UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 7.1 Free with a free account
The Basics of How Employees Get Paid
Human Resources Management · Chapter 7: Paying Employees: Salaries, Benefits, Bonuses, and Incentive ProgramsSection 7.1 · lesson 42 of 9117 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Human Resources Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Human Resources Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Types of Pay and Common Pay Structures →← Employee Dissatisfaction: Causes and ResponsesNext lesson: Types of Pay and Common Pay Structures →
In this lesson
Understand the package, compare the market, and make equity trade-offs explicit.
- Distinguish direct, indirect, and non-financial compensation
- Explain 6 factors influencing individual pay
- Balance internal equity, external competitiveness, and individual equity
- Read market distributions and record a compensation philosophy
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (2,010 words). Read along, or search it.
Paying Employees: Salaries, Benefits, Bonuses, and Incentive Programs
The Basics of Employee Pay
Compensation includes returns from employment, rather than only the wage or salary an employee quotes. Direct financial compensation includes base pay and variable payments under a plan. Indirect compensation includes benefits; non-financial rewards arise from work and its setting. Employer cost and employee value can differ considerably. Total-rewards statements must explain usable benefits honestly. Six factors influence pay: job value, market rates, performance and skill, tenure, location, and organizational capacity. Ability to pay is a financial constraint; willingness concerns the choices made within that capacity. Three objectives are internal equity, external competitiveness, and individual equity among people doing comparable work. These can conflict, requiring explicit choices based on relevant evidence and an explanation of their consequences. Record market positioning, the variable share, and transparency in a philosophy that individual decisions can follow. Read survey distributions, checking duties, dates, and the relevant recruitment market. Rosa's fictional electrician raise shows why market responses also need attention to incumbents and neighboring roles.
Direct Financial Compensation
Base Pay and Variable Pay Make Different Commitments
Base pay is the ongoing rate for holding and performing the job, through wages or salary. A base increase changes future payroll, rather than provide one period-specific payment. Future percentage increases build on that rate, and earnings-linked benefits can rise. Not every increase or benefit uses the same formula, so check the actual arrangements involved. Variable pay depends on the plan, including commission, bonuses, incentives, and a share of profits. It generally must be earned under applicable conditions, rather than automatically increase the base rate. Variable arrangements can provide cost flexibility for the employer. They transfer some earnings uncertainty to the employee. A period's payment does not automatically commit the same payment for the next period. Earned pay, contractual promises, wage law, and bargaining obligations still constrain changes to the arrangement. Bonuses can affect overtime calculations; a discretionary label does not itself establish the payment's legal treatment. Compare instruments and obligations, rather than assume variable pay is always cheaper or freely withdrawable.
Indirect and Non-Financial Compensation
Employer Cost and Employee Value Can Differ
Indirect compensation includes health coverage, employer retirement contributions, paid leave, insurance, and services supplied through employment. It carries real cost, even when employees do not recognize or use every available benefit. Bureau of Labor Statistics compensation-cost data separates wages and salaries from substantial spending on benefits. The mix varies; one package cannot establish universal proportions for every employer. Cost and perceived value can diverge, where access, eligibility, understanding, or personal needs limit usefulness. Explain coverage and contributions, rather than merely quote what the employer spends on the package. Non-financial compensation includes work content, job scope, development, recognition, schedule control, and the quality of supervision. People value these features differently according to their circumstances. Their presence does not guarantee a positive experience. Interesting assignments and supportive management can matter in offer comparisons, alongside the actual financial terms. Cash values are not always credible, making a single total potentially misleading. Compensation is broader than base pay, but cash needs and usable rewards require separate attention.
Total Rewards
Explain the Package Without Evading a Pay Concern
Total rewards presents pay, benefits, and non-financial rewards, often through an annual statement. It explains contributions and terms that might otherwise be missing from an employee's offer comparison. An unknown retirement contribution cannot enter an employee's comparison of competing offers. A manager can discuss actual benefits when the base-pay budget has limited room to move. Employer expense is not identical to employee value, or to the cash actually taken home. Explain eligibility, coverage, access, and restrictions, supporting useful comparisons rather than merely advertising a headline total. Interesting work does not pay household bills, and culture does not remove wage obligations or financial concerns. Employees may value flexibility highly, without it replacing every need for adequate and credible base pay. Address the actual complaint, rather than change the subject to development or recognition alone. Explain genuine constraints, preserving distinctions between financial security and other returns that the employee values. Credible statements clarify compensation and support an informed comparison. Inflated claims can undermine trust in the explanation.
6 Pay Factors
Job, Person, Situation, and Organizational Choices
Internal job value reflects contribution, skill demand, responsibility, and conditions, using job evaluation from chapter three. External rates concern competing offers for comparable work, within the relevant labor market for the role. These inform ranges, while policy determines how individual placement and exceptions are actually handled. Performance and demonstrated skill can affect placement, depending on the organization's recorded reward rules. Tenure may reflect relevant experience or continuity, but time served does not always establish greater skill. Rapid market movement can create difficult comparisons between established employees and colleagues joining at new rates. Location matters, including whether remote-work pay follows the work location or the worker's location. Different approaches require clear policies, relevant recruitment markets, and attention to the applicable obligations involved. Ability to pay concerns revenue, margins, and financial capacity. Distinguish it from a preference for lower payroll. Willingness concerns allocation within that capacity, which should not be disguised as unavoidable financial constraint. Disputes can involve different weights on these factors, making evidence and explained policy useful for resolution.
3 Compensation Objectives
Each Objective Needs a Different Body of Evidence
Internal equity aligns differences between jobs with their contribution and demands inside the organization. Job evaluation supplies that ordering, rather than simply borrow the external ranking of every occupation. External competitiveness concerns attracting and retaining required employees, against usable offers available in the relevant market. Surveys help, alongside hiring, departure, benefit, and other evidence about what employees can obtain elsewhere. Individual equity concerns differences within the same job, supported by reasons the organization can defend. Performance, skill, relevant experience, and consistent rules can support differences between employees' actual pay. Each objective needs different evidence, so one dataset cannot fully answer every equity question by itself. A scarce role's market raise can disturb internal alignment, even when evaluated demands remain unchanged. Performance-based increases need a visible basis, because unexplained differences can seem arbitrary or unfair. Objectives can align in some decisions and conflict in others. Examine the actual conditions and proposed design. Identify the real trade-off, rather than assume one objective necessarily defeats the others in every case.
Worked Trade-Off
A Scarce Job Can Move Ahead of Its Evaluated Peer
Maintenance and laboratory technicians share one grade, based on comparable evaluated demands of their work. Local maintenance skills become scarce, prompting competitors to raise their offers for that particular role. Laboratory hiring remains easier, so the pressure does not apply equally to both evaluated jobs. Raising maintenance rates alone responds to scarcity, creating a differential that laboratory technicians may question. Raising the whole grade preserves aligned rates, at greater cost including work already recruited without difficulty. Holding both rates controls current payroll, while accepting longer maintenance vacancies and their operational consequences. These are three illustrative responses, rather than every arrangement an employer could design for this problem. A role-specific market adjustment makes an exception explicit, while still requiring incumbent comparisons and explanation. Use matched market data, vacancy costs, affordability, and applicable obligations when evaluating the available alternatives. Internal alignment does not make vacancies costless, and a market raise does not remove fairness concerns. Record the rationale and review conditions, so an exception remains deliberate rather than an unexplained anomaly.
Compensation Philosophy
Record Positioning, Variable Risk, and Transparency
A compensation philosophy records how the organization intends to pay, making individual decisions testable against stated choices. Market positioning identifies whether the organization leads, matches, or lags relevant rates for comparable work. Leading offers higher pay, potentially improving attraction and retention where roles are scarce and critical. Leading the market costs more per employee. Pay above the midpoint does not guarantee the intended outcomes. Matching targets a typical rate, requiring clarity about the relevant market and components being compared. Lagging lowers direct payroll, while valued flexibility or benefits may support the usability of the whole offer. Test actual hiring and retention, rather than assume an advantage compensates every employee for lower cash pay. Positions can vary by role, when distinctions are deliberate, recorded, and appropriately explained to affected employees. The variable share identifies employee earnings risk and the cost flexibility sought by the organization. Transparency choices cover ranges, placement, and increase rules, alongside any applicable requirements for disclosure. Implicit pressured decisions create a pattern, often difficult to explain or apply consistently.
Reading Market Data
A Market Rate Is a Distribution, Not a Single Number
A salary survey describes defined jobs and markets, rather than reveal one timeless correct salary. The twenty-fifth percentile has about a quarter below it, showing the lower part of the reported spread. The median is the middle value, with half below and half above that point in the distribution. The seventy-fifth percentile has about three-quarters below, identifying a higher point within the reported spread. A chosen percentile expresses positioning; the distribution still shows variation in offers. Match actual duties and responsibility, because identical titles can describe different work across employers. Check the reference date, and whether updating is justified for the dataset and decision involved. Older figures do not automatically represent current conditions, particularly when the relevant market has moved sharply. Use the recruitment market, whether local commuting areas or broader national markets for the work. Bureau of Labor Statistics occupational wage estimates supply public data by occupation and geographic area. Check included components, rather than compare base salary with an outside measure containing different compensation.
Legal Framework
Pay Design Must Respect Coverage and Applicable Rules
Pay design operates within applicable laws, with coverage and facts determining which requirements govern a decision. The Fair Labor Standards Act establishes federal minimum-wage, overtime, and exemption rules, administered by the Labor Department. Salary payment alone does not establish an overtime exemption. Variable payments may affect the regular rate for overtime. The Equal Pay Act addresses sex-based differences for substantially equal work, judged through content rather than titles. Applicable defenses matter; the statute does not simply require identical pay for every evaluated peer. Title Seven reaches compensation discrimination on protected grounds, without the same substantially-equal-work requirement as the Pay Act. The National Labor Relations Act protects wage discussions and related collective activity for its covered employees. These protections apply with or without a union, making blanket wage-discussion bans a potential violation. State and local rules may add wage, salary-history, or disclosure requirements, according to the jurisdiction involved. Bargaining and contract obligations also matter, rather than assume managerial discretion alone authorizes a rate change. Later sections examine detail; check applicable rules before implementing compensation decisions.
Composite Case
Rosa’s Market Raise Also Changes Incumbent Comparisons
Rosa leads compensation at a fictional manufacturer, where two electrician posts remain vacant for five months. Production is delayed, supporting recruitment's proposal to raise the starting rate toward competing local offers. Electricians share a grade with maintenance planners, whose vacancies are easier for the employer to fill. Four incumbent electricians would fall below new hires, if only the starting rate were raised. Rosa recommends the market response, given the idle line's cost, with conditions addressing those resulting comparisons. Move incumbents above the new starting rate on the same date, rather than leave that inversion unexamined. Document a role-specific market adjustment, explaining that the evaluated grade itself has not changed. Tell planners what happened and why, because making the change quietly does not remove their comparisons. Review the exception annually, recognizing the trade-off between external competitiveness and the internal pay alignment. Check equitable treatment, wage obligations, contracts, and bargaining duties, including requirements affecting any later modification. Documentation makes exceptions reviewable; it does not automatically authorize withdrawal or establish compliance for every employee.
Pay Communicates Priorities
Compare the Whole Offer When Median Base Pay Is Not Enough
Pay communicates priorities, committing money to roles, contributions, and measured outcomes rather than only expressing intentions. Individual-output bonuses can contradict teamwork priorities, when helping colleagues earns no reward under the actual measure. Explain changes and incentives, rather than expect values statements to override the structure's payment rules. Pay helps attraction, retention, and direction of effort, without alone creating purpose or effective supervision. Adequate, fair pay addresses concerns, without guaranteeing engagement or making every other aspect of work acceptable. The reverse problem describes one job family's departures, despite median base pay and consistently administered increases. Three competitors attract experienced leavers without higher base salary, inviting examination of the whole offer. External competitiveness concerns the usable package, rather than only matching one cash figure to a survey midpoint. Examine benefits and non-financial conditions first, including coverage, retirement, leave, schedule control, development, and supervision. Confirm employees' reasons and circumstances, because this pattern does not prove a particular cause of departure. The next section turns these choices into grades and ranges, within which individual pay decisions are administered.
About Human Resources Management at UPI Study
Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses
Why take it here
Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About The Basics of How Employees Get Paid
What is the difference between direct and indirect compensation?
What factors determine how much an employee is paid?
What is the difference between internal equity, external competitiveness, and individual equity?
What does a lead, match, or lag pay strategy mean?
About the Human Resources Management course
How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Human Resources Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →