of the unconscious. Jung proposed a second, deeper layer, shared across people and inherited. Third, the direction of development, and this is the most consequential. Jung held that the psyche is also oriented forward. Which makes a symptom potentially purposive rather than only residual. That is clinically powerful, and unfalsifiable as stated.
The Psyche
Three Regions, Nested Rather Than Sequential
Jung divides the psyche into three regions, nested rather than sequential. The ego here is the center of consciousness. The personal unconscious holds this individual's own material: forgotten, repressed, or never attended to. The collective unconscious is Jung's addition, and the model's most contested claim. A layer proposed to be inherited rather than acquired, shared across all people. Containing not memories, but predispositions to organize experience in certain ways. The argument offered was the recurrence of similar images across unconnected cultures. But at least three other explanations account for it with no inherited layer. Common features of human life and human bodies generate similar themes. Cultural transmission runs over longer periods than was once assumed. And we notice resemblance while discounting difference. The recurrence is a genuine observation. The collective unconscious is one reading of it.
The Model
What the Diagram Does and Does Not Claim
Picture three regions as rings, one inside another. The ego sits inside the personal unconscious. The personal unconscious sits inside the collective unconscious. That containment is the whole claim. It is where this model departs from four point one, whose unconscious has no outer ring. The areas are not measurements. Nobody has measured any of this. And nothing shown has been demonstrated to exist as a structure. What you are looking at is a model of a mind as its author described it. Which is not the same thing as a map of something found.
Complexes
The Marker Is Disproportion
A complex is an emotionally charged cluster of memories, images, and feelings. Organized around a common theme, and located in the personal unconscious. The everyday phrase, an inferiority complex, descends from this term. Three properties are attributed to them. They are autonomous, operating with some independence, and produce reactions the person does not choose. They are triggered by association, when something in the present touches the theme. And they are disproportionate. This is the useful one. The marker of an active complex is a reaction much larger than the situation warrants. That observation survives independently of the theory around it. And Jung investigated complexes by timing word associations, measuring the delay before a response. That is among the few parts of this framework that produced a measurement procedure.
Archetypes
A Tendency, Not an Image
An archetype is an inherited tendency to organize experience in a particular way. It is not an inherited image, and not an inherited idea. Nobody inherits a picture of a wise old man. What is proposed is a disposition to form and respond to figures of that kind. Four archetypes recur most often in the model. The persona is the face turned outward, the role adopted for social life. The shadow holds the parts of oneself judged unacceptable and disowned. The anima and animus are internal images of the other gender. And the self is the organizing center of the whole psyche. Each one describes something already visible in ordinary behavior. That is why they feel recognizable, and also why they cannot be tested. The archetype is inferred from the behavior it explains, so it adds a name, not a prediction.
Shadow
What Was Not Permitted Goes There
The shadow holds what a person judged unacceptable in themselves and disowned. And the model is specific here. That is not necessarily what is bad. Assertion. Ambition. Anger. Need. Playfulness. Sexuality. None of those is a vice. Whatever was not permitted goes there. Projection is the mechanism by which that material is said to become visible. What is disowned in oneself is perceived vividly in others. The proposed marker is intensity: a strong, immediate, disproportionate reaction to a quality in someone else. Particularly one shared by others who do not provoke the same response. Integration means recognizing the quality as one's own, which does not mean acting on it. It means the quality becomes available and chosen, rather than leaking out sideways. The intensity claim is not testable, and it can dismiss any strong moral reaction. A person who reacts strongly to cruelty is not thereby revealing their own.
Attitudes
The Framework's Most Respectable Descendant
Jung proposed two attitudes. Introversion orients energy inward, toward thought and reflection. Extraversion orients it toward the outer world of people and activity. He intended these as tendencies rather than types, and held that everyone uses both. He also proposed four functions. Sensing attends to concrete detail through the senses. Intuiting attends to patterns and possibilities. And two ways of reaching conclusions. Thinking decides by logical analysis. Feeling decides by weighing what matters, and to whom. Feeling here means evaluation, not emotion. That is the standard misreading. Introversion and extraversion were taken up and measured, and appear in every personality model. As a continuous dimension on which people are distributed. Not as two categories. Commercial typing instruments sort people into discrete types by combining dichotomies. The underlying traits are continuous, so cutting at a midpoint splits near-identical people. Retest agreement is poor. Many people get a different type weeks later. These instruments are widely used at work, and are not a sound basis for any decision.
Dreams
Two Accounts of Dreaming, Compared
Jung's account of dreams differs from the earlier one at the root. That model treats a dream as a disguised wish, requiring decoding. Jung held that the dream says what it means in its own language. Two functions are proposed. The compensatory function says dreams supply what the conscious attitude leaves out. The prospective function says dreams can indicate where development is tending. That is the forward-looking orientation again, and it is the harder to defend. The method is amplification: staying with an image and enriching it. There is no symbol dictionary here. An image means what it means for this dreamer. And the dreamer's response is the test of an interpretation. They fail in the same place. Each applies to any dream whatever. State the limit plainly. Dream interpretation is not a diagnostic method. And books assigning fixed meanings to dream images have no support from any tradition.
Individuation
A Change of Task, Not a Malfunction
Individuation is the lifelong process of becoming a distinct, integrated person. Moving toward the self as the center of the whole psyche. Jung placed its main work in the second half of life. The first half of life is occupied with building: a persona, an occupation, a household. The second half faces a different task, because those things are in place. The question becomes what they were for. So the midlife turn is a change of task, not a malfunction. And the distress comes from applying the first half's methods to the second half's problem. That adult development continues, and that middle life brings a reappraisal, is established. But the popular midlife crisis, as a universal predictable event, is not. It is common rather than universal, and its timing and severity vary widely.
Composite Case
Helen, 49: Two Readings Side by Side
A composite case, constructed for instruction. It describes no real person. Helen is forty-nine, a senior manager. She was referred after speaking to a junior colleague in a way she calls unlike her. She describes herself as someone who does not lose her temper and never has. She reports a strong, immediate dislike of one particular colleague. She has slept poorly for six months and withdrawn from a book group she valued. The Jungian reading takes her controlled presentation as a persona she is identified with. On that reading, spontaneity, need, and anger have gone to the shadow. The intense reaction to one colleague, which others do not share, reads as projection. Now, what can the reading establish? Nothing in it. Helen may simply dislike her colleague on ordinary grounds, and be under strain. Hold the two side by side. The Jungian reading is richer, and cannot be checked. The alternative is duller and predicts something: restoring sleep and the book group would help. A reading that explains everything should raise suspicion, not confidence.
Evaluation
Three Categories That Are Usually Run Together
An honest evaluation separates what is supported, what could be tested, and what cannot. Introversion and extraversion, as a continuous dimension, are in every personality model. The observation that adult development continues was taken up by lifespan research. Next, testable in principle, and largely untested. Take the claim that identifying with a role predicts difficulty when the role ends. Now, untestable as stated. The collective unconscious cannot be observed apart from what it explains. Archetypes, defined as predispositions known only by their products, have that same shape. And synchronicity, the idea that some coincidences are meaningfully connected, is not a hypothesis at all. The framework keeps its appeal chiefly outside clinical psychology, in literary and cultural analysis. That appeal is real. And appeal is not evidence. A framework can be valuable for thinking about a life and still fail as a theory.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Jungian Psychology: The Psyche, Symbolic Dreams, and Archetypes
What is Jung's collective unconscious?
What is the shadow in Jungian psychology?
How did Jung and Freud differ in their views of dreams?
Is the Myers-Briggs personality test based on Jung's theory?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →