UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 4.4 Free with a free account
Key Psychodynamic Techniques
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 4: Psychodynamic Theories and Therapeutic PracticeSection 4.4 · lesson 17 of 9712 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: A Critical Review of the Psychodynamic Model →← Jungian Psychology: The Psyche, Symbolic Dreams, and ArchetypesNext lesson: A Critical Review of the Psychodynamic Model →
In this lesson
Free association, interpretation, and emotional release - and what the evidence supports.
- Describe the principal techniques and the rationale for each
- Distinguish transference and resistance from their ordinary alternatives
- Explain how insight and emotional release are said to produce change
- State which claims current evidence actually supports
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,610 words). Read along, or search it.
Psychodynamic Theories and Therapeutic Practice
Key Psychodynamic Techniques
This section describes what psychodynamic techniques are and how they are understood. It does not describe how to perform them. This is educational: not a basis for diagnosis, and not a technique to apply to anyone. Psychotherapy is delivered by trained, licensed practitioners working under supervision. The distance between reading about a method and using one safely is professional training. We will start with the aim of treatment, and the correction the tradition made to it. Then resistance, transference, countertransference, and interpretation. And at the end, an honest account of what the evidence supports. One theme runs through all of it. Keeping the client able to correct the therapist.
The Aim
Insight, and the Tradition's Own Correction
The classical aim follows directly from the model in four point one. If a symptom is a compromise expressing conflict outside awareness, then making that conflict available to understanding should remove the need for it. Insight was the proposed mechanism of change. Then the tradition discovered its own most important correction, early. Insight alone is not sufficient. People arrive at accurate understandings of their patterns and go on enacting them. Insight has to be emotionally live rather than merely intellectual. And insight has to be worked through, met repeatedly in different situations. One warning before anything else, about memory. This tradition sometimes implies that intact memories can be recovered. That is wrong. Suggestive questioning can produce confident, detailed memories of events that never happened.
The Frame
Arrangements Treated as Therapeutically Active
The therapeutic frame is the set of arrangements the work takes place inside. The same time each week. The same session length. An agreed fee. Confidentiality and its limits, and clear boundaries on contact outside sessions. The tradition treats these as therapeutically active rather than administrative. A reliable frame is a demonstration rather than a promise. It also makes departures informative. Now the serious part. The power asymmetry here is an ethical matter, not a background fact. One person discloses and the other does not. One is distressed and the other is not. That is why boundaries in this field are prohibitions rather than preferences. Contact outside sessions, dual relationships, and any romantic or sexual involvement. And the last prohibition extends beyond the end of treatment. A client's apparent willingness does not make a crossing acceptable, because the asymmetry makes willingness unreliable.
Listening
Free Association, Dreams, and Slips
Free association is the instruction to say whatever comes to mind. What it aims to bypass is the ordinary editing everyone does in conversation. The proposal is that this editing is not neutral. It screens out exactly the material that is uncomfortable. So what the therapist attends to is not only the content. It is the movement. What follows what. Where the flow stops. What is approached and then left. Dreams work similarly here, from manifest content to latent content. But note the limit. The same dream can be traced to several coherent meanings. And a dream is not evidence about a person's history. Slips and forgetting are also treated as material, though most have mundane explanations. A pattern of forgetting attached to one topic is worth noticing. A single slip is not.
Resistance
The Most Misusable Idea Here
Resistance is any movement within treatment away from difficult material. Falling silent. Changing the subject. Arriving late. Disputing an interpretation. The tradition treats it as informative rather than obstructive. The reasoning: a person moves away from what is painful, so the movement locates the pain. Read that way, the task is not to push past resistance but to notice it. Now the risk, stated at full strength, because this is the most misusable idea here. If disagreement can be classified as resistance, then the interpretation cannot be wrong. Agreement confirms it. Disagreement confirms it. It is also insulting. It tells a person their considered objection is a symptom. Reasonable disagreement is usually specific, engages the content, and offers an alternative. So the safer rule, which contemporary practice adopts, is to treat disagreement as evidence.
Transference
The Pattern That Happens in the Room
Transference is the redirection onto the therapist of feelings from earlier relationships. Someone who learned that closeness precedes abandonment may grow guarded as work deepens. The tradition treats this as the most valuable material available. Here is why. Everything else a client reports about relationships is an account. Transference is the pattern occurring in the room, while both people can observe it. Clients also perceive their therapists correctly. A therapist who was distracted, who was late, who did miss something, may be accurately observed. Reading an accurate perception as transference is a clinical error. So, some practical questions. Does the perception fit what actually happened? Is it proportionate? Does the same pattern appear elsewhere in the client's life? And most usefully, has the therapist honestly checked whether it is true?
Countertransference
Two Directions of Feeling, One External Check
Countertransference is the therapist's own emotional reactions to the client. The term originally meant something narrower, and more disapproving. Contamination, to be eliminated through the therapist's own analysis. The shift to treating it as data is one of the tradition's more useful developments. On the current view, the reaction is information about what happens around this person. Feeling unusually protective. Unusually irritated. Unusually eager to please. But that reframing carries an obvious hazard. It licenses a therapist to attribute their own feelings to the client. A therapist irritated because they are tired would be mistaken to read it as data. Supervision handles this: regular structured discussion of the work with an experienced practitioner. It is the only external check on a process where the practitioner is participant and observer. The client has no comparable check, which is one more form of the asymmetry.
Interpretation
What Separates an Interpretation From an Assertion
An interpretation connects something a person said or did to something outside awareness. Three features distinguish a competent interpretation from an assertion. First, timing. An interpretation offered too early is at best wasted. The material should already be close to awareness. The interpretation names something arriving, not something buried. Second, tentativeness. It is offered as a possibility to examine together. And this is not politeness. A tentative interpretation can be rejected without a contest. Which keeps the client's disagreement usable as evidence rather than converting it to resistance. An interpretation the client arrives at is worth far more than one delivered to them. So the difference is epistemic. An assertion claims to know another mind; nobody can. An interpretation proposes a reading and submits it for testing.
Change
Working Through, and What Catharsis Is Not
Working through is the repeated encounter with the same pattern in different situations. So that recognition becomes usable rather than merely accurate. It is the tradition's answer to its own discovery that insight is insufficient. A pattern built over decades is not dismantled by being named once. This is where the tradition converges with plasticity, without using its vocabulary. A pattern built by repetition is changed by repetition. Now catharsis: the discharge of pent-up emotion, proposed originally as curative in itself. The hydraulic metaphor is doing the work, and it does not survive. Emotional expression inside a supportive relationship, connected to understanding, helps. But release on its own is not supported. Research on venting anger found the opposite: expressing anger tends to maintain or increase it. A person can weep in a session, feel better that evening, and be unchanged a fortnight later. Relief is not the same as change.
Then And Now
The Popular Image Is a Century Out of Date
Almost nobody now practices the classical form described so far. What is delivered today is time-limited dynamic therapy. Focused on one specific recurring interpersonal pattern, identified early. With the therapist considerably more active than in classical analysis. Classical analysis rests essentially on case reports. No controlled trials of that form. Contemporary dynamic therapy has randomized trials behind it, for some presentations. So the columns differ not in degree but in kind. Only one has been tested. A contemporary dynamic therapist is an active, engaged participant. Which means criticisms aimed at the classical form often miss what is practiced. The reported effects are broadly comparable to other established psychological treatments. And it does not validate the theory. A treatment can work for reasons other than the ones its framework proposes.
Composite Exchange
Deepa, Session 11
A composite exchange, constructed for instruction. Not a real session or transcript. Deepa is forty-one, attending weekly, eleven sessions in, after difficulties at work. For the past three weeks she has begun each session by apologizing for something. The therapist names it. You have started the last few sessions with an apology. Deepa says she does not want to waste anyone's time. Then: that sounds like my mother. The therapist then wonders aloud whether some of that comes into the room. She named a pattern across sessions, not a single instance. She named the observation before offering any meaning. The connection to Deepa's mother came from Deepa, not from her. And the interpretation was tentative, which leaves Deepa able to reject it. But one alternative, stated seriously. She may simply be habitually polite. If she says that is not what is happening, there is one defensible response. Take it as evidence about the interpretation.
The Evidence
Three Supported Claims, and the Rest
Three statements can be made with reasonable confidence. First, the therapeutic alliance is well supported. It has three components: agreement on goals, agreement on tasks, and the bond. All three are required. Warmth without agreement on the task is not an alliance. It holds across approaches, and early alliance predicts later improvement. Whether it causes improvement is less settled. Second, short-term dynamic therapy has outcome evidence for some presentations. Third, emotional processing within a supportive relationship is supported. Now what lacks comparable support, stated plainly. That insight into unconscious conflict is the mechanism of change. And that this tradition's interpretive content is more accurate than any other's. And note the common-factors argument: much of what works may be shared across all therapies. Finally, an account where agreement confirms and disagreement is resistance cannot be disconfirmed.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Key Psychodynamic Techniques
What is transference in psychotherapy?
What is resistance in psychodynamic therapy?
What is countertransference?
Does catharsis or venting emotions help in therapy?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →