UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 12.7 Free with a free account
Working From Home, Virtual Teams, and Telecommuting
Human Resources Management · Chapter 12: Diversity, Remote Work, and Other Modern HR ChallengesSection 12.7 · lesson 91 of 9116 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Human Resources Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Human Resources Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
← HR Software Systems: Costs, Benefits, and What They Change
In this lesson
Choose arrangements for actual work; evaluate evidence, equity and legal requirements. Close the course as one system.
- Distinguish location, schedule and team arrangements.
- Assess claims using task, comparison, measure and context.
- Design eligibility, decision rights and review; connect the course’s four parts.
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,856 words). Read along, or search it.
Chapter 12
Working From Home and Virtual Teams
Alternative arrangements change when or where work happens, and who is physically present together. Fully remote work has no regular workplace attendance requirement; hybrid work combines locations. The hybrid pattern matters: fixed days, employee choices, team coordination, and individual discretion can differ substantially. Flexible hours change timing; compressed weeks preserve hours; job sharing divides a role. Virtual teams coordinate across locations, even when members work at different employer sites. Evaluate claims using the task, arrangement, comparison, outcome measure, and period studied. Equity concerns eligibility, proximity-based opportunity, and unequal household circumstances. Management specifies contributions and designs communication, learning, and cross-team contact. Legal and administrative review covers hours, home-work distinctions, expenses, locations, and information security. Rivermark's case connects role criteria, recorded reasons, and visible development opportunities. We close by connecting the course's four parts and the decisions that affect several of them.
SIX ARRANGEMENTS
Specify What Changes, and the Management Work It Creates
Fully remote work removes regular attendance, requiring deliberate induction, access, coordination, and cross-team connections. Employer-set hybrid days can support concentrated collaboration, when shared attendance serves actual tasks. Employee-chosen days require coordination, because interdependent colleagues may otherwise never attend together. Hybrid can also require a chosen minimum, use team-coordinated days, or permit individual discretion. Flexible hours vary timing within limits, including constrained self-scheduling for some shift roles. Plan coverage, core hours, and meetings; flexible timing does not automatically change location. A compressed week keeps full-time hours in fewer days, commonly creating longer scheduled days. For illustration, forty hours can become four ten-hour days; a reduced-hours week is different. Check fatigue, coverage, and applicable overtime rules, without importing federal-employee rules into every employer. Job sharing divides one role between two people, requiring clear handover and decision authority. A virtual team coordinates across locations, including employer sites; work-life access and software remain relevant foundations.
EVIDENCE AND ITS SCOPE
Compare the Task, Measure, Arrangement and Counterfactual
Productivity studies measure different things: reported output, hours, ratings, calls, code, or revenue. They compare different arrangements and tasks, including voluntary versus imposed work and individual versus interdependent contribution. Periods of emergency change also differ from deliberately designed ordinary arrangements. Neither a universal productivity increase nor a universal decline follows from those varied findings. Bloom, Han, and Liang's Trip.com trial allowed two home days, improving retention without detected harm on measured performance. That hybrid setting cannot settle every fully remote or operational role's outcome. Yang and colleagues studied Microsoft's firm-wide remote shift in twenty twenty, finding more separated communication networks. Deliberate cross-team contact is a response to test, rather than proven complete replacement for incidental connections. Early-career staff can lose incidental learning access; design induction, buddies, observation, and reviewed work. Flexibility is valued by many, and can broaden recruitment reach; actual retention and lawful locations remain conditional. Use contextual evidence without asserting an unsupported universal ranking of which group or outcome is most affected.
THREE EQUITY QUESTIONS
Who Can Access the Arrangement, Opportunity and a Usable Workspace?
Eligibility is the first equity question, because many operational jobs require physical presence. Explain actual requirements and consider other usable flexibility, rather than silently favor office roles. Proximity bias concerns visibility, informal information, and opportunity beyond relevant performance. An employee present when something arises may be considered while a comparable colleague elsewhere is overlooked. Different attendance patterns can create group effects, but need actual decision and usage evidence. Do not infer someone's care burden, commitment, or ambition from their gender or arrangement. Household circumstances are the third question: space, equipment, privacy, and shared responsibilities vary. A home office and a crowded shared surface do not provide the same working conditions. Ask actual needs and examine accessible alternatives, without assuming home work benefits everybody equally. Publish opportunities and assess relevant contribution, rather than reward visibility alone. Handle individual accommodation duties separately from ordinary role eligibility, using the applicable framework.
MANAGEMENT CHANGES
Specify Contributions and Design the Missing Connections
Management by output starts with clear objectives, standards, deliverables, and dates. Contribution includes quality, service, and collaboration, rather than easily counted volume alone. Keyboard activity is an incomplete performance proxy, because presence does not equal useful contribution. That does not eliminate legitimate timekeeping, security, or coordination needs under proportionate, lawful controls. Communication norms specify channels, response expectations, written information, and decision records. People outside a room need usable information to act on the same decision. Design cross-team contact and trust-building time, then check whether participation and information access improve. Learning needs buddies, observation, reviewed work, and a convenient route for small questions. Use shared attendance for work that benefits from co-presence, explaining the actual purpose. Some difficult conversations and collaboration can also work online; no setting is uniquely effective for every task. Managers must design and review the process, rather than assume location itself solves coordination.
LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW
Approve the Location and the Operating Rules Before Work Moves
For covered nonexempt employees, record and pay compensable work, including work the employer knows is occurring. Exercise reasonable diligence with usable unscheduled-time reporting; do not prevent or discourage accurate reporting. Federal OSHA's directive does not inspect or hold employers liable for ordinary employee home offices. Other home worksites and employer-provided or required processes receive different treatment; required work-related injury records can still apply. Check applicable state safety and workers' compensation rules with qualified advisers. Review necessary expenses and equipment under the actual jurisdiction; no universal reimbursement amount is supplied. Working from another state can affect registration, withholding, insurance, and local leave, pay, or notice obligations. Another country adds immigration, tax-presence, and data-transfer questions, depending on the actual facts. Maintain approved work locations and obtain counsel and tax advice before approving exceptions. Security owners review devices, networks, printed records, and confidential conversations in shared spaces. Neither an arrangement's convenience nor an unchanged job title settles those location-specific obligations.
THREE POLICY DECISIONS
Make the Eligibility Basis and Review Process Visible
Three policy decisions make the arrangement basis visible and reviewable. Set eligibility from actual role requirements, publish supported patterns, and use a consistent framework for comparable work. Material operational differences need evidence, rather than an unexplained local preference. Explicit decision rights name who decides, acceptable refusal grounds, required records, and the review route. Review applicable accommodation, contractual, and collective-bargaining duties before treating ordinary eligibility as the complete answer. An individual legal right may require a different assessment, even within the same role. Agree review timing, relevant evidence, and the process when work or circumstances change. Explain adjustments so that withdrawal is not experienced as arbitrary punishment. Consistency means the same stated basis, rather than an identical answer regardless of material facts. Approved locations, equipment, learning, and access to opportunities must be implemented alongside the written policy. Managers retain justified operational decisions, with a reasoned record and a usable review mechanism.
COMPOSITE CASE: RIVERMARK FOODS
The Complaints Concern the Decision Basis, Rather Than More Days
Fictional Rivermark Foods has eight months of complaints after leaving hybrid arrangements to each manager. Two planners doing the same job receive three home days and no home days, without an explained refusal. Another employee loses an arrangement when her manager changes, despite having relied on it. Two daily-attending finance employees receive the last three development opportunities because they were nearby. Managers value discretion and may know genuine coverage requirements; operations fears arrangements it would prefer to refuse. Employees ask why comparable jobs get different answers, rather than simply demand more days. HR and function heads publish role classifications and supported work patterns. Managers can refuse on stated operational grounds, which must be recorded and reviewed. Development opportunities are posted, with relevant selection evidence replacing incidental presence-based access. HR seeks advice before applying a new classification to the employee whose relied-on arrangement was withdrawn. Eligibility design and opportunity access are separate defects; repairing both requires accountable decisions.
THE COURSE IN FOUR PARTS
An HR Decision Moves More Than One Part of the System
The twelve chapters connect in four parts, rather than stand as unrelated subjects. Chapters one and two define HR's function, alignment, environment, and workforce context. The function builds needed capability while ensuring lawful, consistent treatment; tensions require named trade-offs. Chapters three and four connect motivation and work design with planning, hiring, and exit. Examine role requirements, discretion, and managerial assumptions before attributing every difficulty to the person. Chapters five through eight connect development, performance, reward, rights, safety, and conditions. Selection shapes who can develop; development shapes promotion; appraisal and reward influence behavior. Exit information can expose problems across that life cycle, if it is collected and used. Chapters nine through twelve add law, collective voice, international context, diversity, systems, and arrangements. Legal compliance is a required floor; a lawful practice can still be poorly designed or unfair in effect. An accountable decision must connect organizational capability with consistent treatment and evidence, without pretending the objectives never conflict.
8 DEFINITIONS
State What the Arrangement or Evidence Does Not Establish
An alternative arrangement changes timing, location, or physical co-presence, rather than describe one uniform benefit. Hybrid work combines workplace and elsewhere under a pattern that must be specified. A virtual team coordinates across locations, without every member necessarily working at home. Weak ties connect people beyond their closest work group, rather than mean distrust or useless online relationships. Proximity bias gives presence undue influence over access, without attendance alone proving a biased decision. Management by output assesses relevant results, quality, and contribution, rather than volume alone. It does not mean abandoning lawful hours records or legitimate coordination information. Eligibility by role uses published work-based criteria, while allowing material differences and individual legal rights. Jurisdictional exposure means another location can create obligations, rather than authorize unrestricted work from anywhere. Use each definition to identify the actual policy question and what the label leaves unsettled. Productivity, access, learning, and legality need evidence about the specific work and decision.
8 CLAIM TESTS
Separate Conditional Evidence From Universal Assertions
The eight claims mix contextual evidence with unsupported generalizations. Claims one and eight, universal productivity gains and fewer home-work hours, need matched roles and credible measures. Claim two, many valuing flexibility and removal being associated with departures, is supported conditionally. Actual preferences and departures matter; an association alone does not prove removal caused every departure. Claim seven, wider recruitment reach without daily geographic constraints, is reasonable within lawful employment locations and role needs. Claim three, weaker cross-team ties by default, has specific-context support rather than inevitable effects. Test actual network access and whether deliberate design changes it. Claim five identifies junior learning vulnerability, without establishing that juniors are always the most affected group. Claim four, hybrid fitting every role, needs role and coverage evidence and is unsupported as stated. Claim six, activity replacing output assessment, confuses a partial proxy with total contribution. Specify task, arrangement, period, measures, and plausible alternatives before choosing the story management prefers.
4 ROLE COMPARISONS AND COURSE CLOSE
Choose a Supported Pattern and Change the Management Process
For a payroll administrator, remote or hybrid can fit secure access, deadlines, coverage, and verified outputs. A first-line production supervisor usually needs onsite coverage; usable hours or job sharing still require handover design. For an eight-person engineering team, test coordinated hybrid or supported remote work with shared decisions and quality review. A newly qualified analyst needs a buddy, observation, frequent review, and a questions route under the chosen pattern. These are conditional designs to test, rather than universal prescriptions based on job titles. The reverse policy's unexplained manager discretion creates inconsistent eligibility, while nearby employees receive disproportionate development access. Publish role criteria with recorded operational decisions and review; separately post opportunities and assess relevant evidence. Performance criteria and the causal effects of particular HR practices still require credible, context-specific evaluation. Privacy, worker classification, and distributed arrangements raise evolving questions, alongside current legal obligations. HR serves organizational capability and consistent employee treatment; real conflicts require explicit judgment, rather than choosing only one side. That connected, defensible decision process is the thread running through the course.
About Human Resources Management at UPI Study
Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses
Why take it here
Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Working From Home, Virtual Teams, and Telecommuting
What is the difference between remote work, hybrid work, and flexible schedules?
Does working from home increase productivity?
What is proximity bias in hybrid work?
What legal issues should employers consider for remote employees?
About the Human Resources Management course
How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Human Resources Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →