UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 10.11 Free with a free account
Public Sector Unions and Current Trends in Union Membership
Human Resources Management · Chapter 10: Working With Unions: Collective Bargaining and Labor RelationsSection 10.11 · lesson 81 of 9116 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Human Resources Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Human Resources Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Four Ways Global Companies Staff Their International Offices →← When Negotiations Fail: Strikes, Lockouts, and Other OutcomesNext lesson: Four Ways Global Companies Staff Their International Offices →
In this lesson
Identify the governing public framework, measure density correctly, and weigh competing explanations for change.
- Distinguish federal, state and private-sector frameworks.
- Explain membership trends without inventing figures.
- Evaluate five explanations and apply the Marlow case.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,868 words). Read along, or search it.
Working With Unions: Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations
Public Sector Unions and Current Trends in Union Membership
Public-sector labor relations require a different framework from the private-sector rules we have examined. First identify the employer, employee group, governing law, and applicable authority. Covered federal workers use a separate statute administered by the Federal Labor Relations Authority. State and local rules vary substantially, including rights limited to particular occupations. Scope may exclude subjects negotiated privately, and strike restrictions alter available pressure. But a strike ban does not automatically create binding arbitration or a universal procedural sequence. We will compare sovereignty and political arguments analytically, without choosing a political position. Union density also requires careful measurement, a dated source, and attention to annual variation. Five explanations for private decline each have supporting evidence and limitations. The Marlow County case shows why identifying authority precedes negotiation, especially for practitioners moving between sectors. Practice comparisons and the school-support reverse problem complete this chapter's framework and practical controls.
SEPARATE FRAMEWORKS
Identify the Employer, Employee Group and Governing Law
The NLRA employer definition excludes the federal government, states, and political subdivisions. Consequently, public employment cannot simply borrow that statute's bargaining rules or its Board procedures. Covered federal employees have limited rights under a separate labor-relations statute, administered by the FLRA. Agency and employee exclusions matter, and current orders and controlling decisions require review. Do not assume all federal employees, occupations, or agencies have identical coverage. State and local employees instead depend on their particular state's applicable framework. Some jurisdictions provide broad bargaining rights administered through a designated public labor body. Others extend rights only to specified occupations, such as police or firefighters. Some provide meet-and-confer rights, whose legal effects differ from a full bargaining regime. Other frameworks substantially prohibit bargaining, and changing law makes remembered state summaries unreliable. Identify the actual classification, employer, statute, subjects, and procedures before advising either party about its rights.
SCOPE, STRIKES AND IMPASSE
A Strike Ban Does Not Automatically Authorize Arbitration
Public bargaining scope is often narrower, though actual statutes determine which subjects are negotiable. Some reserve salary scales to legislatures or statutory bodies, while parties negotiate permitted conditions. Pensions, staffing, managerial authority, and public policy can also be excluded under particular frameworks. Public strikes are generally restricted or prohibited, with possible individual and organizational penalties. Substitute impasse procedures become important, but binding arbitration is not universally required. New York illustrates different routes even within one state, depending on the employee group. Educational units use mediation and fact-finding, then continue negotiating until agreement. Police, firefighters, and designated groups can proceed from mediation to authorized interest arbitration. Other units can use mediation and fact-finding, with possible legislative determination. These are examples of specified authority, not a nationwide order inferred from a strike ban. Interest arbitration sets new terms; grievance arbitration instead applies existing contractual rights under its authority.
2 COMPETING ARGUMENTS
Analyze Government’s Employer and Political Roles
The sovereignty objection treats employment terms as an exercise of delegated public authority. It argues bargaining shares that authority, while a government strike challenges sovereignty rather than ordinary commerce. Responses distinguish government acting as employer from government exercising sovereign powers. Legislatures can delegate bargaining while retaining appropriation authority, and workers still have employment interests. Present these arguments historically and analytically, without assuming one wins every jurisdiction's policy debate. The political issue concerns unions participating in selection of elected officials across the bargaining table. One reading treats this as ordinary democratic participation by citizens who also work for government. Another sees structural concerns when negotiators partly owe office to the organization negotiating with them. Private organizations also participate politically; the public distinction is direct selection of government employment representatives. Janus prohibits compulsory public nonmember fees without affirmative consent; voluntary authorizations present separate questions. Effects on finances and membership require evidence, rather than assuming the legal rule produces one automatic outcome.
DENSITY AND MEMBERSHIP
Use the Correct Denominator and a Dated Data Source
Union density is a membership proportion, but the denominator must match the measure. BLS uses wage-and-salary workers, excluding self-employed workers, rather than every person who works. Membership differs from representation: covered jobs can include workers who are not union members. Private density has declined over decades, while public density rose as bargaining rights spread. Public density remained much higher, changing the labor movement's balance across industries and occupations. Do not turn those long-run patterns into a claim that every annual observation declines. For twenty twenty-five, BLS reported public density increased, while private density was unchanged. That release also warns about comparability: annual estimates cover eleven months, excluding missing October survey data. Check definitions, period, sampling, and methodology before making a precise comparison or using state figures. The course's schematic depicts direction, without numerical values; it is not an empirical data source. Use the relevant BLS release rather than memory, and do not invent figures to complete a diagram.
5 EXPLANATIONS
Read Supporting and Limiting Evidence Together
Structural change shifts employment away from highly organized industries toward less organized sectors. It can contribute, but within-sector declines mean composition alone cannot explain the whole pattern. Employer opposition can impede organizing through resistance and delay, particularly where remedies have limited deterrence. Direct measurement is difficult, and opposition also existed when density was rising. Legal changes can affect security, access, units, and remedies, changing incentives and organizing conditions. States adopting particular laws differ beforehand, complicating claims that the law alone caused subsequent differences. Global competition increases trade pressure and capital mobility in industries formerly central to membership. Yet density also fell outside tradable sectors, and countries facing similar pressure had different outcomes. Worker-preference surveys can indicate changed demand, while other findings reveal substantial unmet desire for representation. Those results depend on periods, questions, measures, and methods; neither reading establishes a universal single cause. Evaluate each mechanism's supporting and limiting evidence, rather than treat a correlation as a complete explanation.
RECENT ORGANIZING AND PRACTICE
Petitions, Elections, Contracts and Density Are Different
Organizing in technology, media, higher education, retail, and food service has attracted attention. That activity can matter locally, without establishing a rise in national membership density. A petition initiates a process; it is not an election victory or a concluded first agreement. Even successful organizing does not guarantee an aggregate increase, because other membership and employment changes continue. Consult dated NLRB petition and election records, and the appropriate BLS release for membership. Recent increases need not persist, so do not repeat a rising-petitions claim as permanently current. At a represented workplace, the agreement remains important even if its wider industry has low density. Its actual obligations and statutory duties depend on that workplace's governing framework. Covered private employers also have concerted-activity duties without a union, as lesson ten point eight showed. Public employers must identify their own applicable protections, rather than automatically use private NLRA coverage. Aggregate density is a descriptive measure; it does not erase a particular agreement or employees' existing rights.
FICTIONAL MARLOW COUNTY
Confirm Statutory Authority Before Bargaining About Pay
Fictional Marlow County negotiates with a union representing administrative staff, which proposes salary scales. The HR director says the stipulated state statute assigns those scales to the legislature. The union negotiator views refusal through private-sector experience, where wages are a central mandatory subject. Both hold good-faith positions, but their belief cannot establish the county's legal authority. The county cannot promise scales outside its authority, or bind the legislature through an unauthorized agreement. Members nonetheless have a real pay interest, determined by a body outside their bargaining table. Both sides first confirm the scope under the actual statute, obtaining their own advice. They then address permitted scheduling, leave, grievances, classification, and progression in the fictional framework. Those subjects are not automatically negotiable in every public jurisdiction; the case stipulates their availability. The union separately pursues salary scales through the legislative process, preserving its members' underlying interest. The lesson is procedural: identify authority before importing private-sector subject rules into a public negotiation.
CHAPTER 10 SYNTHESIS
Combine Institutional Knowledge With Practical Controls
Chapter ten began with the Board's institutions, representation cases, and unfair-labor-practice cases. It then distinguished union structural levels, explaining why authority does not always sit in the local. Bargaining process, mandatory subjects, good faith, and representation describe the employment relationship's operating rules. Internal union roles and dues arrangements require separate attention, including applicable security and consent rules. Representation begins and ends through defined processes, with employer-conduct restrictions throughout. Concerted rights can protect covered private workers even where no union represents them. Bargaining strategy distinguishes distributive conflict, integrative possibilities, and mixed negotiations grounded in real interests. Impasse, strikes, lockouts, and neutral procedures have distinct conditions, consequences, and governing authority. Public-sector frameworks now add separate scope rules and procedures, alongside evidence about membership trends. HR should recognize issues, preserve facts, give supervisors clear instructions, and obtain appropriate advice early. Check current authority; errors can trigger election remedies, reinstatement, or back pay, depending on circumstances.
8 CLASSIFICATIONS
Qualify Each Public-versus-Private Comparison
The NLRB feature belongs to the covered private framework, not state or federal public employment. Lawful permanent replacement of protected economic strikers also belongs to that private-sector comparison, with conditions. Generally prohibited strikes and legislatively determined salary scales identify public frameworks, subject to jurisdictional variation. Neither statement means every public occupation has identical rights or salary-setting rules. Binding interest arbitration is a public-sector procedure where specifically authorized, rather than a universal standard. Nationwide protection against compulsory public nonmember fees follows Janus, with affirmative consent required for payment. Do not read it as automatically invalidating every voluntary authorization or prohibiting all union payments. The elected-employer feature is public, because union political participation can help select government representatives. Private organizations also engage politically, so the distinction is that particular employer-selection relationship. State right-to-work variation concerns private union-security rules, requiring review of applicable location and sector. Classifications are useful only with these qualifications; they cannot replace the actual governing statute and facts.
4 EVIDENCE COMPARISONS
Explain What Would Raise or Lower Each Mechanism’s Weight
For structural change, more decline explained by employment composition would raise the mechanism's weight. Large declines within comparable industries would lower its sufficiency as the overall explanation. For opposition, reliably observed resistance associated with failed organizing would support the proposed mechanism. Timing mismatches and observations confounded by organizing conditions would weaken that inference. For legal change, credible comparisons around adoption, controlling relevant differences, would strengthen a causal interpretation. If preexisting differences account for the pattern, attribution to the legal change would weaken. For preferences, comparable surveys showing reduced worker demand would increase that explanation's weight. Substantial unmet demand would challenge a simple claim that workers no longer want representation. Employer opposition is one defensible hardest-to-test choice, because it is hard to observe independently of organizing. Preferences also face survey-design and hypothetical-response problems; explain your choice rather than assert one universal ranking. The exercise asks for evidence and identification limits, not confidence unsupported by a research design.
REVERSE PROBLEM AND 8 DEFINITIONS
Identify the Authorized Route for School Support Staff
School support staff reach deadlock over scheduling and leave, with bargaining rights but prohibited strikes. The first task is identifying the actual state's impasse procedure and this classification's coverage. Mediation and fact-finding may be available, but their order and consequences require statutory confirmation. A final stage could involve continued bargaining, legislative action, or authorized interest arbitration, depending on law. The strike ban increases the importance of resolution mechanisms; it does not logically create binding arbitration. Union density measures membership relative to the defined workforce, while unmet demand means desired representation remains unavailable. The sovereignty argument questions sharing legislative employment authority; scope identifies subjects legally open to bargaining. Meet and confer describes consultation rights whose actual obligations depend on the governing framework. Fact-finding investigates and recommends, while authorized interest arbitration determines new agreement terms. Structural change means shifts in employment composition, which differ from membership changes within the same sector. Together, these distinctions complete the chapter, preparing us for the next stage of the employment relationship.
About Human Resources Management at UPI Study
Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses
Why take it here
Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Public Sector Unions and Current Trends in Union Membership
Do state and local government employees have the right to unionize?
Can public employees go on strike?
What is union density and how does it differ between public and private sectors?
Why has union membership declined in the United States?
About the Human Resources Management course
How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Human Resources Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →