UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 10.7 Free with a free account
How Unions Get Started and How They Can Be Dissolved
Human Resources Management · Chapter 10: Working With Unions: Collective Bargaining and Labor RelationsSection 10.7 · lesson 77 of 9116 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Human Resources Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Human Resources Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: What Employers Can and Can't Do During Organizing and Bargaining →← Closed Shops vs. Open Shops: What They Mean for HRNext lesson: What Employers Can and Can't Do During Organizing and Bargaining →
In this lesson
Employee choice, organizing obligations, elections, and representation stability.
- Trace organizing, election and lawful recognition routes.
- Apply employee rights and employer conduct limits with their actual conditions.
- Distinguish decertification, deauthorization, withdrawal and timing bars.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,954 words). Read along, or search it.
Working With Unions: Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations
How Unions Get Started and How They Can Be Dissolved
Organizing begins with employee concerns, and the statutory right to act together about working conditions. Employees can support representation, oppose it, or refrain, without coercion by employers or unions. Authorization cards and petitions begin procedural steps, rather than themselves proving that an election was won. An election ordinarily measures the majority of valid votes cast, while lawful recognition provides another route. Once representation is established, stability periods allow bargaining, instead of repeated immediate challenges to status. This lesson explains employee rights and employer obligations, as a compliance brief for HR practice. It does not supply techniques, for influencing the outcome of employees’ protected choices. Threats, coercive questions, inducements, surveillance, and retaliation can undermine both statutory rights and election conditions. Maintaining lawful normal administration matters too; withholding a planned benefit can be campaign-driven interference. Ending representation differs from removing security authority, and from an employer withdrawing recognition unilaterally. For each process, identify the actual evidence, timing bars, conditions, and current law before acting.
4 STAGES: RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
Representation Is an Employee Choice at Every Stage
Initial interest can involve conversations about pay, workload, treatment, or safety, without any formal union involvement. The employer must respect protected concerted activity, rather than treat early discussion as permission for retaliation. During card signing, employees can designate a union, or decline to sign at all. Showing-of-interest support is checked administratively, and the employer is not given the confidential card showing. Do not coercively question employees, or monitor protected activity while attempting to discover their choices. During the election period, employees make a secret choice, including a vote against representation. The employer follows regional procedures, while avoiding threats, inducements, and other unlawful interference. Following certification, the union bargains for the unit, and the employer must recognize that relationship. Both parties bargain in good faith, without a statutory guarantee that a particular agreement results. The certification year ordinarily protects majority status, providing a period to negotiate the first agreement. Employees’ participation and restraint rights belong to the same framework; union coercion is prohibited as well.
ORGANIZING AND RECOGNITION
Cards, Elections and Recognition Have Different Requirements
An authorization card is an employee’s designation, of a union for collective bargaining representation. Ordinarily, at least thirty percent support permits, an election petition to be assessed by the region. The region examines jurisdiction, eligibility, the appropriate unit, and any bars preventing an election. The parties may agree on arrangements, or a hearing and regional decision resolve disputed issues. The employer must meet applicable filing and notice duties, while preserving employee free choice. A secret ballot ordinarily decides representation, by a majority of the valid votes actually cast. Objections and supporting proof generally are due, within seven days of the count. Successful results and resolved challenges lead to certification, while lawful recognition offers another route. Voluntary recognition relies on actual majority support; card check can provide agreed neutral verification. The Board’s framework can require prompt employer petition action, when a majority demand is declined. Procedures face court challenges; obtain current advice rather than ignore demands or assume one outcome.
4 CONDUCT PROHIBITIONS
Threats, Coercive Interrogation, Inducements and Surveillance
Threats tie adverse treatment, job loss, or closure to employees’ protected representation choices. A supervisor’s claimed harmless intention does not erase, an objectively coercive threat in its actual context. Interrogation is unlawful when the questioning tends, to interfere with, restrain, or coerce protected choice. Assess the total circumstances, including authority, wording, setting, prior conduct, and the information sought. The law prohibits coercive questioning, not automatically every possible union-related conversation. That correction does not make sensitive voting questions, a suitable subject for routine supervisor conversation. Promises or grants meant to influence choice are prohibited, with timing and surrounding evidence relevant. Unlawful surveillance and a created impression of surveillance also interfere, even when no recording actually occurs. Ordinary presence and a legitimate reason require their facts, rather than automatically proving or excusing monitoring. Uncoercive views are protected by the statute, when they contain no threat, force, or promised benefit. Give supervisors clear referral instructions, while keeping the legal test distinct from that operational rule.
DISCRIMINATION AND NORMAL ADMINISTRATION
Campaign-Driven Grants and Withholding Can Both Violate Rights
Protected organizing must not drive discipline, assignment, scheduling, promotion, layoffs, or dismissal decisions. New campaign grievance solicitation can imply a promised remedy, rather than ordinary established problem handling. Benefits granted to influence choice can be unlawful, just as threats can be unlawful. Withholding an otherwise established benefit because of organizing, can use the same employment power to interfere. A scheduled increase, budgeted and announced before the campaign, ordinarily continues under its actual lawful conditions. Limited postponement can be lawful, with clear neutrality assurances and its actual legal conditions satisfied. The campaign does not freeze every business action, or make every new decision automatically unlawful. Legitimate reasons, established practices, timing, and any bargaining obligations must be assessed together. Document the actual basis, rather than manufacture a supposedly independent explanation after a campaign-driven decision. Consistent rule enforcement is relevant evidence, without automatically defeating a claim of retaliation. Do not assume every supervisor understands these boundaries, or that good intentions prevent violations. Training should make boundaries recognizable, so ordinary management habits do not become unlawful interference.
EMPLOYEE ACTIVITY AND SUPERVISOR STATUS
Protected Discussion Is Broader Than a Formal Organizing Drive
Covered employees may act together, about terms and conditions even where no union exists. That includes discussion of pay, workload, safety, and treatment, within the applicable protection rules. Employee solicitation is generally protected during nonworking time, subject to actual special circumstances. A lawful nondiscriminatory working-time restriction differs, from a blanket ban throughout workplace areas. Distribution has a separate rule, generally involving nonworking time and nonworking areas. Do not combine those two standards, or apply an otherwise neutral rule selectively against union activity. Access for nonemployee organizers raises another inquiry, which the next lesson addresses in detail. Supervisors are excluded from NLRA employee coverage, when their actual authority satisfies the statutory definition. The title alone does not decide it; actual duties and independent judgment require assessment. Employer-agent conduct can also be attributed to management, rather than dismissed as an individual’s private mistake. Train people exercising authority, and refer disputed classifications or conduct conditions for legal assessment.
6 ACTIONS
Classify Conduct With Its Controlling Facts
First, asking an employee how she will vote raises a sensitive coercion inquiry, under all circumstances. Supervisory authority matters, but the governing standard is not automatic illegality for every casual question. Second, explaining a preference for direct relations can be lawful, without threats, force, or promised benefits. Third, paying an established preannounced increase ordinarily continues normal administration, rather than rewarding campaign opposition. Fourth, a new benefit two weeks before voting is unlawful, if it induces campaign choices. Timing is important evidence, rather than the only condition that determines the legal conclusion. Fifth, a manager’s proximity to union discussion depends on ordinary presence, unusual observation, and reasonable impressions. Sixth, discipline for lateness requires actual motive, the evidence, and how the rule is consistently applied. Protected organizers do not receive blanket immunity, from lawful rules governing employee conduct. But a convenient rule explanation does not excuse, a decision actually motivated by protected organizing. Support classifications with facts, rather than assume friendliness or an administrative label supplies immunity.
FICTIONAL NORTHGATE LOGISTICS CASE
Tomas’s Voting Question Needs Review and a Clear Training Response
At fictional Northgate Logistics, Tomas asks a long-known operative, how she intends to vote. She does not answer, and the shift supervisor says it makes no difference to him. His claimed friendly intention does not itself settle, whether the questioning tends to coerce. Authority, the sensitive voting inquiry, campaign circumstances, and the surrounding relationship all inform the assessment. A voting question needs contextual review, rather than immunity based on a supervisor’s friendly intention. That distinction still leaves a clear HR response, rather than permission to repeat sensitive questions. Preserve what occurred, involve counsel, and correct conduct where the actual assessment shows a problem. Re-brief supervisors, and direct future questions to the named trained contact for accurate handling. A charge or election objection may follow, with remedies dependent on the record and applicable standards. Closeness of the vote does not alone make every questioned choice, require an automatic rerun. The useful lesson is transparent correction and training, supported by an accurate legal assessment.
3 DIFFERENT ENDING / PAYMENT PROCESSES
Removing Representation Differs From Removing Security Authority
Decertification allows employees to end representation, through a properly supported petition and election subject to bars. Ordinarily, at least thirty percent support begins the inquiry, rather than immediately removing the union. The union is decertified, unless a majority of valid votes cast favors its continuing representation. The process belongs to employees; management must not initiate or unlawfully assist their petition effort. Do not procure signatures, solicit filing, or provide organizing resources that taint the process. Neutral responses have factual limits; refer procedural questions to the NLRB and obtain counsel’s guidance. Deauthorization removes union-security authority, while leaving the union as the unit’s exclusive representative. The petition requires thirty percent support, but rescission needs a majority of eligible unit employees. That threshold differs materially, from a majority of the people who actually cast valid ballots. Withdrawal of recognition is employer action, requiring legally sufficient actual loss of majority outside protected periods. A petition alone does not prove legality; unsupported withdrawal can violate the bargaining obligation.
STABILITY BARS
Calculate the Applicable Period Before Assessing a Petition
The certification bar generally protects a newly certified union, for one year following certification. Exceptions and remedial extensions can matter, so a calendar anniversary is not always the whole analysis. A qualifying contract generally bars representation petitions, for up to three years of its term. The ordinary open period runs, from ninety to sixty days before agreement expiration. For healthcare, the window runs, from one hundred twenty to ninety days before expiration. A longer agreement does not create, an unlimited contract bar for its entire stated duration. The election bar generally prevents another unit election, within twelve months of a valid election. Voluntary recognition and other protected relationships can create reasonable bargaining periods, under the applicable doctrine. Check current recognition rules and procedural conditions, without combining historical requirements into one rule. Validity, sector, agreement dates, and representation history determine, which inquiry actually governs this case. Petition timing and employer withdrawal are separate; permission for one does not authorize the other.
8 PRACTICE ACTIONS
Distinguish Established Administration From Campaign Interference
Asking the team about union approaches raises coercion questions, with authority and context affecting the assessment. Photographing employee leafleting raises surveillance questions, despite the parking lot being visible to management. Paying the increase agreed and announced before the campaign ordinarily maintains, an established lawful commitment. A written statement without threat, force, or promised benefit can fall, within statutory protection of views. Threatening site closure if employees select representation is unlawful, as the exercise describes it. Delaying an established benefit because of the election can also interfere, despite giving employees nothing new. Dismissal for a rule breach depends on actual motive, evidence, and how comparable cases were treated. Previous dismissals are relevant, without automatically proving the organizing employee’s decision was untainted. An employer’s offer to help employees file a decertification petition is unlawful assistance, as described. That assistance can taint the petition, rather than accelerate a legally available employee process. Management acts can affect charges and objections; assess the record, without inventing a guaranteed remedy.
REVERSE PROBLEM AND 8 DEFINITIONS
Trace the Given Rerun to Specific Conduct
The reverse problem stipulates that an election was set aside, and a rerun was directed. During the two weeks before voting, directors solicited concerns and said management would look at them. The campaign context raises implied-remedy and inducement questions, rather than ordinary established grievance administration alone. A long-scheduled shift allowance review was postponed, because management wanted to wait until after the election. That campaign-driven withholding uses control over terms, and can interfere even though nothing new was granted. Two supervisors asked individual voting intentions, requiring contextual coercion and election-effect assessment. A rerun is this problem’s outcome, while other records and controlling law can produce different remedies. Define authorization card, interest showing, voluntary recognition, and card check; interest support does not prove victory. Define certification and contract bars, by their stability functions and the actual applicable periods. Finally, distinguish decertification from deauthorization, by what each removes and whose votes are required. Next, detailed conduct rules connect lawful expression and access, with employee protection without a union.
About Human Resources Management at UPI Study
Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses
Why take it here
Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About How Unions Get Started and How They Can Be Dissolved
What is a union authorization card?
How does a union representation election work?
What is the difference between union decertification and deauthorization?
When can employees file a petition to remove a union?
About the Human Resources Management course
How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Human Resources Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →