UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 1.5 Free with a free account
Mind-Body Connections: How Psychology Shapes Physical Conditions
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 1: Foundations of Abnormal PsychologySection 1.5 · lesson 5 of 9716 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: The Science Behind Clinical Research and Correlational Methods →← Pitfalls in Mental Health ClassificationNext lesson: The Science Behind Clinical Research and Correlational Methods →
In this lesson
How psychological state influences the course of a physical condition - and what that never means.
- Explain the bidirectional relationship, and the behavioral pathway on each route
- State what the diagnostic category requires, and what it does not assert
- Judge claims about stress, placebo, and survival against the evidence
- Separate this material sharply from somatic symptom conditions
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (2,130 words). Read along, or search it.
Foundations of Abnormal Psychology
Mind-Body Connections
This is the section of the chapter where misreading is most likely, and most damaging. So we start with what it does not say, and we say it twice. Then the relationship itself, which runs in both directions. Psychological state influences the course of a physical condition. And a physical condition influences psychological state in return. On both routes, the main pathway turns out to be behavior. We look at stress and immunity, and at depression and the heart. Both are real, and both are routinely overstated. Then placebo and nocebo, which show what expectation does and does not do. And a sharp line between this material and something it is often confused with.
Before You Begin
The Claim This Section Does Not Make
One note before we begin, and then a second that matters even more. This material is educational. It is not a basis for diagnosing anyone. Nor for changing any medical treatment. Medical concerns belong with a licensed clinician who knows the person's history. Now the second point, and it has to be stated before anything else. Nothing here claims that a person's psychological state caused their illness. Nothing here claims that recovery is a matter of attitude. That claim is not supported by the evidence, and it does identifiable harm. It holds people responsible for conditions they did not choose, and adds guilt to illness. It has been used to imply that people who deteriorate did not try hard enough. What the evidence supports is narrower, and it will be stated precisely throughout. Psychological factors can influence the course of a documented condition, largely through behavior. And having a medical condition influences psychological state in return.
A Working Stance
Why the Field Rejects Dualism
Mind-body dualism is the position that mind and body are separate kinds of thing. Separate kinds, requiring separate explanation. This field rejects it, but not for the reason you might expect. The rejection is not principally a philosophical commitment. That question is old, difficult, and not settled by clinical evidence. It is a working stance about how care should be organized, and the justification is practical. Services built on the dualist assumption separate physical care from psychological care. That separation produces failures you can predict in advance. Psychological difficulty goes unrecognized in medical settings. Physical causes go unexamined in psychological ones. And people with both get referred between services, rather than treated. So the stance says only that assessment should not be partitioned in advance. That is a claim about clinical practice, not about the nature of mind.
The Category
Psychological Factors Affecting Other Medical Conditions
The classification system contains a category for exactly this situation. Psychological factors affecting other medical conditions. It applies when a documented medical condition is present. And identifiable psychological or behavioral factors are adversely affecting it. Affecting its course, its treatment, or its associated risk. Two components must both be present, and the first is the one students skip. First, a documented medical condition. Not a suspected one. And not physical symptoms without a diagnosis. The category requires an established medical diagnosis to attach to. Second, an identified psychological or behavioral factor adversely affecting it. It might influence the course, interfere with treatment, or add a health risk. Now be equally clear about what the category does not assert. It does not claim the psychological factor caused the medical condition. It does not claim the physical condition is psychological in nature. It does not imply the person is failing to try. And it is not a diagnosis reached because a medical cause was not found.
Stress And Immunity
Established, Modest, and Routinely Overstated
Psychological stress affects immune function. That direction is established. And that is about as far as this section should go, for two reasons. The mechanism belongs to a later chapter, where the stress response is developed properly. And the strength of the effect is frequently overstated in popular accounts. So state it carefully. Sustained stress is associated with measurable changes in immune parameters. And with modest differences in outcomes like susceptibility to common infections. Also the rate of wound healing. For those specific, well-studied outcomes, the causal direction is best described as probable. Experimental work can manipulate stress and then observe the change. What is unresolved is whether the changes are large enough to matter for serious disease. The claim that stress causes cancer goes well beyond the evidence. So does the claim that reducing stress changes survival. That is not a technicality. Overstating this pathway is what produces the harm.
The Main Route
Health Behavior Does Most of the Work
Here is the part most people get backwards. The most important route from psychological state to physical outcome is not physiological. It runs through behavior, and it is larger and better evidenced than the direct routes. Health behavior is the set of actions a person takes that affect their physical health. Psychological state changes all of them. Start with treatment adherence. Medication taken irregularly, or stopped altogether. Appointments missed. Monitoring not performed. Low mood, anxiety about procedures, and hopelessness all reduce adherence. And adherence is among the strongest predictors of outcome in most chronic conditions. Sleep is disrupted by anxiety and low mood, and sleep itself affects recovery and pain. Substance use frequently increases during psychological difficulty. Physical activity falls during low mood, which affects mood in return. And help-seeking delay. The interval between noticing a symptom and presenting. Lengthened by fear, by avoidance, and by stigma. Where early treatment matters, that delay alone can change the outcome. Two implications. This is where intervention is actually possible. And any claim of a direct mind-to-tissue effect must survive after behavior is accounted for.
The Best Documented Case
Depression and Cardiovascular Outcomes
The best documented association in this area is between depression and cardiovascular disease. Two findings are consistent across large studies. People with depression have higher rates of subsequent cardiovascular events. And people who develop depression after a cardiac event have worse outcomes. The association itself is not seriously disputed. The causal direction is the interesting part. At least four accounts fit the association, and they are not mutually exclusive. One. Depression affects outcome through behavior. Reduced activity, poorer adherence, increased smoking, disrupted sleep. Two. Depression affects outcome through direct physiological routes. Autonomic and inflammatory pathways, for instance. Three. Early, undetected cardiovascular disease contributes to the depression. That would make the depression partly a consequence rather than a cause. Four. A third factor contributes to both. Socioeconomic disadvantage, chronic adversity, or shared biological vulnerability. The behavioral account has the strongest support, and it does not explain everything. And here is the finding that cuts against the simplest reading. Trials treating depression after a cardiac event have generally improved mood. Without producing the clear reduction in cardiac events a causal story would predict. Treat the direction as partly established, and partly unresolved.
The Other Direction
Chronic Illness as a Psychological Stressor
Now the other direction, which is the one most often neglected. Living with a chronic condition is itself a sustained psychological demand. Rates of depression and anxiety are substantially elevated in serious chronic illness. Three components are worth naming separately. Adjustment is the process of adapting to a changed set of possibilities and demands. Treatment regimens, restrictions, uncertainty, and repeated contact with services. Identity difficulty arises when a condition changes what a person can do. And therefore who they take themselves to be. Loss of work, of independence, or of a valued activity is a loss in the ordinary sense. It produces the ordinary response to loss. Caregiver burden is the strain on those providing sustained care. Physical, emotional, and financial. A documented psychological risk in its own right. Which is why good chronic-illness care attends to the household, not only the patient. Now notice that this direction completes a loop. Illness produces psychological difficulty. That reduces adherence, activity, and engagement. Reduced adherence worsens the illness, and the cycle turns again. So intervening on the psychological side is not a luxury added to real treatment. It is one of the available points of entry to the cycle.
Expectation
Placebo and Nocebo, Stated Carefully
Expectation deserves its own treatment, because it is overclaimed in both directions. The placebo effect is improvement following an inert treatment. Attributable to expectation, to context, and to the meaning of receiving care. The nocebo effect is its mirror. The appearance of adverse effects following an inert treatment, from the expectation of harm. Both are most reliably demonstrated on outcomes the person reports themselves. Pain, nausea, fatigue, and subjective wellbeing. They are much less reliable on outcomes measured independently. Tumor size, for instance, or blood chemistry. And some of what gets called a placebo effect is not an effect at all. It is the natural course of the condition, or regression toward the average. Or a change in what the person reports rather than what they experience. So the honest summary is this. Expectation genuinely changes symptom experience. It does not reliably change the underlying disease. Both misreadings share one structure, and that is worth seeing. Each treats a reported experience as either more powerful, or less real, than it is. The person reporting nausea after an inert tablet is genuinely experiencing nausea. What this demonstrates is that psychological state is a component of every treatment.
Strength Of Evidence
Association Is Not Influence
Now put the documented associations side by side, and read the last column first. The strength of the evidence differs sharply from row to row. For cardiovascular disease, the association is strong. The pathway is behavioral, with proposed autonomic and inflammatory routes as well. The causal direction is partly established and partly unresolved. For diabetes, depression is more common and linked to poorer glycemic control. The pathway is predominantly behavioral. Monitoring, diet, medication, attendance. That one is well supported. In chronic respiratory conditions, anxiety is elevated and presentations are more frequent. But anxiety symptoms and respiratory symptoms overlap, which makes disentangling hard. In chronic pain, the association is strong, and it runs in both directions. Activity avoidance and deconditioning, plus attentional and interpretive processes. For wound healing, the direction is probable and the clinical magnitude is modest. Now the last row, and it is the one to dwell on. Cancer. Depression and anxiety are common after diagnosis, and affect quality of life. The effect of psychological state on survival is not established. Claims to the contrary go beyond the evidence. A strong association between a diagnosis and psychological difficulty says nothing about influence. Conflating those two is the single most common error made with material like this.
A Sharp Line
What This Section Is Not About
One more distinction, and it is a sharp one. Everything in this section concerns a documented medical condition. With psychological factors affecting its course. There is a structurally different situation, taken up later in the course. There, the physical complaint, or the preoccupation with it, is itself the clinical problem. Whether or not a medical condition is present. Two clarifications prevent the usual misunderstandings. First, the distinction is not between real symptoms and imagined ones. Symptoms in those other presentations are experienced exactly as reported. Describing them as imaginary is inaccurate, and it is one of the ways people are poorly treated. Second, the two can co-occur. A person with a documented condition can also be disproportionately preoccupied with symptoms. The presence of one does not exclude the other. So use a workable test. Ask where the clinical attention is directed. Here, at a documented condition, and at the psychological factors affecting its course. There, at the person's relationship to their own physical symptoms.
Two Composites
One That Fits, and One That Does Not
Two composites, constructed for instruction, describing no real people. Priya is forty-six, referred by her diabetes service after two hospital admissions. Two admissions in six months, for markedly raised blood glucose. She has had type two diabetes for nine years, well controlled until about a year ago. Her mother, for whom she was the main carer, died fourteen months ago. Since then she describes persistent low mood, poor sleep, and a sense of futility. She has stopped monitoring her glucose and takes her medication irregularly. She has missed three review appointments and reduced her walking to almost nothing. Work through it. The medical condition is documented and long-standing. Requirement met. The psychological factor is identified. A depressive presentation following bereavement. And the adverse effect is concrete, running through the behavioral route. Now notice what the analysis does not say. It does not say her mood caused her diabetes. She has had it for nine years. It does not say the raised glucose is psychological. It is a physical measurement. Treating the depression here is a diabetes intervention, not an addition to one. Daniel is thirty-four, and has consulted several services over two years. Abdominal discomfort, fatigue, and intermittent palpitations. Investigation has been thorough and repeated, and no medical condition has been identified. He researches his symptoms for hours most days, and seeks repeated reassurance. The first requirement of this category is simply absent. There is no documented medical condition for psychological factors to be affecting. Two cautions before we leave him. His symptoms are real, and experienced as described. And investigation found nothing is not, by itself, a diagnosis of anything.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Mind-Body Connections: How Psychology Shapes Physical Conditions
What is psychological factors affecting other medical conditions?
How does depression affect heart disease?
Can stress cause cancer?
What is the difference between the placebo effect and the nocebo effect?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →