UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 17.6 Free with a free account
Gender Incongruence, Diagnosis, Support, and Affirming Care
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 17: Sexual Health, Gender Identity, and Atypical Sexual BehaviorsSection 17.6 · lesson 65 of 9715 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Defining the Continuum from Substance Use to Dependence →← Voyeuristic, Frotteuristic, Pedophilic, and Sadomasochistic Behaviors: Clinical OverviewNext lesson: Defining the Continuum from Substance Use to Dependence →
In this lesson
What is classified is distress - never identity.
- Define the core terms precisely, and separate identity from orientation
- Describe how the 2 classification systems differ, and the debate
- Explain where distress comes from, and what protects
- Describe affirming care, assessment, and the barriers to access
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,919 words). Read along, or search it.
Sexual Health, Gender Identity, and Atypical Sexual Behaviors
Gender Incongruence and Affirming Care
This final section of the chapter covers gender incongruence, how it is diagnosed, and affirming care. We define the core terms precisely, and separate gender identity from sexual orientation. We look at how the two major classification systems now differ, and at the debate behind that difference. Then we look at where distress comes from, at assessment and affirming care, and at the barriers people face. We close by drawing the whole chapter together.
Before You Begin
Being Transgender Is Not a Disorder
One statement comes first. Being transgender or non-binary is not a mental disorder. What is classified is the distress that can accompany incongruence. And the diagnosis exists, in part, to enable access to care. As always, this material is not a basis for diagnosing yourself or anyone else. Some viewers may find it personally relevant. Anyone seeking support should speak with a qualified professional. A note on terminology. The older terms from the course outline are replaced here with current ones. Gender dysphoria is the term in the current psychiatric classification. Gender incongruence is the term in the international health classification, where the category has left the mental disorders chapter entirely. Neither term describes being transgender or non-binary as a disorder, and neither does this section.
Table 17.6.1
Core Terminology, Precisely
Precision matters here, because most confusion comes from terms being used interchangeably when they mean different things. Sex assigned at birth is the classification recorded at birth, usually from observed anatomy. It is not the same thing as gender identity. Gender identity is a person's internal sense of their own gender. It is a sense of self, not a preference, and not a claim. Gender expression is how a person presents gender outwardly, through appearance, dress, and manner. Identity cannot be inferred from expression. Transgender describes a person whose gender identity differs from their sex assigned at birth. Cisgender describes the complementary case. Both are adjectives, and cisgender is an ordinary description, not a political term. Non-binary describes an identity that is not exclusively male or female. Such identities are documented across cultures and history. And sexual orientation is the pattern of a person's sexual or romantic attraction to others.
What Is Classified
Distress, Not Identity
That last term deserves emphasis. Gender identity and sexual orientation are independent. A transgender person may have any orientation, and knowing one tells you nothing about the other. The conflation is common, and in clinical settings people then have to correct it. So what is actually classified? In paraphrase, the psychiatric category requires a marked incongruence between experienced gender and sex assigned at birth. It must be present for a minimum period, shown in a specified number of ways, and come with clinically significant distress or impairment. Separate formulations exist for children, and for adolescents and adults. Their content is not set out here. And the distress requirement does the same work it does everywhere in this course. Incongruence without distress or impairment does not meet the description.
Table 17.6.2
2 Systems, 2 Placements
The two major classification systems now differ, and the difference is substantive. The psychiatric manual keeps gender dysphoria among the mental disorders. Its reasoning is that what is classified is distress, not identity, and that keeping a diagnosis maintains access to funded care. The international health classification has moved the category, as gender incongruence, out of the mental disorders chapter, into a chapter on sexual health. Its reasoning is that placing it among mental disorders is itself stigmatizing, and not supported by the evidence. It keeps a code, so care remains accessible. Notice that both systems serve the same two goals. Access to care, and freedom from stigma. They simply trade them off differently.
The Depathologization Debate
Shared Goals, Different Means
The depathologization debate is real, and it is presented here as unresolved. One position holds that any diagnosis stigmatizes. Requiring a person to be classified in order to get care tells them something is wrong with them. And the history of this field gives ample reason to expect such classifications to be misused. The other position holds that removing the diagnosis entirely would obstruct funded care, in systems that require a diagnostic code. The consequence would fall hardest on the people with the fewest resources. The compromises tried so far, relocating the category, renaming it, and keeping a code outside the mental disorders chapter, all try to keep access while reducing stigma. You should be able to state both positions, and notice that they share their goals, and differ about the means.
History
The Gatekeeping Model
Earlier classifications used terms that are no longer acceptable. But the more consequential history is how care was organized. For a long time, it followed a gatekeeping model. Access to any intervention required a person to satisfy a clinician that they met criteria, often by presenting a narrative that fit clinical expectations. The documented consequences were predictable. People learned what to say, rather than saying what was true. Clinicians therefore received systematically distorted information. And the relationship between people and services became adversarial. The parallel with the removal of homosexuality from classification is close, and drawn deliberately. In both cases, a category defended on clinical grounds was eventually recognized as recording social expectation. And gender categories beyond a binary are documented across many cultures and periods. The assumption that a binary is universal, and anything else is recent, is not supported.
Figure 17.6.3
2 Contributors to Distress
Two contributors to distress have to be separated, because they have entirely different implications for intervention. The first is distress arising from incongruence itself. That one originates inside the person, and affirming care responds to it. The second is minority stress. Distress arising from discrimination, rejection by family or community, misgendering, violence, and obstructed access to care. Look at where the two arrows come from. Only one of them starts inside the person. The response to the other is not clinical treatment. It is acceptance, protection, and access.
Attribution and Protection
The Stressors, Not the Identity
That attribution has to be made explicitly. Elevated distress in this population, and elevated risk, are attributable to those stressors. Not to identity. Risk is stated here as a population-level clinical fact that requires professional care, and nothing further. Protective factors are documented, and they are practical rather than abstract. Family acceptance. Use of a person's affirmed name and pronouns. Community connection. Legal protection. And access to appropriate care. Each of these is something that can be provided, and that is the reason for naming them.
Assessment
From Gatekeeping to Informed Consent
Assessment has moved substantially from the gatekeeping model toward informed consent models. In those models, the clinician's role is to make sure a person understands the options, the expected effects, and the uncertainties, not to rule on whether they qualify. The shift is not complete, and it varies by service. A supportive assessment covers the person's own account and goals, their circumstances and supports, and any co-occurring conditions that need treatment in their own right. It does not require the person to prove anything. And it does not treat hesitation or uncertainty as disqualifying. One requirement deserves its own statement. Unrelated presentations must not be attributed to gender. A transgender person with an anxiety or depressive difficulty has an anxiety or depressive difficulty, and needs that treated. Attributing everything to gender leaves treatable conditions untreated, and drives people away. And one caution. Clinicians have historically applied far more doubt in this population than elsewhere. Doubt applied selectively to one group is not rigor.
Table 17.6.4
Affirming Practice - and the Cost of Its Absence
Here is affirming practice, set against the cost of its absence. Using a person's affirmed name and pronouns is a documented protective factor, and a minimum standard. Without it, the person experiences the service as unsafe, and often disengages. Records and systems should support it, and mistakes should be corrected briefly, without a display of distress that puts the burden back on the person. Not attributing unrelated presentations to gender keeps treatable conditions from going untreated. Not requiring the person to educate the clinician matters, because otherwise they carry the work of the consultation, and receive less from it. Knowing the referral pathways prevents delay on an already long wait. And stating uncertainty honestly protects trust, because overstatement in either direction erodes it. Notice how much of this column concerns whether the person comes back.
Affirming Care
Categories Only - Decisions With Specialists
Affirming care is described here at category level only. The categories are social transition, supportive psychological care, hormonal treatment, surgical options, and voice and other supportive services. No procedural, dosing, age, or eligibility content appears in this course. These are specialist decisions, made with qualified clinicians. Psychological support within affirming care has three functions. Supporting exploration and decision-making. Treating co-occurring conditions in their own right. And supporting families. Its purpose is never to change the person's identity. Attempts to do so, meaning conversion or reparative efforts directed at gender identity, are ineffective, and harmful. They are condemned by professional bodies, and prohibited in many jurisdictions. That sentence carries no qualification.
Children and Adolescents
Active Debate - About Clinical Pathways
Care for children and adolescents is an area of active clinical debate, and national guidance differs. The considerations are set out factually, without advocating a position. Those arguing for earlier intervention point to the distress experienced during adolescence, and to evidence linking access to care and family acceptance with better outcomes. They also point to developmental changes, some irreversible, that occur while a decision is deferred. Those arguing for greater caution point to the limits of the outcome evidence, and to changes in the population presenting to services that are not fully understood. They also point to how hard decision-making is under uncertainty at that age. One point is frequently lost. The disagreement concerns clinical pathways. What should be offered, when, and on what evidence. It is not a disagreement about whether transgender and non-binary people exist, or whether their identities are valid. Conflating those questions makes the clinical one impossible to discuss, and is itself harmful.
Barriers to Care
Practical, and Well Documented
The barriers to care are practical, and well documented. Waiting times are long in most systems. Care costs money where it is not funded. And geography limits access. Clinician knowledge has gaps, and people encounter discrimination in healthcare settings. And documentation and legal recognition generate repeated administrative encounters, each one an opportunity to be misgendered by a system. One practical rule from the clinic. A transgender person attends with a chest infection, a sprained wrist, or a panic difficulty. The clinical task is the chest infection, the wrist, or the panic difficulty. Redirecting the consultation to gender leaves the problem untreated, and suggests their identity is the most notable thing about them. Ask about gender when it is relevant to the presenting problem, as you would ask about anything else relevant. Otherwise, treat what the person came in with.
Table 17.6.5 - Chapter 17 Synthesis
Distress, Impairment, or Harm - Never Content
Chapter seventeen has covered three areas that share little clinically, and a great deal historically. For sexual dysfunctions, the threshold is a persistent difficulty, with distress to the person, after the exclusions. The historical caution is that ordinary behavior was once classified as disease. Sex therapy is not a diagnostic area. The frame and the person's own goals govern it, because goals set against a norm repeat the original error. For paraphilic disorders, the threshold is distress or impairment, or harm to a non-consenting person. Consensual practice was once pathologized, with documented harm. And for gender incongruence, the threshold is distress accompanying incongruence, never identity itself. Gatekeeping once distorted both care and evidence. The thread is a single recurring failure. A classification recorded social expectation in clinical language, was defended at the time, and was corrected late, after harm. The current categories are better built, and the requirement of distress, impairment, or non-consent is what makes them so. A clinician's job is to apply that requirement, rather than substitute their own sense of what is normal.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Gender Incongruence, Diagnosis, Support, and Affirming Care
What is the difference between gender identity and sexual orientation?
What is the difference between gender dysphoria and gender incongruence?
What is minority stress in transgender people?
What is the informed consent model of gender-affirming care?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →