UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 10.3 Free with a free account
What Collective Bargaining Is and How It Works
Human Resources Management · Chapter 10: Working With Unions: Collective Bargaining and Labor RelationsSection 10.3 · lesson 73 of 9116 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Human Resources Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Human Resources Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Why Collective Bargaining Matters So Much in the Workplace →← The AFL-CIO: Its Members and How It Has Changed Over TimeNext lesson: Why Collective Bargaining Matters So Much in the Workplace →
In this lesson
Preparation, bargaining subjects, good faith, agreements, and effects.
- Define collective bargaining and trace preparation through administration.
- Distinguish mandatory, permissive, and illegal bargaining subjects.
- Explain good faith, information duties, and decision versus effects bargaining.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,921 words). Read along, or search it.
Working With Unions: Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations
What Collective Bargaining Is and How It Works
Collective bargaining is negotiation, between an employer and the employees’ lawful unit representative. It concerns wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of the represented employees’ work. The relationship is collective, because the representative negotiates for the unit rather than individual preferences. Bargaining can produce an enforceable agreement, commonly covering a defined term and administration procedure. But the statutory bargaining duty guarantees no settlement, and compels no proposal acceptance or concession. We follow preparation, exchanged proposals, tentative terms, required approvals, and administration of the resulting agreement. Then we classify bargaining subjects, which determine what the parties must discuss or may insist on. Good faith requires serious participation; hard positions are different, from merely pretending to negotiate. Information duties and effects bargaining create obligations, that managers can overlook even with legitimate business plans. A fictional depot closure shows why decision authority, and consequences for employees, need separate analysis. Our purpose is informed negotiation, accurate approvals, and administration that improves the next bargaining round.
DEFINITION AND BARGAINING PROCESS
Negotiation and Administration Form a Continuing Relationship
Preparation begins by costing proposals, including increases that compound over the contract term. Examine linked items, such as benefits or overtime, that change when base pay rises. Review actual grievances and administration problems, rather than relying only on management’s complaints. Rank priorities and resistance points, then establish the team’s authority and approval conditions. The parties exchange proposals, explain positions, and assess concessions within the whole package. Individual tentative settlements commonly remain conditional, on the complete package and its required approvals. Ratification approves a tentative settlement, through whatever member and employer processes actually apply. Do not assume every agreement legally requires, the same vote, signature sequence, or effective date. When requested, the parties must execute a writing, incorporating the collective agreement they have actually reached. Administration applies the terms and processes disputes; its evidence feeds the next negotiation. Exclusive representation generally bars direct individual bargaining, while statutory individual grievance rights retain their conditions.
3 CLASSES OF SUBJECTS
Classification Determines What a Party May Insist On
Three subject classes determine, what negotiation permits and what a party may insist on. Mandatory subjects concern wages, hours, and other terms or conditions of unit employment. Both parties must bargain on request, while neither is required to accept a proposal. Good-faith negotiations over mandatory matters can reach genuine impasse, under the actual legal requirements. Permissive subjects fall outside the mandatory category, but the parties may discuss and agree on them. Neither party may insist to impasse, or make permissive acceptance a precondition for further bargaining. An illegal subject requires prohibited conduct, which mutual consent cannot transform into lawful agreement. Classification depends on the precise proposal, affected population, and current governing legal doctrine. Already retired workers’ benefits differ, from future retirement benefits for current unit employees. An agreed permissive promise may still have contractual significance, despite no statutory duty to negotiate it. When classification affects a real bargaining strategy, provide the actual wording and facts to counsel.
12 SOURCE SUBJECTS: FIRST 6
Pay, Time, Benefits, Procedures, and Safety Concern Unit Work
Hourly wage rates for unit classifications are mandatory, because compensation concerns represented employees’ work. Shift lengths and overtime schedules are mandatory, because they govern hours and allocation of unit work. Health and retirement benefits for current employees concern compensation, including their future retirement arrangements. The grievance and arbitration procedure is mandatory, because it enforces negotiated employment terms. Seniority rules for layoffs, promotions, and shifts allocate employment, opportunities, and work within the unit. Safety rules and protective equipment are mandatory, because they concern employees’ working conditions. These six illustrations place employment terms, at the center of the statutory bargaining relationship. However, mandatory status describes a bargaining obligation, rather than endorsing every provision somebody proposes. A safety agreement cannot authorize unlawful exposure, and wage agreements remain subject to governing law. Assess the proposed term’s legality separately, from the subject’s status as mandatory for bargaining. Record the affected workers and actual provision, so the legal classification matches what is being negotiated.
12 SOURCE SUBJECTS: REMAINING 6
Governance and Prohibited Conduct Have Different Status
Discipline and discharge standards are mandatory, because they determine conditions for continuing unit employment. An employer’s proposed ratification voting method concerns internal union governance, and is permissive here. Benefits for people already retired are permissive, rather than current unit employees’ employment terms. Existing retiree promises can still raise contractual rights, and other applicable benefit-law obligations. A proposal about employer board membership is permissive, in the governance example described by the source. Requiring union membership before hiring is an illegal closed shop, under the governing federal framework. A race-based job-assignment clause requires unlawful discrimination, so agreement by both sides cannot legalize it. These examples distinguish voluntary discussion, from bargaining obligations and prohibited final provisions. The future retirement compensation of current workers remains different, from benefits for already retired people. A precise proposal can present additional issues, which these general labels cannot settle alone. Verify its wording and governing law, before insisting on it or incorporating it into an agreement.
GOOD FAITH AND SURFACE BARGAINING
Serious Effort to Reach Agreement Can Include Firm Positions
Good faith requires reasonable meetings and sincere discussion, by representatives able to conduct useful negotiations. Both employer and union must participate seriously, rather than treating bargaining as an empty performance. A party may hold firm, reject proposals, and make no concession while sincerely seeking agreement. That permission does not establish genuine impasse, merely because one side announces negotiations are exhausted. Surface bargaining has negotiation’s outward form, without a sincere effort to reach a settlement. Assess the full pattern, including delay, authority, unexplained regression, information refusals, and unilateral changes. A particular representative’s approval limits can be legitimate, while a powerless messenger may obstruct useful discussion. Changing mandatory terms ordinarily requires bargaining, with contract authority and narrow exceptions assessed under current law. An unlawful information refusal or unilateral change can independently violate the Act, without proving every other concern. The total pattern can support an additional conclusion, that negotiations themselves lacked good faith. Keep those legal questions distinct, and explain the circumstances rather than reducing the analysis to a checklist.
INFORMATION REQUEST DUTY
Distinguish Relevance, Financial Claims, and Legitimate Confidentiality
Relevant information enables a representative to bargain, and administer employment terms for the unit. Unit wage rates, hours, classifications, and relevant benefit costs are generally presumed relevant. The requester ordinarily need not independently demonstrate, why those unit employment details matter. Outside-unit matters ordinarily require an explanation, linking the requested information to representative duties. General financial records are not automatically open, whenever a union asks for the company’s finances. An employer claiming inability to pay may create an obligation, to substantiate that particular claim. Inability differs from unwillingness or competitive preference; the actual statements and circumstances matter. Respond promptly, clarify the request, and explain legitimate scope, confidentiality, availability, or burden concerns. Appropriate accommodation can protect sensitive information, while meeting a representative’s legitimate information needs. Ignoring a request is not a substitute, for responding and addressing the governing duty. Where scope or competing rights are disputed, identify the precise records and obtain qualified legal assessment.
AGREEMENT ARCHITECTURE
The Written Terms Establish a Framework for Daily Administration
A recognition clause identifies the representative, and defines the employees within the agreement’s unit. Management-rights language addresses retained authority, subject to the actual terms and governing labor law. A lawful security provision addresses applicable union obligations, which a later lesson examines more closely. Economic clauses establish wages, hours, overtime, and benefits, while seniority provisions allocate work and opportunities. Discipline and discharge standards connect, to the grievance and arbitration process for disputed administration. No-strike and no-lockout provisions state continuity commitments, subject to their scope and applicable legal limitations. Duration and reopening language establish timing, but expiration does not erase every bargaining or status-quo duty. Administration is the daily application of these provisions, rather than an afterthought following negotiation. Track recurring grievances, costs, and interpretations, because they identify problems for the next round. Arbitration binds under the agreed procedure, subject to governing law and limited review. Separate statutory rights may have additional forums, so contractual dispute resolution does not answer every legal question.
DECISION VERSUS EFFECTS; 4 COMPARISONS
A Decision’s Legal Status Does Not Settle Its Employee Consequences
Decision bargaining addresses the proposed business action; effects bargaining addresses consequences for represented employees. Some enterprise-direction decisions can belong to management, while their employment effects still require bargaining. A new scanner may change work recording, monitoring, discipline, or job procedures within the unit. Check its actual effects, and what the agreement and governing law permit before implementation. A logo change ordinarily creates no bargaining duty, by itself without changes to unit employment terms. Uniform expenses or changed duties could alter that conclusion, so identify what the logo project actually does. Subcontracting that substitutes workers for the same work can require bargaining, unlike some enterprise-direction changes. Assess the function, labor substitution, contractual authority, and effects, rather than relying on the subcontracting label. Moving employee parking ten minutes farther can affect access, time, costs, and working conditions. Determine actual burdens and existing terms; the legal obligation requires the specific facts and current standards. For each example, assess the decision and employee effects separately, with counsel where doctrine is disputed.
FICTIONAL NORTHGATE LOGISTICS CASE
Priya Obtained a Decision Answer and Missed the Effects Question
Fictional Northgate Logistics closes its smallest depot, and moves work to two larger sites. Twenty-two unit employees are affected; counsel advises that this closure decision belongs to management. Priya announces the closure ninety days ahead, offers receiving-site vacancies, and considers the matter handled. The union’s charge concerns effects, rather than challenging the company’s authority to close this depot. What happens to transferred seniority, and how will vacancies be allocated among affected employees? What happens when the new commute is impossible, and will severance be available? The parties also need to address, the order of any later employment recall. The source settlement keeps the closure date, with effects bargaining on a compressed schedule. Requested seniority and vacancy data are supplied; management spends three weeks and accepts a recall concession. That outcome illustrates this case, rather than guaranteeing every employer can preserve its original timetable. Priya needed a second legal question, before treating authority over the decision as authority over every effect.
8 PRACTICE CLASSIFICATIONS
Explain Why the Described Subject Falls Into Its Class
Classify the meal-break length as mandatory, because it concerns hours and unit working conditions. Customer pricing is permissive in the ordinary example, concerning the business rather than unit employment terms. Call-in pay for employees sent home early is mandatory, because it concerns their compensation. Annual union officer elections concern internal governance, making that bargaining proposal permissive as described. Prehire union membership is illegal, because it would impose the prohibited closed-shop arrangement. Weekend overtime allocation is mandatory, because it governs unit work and its assignment among employees. Health contributions for current unit workers are mandatory, as part of their employment compensation. Arbitration coverage for workers below one year concerns grievance procedure, a mandatory subject as described. That classification does not erase statutory discrimination rights, other legal claims, or fair-representation duties. Discriminatory or otherwise unlawful wording can change the analysis, even within a generally mandatory subject. Explain each classification through its actual employment connection, rather than assuming every proposed restriction is lawful.
REVERSE CASE AND 8 DEFINITIONS
Evaluate the Pattern and Each Potential Independent Violation
The reverse case records four bargaining sessions, spread across five months, with additional troubling conduct. The representative needs outside approval for every proposal; two tentative provisions are withdrawn. A written unit-wage request receives no response, and attendance policy changes during negotiations. The scheduling pattern can indicate delay, depending on availability, explanations, and serious attempts to negotiate. Approval limits alone are not necessarily unlawful, but complete inability to negotiate can support the finding. Withdrawal of tentative terms may be justified in context, or contribute to an obstructive bargaining pattern. Ignoring relevant wage data raises an information violation; an unlawful attendance change can independently violate the Act. A lawful agreement, waiver, genuine impasse, or narrow exception could change the unilateral-action analysis. Several recorded actions may be lawful under different facts, rather than exactly one being uniquely excusable. Define bargaining, tentative agreement, ratification, the three subject classes, surface bargaining, and effects bargaining. Then connect each definition to a case fact, and distinguish overall bad faith from independent violations.
About Human Resources Management at UPI Study
Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses
Why take it here
Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About What Collective Bargaining Is and How It Works
What is collective bargaining?
What are the main steps of the collective bargaining process?
What is the difference between mandatory, permissive, and illegal subjects of bargaining?
What is effects bargaining?
About the Human Resources Management course
How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Human Resources Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →