Types of Pay and Common Pay Structures, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 7.2 Free with a free account

Types of Pay and Common Pay Structures

Human Resources Management · Chapter 7: Paying Employees: Salaries, Benefits, Bonuses, and Incentive ProgramsSection 7.2 · lesson 43 of 9116 min · free with a free account

← The Basics of How Employees Get PaidNext lesson: What Pay Equity Means and Why It Is Important →

Earn 3 college credits for Human Resources ManagementRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 306 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Human Resources Management · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Build grades and ranges, then administer decisions without losing the comparison.

  • Distinguish 5 pay bases and overtime classification
  • Build a structure from evaluated jobs and market matches
  • Calculate range spread and compa-ratio
  • Diagnose compression, inversion, and rates outside the range

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,927 words). Read along, or search it.

Paying Employees: Salaries, Benefits, Bonuses, and Incentive Programs

Pay Types and Structures

A pay structure organizes grades and ranges, helping decisions follow a consistent basis. It connects internal job evaluation with market anchors, rather than rely entirely on either. Five pay bases are hourly wages, salary, piece rates, commission, and fees for assignments. The basis does not itself determine employee status, overtime exemption, or applicable wage obligations. For covered, nonexempt employees, hours matter even when output determines the earnings received. Each grade has a minimum, midpoint, and maximum; spread describes width relative to minimum. Compa-ratio divides pay by midpoint, locating placement in the structure. The ratio does not automatically decide whether that placement is fair. Overlap and broad bands support flexibility, with clear decisions and controls needed for consistency. Administer offers, increases, boundaries, and out-of-range rates, considering the consequences for comparable employees. Maintain the structure separately from individual pay, monitoring compression as offers outpace incumbent progression. Marcus's fictional hire illustrates negotiated terms and incumbent adjustments, with remaining differences still needing explanation.

5 Pay Bases

Choose the Basis and Check Its Conditions

Hourly wages pay for time worked, fitting variable hours and the need for schedule coverage. Extra worked hours add earnings, while paid leave may also supply pay under applicable arrangements. Salary is a predetermined period amount, often fitting work defined by responsibility and outcomes. Salary does not automatically remove overtime, or allow deductions regardless of the applicable rules. Piece rates pay for units, fitting attributable output that can be counted and quality checked. Commission ties pay to sales value or margin, according to the actual sales plan. Counts and sales totals alone do not guarantee value, so quality and contribution still matter. Fees pay for defined assignments, in arrangements that may involve contractors or employee pay. A fee label does not establish contractor status; the actual relationship and legal test matter. Covered, nonexempt employees require minimum-wage and overtime compliance, even when earnings depend on output. Record required hours and wages, rather than assume piece or commission pay makes time irrelevant.

Exempt and Nonexempt

Actual Duties and the Applicable Tests Govern Classification

Covered, nonexempt employees generally receive overtime after forty hours worked in a workweek. Apply FLSA requirements alongside any additional state rules. The rate is at least one and one-half the regular rate, including applicable variable payments. Apply the particular exemption's actual tests, rather than decide from a manager or analyst title. Many white-collar tests involve duties, salary basis, and salary level, with exceptions and different categories. Check current requirements and state rules, rather than apply one test everywhere without considering coverage. Nonexempt employees can receive salaries, with overtime and required hours records still applying to them. Some exempt arrangements allow additional pay, subject to their salary-basis and other applicable rules. Forecast overtime as a real cost, connecting scheduling decisions to coverage and their payroll consequences. Workload still affects health, retention, quality, and costs, even where extra hours add no overtime premium. Misclassification can create unpaid-wage liability and other remedies, accumulating across employees and affected workweeks. Classification and payment method are related, but titles and salary alone do not settle exemption.

Building the Structure

Reconcile Internal Ordering With External Anchors

Job evaluation provides an internal ordering, based on the demands and contribution of the jobs. Market data supplies external anchors, where genuinely comparable work matches reliable wage information. Benchmark jobs have useful market matches, rather than merely titles appearing in a salary survey. Relate market rates to evaluated points, establishing the intended relationship between internal value and pay. Fitting a line needs judgment about data quality, role matches, and the policy's purpose. Place other evaluated jobs against that relationship, where direct market matches are unavailable. Group broadly similar jobs into grades, attaching ranges for consistent and manageable individual placement. Grading simplifies a continuum, trading some precision for administration and movement between comparable jobs. Internal ordering alone can miss competitiveness; market rates alone may leave unexplained internal relationships. Those problems are not inevitable, but using both sources supports a more deliberate structure. Review actual duties and exceptions, rather than assume plotting perfectly prices every job without judgment.

Range Anatomy

Minimum, Midpoint, Maximum, and Spread

The constructed example has three grades, each with a minimum, midpoint, maximum, and rounded spread. Grade one spans thirty-eight to fifty thousand dollars, with a forty-four-thousand-dollar midpoint. Grade two spans forty-eight to sixty-eight thousand dollars, with a fifty-eight-thousand-dollar midpoint. Grade three spans sixty-two to ninety-four thousand dollars, with a seventy-eight-thousand-dollar midpoint. Minimum is the lower boundary, often associated with entry into work or developing proficiency. Midpoint is the full-competence policy anchor, reflecting market positioning rather than every employee's entitlement. Maximum is the upper policy boundary, with exceptions needing an appropriate basis and approval. Spread divides maximum by minimum, subtracts one, and expresses the result as a percentage. Rounded spreads are thirty-two, forty-two, and fifty-two percent, widening across these illustrative grades. Wider spreads may allow more variation in contribution and development, according to the actual design. The pattern is not universal, and reaching maximum does not itself mean contribution stops growing.

Compa-Ratio

The Ratio Locates Pay Relative to the Midpoint

Compa-ratio divides employee pay by the midpoint, expressing placement relative to that policy anchor. Dev earns fifty-two thousand two hundred dollars, against grade two's fifty-eight-thousand-dollar midpoint. The division gives zero point nine zero, locating Dev below the illustrated midpoint. Wren earns eighty-five thousand eight hundred dollars, against grade three's seventy-eight-thousand-dollar midpoint. The ratio is one point one zero, locating Wren above midpoint within the range. One point zero zero means midpoint pay, rather than a universal market or fairness verdict. Below midpoint can reflect entry, developing proficiency, or drift, each requiring a different response. Above midpoint can reflect contribution, experience, an exception, or a structure requiring review. Compare departmental or group averages, accounting for job mix, contribution, and the underlying policy. Averages reveal possible drift or patterns, without alone proving merit, unfairness, or managerial error. Use ratios alongside evidence, rather than mechanically reward or correct everyone on either side of midpoint.

Overlap and Broadbanding

Flexibility Requires an Explained Basis and Controls

Overlap means adjacent ranges share pay levels, rather than begin strictly above the previous maximum. Grade one's fifty-thousand-dollar maximum exceeds grade two's forty-eight-thousand-dollar minimum by two thousand dollars. This can support higher pay for relevant lower-grade experience than for a newcomer in higher-graded work. It does not prove experience always means greater contribution, or justify every resulting difference. Current pay may already fit a promoted employee's new range, requiring a policy-based increase decision. Check duties, market conditions, and placement, rather than give every promotion the same increase. Broadbanding replaces many narrow grades with fewer wide bands, permitting more discretion and lateral flexibility. It can reduce reclassification barriers, while weakening guidance over substantial differences in individual pay. Standards, evidence, approval controls, and equity monitoring help manage inconsistency and upward cost drift. Review materially changed duties; capability alone does not establish a different grade or assignment. Flexibility needs management capability and actual purpose, rather than replace controls with unexplained discretion.

Recurring Administration

Record the Reason for Placement, Increase, or Exception

New-hire placement considers readiness, relevant experience, market evidence, and comparable incumbents, rather than assuming inexperience. Before the offer, check whether it creates compression or inversion that needs an explained response. Increase pools can combine contribution and position in range, using understandable and consistently applied criteria. Equal percentage increases are simple, but do not differentiate performance or automatically repair existing gaps. At maximum, consider a lump sum, suitable promotion, or an honest explanation of policy limits. Being at maximum is not itself red-circling, which means pay above that upper boundary. Green-circled pay is below minimum, often after restructuring or reevaluation; document an appropriate correction schedule. That schedule does not authorize postponing a wage obligation that applies immediately under law or agreement. Red-circled pay exceeds maximum, sometimes handled through a base freeze and future lump sums. Check contracts, equity, wage law, and bargaining duties, rather than assume conventional responses always comply. Record reasons and approvals, preventing quiet exceptions from dismantling the structure's intended consistency over time.

Maintenance and Compression

Changing the Range Is Different From Changing Someone’s Pay

Structure maintenance changes ranges or midpoints, after reviewing market anchors and the compensation philosophy. Individual increases change actual pay, separately from structure adjustments even during the same review period. Moving a midpoint does not itself pay employees, or resolve every resulting placement question. An employee increase does not automatically repair a structure's anchor that has fallen behind market conditions. Compression narrows pay gaps beyond justified contribution differences; inversion places newer or junior employees above incumbents. Market offers can outpace incumbent increases, producing comparisons without a deliberate plan for those differences. Higher newcomer pay is not automatically unfair; check capability, contribution, and the relevant placement policy. Targeted incumbent adjustments can repair unjustified gaps in actual pay. Maintained ranges and controlled offers help prevent recurrence. Off-cycle increases need explicit eligibility, so repairing the worst cases does not appear arbitrary. Monitor offers, progression, compa-ratios, and market data, before departures force an expensive correction. Explain costs and remaining differences, because silence neither changes arithmetic nor supplies a defensible reason.

Person-Based Alternatives

Pay for Verified Skills or Broader Capabilities

Skill-based pay rewards verified skills and their depth, rather than only the job currently occupied. Additional demonstrated capability earns increases, where flexibility has practical value for the organization's work. Production cells benefit from employees covering several stations, reducing dependence on one person per task. Verify real capability, rather than reward attendance at a course or an untested skill claim. Verification takes resources; acquired skills can create payroll cost before the organization needs them. Competency-based pay rewards broader professional or behavioral capabilities, beyond discrete skills such as machine operation. Broader definitions can be harder to assess consistently, requiring clear evidence and standards for pay decisions. Explain qualifying capabilities, how they are demonstrated, and whether development opportunities are reasonably accessible. Review actual need, rather than pay for an expanding inventory unconnected to useful work. Neither approach removes wage obligations or equity questions, simply because capability replaces grade as the basis. Both require credible assessment and attention to the arrangement's continuing cost for the employer.

Composite Case

Marcus Must Price the Hire and the Incumbent Consequences

Marcus manages a fictional grade-two quality team, whose longest-serving incumbent earns fifty-six thousand dollars. The candidate initially requests sixty-two thousand dollars, six thousand higher and above the midpoint. The midpoint is fifty-eight thousand dollars, so the proposed hire ratio is about one point zero seven. The incumbent ratio is about zero point nine seven, requiring examination of the proposed inversion. The accepted package negotiates the hire to sixty thousand five hundred dollars, revising the initial request. Experienced analysts move to sixty thousand and fifty-eight thousand five hundred dollars, in the same pay period. Another vacancy is held for one quarter to fund adjustments, accepting a staffing cost elsewhere. The hire still earns more than both adjusted analysts, so inverted comparisons are not completely eliminated. Explain selection and remaining differences with evidence, rather than assume adjustments alone establish fairness or compliance. Covered employees' protected wage discussions cannot simply be banned, with or without union representation. The hire package costs more than the candidate's pay alone. Exact adjustment cost requires the incumbents' original rates.

Reverse Problem

An Unexplained $9,000 Gap Needs a Structure and Decision Review

Two analysts share a team, grade, and similar performance, with pay nine thousand dollars apart. The higher-paid analyst joined eighteen months ago; the other has six years of service. No recorded performance reason explains the gap, and the manager cannot supply a clear basis. Market-based hiring may have outpaced incumbent progression, producing possible compression or inversion within the role. Examine offers and subsequent increases, rather than conclude tenure alone determines who deserves higher pay. Review offer placement and incumbent increases, alongside maintenance of the structure's actual market anchor. Monitor compa-ratios, hiring rates, tenure, contribution, and groups, catching unexplained drift before years accumulate. A ratio prompts inquiry, rather than prove an individual difference is justified or unlawful. Document reasons, compare genuinely similar work, and select remedies where differences lack a defensible basis. Structures provide boundaries, but decisions still need evidence, context, and an explained allocation rule. The next section examines pay equity, asking whether differences within those boundaries can be defended.

About Human Resources Management at UPI Study

Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses

Why take it here

Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study

How organizations hire, pay and keep peopleHuman Resources Management covers the work of an HR department: job design, recruiting and onboarding, training and discipline, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, U.S. employment law, unions and collective bargaining, and staffing across countries. It is a core course in business, management and human resources degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Types of Pay and Common Pay Structures

What is a compa-ratio and how is it calculated?
A compa-ratio divides an employee's pay by the midpoint of their pay range, showing placement relative to that policy anchor. For example, $52,200 against a $58,000 midpoint gives 0.90, and $85,800 against a $78,000 midpoint gives 1.10. A ratio of 1.00 means midpoint pay. Below midpoint can reflect entry or developing proficiency, and above can reflect contribution or experience, so a ratio prompts inquiry rather than proving fairness.
How do you calculate range spread in a pay grade?
Range spread divides the range maximum by the minimum, subtracts one, and expresses the result as a percentage. For a grade running from $48,000 to $68,000, 68,000 divided by 48,000 is about 1.42, so the spread is about 42 percent. The minimum is typically the entry point, the midpoint is the full-competence policy anchor, and the maximum is the upper policy boundary. Wider spreads allow more room for growth in a role.
What are red-circle and green-circle pay rates?
A red-circle rate is pay above the range maximum, and a green-circle rate is pay below the range minimum. Red-circling often follows a job reevaluation or demotion and may be handled with a base-pay freeze plus future lump sums. Green-circled pay needs a documented schedule for moving into the range, though that schedule cannot postpone any wage obligation that applies immediately. An employee paid exactly at the maximum is not red-circled.
What is the difference between pay compression and pay inversion?
Pay compression occurs when pay gaps narrow beyond what differences in contribution justify, while pay inversion occurs when newer or more junior employees earn more than experienced incumbents. Both usually arise when market-driven starting offers outpace incumbents' raises. Higher pay for a newcomer is not automatically unfair, but unexplained gaps need review. Remedies include targeted incumbent adjustments, maintained ranges, controlled offers, and regular monitoring of compa-ratios and hiring rates.

About the Human Resources Management course

How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
Human Resources Management (Business 306) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 91 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. It is sold on its own and is not part of UPI Study PRO.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Human Resources Management take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 91 lessons total about 23 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.

91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Human Resources Management →Download the syllabus
Human Resources Management
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →