Avoiding Deception in Research, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Research Methods in Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 2.5 Free with a free account

Avoiding Deception in Research

Research Methods in Psychology · Chapter 2: Ethics and Integrity in ResearchSection 2.5 · lesson 12 of 9410 min · free with a free account

← Maintaining Ethical Standards in PracticeNext lesson: Handling Misconduct and Meeting Legal Obligations →

Earn 3 college credits for Research Methods in PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 111 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Ethical limits of concealment and the obligations that accompany its use.

  • Define deception and separate active from passive
  • Identify when deception is ethically permissible
  • Design an effective debriefing procedure
  • Describe alternatives that avoid deception entirely

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,348 words). Read along, or search it.

Ethics and Integrity in Research

Avoiding Deception in Research

This section deals with an ethical problem psychology has never fully solved. Deception in research means giving participants false or incomplete information, on purpose. It sits in one of the most contested ethical territories in the discipline. The uncomfortable part is that it sometimes works, scientifically. Some questions may be unanswerable without it. By the end you will define deception, and tell active apart from passive. You will identify the conditions under which deception is ethically permissible. You will design a debriefing procedure that actually discharges the obligation. And you will describe alternatives that reduce or remove the need for deception. Keep one thing in mind throughout. Deception is never ethically neutral.

Contested Ground

Why Deception Is Never Neutral

Start with the definition, because it is broader than most people expect. Deception is the intentional provision of false or incomplete information to participants. Incomplete counts. You do not have to say something untrue to deceive someone. Now the case for it, stated honestly. Some research questions about social influence and conformity may be impossible to answer otherwise. The same goes for questions about unconscious cognition. If people know what you are testing, they often stop behaving naturally. That is the scientific argument, and it is a real one. Now the other side of the ledger. Deception fundamentally compromises the informed consent process. It can harm participants, erode public trust, and damage psychology's reputation.

Five Forms

What Actually Counts as Deception

Deception is not one thing, and treating it as one thing hides the small cases. It ranges from deliberate misinformation about a study's purpose. Down to the far subtler concealment of a confederate, or of your real hypothesis. Five forms come up again and again. Active deception, and passive deception. The use of confederates, and cover stories. And false feedback about the participant's own performance. Notice that only the first involves saying something flatly untrue. The other four work by what they leave out, or by who is pretending.

Types And Cases

The Five Forms, With Examples

Take those five forms with their examples attached. Active deception provides false information about a study's purpose, procedures, or stimuli. Telling participants you are studying learning, when you are studying obedience. Passive deception withholds information participants would likely consider relevant to their decision. Not disclosing that a confederate will insult them during the study. That is the form students most often fail to recognize as deception. Confederates are actors who pose as participants or bystanders. A confederate pretending to need help, in a study of bystander intervention. A cover story is a plausible but false explanation of the study's purpose. Claiming the study is about memory, when it examines racial bias. And false feedback gives inaccurate information about a participant's own performance. Telling participants they scored unusually low on an intelligence test.

The Case Against

Five Objections Worth Taking Seriously

Many ethicists argue deception is fundamentally incompatible with respect for persons. On that view it should be avoided wherever it possibly can be. Their objections come in five parts, and each is worth taking seriously. First, violation of autonomy. Deception denies participants the information they need to make a genuinely informed decision. Second, breach of trust. Participants who discover they were deceived may feel violated, and lose trust in psychology. Third, cumulative harm. Widespread use of deception makes potential participants suspicious of all research. That is the suspicious subject problem, and it damages studies that come later. Fourth, participant distress, as with Milgram's participants who believed they had harmed others. And fifth, scientific integrity. A discipline that routinely deceives undermines its own honesty.

When Permitted

The Four Conditions, All Required

So when is deception actually permitted? The APA Ethics Code answers that in Standard eight point zero seven. It permits deception only when all four of the following conditions are met. All four. Not the most convenient one. First, scientific justification. The study must have significant scientific, educational, or applied value. Value that could not be achieved through non-deceptive methods. Second, no effective alternative. Researchers must have determined that no non-deceptive design is feasible for the question. Third, no significant harm. The deception must not cause significant pain, or severe emotional distress. And fourth, full debriefing, as soon as possible after participation.

Never Permitted

Four Absolute Prohibitions

Some deceptions are barred outright, whatever the scientific case for them. No value calculation reaches these. You may never deceive participants about the voluntary nature of their participation. You may never use deception that could cause lasting psychological harm, or trauma. You may never deceive in ways that stop participants protecting their own safety. And you may never withhold information from participants who are in physical danger. Look at what those four share. Each one removes a person's ability to protect themselves. The permissibility conditions are a balance of costs and benefits. These are not a balance at all. They are the floor, and the floor does not move.

The Debrief

Debriefing Is Not Optional

Debriefing is the post-study process that reveals the truth to participants. The true nature of the research, and its real purpose. Where deception was used, a thorough debriefing is not optional. It is the obligation the permission was granted on. Step one. Clearly explain the study's true purpose and hypotheses. Step two. Describe the specific deception used, and why it was necessary. Step three, and this is the one that gets skipped. Assure participants their responses were typical, and not a sign of personal failings. Think about why that step has to exist. Someone who complied, or who failed to help, leaves with a new self-belief. An unflattering one, formed under conditions the researcher engineered.

Finishing Properly

The Three Steps People Skip

Three more steps finish the job. Step four. Provide an opportunity for questions, and give genuine answers. Genuine is doing real work in that sentence. Step five. Offer information about professional support, if the study caused distress. And step six, which is the one that costs researchers something. Allow participants to withdraw their data after learning the true nature of the study. That step matters more than it looks. It hands back a piece of the decision the deception took away. A debriefing without it is a disclosure, not a debriefing. The difference is whether the participant can still act on what they learned.

Before You Deceive

Five Alternatives to Work Through First

Before resorting to deception, work through the alternatives systematically. Not as a formality. As a genuine search. Role play asks participants to imagine a scenario, and respond as they would in reality. It is ethical, but results may reflect self-presentation rather than actual behavior. Naturalistic observation watches behavior in natural settings, without participant awareness. That avoids deception, but it raises privacy concerns instead. Prior consent designs get agreement in advance to one of several possible conditions. Including aversive ones, without the participant knowing which they will receive. Simulation studies build realistic conditions on a computer. No deception about the fundamental nature of the study is needed. And full disclosure designs tell participants every feature of the study. Demand characteristics then get managed through careful procedure design instead.

Applying It

A Case That Divides People

Try the framework on a real design problem. A researcher wants to study racial bias in hiring decisions. The plan is to send identical CVs to employers, with names suggesting different ethnic backgrounds. The employers are not told, and they never consented. Run the four conditions against it. Does the study have value that no non-deceptive design could achieve? Is a feasible alternative available? Will anyone suffer significant harm? And can every deceived employer actually be debriefed afterward? Now build the opposite argument, because you will need that too. If deception were banned outright, some questions about obedience and bystander intervention could not have been asked.

Section Summary

A Necessary but Serious Tool

Pull the section together. Deception in research is a necessary tool, and an ethically serious one. Its use must be carefully justified, strictly limited, and hedged with real safeguards. Thorough debriefing is the most important of those safeguards. A confederate is an actor who poses as a fellow participant or bystander. A cover story is a plausible but false explanation of a study's true purpose. It exists to reduce demand characteristics, not to make the study easier to run. Debriefing is post-study disclosure of the true purpose and procedures. Researchers must explore non-deceptive alternatives before concluding deception is the only feasible approach. The trust participants and the public place in psychology depends on that judgment.

About Research Methods in Psychology at UPI Study

Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) is a self-paced online course of 94 video lessons in 16 chapters, from the scientific method and research ethics to designs, data collection, sampling, measurement, validity, experiments, descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Research Methods vs Statistics

Why take it here

Why students take Research Methods in Psychology with UPI Study

How psychologists know what they knowResearch Methods in Psychology teaches how psychological studies are designed, run and judged: research ethics, surveys and observation, correlational and experimental designs, sampling, reliability and validity, and the statistics used to test hypotheses. It is a core course in psychology and many social-science degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Research Methods in Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Avoiding Deception in Research

What is the difference between active and passive deception in research?
Active deception gives participants false information, such as saying a study is about learning when it is really about obedience. Passive deception withholds information participants would likely consider relevant, such as not telling them a confederate will insult them. Other common forms include confederates, who are actors posing as participants or bystanders, cover stories that give a false purpose, and false feedback about a participant's performance.
When is deception allowed in psychology research?
Under APA Ethics Code Standard 8.07, deception is permitted only when the study has significant scientific, educational or applied value, no effective non-deceptive method is feasible, participants are not deceived about any part of the research reasonably expected to cause physical pain or severe emotional distress, and participants are told the truth as early as feasible. Researchers must also let participants withdraw their data once they learn of the deception.
What should a debriefing include after a study that used deception?
A debriefing should explain the study's true purpose and hypotheses, describe the deception and why it was needed, and reassure participants that their responses were typical rather than a sign of personal failing. It should also invite questions and answer them honestly, offer information about professional support if the study caused distress, and allow participants to withdraw their data now that they know the truth.
What are some alternatives to deception in psychology experiments?
Alternatives include role play, where participants imagine a scenario and say how they would respond; naturalistic observation of behavior in real settings; prior consent designs, where people agree in advance to one of several possible conditions without knowing which; computer simulations; and full disclosure designs that manage demand characteristics through procedure. Each has trade-offs, such as role play capturing self-presentation rather than actual behavior.

About the Research Methods in Psychology course

How many college credits is Research Methods in Psychology?
Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Research Methods in Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 94 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Research Methods in Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 94 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Research Methods in Psychology.

94 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Research Methods in Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →