Performance-Based Rewards: Individual and Company-Wide

UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 7.5 Free with a free account

Performance-Based Rewards: Individual and Company-Wide

Human Resources Management · Chapter 7: Paying Employees: Salaries, Benefits, Bonuses, and Incentive ProgramsSection 7.5 · lesson 46 of 9115 min · free with a free account

← Employee Benefits: Required, Optional, and Retirement PlansNext lesson: How CEO and Executive Pay Is Changing in the United States →

Earn 3 college credits for Human Resources ManagementRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 306 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Human Resources Management · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Choose the behavior before the measure, then test how the measure can mislead.

  • Compare individual, group, and organization-wide plans
  • Assess line of sight and 5 design conditions
  • Diagnose 5 recurring failure modes
  • Stress-test a plan and protect earned pay

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,882 words). Read along, or search it.

Paying Employees: Salaries, Benefits, Bonuses, and Incentive Programs

Performance-Based Rewards

Performance-based rewards try to connect compensation with particular contributions, outputs, or results. Variable pay needs earning under period conditions, rather than automatically continuing as base pay. A merit increase differs, because its performance-related addition becomes part of continuing base pay. Individual plans include piece rates, commissions, bonuses, and spot awards, each with different design risks. Group plans reward shared work, while broad plans connect compensation with organizational results or ownership. Line of sight describes the connection employees can see, between effort and the rewarded measure. A strong connection encourages action, while incomplete measures can intensify harm. Five design checks examine validity, influence, meaningful awards, trust, and easier unwanted routes. Recurring failures include gaming, displaced work, damaged cooperation, rewarded luck, and ratcheted targets. Crowding out concerns conditional effects on intrinsic interest; recognition also needs a visible contribution basis. Nadia's fictional sales plan shows why volume, margin, and service need consideration before launch.

Conditional and Permanent Pay

A Merit Increase and a Period Bonus Create Different Commitments

Base pay creates an ongoing commitment for the job, under the applicable employment arrangement. Variable pay depends on stated conditions, with the next period's award needing to be earned again. That can make prospective cost flexible, while leaving employees with uncertainty about future income. Plan terms and wage law govern payment, so conditional earnings cannot be freely canceled. A merit increase rewards assessed performance, then permanently adds to base pay. The organization keeps paying that increase, beyond the original assessment period. Small differences between performance categories may create limited motivation, particularly where employees barely notice the amount. Weak ratings also transfer their problems into pay, even when the calculation itself is accurate. Repeated bonuses may become part of expected income, making a missing award feel like a cut. Psychological expectations and legal entitlement remain different questions, requiring careful terms and communication. Evaluate the commitment and its consequences, rather than put every performance-related payment into one variable-pay category.

Individual Plans

Different Measures Create Different Opportunities and Risks

Piece rates pay per unit, fitting output that can be attributed, counted, and independently quality checked. Safe pace and useful quality matter, because producing more defective units may add little value. Commissions use sales value or margin, with their chosen basis shaping discounting incentives. Revenue-based pay may reward a discounted sale, while margin-based pay makes the discount affect the measure. Caps can change behavior after the threshold, and timing rules can shift when deals are booked. A draw advances future commission, with recovery terms affecting income risk under the applicable agreement and law. Individual bonuses reward stated period results, requiring checks of control, validity, and omitted work. Spot awards recognize contribution promptly, with timing and a credible explanation supporting their usefulness. Small awards are not automatically discretionary, because promises and actual operation matter. Merit increases require credible performance evidence, alongside attention to permanent cost and meaningful differentiation. No payment form guarantees motivation; match its measure and administration to the actual work.

Group and Organization-Wide Plans

Shared Interest Trades Precision for a Wider Comparison

Team incentives reward a defined group's output, useful where members depend on one another. Allocation and free riding need attention, especially when contribution is difficult for colleagues to observe. Gainsharing distributes part of a unit's measured improvement, against an agreed cost or productivity baseline. Its connection can be close to the work, if employees can influence the change being counted. Baseline choices matter, because resetting the hurdle can discourage improvements employees believe will later penalize them. Profit sharing distributes organizational profit, providing a shared outcome while individual influence may be remote. Employee ownership gives a stake in the organization, sometimes through a trust, with plan details differing. Ownership may support attachment, with employees needing to understand risks and rights. Weak individual influence does not prove an absence of possible behavioral effects. Collective influence and participation matter, alongside the workplace's broader practices and organizational size. Distribution, retention, and a precise daily incentive are different purposes, so assess the plan against its actual objective.

Line of Sight

What Would the Employee Do Differently Tomorrow?

Line of sight connects a person's effort with the measure that determines the reward. Ask what someone would do differently tomorrow, and whether they could recognize its effect afterwards. A seller can often connect a qualifying margin improvement with the commission received under the formula. A small maintenance crew can connect joint work with reduced downtime, although individual contribution may remain shared. An employee in a twelve-thousand-person firm may have little identifiable influence on the company profit figure. Explaining the formula helps understanding, without creating control over an outcome that remains structurally remote. Fit the reward level to the work, beyond relying on clearer communication alone. Influence also depends on resources, territory, market conditions, assignments, and cooperation from other people. A clear connection can make a plan powerful, without ensuring that it points toward the right result. If units alone earn the award, quality and follow-through may lose attention despite being important. Evaluate both the connection and the completeness of the measure, before celebrating a strong incentive.

5 Design Conditions

Use These Checks Together Before Launch

First check validity, asking whether the counted result represents the desired objective. A proxy can improve while the underlying objective worsens, as unresolved tickets are marked closed. Second, check line of sight, asking whether useful action influences the result. Third, compare award size with the effort and trade-offs required. An amount may look substantial in aggregate, while each person's incremental reward remains too small to notice. Fourth, examine trust through credible terms, followed rules, and timely payment. Unexpectedly moved targets or deferred payments can weaken confidence in this plan and later plans. Fifth, look for unwanted shortcuts, improving the measure without the desired work. Case selection or timing changes may become more attractive than genuine service improvement. Use these checks together, alongside capability, resources, competing goals, legal requirements, and affordability. These checks guide diagnosis, without guaranteeing achievement of the intended objective.

5 Recurring Failures

The Counted Result Can Improve While the Job Gets Worse

Gaming improves the proxy through conduct that does not create the performance it represents. Closing an unresolved ticket changes the count, while leaving the customer's problem untouched. Displacement occurs when rewarded tasks crowd out valuable work the plan does not count. Mentoring, documentation, and careful handovers can lose time, even though colleagues still depend on them. Cooperation suffers when individual rewards create competition within work that requires people to share information. Rewarding luck pays for circumstances beyond useful control, such as favorable territories or assignments. The calculation can be correct, while the award poorly represents the person's actual contribution. The ratchet effect arises when achievement unexpectedly raises the next period's hurdle. Employees may hold back improvements, if revealing capability makes later awards harder to earn. Use fair baseline rules, contribution evidence, and quality and safety controls to protect the wider objective. Design mechanisms guide investigation, without proving motive or excusing misconduct when individual evidence establishes it.

Intrinsic Motivation and Recognition

Reward Context Matters Alongside the Amount

Intrinsic motivation reflects interest in the activity, beyond an attached payment. Under some conditions, external rewards can reduce that interest, often described as crowding out. Research by Deci, Koestner, and Ryan examined reward types and different measures of intrinsic motivation. Expected tangible rewards for interesting tasks deserve attention, particularly where their context feels controlling. The findings vary by reward, task, and assessment, rather than establish that every paid incentive undermines interest. They are not an argument against paying employees, or a universal prediction about every workplace task. Recognition acknowledges a specific contribution, and can complement compensation without replacing it. Positive, informative feedback can support competence, with employee preferences and context influencing how recognition is received. An automatic rotation may weaken an award's signal, while arbitrary selection can create resentment. Recognize a visible contribution promptly, rather than give an unexplained favor. Pay what is owed separately, because acknowledgment cannot substitute for wages or earned awards.

Design and Stress Test

Write the Wanted Behavior Before Selecting a Number

Begin with the desired behavior, writing what useful contribution the plan should encourage. Then choose a measure, checking what it captures and which valuable activities it leaves out. Ask how employees could raise the number, without creating the result the organization actually needs. Next, identify whose work moves the measure, and which conditions they cannot meaningfully control. Set award size and timing, connecting action to payment without creating an unaffordable maximum payout. Stress-test the best-case cost, rather than budget only for the expected level of achievement. Also test discounts, selective cases, changed timing, withheld cooperation, rushed quality, and unsafe shortcuts. Close feasible loopholes in the design, and monitor remaining risks with planned responses. Include a stated review point, with prospective adjustment or sunset terms explained before launch. Review provisions still must respect earned rights, agreements, wage law, and credible administration. Monitor the full objective after launch, because an attractive number is not proof of successful work.

Composite Case

Nadia’s Volume Plan Rewards the Wrong Combination

Nadia works at a fictional seller of maintenance equipment, serving many long-standing repeat customers. The quarterly incentive pays on units, with acceleration above target. Volume rises quickly, producing a first quarter that leadership celebrates as a clear success. By the third quarter, average selling price falls and installation-support complaints rise sharply. Discounting helps close a sale, without reducing the seller's award under the unit-based measure. The seller receives the reward, while the business absorbs reduced margin from those discounts. Site visits, commissioning calls, and training compete for hours with rewarded new sales. Because follow-through is omitted, employees have an incentive to shift attention toward the next unit. The plan represents one important objective, while missing margin and ongoing customer support. Examine the mechanism, rather than assuming employee character explains the aggregate changes. Repeat relationships may deteriorate before revenue shows the full consequence, so monitor service alongside immediate volume.

Prospective Redesign and Legal Boundaries

Change the Incentive Without Treating Earned Pay as Available Savings

Nadia proposes tying the reward more closely to margin, making discounting affect the award. She also proposes a defined service condition, alongside the sales component, to protect follow-through. The service measure needs valid evidence and staff influence, rather than a new arbitrary hurdle. She plans a transition over two quarters, showing calculations and likely effects to sellers in advance. Some sellers may earn less or leave, and the revised plan requires more explanation and administration. Prospective changes differ from changing commissions already earned under existing terms. Plan documents, agreements, and applicable wage law govern those rights; obtain appropriate legal and payroll review. For covered nonexempt employees, promised formula bonuses generally enter the overtime regular rate, unless another statutory exclusion applies. Excludable discretionary bonuses require genuine discretion over payment and amount, without a prior promise creating regular expectations. Calling a payment discretionary does not decide its treatment, and the covered period's overtime may need recalculation. Protect earned pay while redesigning future incentives, rather than treat earlier awards as available savings.

Reverse Problem

Perfect Delivery Scores Can Hide Safety and Selection Costs

Consider a logistics plan rewarding on-time delivery, with nearly perfect scores within two quarters. Vehicle damage rises, drivers decline difficult routes, and dispatch faces daily arguments about allocation. Damage suggests examining whether faster shortcuts displace safe driving or careful handling under the reward. Declined routes suggest selection, improving the percentage by avoiding work that is harder to complete on time. Allocation arguments suggest unequal opportunity, rewarded luck, and damaged cooperation between drivers and dispatch. These plausible mechanisms require evidence about routes, behavior, and damage causes. A prelaunch stress test should ask whether safety can lose to speed, and difficult customers become unattractive. It should also examine route allocation, because the same percentage may represent very different operating conditions. The measure needs safeguards for the full service objective, alongside fair opportunity and useful contribution evidence. Rewarded numbers can improve while business worsens, requiring evaluation beyond the metric. Chapter seven point six applies these incentive questions to senior executives and their compensation.

About Human Resources Management at UPI Study

Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses

Why take it here

Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study

How organizations hire, pay and keep peopleHuman Resources Management covers the work of an HR department: job design, recruiting and onboarding, training and discipline, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, U.S. employment law, unions and collective bargaining, and staffing across countries. It is a core course in business, management and human resources degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Performance-Based Rewards: Individual and Company-Wide

What is the difference between a merit increase and a bonus?
A merit increase rewards assessed performance by permanently adding to base pay, so it carries into later pay periods and future raises, while a bonus is variable pay earned under stated conditions for one period and must be earned again. Variable pay gives the employer cost flexibility but shifts income uncertainty to employees. Repeated bonuses can still become expected income, and plan terms and wage law govern what has already been earned.
What is the difference between gainsharing and profit sharing?
Gainsharing distributes part of a unit's measured improvement in cost or productivity against an agreed baseline, so employees can often see how their work affects the payout. Profit sharing distributes a portion of organizational profit, a shared outcome on which one person's influence may be remote. Gainsharing depends on fair baselines: raising the hurdle after each success, called the ratchet effect, can lead employees to hold back improvements.
What is line of sight in incentive pay?
Line of sight is how clearly employees can connect their own effort to the measure that determines their reward. A salesperson can often link a better margin to their commission, and a small maintenance crew can link joint work to less downtime, but an employee in a 12,000-person firm has little identifiable influence on company profit. Strong line of sight makes a plan powerful, so the measure must also be complete.
Can incentive pay reduce intrinsic motivation?
Under some conditions, yes. Deci, Koestner, and Ryan's 1999 meta-analysis found that expected tangible rewards for interesting tasks can reduce intrinsic interest, especially when the rewards feel controlling, an effect often called crowding out. The findings vary by reward type, task, and measure, so they do not mean every incentive undermines motivation or that employees should not be paid. Informative recognition of a specific contribution can support a sense of competence.

About the Human Resources Management course

How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
Human Resources Management (Business 306) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 91 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. It is sold on its own and is not part of UPI Study PRO.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Human Resources Management take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 91 lessons total about 23 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.

91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Human Resources Management →Download the syllabus
Human Resources Management
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →