UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 10.8 Free with a free account
What Employers Can and Can't Do During Organizing and Bargaining
Human Resources Management · Chapter 10: Working With Unions: Collective Bargaining and Labor RelationsSection 10.8 · lesson 78 of 9117 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Human Resources Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Human Resources Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Two Styles of Bargaining: Integrative and Distributive →← How Unions Get Started and How They Can Be DissolvedNext lesson: Two Styles of Bargaining: Integrative and Distributive →
In this lesson
Protect employee choice, distinguish lawful expression, and administer continuing bargaining duties.
- Explain the conduct categories and lawful expression.
- Apply solicitation, concerted activity and bargaining rules.
- Assess cases, remedies and the HR response.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,925 words). Read along, or search it.
Working With Unions: Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations
What Employers Can and Can't Do During Organizing and Bargaining
This lesson explains employer conduct during organizing, and continuing duties after an agreement. It is a compliance lesson, covering employee rights and corresponding employer duties. We will distinguish coercion from lawful expression, using circumstances rather than categorical shortcuts. Four familiar categories concern threats, coercive interrogation, benefit inducements, and surveillance of protected activity. Discriminatory discipline adds a fifth concern, because the employee can suffer direct economic harm. Solicitation and distribution have different boundaries, and employee activity differs from outsider access. Protected concerted activity can exist without a union, including workplace complaints and group discussions. During a contract, bargaining duties continue for changes, effects, and relevant information. The Calder Foods case shows how a scheduling discussion creates a labor-law issue. Practice statements will require reasons and qualifications, following the governing legal test. Throughout, preserve facts accurately, obtain appropriate advice, and correct harm without inventing automatic remedies.
5 CONDUCT CATEGORIES
Protect Choice From Coercion and Discrimination
Start with threats: an employer must not link adverse consequences to employees' protected choices. Threatened closure, harder work, reduced benefits, or lost employment can pressure employees choosing representation. Interrogation means coercive questioning here; authority, location, wording, information sought, and surrounding conduct matter. A friendly intention does not create immunity, but union-related conversations are not automatically unlawful. Benefits become problematic when promised, granted, or withheld to influence employees exercising protected rights. Surveillance includes unusual observation, and separately, an impression of monitoring. Ordinary supervisory presence is not automatically spying, although circumstances require examination. Discrimination includes discipline, transfer, demotion, or dismissal because employees exercised protected rights. Lawful enforcement needs legitimate reasons; a supposedly consistent policy does not excuse retaliation. Remedies may include cease-and-desist orders, notices, election-related relief, reinstatement, back pay, and corrected records. Benefits remedies depend on the case; do not assume that an unlawfully granted benefit must disappear.
EXPRESSION AND PREDICTION
Section 8(c) Protects Views Within Defined Limits
Section eight, subsection c, protects views, argument, and opinion, subject to stated limits. The expression must contain no threat of reprisal or force, and no promise of benefit. That standard permits an uncoercive preference for direct relations, preserving employees' freedom to choose. Explaining that bargaining guarantees no particular result can likewise be lawful in context. Predictions require care: objective facts must support demonstrably probable consequences beyond employer control. The speaker cannot relabel an intended punishment as an economic prediction, then claim protected expression. A port authority's contractual rate cap might be an objective constraint, if the asserted facts hold. Its existence does not prove every claimed wage consequence, or remove the employer's duty to bargain. Announcing lost overtime because employees select representation concerns an employer-controlled consequence as posed. Read the complete communication, verify the facts supporting a prediction, and examine its actual message. HR should obtain reviewed advice before presenting sensitive predictions, rather than improvise assurances or warnings.
TIME, AREA AND ACCESS
Solicitation and Distribution Have Different Boundaries
Solicitation and literature distribution are different activities, and their employee rules have different boundaries. An employer may maintain nondiscriminatory restrictions on solicitation during working time, subject to special circumstances. Employee solicitation on nonworking time is ordinarily protected, including in working areas. Distribution may ordinarily be restricted during working time, and in working areas because of literature-related concerns. Employee distribution on nonworking time in nonworking areas is ordinarily protected, subject to special settings. Hospitals, retail settings, access restrictions, and actual circumstances complicate application; blanket shortcuts are unsafe. Compare permitted activity and enforcement, because selective restrictions can interfere with protected rights. A charity collection and union solicitation require contextual comparison; timing and purpose are relevant evidence too. Nonemployee organizers stand differently: property rights generally permit exclusion, with inaccessibility and discrimination exceptions requiring review. Lechmere distinguishes outsider access from employee communication; convenient access alone does not establish the exception. Check property rights, forum, comparators, and current doctrine before acting; employee rules do not transfer mechanically.
RIGHTS WITHOUT A UNION
Concerted Activity Concerns Mutual Aid or Protection
Concerted activity concerns employees acting together for mutual aid or protection regarding workplace interests. Two coworkers jointly raising scheduling concerns, or signing a workload letter, are familiar examples. A single employee can qualify when acting for others, or seeking group action. A shift representative raising safety concerns, or inviting coworkers to compare wages, may fit that framework. No union, election campaign, or collective agreement is necessary for those rights to exist. Social media can qualify, when workplace discussion involves or seeks colleagues. A solely individual complaint may lack concerted character; misconduct can remove protection under applicable standards. Public criticism alone does not resolve protection, and current law must guide misconduct judgments. A handbook rule can be unlawfully overbroad even before any disciplinary incident. Review the specific post, group connection, wording, policy scope, and circumstances before deciding on discipline. HR must recognize the labor-law question in ordinary management decisions, without waiting for union involvement.
DURING THE AGREEMENT
3 Continuing Obligations Shape Routine Administration
Signing an agreement does not end bargaining duties, or permit unrestricted midterm changes. Wages, hours, and other mandatory conditions generally cannot change without satisfying applicable bargaining obligations. A revised attendance system, overtime allocation method, or break schedule can require bargaining despite operational labels. The agreement's authority and scope matter, including any clear and unmistakable waiver. Do not assume a change is minor merely because a manager considers it administratively simple. Effects bargaining remains separate: a decision may belong to management, while employee consequences still require bargaining. Identify both the underlying decision and its effects, then examine obligations with appropriate advice. The information duty also continues, because a representative needs relevant information to administer the agreement. Unit employees' terms are presumptively relevant; other information may require explanation of relevance. Confidentiality concerns need a reasoned response and possible accommodation, rather than unexplained refusal or delay. Give requests an owner, preserve correspondence, assess actual scope, and respond promptly.
SUPERVISOR TRAINING
Recognize the Issue, Preserve Facts and Route the Response
Supervisor training should teach recognition and a usable response, using accurate legal distinctions. Sensitive voting questions, benefit announcements, protected complaints, and monitoring concerns should trigger referral and review. Preserve the exact words, timing, prior commitments, applicable rules, and relevant enforcement history accurately. Do not substitute a polished summary for what occurred, or erase uncomfortable details. Use the designated HR or counsel contact for sensitive matters, especially predictions, access disputes, and discipline. Referral is an operational instruction; it does not make every question, prediction, or benefit unlawful. Established grievance solicitation may continue unchanged, rather than disappear during organizing. A newly solicited complaint with an implied promise to remedy grievances can create a legal problem. Normal benefits continue. Limited postponement requires assurance of implementation regardless of vote, solely to avoid perceived influence. When a violation occurs, assess correction and employee harm, then update policies and supervisor training. Avoid unsupported claims about the frequency of violations, or assumptions that supervisor intentions resolve legality.
FICTIONAL CALDER FOODS CASE
A Public Scheduling Thread Can Be Protected Group Activity
Calder Foods is a fictional workplace with no union, and no organizing campaign at all. Three employees discuss changed weekend schedules in a public thread, including caregiving difficulties. Another participant agrees, and suggests raising the problem together; the group response is central. The manager warns the first employee, citing a policy against bringing the company into disrepute. The posts concern working conditions, involve multiple employees, and explicitly contemplate joint action about those conditions. Those facts point toward protected concerted activity, despite the absence of any union. Public criticism does not automatically destroy protection, and the broad policy may independently inhibit statutory rights. Review the specific content and applicable limits, rather than treating policy wording or criticism as decisive. The source resolves the case by rescinding and expunging the warning, and reviewing the policy with counsel. It also hears the scheduling concern through ordinary channels, addressing the underlying problem on its merits. Hearing employees fairly does not require granting every requested schedule; protection concerns their right to act together.
8 CLASSIFICATION STATEMENTS
Connect Each Statement to the Governing Legal Test
Classify each statement by its message and circumstances, explaining the test rather than choosing labels. Statement one explains that bargaining has no guaranteed result; six expresses a preference for direct relations. Both can be lawful expression, provided the complete communication contains no threat, force, or promised benefit. Statement two asks who put the employee up to this, raising coercive-questioning concerns in the circumstances. Action five records off-site meeting attendees, raising surveillance concerns where management unusually monitors protected activity. Statement three cites port-authority rate constraints; verify objective facts and their connection to any predicted consequence. Statement four predicts overtime will disappear if organizing succeeds; as posed, it suggests an adverse employer-controlled consequence. Action seven announces a health benefit three weeks before voting; timing alone does not decide legality. If the benefit induces rejection of representation, it is unlawful; purpose and evidence matter. Action eight pays an increase budgeted and communicated two months earlier, ordinarily reflecting established administration. Explain each condition explicitly, because a fact-dependent classification should not quietly become an automatic rule.
4 RIGHTS / RESPONSES
Apply the Same Protection to Different Settings
The first situation involves two employees jointly seeking a new break schedule, engaging in concerted workplace activity. Management may hear the merits, assess operational needs, and satisfy bargaining duties before changing mandatory terms. The second employee posts about wages and invites colleagues to compare, potentially seeking concerted discussion online. Review the group connection and content, rather than enforce a blanket pay-discussion prohibition. The third situation involves employees handing out leaflets in a parking lot after work. Ordinary nonworking-time and nonworking-area protections apply, subject to lawful neutral restrictions and justified special circumstances. Their status as employees matters; do not confuse this with property access sought by nonemployee organizers. The fourth employee asks directly what the employer thinks about representation, without inviting a voting inquiry. A factual, uncoercive answer can be lawful, or the supervisor can use the designated referral channel. Any answer must avoid threats of reprisal, force, and promises of benefits, considering the complete communication. Across these cases, distinguish the right to communicate from the merits of the requested change.
REVERSE PROBLEM
Trace the Findings to Rules, Monitoring and Dismissal
The reverse problem stipulates unfair labor practices, so connect each finding to its conduct and consequence. A rule prohibiting wage discussion interferes with protected rights, and may need correction independently of discipline. The solicitation ban follows organizing by two days, while charity collections continue; examine selective application. Timing is evidence, with comparators and actual enforcement supporting the stipulated interference finding. The manager records attendees at an off-site meeting, presenting surveillance rather than ordinary workplace observation. The employer also dismisses the worker who organized a shift-pattern petition, attaching job loss to concerted activity. Unlawful dismissal can require reinstatement, back pay, and expungement, because it directly harms employment. Other violations may require notices, cessation, policy correction, or election-related relief, depending on facts and law. Do not infer identical remedies for every benefit, statement, or surveillance case. Pay discussion can be protected without a union, and a group petition can qualify too. The absence of organizing activity would not erase those rights, or excuse retaliatory discipline for their exercise.
8 DEFINITIONS AND SYNTHESIS
Use Precise Definitions to Make the Compliance Decision
Close by connecting the eight definitions to the compliance decision, beyond a four-letter shortcut. A threat links an adverse consequence to protected choice; interrogation means questioning that is coercive in context. Benefit inducement uses promises, grants, or withholding to influence choice, while surveillance includes an impression of monitoring. Section eight, subsection c, protects expression without threats of reprisal or force, and without promised benefits. An objective prediction needs demonstrably probable outside-control consequences, carefully linked to verified facts and the complete message. Concerted activity involves joint or group-directed action for mutual aid or protection, without requiring any union. A unilateral change alters mandatory conditions without satisfying applicable bargaining duties, subject to lawful authority or exceptions. These rules apply during organizing, daily workplace administration, and an existing collective agreement. Train supervisors with accurate distinctions, preserve the actual record, consult appropriately, and remedy identified harm. The fictional case and practice questions show why ordinary management decisions deserve this careful rights-based assessment. Next, we turn to distributive and integrative bargaining, and how preparation shapes negotiation choices.
About Human Resources Management at UPI Study
Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses
Why take it here
Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About What Employers Can and Can't Do During Organizing and Bargaining
What are employers not allowed to do during a union organizing campaign?
What can an employer legally say to employees about a union?
Can an employer ban union solicitation and literature at work?
Can an employer stop employees from discussing their pay?
About the Human Resources Management course
How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Human Resources Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →