UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 6.1 Free with a free account
How the Mind Works and the Cognitive Framework
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 6: Cognitive Theories in Abnormal PsychologySection 6.1 · lesson 24 of 9711 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Practical CBT Strategies: Thought Restructuring and Behavioral Activation →← Strengths and Weaknesses of the Behavioral FrameworkNext lesson: Practical CBT Strategies: Thought Restructuring and Behavioral Activation →
In this lesson
Appraisal between event and emotion, and the levels of belief beneath it.
- State the core assumptions of the cognitive model
- Relate automatic thoughts, intermediate beliefs and core beliefs
- Identify the principal distortions and tell the confusable pairs apart
- Explain why the maintenance cycle, not the origin, is the target
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,546 words). Read along, or search it.
Cognitive Theories in Abnormal Psychology
How the Mind Works and the Cognitive Framework
Here is the claim this chapter is built on, and it is easy to state. Between an event and your reaction to it, there is an interpretation. And it is the interpretation, not the event, that determines the emotional response. It does not say people are distressed because they think incorrectly. Or that a condition would resolve if someone simply thought differently. One note first. This material is educational, and is not a basis for diagnosis. Then the distortions, and how to tell the confusable ones apart. Then the cycle that keeps a difficulty supplied with its own evidence. And an honest problem at the end. Which comes first, the mood or the thought?
The Turn
Where the Difference Sits
Chapter five ended with a gap the behavioral model could not close. Excluding thought and meaning proved untenable. Because two people meeting the same event respond differently. Five point three opened the door by admitting expectancy as a cause. The cognitive model is the systematic development of that opening. What it adds is a claim about where the difference sits. What the cognitive model contributed was a specification detailed enough to be treated. Now state the evidential position at once, because the rest depends on it. The mediating claim, that appraisal stands between event and emotion, is supported. The stronger claim, that distorted cognition causes disorder, is contested. Because cognition and mood influence each other in both directions. Low mood produces negative thinking as readily as negative thinking produces low mood.
Processing
Five Places Bias Can Enter
The model treats the mind as an information-processing system. And it locates difficulty in systematic bias at those stages, not in a fault anywhere. Five points matter. First, attention. What gets noticed. Bias here means noticing some classes of information preferentially. Second, encoding. How what is noticed is registered and given a shape. Two people can encode the same remark as a joke, or as a slight. Third, interpretation. The meaning assigned. Most events are ambiguous, and ambiguity has to be resolved before a response occurs. Fourth and fifth, storage and retrieval. What is kept, and what comes back. Bias can enter at any stage, so two people can diverge without misremembering anything. And none of it is deliberate. These processes run automatically, outside awareness. Which is why the model does not treat a distortion as a failure of effort or intelligence.
The Foundation
The Mediating Claim
The mediating claim is the model's foundation. An event does not produce an emotion directly. It does so by way of the appraisal the person makes of it. The A B C framing: activating event, belief or appraisal, and consequence in emotion and behavior. That framing exists because the middle term is what people leave out of their own accounts. Two colleagues receive identical brief feedback on a piece of work. One thinks, that's useful, I'll fix it, and feels mildly irritated for an hour. The other thinks, they've realized I'm not up to this. And feels a sinking dread that lasts three days. The event is constant. The appraisal is not. And the appraisal is not always distorted; an accurate one produces a proportionate response. Also, appraisal mediating is not appraisal being chosen. Appraisals arrive; they are not selected.
Three Levels
Shorter, More Absolute, Less Situational
The model distinguishes three levels of cognition. Automatic thoughts are rapid and situation-specific, and arrive unbidden. They feel plausible rather than arguable. And they are usually unexamined. Most people are more aware of the emotion than of the thought that produced it. What went through your mind at the moment the feeling changed? Intermediate beliefs are the rules and conditional assumptions underneath. If I ask for help, people will think less of me. I must never let anyone down. Core beliefs, also called schemas, are enduring organizing structures. They are absolute rather than conditional, and formed developmentally rather than adopted. They are not active at all times, but activated by circumstances matching their content. And they are self-maintaining. Consistent information is kept, inconsistent discounted. Which is why ordinary experience does not correct them.
The Triad
Self, World, and Future
The cognitive triad organizes depressed thinking into three domains. The self, the world, and the future. The self is appraised as deficient, inadequate, or worthless. The world here means current experience and other people. Appraised as demanding, unrewarding, or defeating. And the future is appraised as offering no prospect of change. That third element is hopelessness, and it carries the most clinical significance. It is a recognized risk indicator. Which is one reason risk assessment is a clinical responsibility. And because it identifies which domain a person's thinking is concentrated in. And two people with equally low mood may differ: one self-critical, the other hopeless.
Distortions
Systematic, Universal, and Not Chosen
A cognitive distortion is a systematic pattern of interpretation. One that departs from what the available evidence supports. These are recurring habits of interpretation, not occasional errors. And everybody uses them. They are ordinary features of a system that has to interpret ambiguity quickly. They become clinically relevant through frequency, rigidity, and the distress they generate. All-or-nothing thinking evaluates in absolute categories, with no middle ground. Overgeneralization treats one instance as a never-ending pattern. Mental filter attends to one negative detail until it colors everything. Discounting the positive treats good experiences as not counting. Mind reading assumes knowledge of another person's thinking, without evidence. And fortune telling predicts a specific negative outcome as though it were established.
Telling Them Apart
The Skill Is in the Last Column
Knowing the definitions is easy. Telling adjacent distortions apart is the actual skill. Fortune telling predicts that something will happen. Catastrophizing concerns how bad it would be if it did. I'll forget my words is fortune telling. I would never live it down is catastrophizing. Now emotional reasoning and mind reading. Mind reading attributes contents to another person's mind. Emotional reasoning cites your own feeling as evidence about external facts. Should statements apply fixed rules about how you or others must be. Labeling converts an event into an identity. I got that wrong, so I am useless. And personalization takes responsibility for events that had other causes. And a single thought often contains several distortions; naming several is more accurate.
Style And Content
How Events Are Explained, and What Thinking Is About
Attributional style is a person's characteristic way of explaining why events happen. Along the three dimensions from the learned helplessness reformulation. Explaining negative events as internal, stable, and global is associated with depression. Take one failed job application, explained two ways. I'm not good enough, I never will be, and it applies to everything I do. Against, that was a strong field, this time. The event is identical, and the implication for the person's future is entirely different. Two cautions: the association is not evidence of direction, and it is nobody's fault. Cognitive specificity is a related proposal. Depressive presentations concern loss, failure, and worthlessness. Anxiety presentations concern threat and danger. Its status is partial support: the loss-versus-threat distinction holds; finer ones are less secure.
Maintenance
A System That Supplies Its Own Evidence
Two processes explain why beliefs of this kind are not corrected by ordinary experience. Attentional bias is preferential attention to information matching an existing concern. Someone worried about threat detects threat cues faster, and more often. The environment they experience genuinely contains more threat. Mood-congruent recall is the retrieval of material matching the current mood. In low mood, past failures come to mind more easily, skewing the evidence before reasoning. Together, these produce a system that supplies its own confirming evidence. Now the maintenance cycle, which closes the loop. A situation produces a thought, the thought an emotion, the emotion a behavior. And the behavior produces a consequence, taken as evidence for the original belief. The loop ends at the thought, not outside it. That is what makes it self-sustaining. That behavior is often avoidance, which relieves distress now and prevents any test.
The Hard Question
The Causal-Direction Problem
Everything so far describes an association. The model's stronger claim is that the cognition comes first and produces the difficulty. And that claim does not follow from the association. The alternative is straightforward, and well supported. Low mood produces negative thinking directly. People experimentally put into a low mood recall more negative material. So mood may cause the cognition as readily as the reverse. Now, this does not undermine the treatment, which is what students assume next. And interrupting it works regardless of which element began it. Which is why the model's clinical utility is better established than its causal claim. Describe the cycle, not the error. And check accuracy first. Someone whose employer really is planning redundancies is not catastrophizing.
Composite Case
Elena, 36, and a Colleague in the Same Situation
A composite case, constructed for instruction. It describes no real person. Elena is thirty-six, referred with low mood and difficulty at work. Nine months of gradually worsening mood, with no single precipitant. The immediate trigger was an email from her manager, asking to meet about a report. Automatic thought: there's something wrong with the report and she's seen it. The intermediate belief: if my work isn't excellent, I have no value to anyone. And the core belief underneath: I am only worth what I produce. Her colleague got a comparable email, thought it was about the timeline, and replied within the hour. The emails did not differ. The appraisals did. The thought produces anxiety, then rewriting and late work, which she takes as further evidence. Notice what the formulation does not claim. Not that her mood is caused by faulty thinking. And the mood is very likely shaping the thinking as much as the reverse.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About How the Mind Works and the Cognitive Framework
What is the cognitive model of psychological disorders?
What is the difference between automatic thoughts, intermediate beliefs, and core beliefs?
What is the cognitive triad of depression?
What is the difference between fortune telling and catastrophizing?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →