UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 5.2 Free with a free account
Human Resource Management: Types of Training Programs and New Hire Orientation
Human Resources Management · Chapter 5: Training Employees, Building Careers, and Handling Workplace DisciplineSection 5.2 · lesson 31 of 9116 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Human Resources Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Human Resources Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Human Resource Management: On-the-Job Training, Mentoring, Rotation, and Experiential Learning →← Human Resource Management: Identifying Employee Training NeedsNext lesson: Human Resource Management: On-the-Job Training, Mentoring, Rotation, and Experiential Learning →
In this lesson
Choose the learning method, then build contribution over time.
- Distinguish training purpose from delivery format
- Match knowledge, skill, judgment, and attitude objectives
- Separate orientation from manager-owned onboarding
- Evaluate role clarity, contribution, and early departure
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,961 words). Read along, or search it.
Training Employees, Building Careers, and Handling Workplace Discipline
Training and Onboarding
Training types describe purpose, while delivery formats describe how the learning is organized and provided. Keeping those choices separate helps prevent an attractive format from replacing a sound learning design. We will examine eight purposes, then match delivery to knowledge, skill, judgment, and attitude objectives. A central risk is teaching information about a skill. That does not establish the ability to perform it. The second part separates orientation from onboarding, which continues until the employee can contribute effectively. An initial welcome cannot supply weeks of role clarification, real work, feedback, and relationship development. The manager owns those results, while HR builds the process and supports its follow-through. Remote starters need deliberate opportunities for learning and connection, which proximity might otherwise make easier. Calder's fictional case shows a strong orientation record, alongside a failure to establish the actual role. Evaluation should therefore examine contribution, clarity, and early departures, rather than depend on a welcome survey alone.
Training Purposes: 1–4
The Purpose Determines the Design Problem
Orientation and onboarding introduce the organization and role, aiming for full contribution. Their recurring failure compresses everything into the first day, then leaves the starter alone. Technical training develops defined task capability through work-related practice. Its content must remain current. Someone needs responsibility for updating it when work changes. Compliance training addresses applicable legal or policy obligations, rather than a single universal learning format. Its risk is mistaking a completion record for evidence that the substantive requirement was met. As the previous section explained, actual rules can require understanding, skills, or other particular learning conditions. Safety training develops hazard recognition and a correct response, often requiring practice in the work environment. It can also satisfy mandatory requirements, so safety and compliance purposes need not be mutually exclusive. Design both the required content and the capability, rather than assume a certificate establishes safe performance. These types show why purpose matters more than software or venue. Ask what employees must do afterward, and what evidence will establish that result.
Training Purposes: 5–8
Behavior Requires More Than Recognizing Good Advice
Interpersonal training develops communication, feedback, and conflict handling through rehearsal and correction. Knowing what good communication looks like does not establish, that someone can handle a difficult conversation. Supervisory training prepares people to direct, develop, and appraise others. Timing matters: long delays after promotion allow unsupported habits to form. Application between sessions can connect learning to actual decisions, with feedback on what the supervisor tried. Systems training develops application or equipment operation, ideally close to first use. Learning can be forgotten when many weeks separate training from use. A realistic practice environment lets learners make mistakes, without putting live work or safety at unnecessary risk. Diversity and inclusion training can address awareness, obligations, and behavior toward colleagues in several ways. Specify whether the particular objective is mandatory content, a behavioral capability, or both together. Without a stated objective, success cannot be tested against an agreed result. Each type has a recurring design risk, which provides a practical question when reviewing an existing program.
Delivery Formats
Use the Format to Serve the Objective
Classroom or live virtual delivery supports discussion, practice, and immediate feedback. It also carries scheduling difficulty and cost. Plan participation and task relevance deliberately. Self-paced e-learning provides consistent material and tracking, often at lower cost per person. Information and recognition tests alone are weak evidence, when the objective requires performing a skill. Interactive simulation can add practice, but the relevant behavior and feedback still need to be designed. Blended learning combines knowledge preparation with live or applied practice, making the parts serve one objective. It is useful for many skills, rather than compulsory for every need. Self-directed study gives initiative to the learner, and depends on motivation, resources, and suitable support. Microlearning provides brief units near use, supporting reinforcement and procedural reminders within ordinary work. Complex capability usually needs a broader sequence, so short units should be integrated with practice and feedback. The objective guides the format choice, instead of treating the cheapest or newest format as sufficient.
Objective Types
Knowledge About a Skill Is Different From Performing It
A knowledge objective might require stating which inquiries need escalation. Use content and a suitable test. A skill objective might require conducting the escalation conversation, rather than recognizing its correct description. That needs demonstration, practice, feedback, and repetition, in conditions that represent the actual conversation. Varied cases develop judgment, when several defensible responses could fit an ambiguous situation differently. Discuss reasoning, because a memorized answer cannot establish judgment between competing considerations. An attitude objective concerns what a person values, such as believing near-miss reporting is worthwhile. Training may contribute, but workplace modeling and consequences strongly influence whether that belief becomes behavior. If reporting disruption is punished, encouragement contradicts the employee's experience. Objective types can overlap. A program may need different learning activities for different results. The expensive mismatch is providing knowledge content, then assuming that the employee has acquired a practical skill. Assess the actual target behavior, rather than only the learner's ability to describe it accurately.
2 Different Processes
Orientation Is the Initial Event; Onboarding Builds Contribution
Orientation is the bounded initial event, usually covering administration, required briefings, and introductions to the organization. It often occupies a day or less, with HR delivering much of its content. Onboarding is the extended process, bringing a new employee from arrival to full contribution in the role. It builds role clarity, capability, working relationships, and an understanding of how the work actually gets done. The manager owns these results, with HR supporting a process that can run for weeks or months. Duration varies by role, rather than follow a universal deadline for full proficiency. The two activities are related, but completing the initial event does not establish the longer process's success. Imagine a starter who can recite the leave policy, yet cannot describe a good month in the role. By day thirty, that contrast is reason to investigate whether expectations and feedback have been provided. Orientation may have happened effectively, while the work needed to build contribution remains incomplete.
4 Onboarding Phases
Preparation and Follow-Through Surround the First Day
Before arrival, prepare access, equipment, workspace, a first-week plan, and team notice. The manager coordinates the required preparation, supported by HR, IT, and others with relevant responsibilities. Three days without a login sends a message, which a polished welcome cannot simply undo. The first day covers administration, required policy and safety content, the environment, and introductions. The person should know where to work, who manages them, tomorrow's plan, and whom to ask for help. The first weeks build explicit role clarity. A job title does not explain the actual expectations. Discuss performance standards, how work is judged, decision authority, and boundaries with neighboring roles. Provide real work and early feedback, so misunderstandings can be corrected before routines become established. Through about ninety days, support core contribution and relationships with defined check-ins rather than occasional recollection. The course proposes reviews at thirty, sixty, and ninety days, adjusted to the role and its requirements. A scheduled review also gives the employee a legitimate opportunity to raise concerns that otherwise remain unspoken.
Ownership
HR Designs the Process; Managers Deliver Role Clarity
HR designs the process, supplies materials, schedules reviews, and reports missed steps. The manager establishes role expectations, allocates work, observes performance, and provides the feedback that supports adjustment. Colleagues or specialists can help. Delegating tasks does not remove the manager's responsibility. HR cannot infer the meaning of good work, from an administrative record that merely confirms attendance. Nor can it build every team relationship, from outside the team where the starter will actually work. A buddy provides a lower-stakes source of answers, distinct from the manager responsible for later appraisal. That relationship can make ordinary questions easier to ask, including questions that reveal an unclear instruction. It supports the process rather than replace role standards, feedback, or access to the actual manager. The next section distinguishes mentoring, coaching, and sponsorship, which have different purposes in employee development. For onboarding, the immediate question is whether someone is accountable for the employee becoming able to contribute.
Remote and Hybrid Starters
Replace Incidental Learning Deliberately
Remote onboarding requires deliberate substitutes for opportunities that physical proximity may make easier to obtain. A new starter may miss incidental observation, informal conversations, and visible signals that help is needed. Schedule pairing, and let experienced colleagues narrate their work, explaining decisions rather than merely showing a screen. Make introductions purposeful, explaining why the starter may need each person's knowledge. Use focused check-ins, so uncertainty surfaces before it becomes prolonged isolation. The argument for distributed work emphasizes wider access, less commuting, and flexibility for different circumstances. It also sees coordination problems as matters of design, with workable ways to improve the experience. The argument for co-presence emphasizes informal learning, early-career development, and organizational knowledge that substitutes may not fully reproduce. Productivity, development, and retention are empirical questions, which require evidence about the actual arrangement. How costs and benefits should be shared is a separate judgment, rather than something a productivity figure settles. This section addresses the onboarding design, while a later chapter returns to the broader work arrangement.
Composite Case
Joel Had an Impressive Welcome and an Unclear Role
Joel joins fictional Calder Systems as a customer success analyst, receiving an impressive first-day orientation. Contracts, systems explanation, a tour, security briefing, and lunch give him a positive initial impression. On day two, his manager is traveling, and access to the customer platform is still unavailable. The request was raised on arrival, although processing takes five working days before access is granted. Nobody told the team what Joel would do, so colleagues offer small tasks outside his intended role. At three weeks, he has still not discussed expectations or what successful performance should look like. At seven weeks, he resigns; the exit note records a better opportunity without revealing the onboarding failure. The manager carries a genuine workload. HR has a strong orientation product and completion record. The accepted change makes the manager raise access requests at offer acceptance, and prepare a first-week plan. It also requires a recorded role-clarity conversation within the first ten days, despite the cost to managerial capacity. HR retains orientation and centrally schedules thirty-, sixty-, and ninety-day reviews, reporting any that are missed. The trade adds real manager work, rather than assume a stronger HR welcome will repair an unclear role.
Evaluation
Measure Contribution and Clarity, Alongside Departure
A first-week enjoyment survey can improve the welcome, but cannot alone establish successful onboarding and contribution. Early separation tracks departures within the first six or twelve months, broken down by manager and role. Those patterns identify questions for investigation, rather than prove that every early departure was caused by onboarding. Time to full contribution measures core-duty performance against an agreed standard. Define that standard in advance, so different managers are not silently measuring different levels of capability. A role-clarity check at thirty days asks the starter to explain responsibilities and good performance. Compare the answer with the role's expectations, rather than accept a generic statement that everything is fine. Review variation between managers and roles, because an overall average can conceal a local process failure. Early-departure rates vary with industry, roles, and circumstances. Use relevant evidence rather than assume a universal percentage. Use appropriate local measures and causal investigation, connecting the evidence to the specific part of onboarding needing improvement.
Reverse Problem
Completed Modules Can Coexist With Missing Role Clarity
The reverse exercise describes a warehouse team leader leaving after nine weeks. She attended orientation, completed mandatory modules, and received a satisfactory recorded review in week eight. Her resignation says she never knew what she was supposed to be doing, despite those completed steps. Investigate the first-weeks phase, where expectations, standards, authority, and boundaries should have been made explicit. The manager should establish those points and provide early feedback, using actual work to check understanding. A broad satisfactory rating can miss uncertainty, when nobody asks the employee to explain the role's expectations. Mandatory-module completion answers another question, and cannot substitute for learning what good work looks like locally. Across the section, purpose determines training design, while the objective determines suitable delivery and assessment. Orientation begins the relationship; onboarding needs sustained ownership, role clarity, relationships, and progress toward contribution. The next section examines workplace learning methods, and the distinct development relationships that support employees over time.
About Human Resources Management at UPI Study
Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses
Why take it here
Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Human Resource Management: Types of Training Programs and New Hire Orientation
What is the difference between orientation and onboarding?
What are the main types of employee training?
How do you choose a training delivery method?
What should a 30-60-90 day onboarding plan include?
About the Human Resources Management course
How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Human Resources Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →