UPI Study › Courses › Abnormal Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 17.5 Free with a free account
Voyeuristic, Frotteuristic, Pedophilic, and Sadomasochistic Behaviors: Clinical Overview
Abnormal Psychology · Chapter 17: Sexual Health, Gender Identity, and Atypical Sexual BehaviorsSection 17.5 · lesson 64 of 9712 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Abnormal Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Abnormal Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Gender Incongruence, Diagnosis, Support, and Affirming Care →← Sex Therapy in Practice and Defining Paraphilias: Core Methods and ApplicationsNext lesson: Gender Incongruence, Diagnosis, Support, and Affirming Care →
In this lesson
Organized by consent - and aimed at preventing harm.
- Distinguish conditions defined by non-consent from those where consensual practice is at issue
- Describe the clinical and public health response to each
- Explain the professional obligations these presentations raise
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,595 words). Read along, or search it.
Sexual Health, Gender Identity, and Atypical Sexual Behaviors
Paraphilic Disorders: A Clinical Overview
This section gives a clinical overview of the paraphilic disorders. It is organized around one division, which it holds throughout. Conditions defined by harm to a person who has not consented, and conditions where consensual practice is at issue. We look at the clinical and public health response to each group, and at the professional obligations these presentations raise.
Before You Begin
How This Section Is Written
A word on how this section is written. It is clinical and educational. Its purpose is to help you recognize these conditions, understand the clinical and legal responses to them, and understand how harm is prevented. It contains no description of any behavior, and it is not a basis for diagnosing anyone. Some viewers may find the subject distressing. Anyone affected by sexual harm should seek support. And anyone concerned about their own sexual thoughts should seek confidential professional assessment. That help exists, and seeking it before harm occurs is exactly what prevention aims for.
The Organizing Division
Not a Matter of Degree
On one side of the division are conditions where the defining concern is harm, to a person who has not consented, or cannot consent. There, the clinical response includes protecting other people, and safeguarding obligations. On the other side are conditions in which consensual adult practice is at issue. There, no disorder exists at all, unless distress or impairment is present. The division is not a matter of degree. The two groups raise different questions, carry different obligations, and need different responses. Grouping them together, as popular treatments almost always do, produces two errors at once. It treats consensual practice as though it were harmful. And it treats harm to others as though it were a variation in taste.
One Clarification First
Interest, Disorder, Offense: 3 Different Things
Before the categories, one clarification. A sexual interest, a diagnosable disorder, and a criminal offense are three different things. They overlap only partly, and the terms are not interchangeable. Most people with an atypical interest do not meet criteria for any disorder. Most people who meet criteria for a disorder have not committed an offense. And most people who commit sexual offenses do not meet criteria for any paraphilic disorder. Hold onto that finding, because public understanding assumes the opposite. Treating the three as interchangeable causes two failures. Over-inclusion, where a person with an interest is treated as a danger. And under-detection, where offending by people who do not fit the assumed clinical picture is not anticipated.
Figure 17.5.2
3 Partly Overlapping Categories
Here are the three categories drawn as overlapping circles. Atypical interest, diagnosable disorder, and criminal offense. They do overlap. But look at the areas outside the overlaps. Those regions are where most people in each category actually sit. That is the point the diagram exists to make.
Defined by Non-Consent
Named at the Level of the Clinical Concept
Four conditions are defined by harm to a non-consenting person. They are named here at the level of the clinical concept only. No behavior, scenario, method, setting, or circumstance is described, and none is needed for the purpose of this section. Voyeuristic disorder involves recurrent, intense arousal centered on observing an unsuspecting person. Exhibitionistic disorder centers on exposure to an unsuspecting person. And frotteuristic disorder centers on contact with a non-consenting person. Pedophilic disorder is a clinical category involving sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Each reaches the diagnostic threshold if the person has acted on the urges, or if the urges cause marked distress or impairment. The first three are criminal in most jurisdictions, and the harm to the people subjected to them is serious and lasting.
Pedophilic Disorder
4 Statements, Read Together
For pedophilic disorder, four things must be stated plainly. They should be read together, not selectively. First. Sexual contact with a child is always abuse, and always seriously harmful. There is no version of that sentence with a qualification attached. Second. A diagnosis explains nothing away. It describes a clinical condition. It is not a mitigation, it does not reduce responsibility, and it is not an orientation deserving accommodation. Third. The terms are not interchangeable. Most people who abuse children do not meet criteria for this diagnosis, and most people with this attraction do not offend. Both halves matter. Drop the first, and detection is aimed at the wrong people. Drop the second, and it seems nothing can be prevented. Fourth. The objective is prevention of any offense. Not management after the fact, and not detection alone.
Prevention
The Group Best Placed to Prevent Harm
That last point has a consequence that is uncomfortable, and well evidenced. People distressed by such urges, who have committed no offense, face severe barriers to seeking help. They fear legal consequences, and losing their work and relationships. And they are uncertain what a clinician is obliged to do. So the group best placed to prevent harm is the group least able to reach help. Confidential assessment and treatment exist. Enabling access to them before any offense occurs is a documented prevention strategy, not leniency. In the clinic, such a person is not disclosing an offense. If a clinician responds as though they were, that person leaves, and so does everyone they later warn. What is needed is accuracy. Know your obligations well enough to state the limits of confidentiality clearly, before anything is disclosed, so the person can decide what to say.
Where Consensual Practice Is at Issue
No Threshold, No Disorder
Now the other side of the division. Sexual sadism disorder and sexual masochism disorder require the threshold to be met, like every other category. Consensual practices between informed adults are not disorders. No detail of any practice appears in this course. This has to be stated, not implied, because these practices were historically pathologized. People were diagnosed, treated against their wishes, and in some places disadvantaged in custody and employment decisions, on the basis of a consensual private life. Fetishistic disorder and transvestic disorder carry the same threshold. Both have been criticized for pathologizing consensual variation, since the distress they require often comes from others' reactions. The counter-argument, as before, is that distress is distress, and people seeking help should get it. The question is unresolved. Hold both positions. Other specified categories also exist, and are named here only.
The Reliability Problem
What We Know - and How We Know It
The evidence in this area has a structural weakness that shapes everything built on it. Almost all research uses forensic samples, meaning people who were detected, charged, or convicted. They differ systematically from people with the same interests who were never detected. And the direction of that difference is unknown. So generalizing from convicted samples to everyone with a given interest is unsound. A great deal of confident writing does exactly that. A second problem compounds the first. Assessment often happens under legal jeopardy, which affects what people say. Explanatory accounts, drawing on learning, development, and neurobiology, are proposals with an evidential status. None is established. And none, on any reading, excuses harm.
Treatment
Specialist Work, Described as Approaches
Treatment is specialist forensic and clinical work, described here only at the level of approach. Psychological approaches aim at self-management, at reducing risk situationally, and at victim empathy. Medication is described by class only, and prescribing decisions rest with a prescriber. The honest position on outcome is that the evidence is limited, and contested. Confident claims in either direction deserve caution, and the reliability problem is part of the reason. And voluntary treatment differs from mandated treatment. Treatment sought by a person who has not offended is different, from treatment delivered under a legal mandate after an offense. They differ in engagement, in assumed motivation, and in the clinician's role.
Professional Obligations
4 Obligations - Full Framework in Ch 25
Four professional obligations arise here. The full legal framework is in chapter twenty-five. Confidentiality and its limits, stated accurately and at the outset, rather than improvised later. Mandatory reporting, where it applies. It varies substantially by jurisdiction, and each clinician is responsible for knowing what applies to them. Safeguarding duties, where a child or a vulnerable adult may be at risk. And the distinction between clinical and forensic roles, which is most consequential here. Safeguarding is a process, not a decision. The clinician acts through the established process, rather than investigating, or deciding alone whether a concern is well founded. Treating it as a personal decision produces two failures. Concerns that should be passed on are not. And concerns that needed proper examination become accusations.
The Public Health Perspective
A Genuinely 2-Sided Debate
There is a policy debate here that is genuinely two-sided, and it is presented that way. One position holds that the response should be primarily criminal. These are offenses, the right response is prosecution and incapacitation, and clinical framing risks diluting accountability. The other holds that punishment alone addresses harm after it has occurred, and does nothing to prevent the next instance. Prevention requires reaching people before they offend, and that cannot happen while seeking help is functionally unsafe. The positions are not simply opposed. Prevention and accountability can coexist. But the trade-offs are real. Measures that increase detection can also reduce help-seeking. This section does not resolve the debate. It states plainly that protecting potential victims is the objective on both accounts. That is what the disagreement is about.
Table 17.5.3
Myths That Make Prevention Harder
Finally, some common beliefs, set against the evidence. The belief that anyone with an atypical interest will act on it. Most do not offend, and treating interest as danger drives people away from help before harm occurs. The belief that people who offend against children are strangers. Most are known to the child, so effort aimed only at strangers leaves the real routes unaddressed. The belief that a diagnosis excuses conduct. It describes a condition, and responsibility is unchanged. The belief that nothing can be done before an offense. Confidential assessment and treatment are a documented prevention route. And the belief that everyone who offends has a paraphilic disorder. Most do not, so detection aimed at a clinical picture misses most cases. Each of these beliefs, widely held, makes prevention harder rather than easier.
About Abnormal Psychology at UPI Study
Abnormal Psychology (Psychology 180) is a self-paced online course of 97 video lessons in 25 chapters, from the main theoretical perspectives and clinical assessment to anxiety, mood, psychotic and personality disorders, treatment and the law. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Abnormal Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Abnormal Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Voyeuristic, Frotteuristic, Pedophilic, and Sadomasochistic Behaviors: Clinical Overview
Is a sexual interest the same as a paraphilic disorder or a sexual offense?
Which paraphilic disorders are defined by harm to non-consenting people?
Are consensual sadomasochistic practices a mental disorder?
Why does confidential help before an offense matter for preventing sexual harm?
About the Abnormal Psychology course
How many college credits is Abnormal Psychology?
How much does Abnormal Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Abnormal Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Abnormal Psychology.
97 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →