UPI Study › Courses › Human Resources Management › Free lessons › Lesson 5.1 Free with a free account
Human Resource Management: Identifying Employee Training Needs
Human Resources Management · Chapter 5: Training Employees, Building Careers, and Handling Workplace DisciplineSection 5.1 · lesson 30 of 9115 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Human Resources Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Human Resources Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Human Resource Management: Types of Training Programs and New Hire Orientation →← Human Resource Management: Employee Resignation and Voluntary SeparationNext lesson: Human Resource Management: Types of Training Programs and New Hire Orientation →
In this lesson
Diagnose the performance gap before choosing a course.
- Analyze organizational, task, and individual requirements
- Distinguish skill gaps from motivation and system barriers
- Write observable learning objectives and prioritize needs
- Document the diagnosis and meet actual training obligations
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,867 words). Read along, or search it.
Training Employees, Building Careers, and Handling Workplace Discipline
Training Needs Assessment
Training needs assessment asks what capability is missing, rather than which course is easiest to commission. A visible performance problem can have several causes, and a course will address only some. We will analyze requirements at organizational, task, and individual levels before choosing an intervention. The diagnosis distinguishes missing skills from other causes. Unfavorable consequences and operational barriers can also prevent successful work. Those causes can coexist, so the assessment must consider their interaction rather than force a single label. An observable objective then specifies the behavior, conditions, and standard the learning should produce. Priority depends on consequences and strategy, as well as the number of people affected. Mandatory training adds actual legal requirements, which cannot be reduced to collecting completion certificates. Harlow's fictional claim error illustrates why evidence matters before a manager requests teamwide retraining. The assessment record makes the reasoning reviewable, including the nontraining changes needed for improvement.
Organizational Analysis
Start With the Capability the Organization Needs
Organizational analysis connects learning to the capability required by strategy and the operating environment. A new market, service, system, or regulated activity may require skills the present workforce lacks. Employees may currently meet standards for existing work. The future requirement still matters. The analysis also examines the transfer climate: conditions that support using learning after a course. A supervisor may treat practice time as lost production, making the newly taught method difficult to adopt. Heavy workload can leave no opportunity to practice, while equipment may not support the new procedure. Incentives can continue rewarding the old behavior, despite a course explaining why it should change. Ask whether people will have support, tools, time, and consequences consistent with the desired performance. Where conditions are hostile, address them before or alongside training rather than blame reluctant learners afterward. Without that organizational check, a well-delivered program can teach a method that nobody gets to use.
Task Analysis
Identify the Actual Decisions and Skills
Task analysis identifies the work employees must perform, and the knowledge, skills, and abilities it requires. A duty might say resolves customer escalations. It does not describe the actual decisions involved. Identify the systems, common cases, authority limits, and information needed to choose an appropriate response. Current job analysis provides a starting point, but observation should check how work actually occurs. Consider frequency and difficulty together, alongside the consequences when the task is performed incorrectly. A rare, complex task may need deliberate practice, because ordinary exposure gives little opportunity to learn. Frequent, straightforward work can sometimes be learned quickly, but that is not a universal exemption. A common task can still carry serious safety consequences, or specific training requirements under applicable rules. Avoid training for an idealized job, an obsolete procedure, or duties that employees no longer perform. The task analysis must establish usable capability, rather than translate every job-description sentence into a course title.
Person Analysis
Triangulate Who Needs Which Capability
Person analysis determines which individuals need the capability, rather than assume the entire team lacks it. Performance records locate errors or unmet standards, but rarely establish the cause on their own. A competency assessment can observe specific behavior, provided the task design and assessor are suitable. Self-assessment engages employees and reveals felt needs, although people can misjudge their own capability. Those with substantial gaps may not recognize them, while confident ratings need independent evidence too. Manager assessment adds observation and context. It can also reflect bias or limited exposure to the work. Triangulate these sources, particularly when their conclusions disagree about the same person's apparent training need. Disagreement is useful diagnostic information, rather than something to eliminate by averaging ratings mechanically. Use job-related, nondiscriminatory assessment, and observe the applicable limits on disability-related inquiries and medical information. Medical records require separate confidentiality safeguards under the ADA; ordinary training records should not become medical files.
Diagnosis
Different Causes Need Different Interventions
A skill gap means the employee cannot perform adequately, even with suitable conditions and appropriate effort. Instruction, practice, and feedback can develop that missing capability when the diagnosis is sound. A motivation problem involves someone capable of the work, whose behavior responds to unfavorable expectations or consequences. Review incentives and supervision, rather than assume a repeat explanation will change what the organization rewards. A system barrier can prevent performance regardless of personal capability. Tools, information, staffing, or process may be responsible. Training the person cannot supply an approval, required information, or equipment that remains unavailable. Ask whether the employee can perform under direct observation, with necessary resources and full attention. That is useful evidence, rather than proof that every component of competence has been established. Mixed causes require coordinated action: clarify expectations, develop a genuine skill gap, and remove operational barriers. Training can support improvement, but must not replace the system or consequence change the evidence requires.
Diagnosis Examples
Look at the Pattern Across People and Conditions
The first example concerns mispicks concentrated at a warehouse, compared with three other sites. New pickers make similar errors there, while experienced staff transferred away stop making them. That pattern points toward a site condition, such as labeling, lighting, or the arrangement of stock. Investigate the conditions before retraining everyone. Confirm the explanation with actual task evidence. The second example involves a payroll system going live in eight weeks, which nobody has used. Here, a genuine new capability is required, so practice in a test environment is appropriate. The third involves safety checks performed while a supervisor watches, but skipped in other circumstances. The pattern suggests consequences or supervision, although workload and other barriers should also be checked. A reminder course cannot compensate for conditions that reward skipping a safety check to save time. Each pattern changes the investigation, showing why an error count alone cannot identify the right intervention.
Targeted Responses
Match Practice to the Missing Capability
An experienced advisor handles routine work successfully, but struggles with two complex cases under full attention. That evidence supports targeted practice and feedback, rather than repeating all introductory material for the advisor. Specify the difficult decisions and assess them, so the intervention addresses the particular missing capability. Late invoices provide a different example, when finance cannot approve them until a manager supplies codes. If coding is optional, the workflow permits missing information. Better training for finance staff cannot supply it. Require the necessary information and assign responsibility, rather than commission a course for the blocked department. The final example is a supervisor who gives feedback only at the annual review. If the supervisor has never learned the skill, practice and observation can develop effective conversations. Manager modeling also helps demonstrate how feedback should be used during ordinary work, beyond a formal session. These examples match the response to evidence, avoiding a general course whenever a targeted or operational change fits.
Routes and Priorities
A Training Request Is a Proposed Solution
Needs surface through performance reviews, errors, defects, incidents, customer complaints, and evidence about the employee experience. New systems and changed requirements can create future needs, before current performance measures show a problem. Exit and turnover information may reveal supervisory weaknesses, but their cause requires investigation rather than assumption. A manager's training request is a proposed solution. Ask what problem prompted that request. Establish what happened, how often, who was affected, and what should be different after intervention. Then assess priority using risk, strategic importance, and reach, rather than employee popularity alone. Risk includes safety, legal consequences, and material financial harm from failing to close the gap. Strategic importance considers capability essential to a significant organizational direction, including upcoming changes in work. Reach considers the people and processes affected, but a large audience does not automatically outrank serious risk. A high-risk gap affecting four people may deserve priority over a low-risk preference expressed by four hundred.
Learning Objectives
State Behavior, Conditions, and a Standard
A learning objective describes observable behavior, the conditions for performance, and a standard for judging success. Understand complaint handling does not identify what the learner must actually do in a case. The course's example gives an advisor a described complaint, together with the applicable organizational policy. The required behavior is selecting the correct escalation route, and recording all the information that is required. The standard permits no omitted mandatory field, in four out of five cases presented for assessment. That makes the evidence more specific than attendance, confidence, or recalling a definition from memory. The conditions of performance matter. Using a supplied policy is different from recalling every rule unaided. The standard must fit the real task and its risks, rather than copy an arbitrary pass mark. Use the objective to choose practice cases, feedback, and the assessment that will demonstrate capability. If the objective remains vague, return to the task analysis before buying a program that cannot be evaluated.
Mandatory Training
Meet the Actual Training Requirement
Mandatory training can apply even when nobody has an individually diagnosed skill gap at present. The Occupational Safety and Health Act of nineteen seventy supports hazard-related requirements under applicable OSHA standards. Some states also impose workplace training requirements, including harassment prevention, with jurisdiction-specific coverage and timing. Check the actual rule and audience, rather than presume every employer faces the same training schedule. Completion documentation is relevant. It does not establish that required content was understood or skills acquired. OSHA training must use language and vocabulary employees can understand, accounting for the actual audience. Specific standards can require demonstrated knowledge or skill, retraining, or an opportunity for interactive questions. A short module cannot satisfy such obligations merely because the system records that it was completed. Track administrative completion, learning, and use at work separately, while meeting the substantive applicable requirements. Obtain advice on actual coverage, and design the assessment to establish the understanding or capability required.
Composite Case
Harlow Found a Selection Error, Not a Teamwide Gap
At fictional Harlow Mutual, a claims adjuster selects the wrong schedule and pays roughly four times the correct amount. Rina requests a full-team refresher. Training becomes the initial response, rather than an established need. The adjuster's previous claims were correct, and other team members had not made the same error. That weakens the teamwide-gap explanation, although it does not conclusively prove the employee needs no additional skill. Adjacent schedule entries differ by one word, and the system provides no confirmation step before settlement. A backlog also creates pressure to move quickly, making the interface and workload relevant to the investigation. The accepted response renames entries, adds confirmation for high settlements, and supplies a fifteen-minute briefing. It replaces a full-day refresher with changes that address the selection error, alongside concise instruction. The director wants visible action; the employee wants a fair record; the business wants recurrence prevented. A training certificate would satisfy neither the causal diagnosis nor those interests without an effective change.
Assessment Record
Make the Reasoning Reviewable Before Commissioning Training
Record the problem and evidence, including frequency, consequences, and the sources used to understand it. Summarize findings at organizational, task, and person levels, so the reasoning can be reviewed together. State the diagnosis and why alternatives were rejected, rather than record only the preferred intervention's name. Identify the population and learning objectives, describing who needs to do what under which conditions. Explain priority through risk, strategic importance, and reach, particularly when funding requires choices between competing needs. Record required nontraining actions, with responsibility for changes that must support use of the learning. Specify the evaluation measure before delivery, so success is not defined retrospectively by a favorable attendance rate. The result is a reviewable decision, rather than a calendar entry that assumes the diagnosis was correct. Training develops capability when capability is missing, while other causes demand the changes their evidence supports. The next section considers training types and delivery methods, chosen after the need has been established.
About Human Resources Management at UPI Study
Human Resources Management (Business 306) is a self-paced online course of 91 video lessons in 12 chapters, from what HR does and how jobs are designed to hiring, training, performance reviews, pay and benefits, safety, employment law, unions, global staffing and remote work. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses
Why take it here
Why students take Human Resources Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Human Resources Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Human Resource Management: Identifying Employee Training Needs
What are the three levels of a training needs assessment?
How can you tell whether a performance problem needs training?
How do you write a measurable training objective?
How should HR prioritize training needs?
About the Human Resources Management course
How many college credits is Human Resources Management?
How much does Human Resources Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Human Resources Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Human Resources Management.
91 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →