Core Principles of Ethical Research, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Research Methods in Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 2.1 Free with a free account

Core Principles of Ethical Research

Research Methods in Psychology · Chapter 2: Ethics and Integrity in ResearchSection 2.1 · lesson 8 of 9411 min · free with a free account

← The Goals and Purposes Behind ResearchNext lesson: Informed Consent: Standard and Special Cases →

Earn 3 college credits for Research Methods in PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 111 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

The foundation on which trustworthy and meaningful science is built.

  • Identify the five core principles of ethical research
  • Trace the history that made formal ethics necessary
  • Apply beneficence and nonmaleficence to research scenarios
  • Distinguish justice, autonomy and fidelity as obligations

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,448 words). Read along, or search it.

Ethics and Integrity in Research

Core Principles of Ethical Research

Welcome to Chapter Two, on ethics and integrity in research. This chapter starts where every ethics discussion should start, with the principles themselves. Ethics is not a form you fill in at the end of a study. It shapes the design, the recruitment, the analysis, and the way findings get reported. By the end of this section you will name the five core principles of ethical research. You will trace the history that made formal ethical rules necessary. That history is uncomfortable, and it is the reason the rules exist. You will apply beneficence and nonmaleficence to real research scenarios. And you will tell justice, autonomy, and fidelity apart as distinct obligations. They overlap in practice, but they answer different questions.

Why Ethics Comes First

Every Decision Carries Ethical Weight

Ethics lies at the very heart of psychological research. Every decision a researcher makes carries ethical weight. That includes the design of the study, and the reporting of its findings. Without a principled ethical framework, even the most rigorous research can cause harm. It can erode public trust, and undermine the integrity of the discipline itself. Notice that rigor is not a defense here. A study can be methodologically flawless and still be unethical. The principles are not obstacles to scientific inquiry. They are the foundation on which trustworthy and meaningful science is built. And they are not abstract ideals, they are practical standards. They are embedded in professional codes, in federal regulations, and in institutional policies.

Where The Rules Came From

Nuremberg and Tuskegee

The formalization of research ethics did not emerge in a vacuum. It was precipitated by deeply troubling episodes in the history of human experimentation. Following World War Two, the Nuremberg Trials revealed the experiments of Nazi physicians. Those experiments were conducted on prisoners held in concentration camps. In response came the Nuremberg Code, in nineteen forty-seven. It was the first international document to require voluntary informed consent. Its language is absolute. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. Then Tuskegee. From nineteen thirty-two to nineteen seventy-two, researchers followed Black men with syphilis. Three hundred and ninety-nine of them, and none received effective treatment. That held even after penicillin became the standard cure, in nineteen forty-seven. Participants were not told the true nature of the study, and were actively deceived. When it was exposed in nineteen seventy-two, the outrage produced sweeping reforms.

Psychology's Own Cases

Milgram and the Stanford Prison Experiment

Psychology cannot treat those cases as somebody else's problem. Two of its own most famous studies prompted serious ethical concerns. Stanley Milgram's obedience studies ran in nineteen sixty-three. Participants believed they were administering potentially lethal electric shocks to another person. They were not, but they did not know that. Philip Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment followed in nineteen seventy-one. Student prisoners in that study experienced severe psychological distress. Both studies are still taught, because both were genuinely influential. That is exactly what makes them hard. Scientific value and ethical cost can rise together. These studies pushed the discipline to examine the ethical limits of research far more rigorously.

The Timeline

Six Milestones That Built the Rules

Put the landmark dates in order, and the shape of the field appears. Nineteen forty-seven. The Nuremberg Code, the first international standard requiring voluntary consent. Nineteen sixty-three. Milgram's obedience studies raise questions about psychological harm. Nineteen sixty-four. The Declaration of Helsinki expands the Nuremberg Code for medical research globally. Nineteen seventy-one. The Stanford Prison Experiment highlights the dangers of unchecked power. Nineteen seventy-two. The Tuskegee scandal is exposed. That exposure led directly to the National Research Act, in nineteen seventy-four. Nineteen seventy-nine. The Belmont Report defines respect, beneficence, and justice. Every one of those documents is a response to a specific failure. Research ethics is a field built out of its own worst episodes.

The Belmont Report

Three Principles, One Framework

The Belmont Report was published in nineteen seventy-nine. Its author was the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects. It remains one of the most influential documents in the history of research ethics. It named three principles, and each one turns into a concrete procedure. Respect for persons says individuals must be treated as autonomous agents, capable of deciding for themselves. Those with diminished autonomy must receive additional protections. Beneficence says researchers must maximize benefits, and minimize possible harms. Research should not be conducted if the risks outweigh the potential benefits. Justice says the burdens and benefits of research must be distributed fairly across society. Vulnerable groups must not bear a disproportionate burden. Each principle is operationalized differently, through consent, risk-benefit assessment, and fair subject selection.

From Belmont To APA

Aspirational Goals, Enforceable Standards

The American Psychological Association built on the Belmont framework. It produced a comprehensive Ethics Code, tailored to psychological research and practice. The code was first adopted in nineteen fifty-three. It was most recently updated in twenty seventeen. It addresses research, clinical, educational, and applied settings. The code is organized around five General Principles. Beneficence and nonmaleficence. Fidelity and responsibility. Integrity. Justice. And respect for people's rights and dignity. Those are followed by specific enforceable standards, and the difference between the two matters. The General Principles are aspirational goals. The Ethical Standards are obligatory, and they form the basis for adjudicating complaints.

Principle One

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Now take the five principles one at a time. Beneficence requires researchers to actively seek to benefit their participants, and society more broadly. Research should produce knowledge that improves human welfare, or advances scientific understanding. It might instead inform practice and policy in meaningful ways. Nonmaleficence is the complementary constraint, the obligation to do no harm. Researchers must take all reasonable steps to prevent or minimize harm. That means physical, psychological, social, and economic harm. Direct harm is the obvious kind, a distressing stimulus inside the study itself. Indirect harm is subtler, a breach of confidentiality that later results in discrimination. So weigh benefits against risks before you begin, and use the least invasive procedure available. Then monitor for distress throughout, and provide debriefing and referrals where they are needed.

Principles Two And Three

Fidelity, Responsibility, Integrity

Psychologists establish relationships of trust with research participants, with students, and with clients. Fidelity is the obligation to honor those relationships. Honesty, reliability, and consistent professional conduct. In research that means being transparent about study procedures. It means following through on commitments about compensation or feedback. And it means acknowledging conflicts of interest. Responsibility extends that obligation to the wider scientific community, and to society. Scientific standards, mentoring of junior researchers, contribution to public understanding. Integrity demands accuracy, honesty, and transparency in every scientific activity. It expressly prohibits fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. And it requires researchers to correct their own errors, promptly and publicly.

Principles Four And Five

Justice and Respect for Persons

Justice concerns the fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of research. Historically, the poor, incarcerated individuals, and racial minorities have borne a disproportionate burden. They received fewer of the benefits. Tuskegee is the most notorious example. So justice requires that participant selection rest on scientific criteria. Not on convenience, and not on the power differential between researcher and participant. It also means communities that take part get access to the benefits generated. The fifth principle is respect for people's rights and dignity. That covers privacy and confidentiality, and the right to withdraw at any point. It covers the special protections owed to members of vulnerable groups. And it extends into cultural competence, because procedures differ in meaning across cultures. What is routine in one setting may be coercive, confusing, or offensive in another.

Weighing It Up

Risk-Benefit Analysis

A central task in ethical review is the risk-benefit analysis. Risks are broader than most students expect. Physical discomfort, emotional distress, loss of privacy, damage to reputation, economic harm. Benefits come in three kinds. Direct benefits go to the participant, such as receiving an experimental treatment. Indirect benefits are subtler, such as increased self-understanding. Societal benefits arise from the knowledge the study produces. No absolute formula governs this analysis, but several factors are always weighed. The probability of harm, its severity, and its reversibility. The breadth of the population affected, and the importance of the knowledge to be gained. And one requirement is not negotiable. Risks must be minimized to the lowest level consistent with answering the research question.

When Principles Collide

Genuine Dilemmas and How to Resolve Them

Researchers regularly meet genuine ethical dilemmas. Those are situations where two or more principles pull in different directions. Deception may enhance internal validity, but it conflicts with informed consent and integrity. The resolution is full debriefing, board approval, and justification of scientific necessity. Privacy can conflict with the public interest. Consider a participant disclosing criminal activity during an interview. Define the limits of confidentiality in the consent form, and take legal advice. Autonomy can conflict with welfare, when a distressed participant wants to keep going. There, the obligation to protect overrides the expressed preference. And the convenient use of psychology student samples sets scientific rigor against justice. Broaden the recruitment, and note the limits on generalizability. The principles apply to every research method, but their implications shift with the context.

About Research Methods in Psychology at UPI Study

Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) is a self-paced online course of 94 video lessons in 16 chapters, from the scientific method and research ethics to designs, data collection, sampling, measurement, validity, experiments, descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Research Methods vs Statistics

Why take it here

Why students take Research Methods in Psychology with UPI Study

How psychologists know what they knowResearch Methods in Psychology teaches how psychological studies are designed, run and judged: research ethics, surveys and observation, correlational and experimental designs, sampling, reliability and validity, and the statistics used to test hypotheses. It is a core course in psychology and many social-science degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Research Methods in Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Core Principles of Ethical Research

What are the three principles of the Belmont Report?
The Belmont Report, published in 1979, names three principles: respect for persons, beneficence and justice. Respect for persons treats individuals as autonomous agents and gives extra protection to those with diminished autonomy. Beneficence requires maximizing benefits and minimizing harms. Justice requires the burdens and benefits of research to be shared fairly. In practice they become informed consent, risk-benefit assessment and fair selection of participants.
What are the five general principles of the APA Ethics Code?
The APA Ethics Code lists five General Principles: beneficence and nonmaleficence; fidelity and responsibility; integrity; justice; and respect for people's rights and dignity. These principles are aspirational goals. They are followed by specific Ethical Standards, which are enforceable and form the basis for judging complaints. The code was first adopted in 1953 and covers research, clinical, educational and applied work.
What historical events led to modern research ethics rules?
Modern research ethics grew out of specific abuses. The Nuremberg Code of 1947, written after the trials of Nazi physicians, first required voluntary informed consent. The Tuskegee study (1932 to 1972) left 399 Black men with syphilis untreated even after penicillin became standard care. Its exposure led to the National Research Act of 1974 and the Belmont Report of 1979. Milgram's and Zimbardo's studies raised concerns within psychology.
What is the difference between beneficence and nonmaleficence in research ethics?
Beneficence is the duty to actively benefit participants and society, while nonmaleficence is the duty to do no harm. Nonmaleficence covers physical, psychological, social and economic harm, both direct harm such as a distressing stimulus and indirect harm such as a confidentiality breach that later leads to discrimination. In practice, researchers weigh benefits against risks, use the least invasive procedure, monitor for distress and provide debriefing.

About the Research Methods in Psychology course

How many college credits is Research Methods in Psychology?
Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Research Methods in Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 94 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Research Methods in Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 94 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Research Methods in Psychology.

94 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Research Methods in Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →