UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 6.5 Free with a free account
Management by Objectives: Goal Setting and Tracking
Human Resources Management · Chapter 6: Reviewing Employee Performance: Methods, Tools, and FeedbackSection 6.5 · lesson 40 of 9116 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Human Resources Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Human Resources Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Employee Dissatisfaction: Causes and Responses →← Forced Choice, Forced Distribution, and 360-Degree FeedbackNext lesson: Employee Dissatisfaction: Causes and Responses →
In this lesson
Agree the outcome, review the conditions, and test what the target rewards.
- Describe the MBO cycle and useful review decisions
- Explain specificity, difficulty, participation, commitment, and feedback
- Write objectives with 6 components and suitable constraints
- Diagnose deficient goals, gaming, and poor role fit
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (2,008 words). Read along, or search it.
Chapter 6
Management by Objectives
Management by objectives, or MBO, establishes assessment terms before the work begins in the agreed review period. Manager and employee discuss objectives and review progress. Assess achievement against those terms and recorded conditions. It aligns with Theory Y's emphasis on commitment and self-direction. The employee needs to understand the goal and believe it matters. The cycle includes decisions during the period, rather than meetings that simply report whether the count improved. Changed resources or priorities can require an adjusted target, a replacement objective, or confirmation after discussion. Goals need specificity, appropriate difficulty, commitment, and feedback supporting action. Participation can help understanding and information exchange; an assigned goal can also work when explained and accepted. Six components make objectives assessable: outcome, measure, target, baseline, timeframe, and owner. Test incentives before adoption, because improving a count can undermine the outcome it should represent for the organization. Sanjay's fictional account objectives illustrate achieved activity targets alongside falling customer retention.
The MBO Cycle
Assessment Terms Are Established Before the Work
MBO starts with discussing objectives and how achievement will be assessed. Record measures, targets, starting points, timing, and accountable ownership before the work begins. The employee should understand purpose and a practical route, rather than receive a list whose meaning remains unexplained. An early review asks whether the objective remains appropriate after new information. Confirm, adjust, or replace an objective that no longer serves its intended purpose in the current conditions. A middle review examines progress and barriers. Agree resources or support where needed to enable the work. A later review considers realistic completion, addressing surprises before final assessment rather than storing them until year end. Assess against agreed objectives and conditions recorded along the way. Discuss changes when their relevance becomes known, recording the reasons and actual agreement. Do not rewrite targets retrospectively to manufacture success or failure, concealing the original agreement from later scrutiny. Review points keep objectives responsive, rather than preserve commitments made under conditions that no longer exist.
Reviews and Cascading
Ask Whether the Lower Goal Actually Moves the Higher One
First compare the actual measure with its starting point and target. Ask what blocks progress, and which barriers the employee controls, before simply demanding a better number. Check whether the objective still matters, given changes in priorities or conditions affecting the intended outcome. Record the decision: resources, revised target, replacement, or confirmation that the existing objective still stands. Record conditions promptly, including equipment unavailable for three weeks in May. Capture its relevance then, rather than reconstructing conditions later. Cascading derives unit objectives from organizational goals, then individual objectives from the unit. The risk is a nominal connection that does not actually move the higher-level outcome, despite a coherent-looking plan. On-time delivery becomes fewer dispatch delays, then a loading log completed within ten minutes after departure. The log can be timely while delivery remains late; meeting the activity does not establish the original outcome. Stop where the connection fails, using relevant behavior and unit context instead of inventing an individual contribution link. Reaching everyone with a target is not itself evidence of alignment or meaningful contribution.
Goal-Setting Principles
Specific and Challenging Needs Ability, Commitment, and Feedback
Locke and Latham's research supports specific, challenging goals under suitable conditions. Specificity defines success, rather than leaving do your best open to different interpretations of acceptable performance. Difficulty can increase effort when ability, strategies, resources, and commitment support the route to achievement. Harder targets do not improve results without limit in every circumstance. Participation supports information exchange and understanding; involvement alone does not guarantee stronger performance from every employee. An assigned goal can work when its rationale is explained and accepted. Commitment depends on importance and a plausible route, both of which can change during the period. Feedback makes progress visible, helping the person adjust effort or method. Novel work may need a learning goal, defining discovery or mastery before demanding output from unlearned methods. Check task and person, rather than apply the same goal prescription to every performance problem. Direction matters too, because effort on the wrong indicator can displace valuable work. Check whether achieving the goal still serves the intended purpose.
6 Objective Components
State the Outcome and How It Will Be Assessed
The outcome states what should be different, separating the result from an activity merely listed on a checklist. The measure explains how that difference will be observed and recorded. Define the evidence, so the same reported value does not mean different things to manager and employee. The target states the agreed level, rather than merely request improvement. The baseline records the present position, helping interpret change and the effort needed to reach the target. The timeframe states when achievement is due, including useful interim milestones. The owner identifies accountability for the agreed objective. Clarify dependencies where several people contribute or provide required support. Shared work remains shared, even when one person owns the objective. Specify all six components, checking feasibility and whether measurement covers the contribution actually required for the job. An objective can be measurable yet deficient, counting activity while omitting the action that makes it useful. Clarity supports assessment, alongside judgment about relevance, control, resources, quality, and incentives.
Correcting Objectives: 1–3
Add Scope, Quality, and the Starting Point
Improve satisfaction lacks a measure, target, starting point, and deadline. The North-depot example proposes a three-point survey improvement by December thirty-first, owned by the depot manager. Establish the actual baseline before adopting that proposed improvement target. Use observed starting evidence, rather than assume a value that has not been established by the data. The cost example specifies packing agency spend reduced fifteen percent against the prior year, giving scope and a comparison. Constrain overtime and defects, preventing savings gained by shifting cost or damage elsewhere in the operation. The packing supervisor owns the proposed cost objective. The assessment deadline must also be explicit before adoption. The calls example targets first-contact resolution at seventy percent by quarter end, instead of unqualified hourly volume. The team leader records the current rate; seven-day repeat contacts must not increase as a quality constraint. The revisions make the intended outcome and unwanted routes more explicit, at the cost of longer specifications. Check every remaining component, rather than assume a corrected sentence automatically contains a complete and feasible objective.
Correcting Objectives: 4–6
Replace Labels and Final-Only Outcomes With Work and Milestones
Be a better team player remains a trait label, rather than an instruction. Require the employee to complete each shift handover before leaving, and raise unresolved items at the weekly meeting. Record current practice, identifying whether the objective requires change or maintenance of an already acceptable standard. Migration needs ownership and milestones, so slippage can be identified before the final deadline. The example completes two remaining depots by September thirtieth, with the first stable for four weeks by July thirty-first. The operations systems lead owns the migration objective. Record current status, and define the evidence establishing stable operation. Zero defects can seem impossible, or encourage underrecording instead of preventing the defects that actually occur. The example halves the current level by year end, eliminating the two largest categories with the line supervisor accountable. Record the actual baseline, and test whether that reduction has a plausible route to achievement. Each revision supplies observable work, while scope and measurement still require a shared interpretation before adoption. Check that constraints preserve purpose, rather than create another number that can be pursued through unwanted means.
Achievement and Stretch
Agree Weight, Partial Credit, and Treatment of Conditions
Agree partial credit before outcomes are known, alongside objective importance and weight. Eighty percent of a target need not mean eighty percent of an appraisal score, unless that relationship was established. Make weighting clear before assessment, rather than negotiate significance after results reveal each participant's interests. Explain how conditions enter judgment, including withdrawn promised resources and barriers outside the employee's control. Context can materially change the interpretation of a missed target. It does not excuse every shortfall; evidence must distinguish the barrier from the individual's own contribution. A stretch goal asks for a different approach, beyond the capability or method currently available. Check whether a plausible route and suitable support actually exist. Ability limits or lost commitment can weaken effects, rather than harder goals indefinitely increasing effort and performance. Pay tied to an implausible target can encourage cautious negotiation or shortcuts, instead of useful exploration. Novel work may need learning goals before demanding output from methods that have not yet been mastered.
Predictable Distortions
Test the Route to a Good Score Before Setting the Goal
MBO inherits attribution and deficiency problems from results criteria. Counted activities can displace mentoring, prevented problems, and help to others, when these contributions earn no objective credit. Goal displacement makes the indicator the purpose, improving the number while the underlying outcome weakens. Rigid targets ignore changing conditions, while individual goals may misrepresent jointly produced outcomes in interdependent work. Gaming deliberately pursues the measure without producing its intended outcome. The number can improve while customers receive worse service. Routes include deferred costs, easy-case selection, altered recording, and transferring unresolved problems to another team outside the measure. Ask about these routes before adoption, instead of only discovering them after the target has rewarded unwanted behavior. Pair targets with constraints, quality evidence, and suitable verification. If the route cannot be adequately addressed, reconsider the measure or use a relevant behavioral criterion instead. Correct poor incentives, while responding appropriately to actual misconduct through the applicable process. Design analysis does not make dishonesty or unsafe methods acceptable merely because a goal was badly constructed.
OKRs and Role Fit
Shorter Cycles Do Not Remove Measurement Problems
Objectives and key results, or OKRs, pair a qualitative objective with measurable indicators of achievement. Common designs use shorter, often quarterly cycles and visible objectives. Explain how aspirational tracking differs from individual performance evaluation, according to the organization's actual design. Avoid automatically making every ambitious target a pay penalty, which can encourage cautious targets or gaming. Explain actual compensation rules, rather than assume universal separation whenever a company uses the term OKR. MBO fits individually attributable, measurable, reasonably stable outcomes. Shared, responsive, long-horizon, or easily distorted work may need behavioral criteria and unit context alongside appropriate objectives. Sales and project roles can fit, but their titles alone do not establish clean attribution for every job. Review the actual work and risks, rather than apply a method simply by occupational label. A new acronym does not remove missing contribution, outside influence, or a route that defeats the target's purpose. Use objectives where they meaningfully show progress, retaining other evidence where the outcome alone is incomplete.
Composite Case
Sanjay Met the Activities While Retention Fell
Sanjay is a retention specialist at fictional Calder Instruments. His goals cover quarterly contacts, logging within one working day, renewal paperwork, and meetings with major accounts. He holds two meetings with each of his ten largest accounts, meeting all four objectives and earning the top rating. Renewals fall, despite the clean activity counts used to assess his work. Three departed accounts had first-quarter product issues logged, but never escalated to anyone able to act on them. The objectives omitted driving serious issues toward resolution, while a renewal target alone would include product, price, and competitors. The accepted redesign adds two behavioral objectives for escalation and resolution, plus one contextualized renewal outcome. Remove the contact-frequency objective, which had become the measure rather than the purpose. Keep this year's agreed-objective rating in the case, instead of replacing targets retrospectively after they were met. That case decision does not make every rating immune from correction in every possible circumstance. Complete the new measures, baselines, targets, dates, and ownership, rather than simply rename activities and reproduce the deficiency.
Reverse Problem
Repair Quality Must Constrain the Volume Objective
The reverse problem gives technicians at least six jobs per day. Within six months, volume rises, revenue per job falls, repeat visits increase, and two long-standing commercial customers leave. The objective is deficient, omitting repair quality and customer value. Goal displacement appears too, as the count displaces the purpose of properly resolving repairs instead of merely closing jobs. Propose three focuses: resolved work, repair quality, and customer outcome, with constraints rather than more unqualified counts. Technicians can be accountable for verified repairs and relevant quality behaviors. A manager reviews customer and revenue outcomes with context, rather than attribute every departure or price change to technicians. These are templates, because actual baselines and feasible new targets are not supplied for every proposed measure. Establish starting points, agree targets and dates, and record accountable ownership before adoption. Check all six components, including resolution verification and how outside conditions enter the assessment of achievement. The next section examines perceived fairness, because employees can question both results and the processes that produce them.
About Human Resources Management at UPI Study
Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses
Why take it here
Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Management by Objectives: Goal Setting and Tracking
What is management by objectives (MBO)?
What are the components of a well-written performance objective?
What does goal-setting theory say about effective goals?
What is goal displacement in management by objectives?
About the Human Resources Management course
How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Human Resources Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →