UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 4.2 Free with a free account
Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Growth
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 4: Psychodynamic Theories and Therapeutic PracticeSection 4.2 · lesson 15 of 9711 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Jungian Psychology: The Psyche, Symbolic Dreams, and Archetypes →← Core Concepts of the Psychodynamic FrameworkNext lesson: Jungian Psychology: The Psyche, Symbolic Dreams, and Archetypes →
In this lesson
Eight crises across a whole life, and where the model diverges from Freud.
- Describe the eight psychosocial stages and the crisis of each
- Explain four divergences from Freud and what follows from each
- Apply the model to a life-stage difficulty
- State what else could explain the same presentation
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,567 words). Read along, or search it.
Psychodynamic Theories and Therapeutic Practice
Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Growth
Freud's developmental sequence finishes in adolescence. Which leaves most of a human life outside the theory. Erikson's model is the correction, and it is an extension rather than a refutation. Eight stages, each built around a tension that has to be balanced. We start with the shift in the tradition that made it possible. Then four points of divergence, and what follows from each one. Then the stages themselves, childhood first, then the adult years. After that, the claim that earlier crises can be renegotiated later. And finally, an honest evaluation, including the objection that does real damage. One thing to hold throughout. A crisis here is not a catastrophe.
The Turn
Ego Psychology: The Ego Gets Its Own Aims
Recall the ego from the previous section. It was a negotiator. It existed to manage pressure from the id below and the superego above. Its achievements were compromises, made with borrowed energy. Ego psychology changed that. It treats the ego as an active adaptive agent, with its own aims. The consequence is larger than it sounds. If the ego has capacities of its own, development is the growth of ability. Attention, memory, planning, competence, the drive to master a task. And if the ego's business is adapting to a world, that world enters the theory. It stops being a backdrop. Erikson's model is what follows from both points. A note before we start. This material is educational, not a basis for diagnosis.
Four Divergences
An Extension, Not a Refutation
Erikson trained inside the tradition and did not reject it. He called his model an extension, and reading it that way is more useful. Four differences matter. First, the content of each stage. The task is psychosocial, not psychosexual. It concerns the person's relation to other people and to their society. Notice that he keeps the ages and changes what is happening in them. Second, the span. Freud's sequence completes with the genital stage. Erikson's runs through young, middle, and later adulthood. Three of the eight stages cover the years after eighteen. Third, culture is formative rather than incidental. The social world supplies the tasks, and what a stage demands differs by society. Fourth, resolution is revisitable rather than fixed.
Side By Side
Every Gain Carries a Cost
Put the two models side by side and read the consequences column. Because every row names a gain, and several name a cost incurred with it. The gain is that the model now has something to say about adult life. Erikson's continues to the end of life, with three adult stages. So middle and later adulthood become developmental periods rather than a plateau. For Freud, culture constrains how drives get expressed. Incidental to the sequence. For Erikson, culture supplies the tasks themselves. That explains cross-cultural variation, and it costs him the claim of universality. It is the clearest row in the table. The strength and the weakness are one move. And where Freud has fixation, Erikson has a tension carried forward. Which turns treatment into renegotiation rather than excavation.
Ground Plan
The Epigenetic Principle, and What Crisis Means
The epigenetic principle is the claim that development follows a ground plan. Each part has its own time of ascendancy, and each stage builds on the last. The term is borrowed from embryology, and is unrelated to molecular epigenetics. A psychosocial crisis is a turning point where one tension becomes central. Three clarifications prevent the standard misreadings, and they matter more than any stage. First, a crisis is not a catastrophe. It means a period of heightened significance and increased potential. Second, and this is the one most often lost, the favorable outcome is a balance. Not the elimination of one pole. A person with no mistrust would be dangerously credulous. So the good resolution is a predominance of trust, with enough mistrust to be safe. Third, resolution is not permanent, in either direction. Nothing here is a verdict.
Stages 1 To 4
The Childhood Crises
Stage one is trust versus mistrust, across the first year. Do needs met with reasonable consistency make the world reliable? What matters is not perfection but predictability: care that arrives reliably enough. The virtue is hope. Stage two is autonomy versus shame and doubt, from about one to three. Can the child act on their own without losing the caregiver's regard? Enough latitude to try things, enough structure to be safe. The virtue is will. Stage three is initiative versus guilt, from about three to six. The child plans, invents, asserts, intrudes. The virtue is purpose. Stage four is industry versus inferiority, the school years. Now there are tasks with standards, comparison, and public results. And note where stage four sits in a life. A learning difficulty or an unsupportive school can leave a disproportionate mark.
Stage 5
Identity Versus Role Confusion
Stage five is identity versus role confusion, in adolescence. It also has by far the largest research literature behind it. Identity here means a coherent sense of who one is. It integrates values, commitments, and how a person is seen by others. Role confusion is its absence: a self that shifts with context. An identity crisis is the active period of questioning itself. The model treats that as necessary, not pathological. Someone who never questions is not thereby doing better. A moratorium is a permitted period of exploration before commitments fix. And societies provide it very unequally. Extended education supplies one. Early economic responsibility removes it. The virtue of this stage is fidelity: the capacity to sustain commitments.
Stages 6 To 8
The Adult Crises, and Two Standard Misuses
Stage six is intimacy versus isolation, in young adulthood. Intimacy means joining yourself to another without fear of losing yourself. The virtue is love. And here is the standard misapplication. This stage is about capacity, not relationship status. A person who is single is not thereby unresolved. Stage seven is generativity versus stagnation, in middle adulthood. Generativity is investment in what will outlast you. The virtue is care. And generativity is not parenthood; childlessness is not stagnation. Stage eight is integrity versus despair, in later adulthood. Integrity is accepting the life you actually lived, including what cannot now change. Despair is the sense that the time was wasted, with too little left to repair it. The associated process is life review, and the model treats it as work.
The Proportion
More Than Half a Life Sits After Stage 5
Look at where the halfway point of a life actually falls in this model. Four stages cover roughly the first twelve years. And three stages cover everything after eighteen. That is sixty years or more, in three boxes. The proportion is the point, and it is the model's most consequential addition. The framework Erikson grew out of had almost nothing to say about those years. Notice also that drawing the boxes equally is a convention, not a claim. The age bands are approximate, and they get looser as they go on. Young adulthood, eighteen to forty, covers lives that differ enormously. Treat the numbers as typical timing, not a schedule.
Carry-Forward
Nothing Here Is a Verdict
An unfavorably resolved crisis is carried forward, not closed. Someone who did not arrive at basic trust faces the intimacy crisis with a harder task. And it tends to resurface when a later situation puts the same tension back at issue. Now the claim that matters most therapeutically. Resolution is revisitable. A later stage can supply what an earlier one did not. A reliable relationship in adulthood can do work that was not done in infancy. A period of real competence at forty can revise a belief formed at nine. This is the developmental version of the plasticity point from chapter three. But one honest caution, because this claim is very hard to test. Almost any adult difficulty can be connected to almost any earlier stage. And connecting them after the fact is not evidence that one caused the other.
Composite Cases
Sofia, 20, and Martin, 58
Two composite cases, constructed for instruction. Neither describes a real person. Sofia is twenty, in her second year of university. She says she does not know who she is. The reading is the identity crisis of stage five, arriving late. School supplied a structure that postponed it. It replaces the thought that something is wrong with me, with the thought that this is supposed to be difficult. Martin is fifty-eight, referred after his employer raised performance concerns. A restructure moved him out of a supervisory role eighteen months ago. He describes never quite feeling good enough, dating back to school. The operative crisis is generativity versus stagnation, with stage four reopened. He then withdrew from mentoring and from a coaching role he had held for years. So the reading is directional: those roles are the promising places to intervene. But carry the alternatives. Sofia's indecision is also compatible with a depressive presentation. And Martin's stage four reading rests entirely on his own retrospective report.
Evaluation
Where the Model Holds and Where It Does Not
The model should be assessed as seriously as it is taught. Identity development in adolescence is the clear success. The crisis was turned into measurable questions about exploration and commitment. Generativity in middle adulthood has its own measurement tradition, and is second. The broad claim that development continues across the lifespan is now uncontroversial. Operationalizing a crisis is hard, though, and different assessors disagree. Now the most serious criticism, stated at full strength. The sequence assumes a particular life course. Extended adolescent exploration. An individual choosing a partner and an occupation. Many societies do not organize life that way at all. Erikson's defense is that culture supplies the content while the tensions recur. But a universal sequence of tensions is a weaker claim than the table implies. What survives is a lifespan frame, and that has real practical value. And it gives normal transitions a vocabulary that does not pathologize them.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Growth
What are Erikson's eight stages of psychosocial development?
How is Erikson's theory different from Freud's?
What does Erikson mean by an identity crisis?
What is a common criticism of Erikson's stages?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →