UPI Study › Courses › Research Methods in Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 1.7 Free with a free account
The Goals and Purposes Behind Research
Research Methods in Psychology · Chapter 1: Foundations of Psychological ResearchSection 1.7 · lesson 7 of 9410 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Research Methods in Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Research Methods in Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Core Principles of Ethical Research →← Basic and Applied ResearchNext lesson: Core Principles of Ethical Research →
In this lesson
What psychology ultimately tries to achieve.
- Name the four core goals of psychology
- Explain why each goal earns the next
- Separate legitimate influence from manipulation
- Recognize purposes beyond the classical four
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,273 words). Read along, or search it.
Foundations of Psychological Research
The Goals Behind Research
This is the final section of the chapter, and it steps back from technique. Every study you have met so far answers one specific question. But what is psychology, as a whole, trying to do? The traditional answer names four goals. Describe, predict, explain, and influence. They are not four options to choose between. They are four stages, and each one earns the right of the next. By the end, you will name all four and say why the order matters. You will separate legitimate influence from manipulation. And you will see why the power to influence carries ethical weight.
The Bigger Question
The Question Beneath All Questions
Every individual study addresses a specific research question. But psychological research as a whole is guided by a smaller set of goals. Broad ambitions that shape what counts as progress, and why the work matters. Naming those goals does two useful things. For a researcher, it places your own study in a larger context. For a reader, it clarifies what any given study actually contributes. That second use is the one most people skip. A study can be excellent and still not answer the question you brought to it. This final section draws together the strands of the previous sections. It asks what scientific psychology, taken collectively, is ultimately trying to do.
Four Classical Goals
Describe, Predict, Explain, Influence
Most introductory texts describe psychology as pursuing four interlocking goals. Describe, predict, explain, and control. That last word is often replaced by influence, and we will come to why. Each goal builds on the one before it. Together they capture the cumulative ambition of the discipline. Description asks what is happening. Prediction asks when, or under what conditions, it will happen. Explanation asks why it happens at all. And influence asks whether we can change it. The arc runs from observation to influence, and the later goals rest on the earlier ones.
What Exists
Description
Description is the starting point of any scientific investigation. It identifies what exists, what people do, and how phenomena are organized. The question it answers is simply this. What is happening? Surveys mapping the prevalence of anxiety disorders serve descriptive ends. So do observational studies documenting parent and child interaction patterns. And case studies of unusual psychological conditions. Description sounds modest. It is the least glamorous word on the list, and the most load-bearing. No science advances without it. Everything that follows depends on a clear, accurate account of the phenomenon. Get the description wrong, and every later stage inherits the error.
Under What Conditions
Prediction
Once a phenomenon has been described, researchers can look for systematic relationships. Relationships that allow prediction. The question becomes: when, or under what conditions, will this happen? High school grade point average predicts university performance. Childhood shyness predicts adult social anxiety. Findings like these let researchers and practitioners anticipate outcomes. Without yet explaining why the relationship holds. That point is worth sitting with for a moment. Prediction does not require causal understanding. It requires only a reliable association. A study may show that holding a pen in your non-dominant hand slightly worsens performance. Nobody needs to know why for that difference to be predictively useful. Many applied tools work at this level, including risk assessment scales and screening instruments.
Why It Happens
Explanation
Explanation moves beyond prediction to ask why a phenomenon occurs. Explanatory research seeks the underlying mechanisms. Cognitive, emotional, neurobiological, social, or developmental processes. The processes that actually produce the observed pattern. This is a far harder standard to meet. Explanation typically requires experimental evidence. It requires theoretical integration, and the elimination of rival accounts. That last requirement is where most explanatory claims come apart. A satisfying explanation tells us not only that A predicts B, but how A produces B. And why the relationship can be expected to hold across different conditions.
Control And Influence
The Fourth Goal
The fourth goal is the most ambitious, and the most ethically charged. Using psychological knowledge to influence behavior, mental processes, or outcomes. When clinicians treat depression, they are exercising it. When educators design curricula, so are they. When human factors engineers redesign cockpit displays. When public health campaigns encourage vaccination. Each of these applies evidence in order to produce an intended outcome. The technical term for this goal is control, and the word does real damage. Control in psychology does not mean coercion. It means the systematic application of evidence to produce intended outcomes. Usually outcomes that the participants themselves want.
Ethical Limits
Influence, and Where It Stops
Because the language of control can sound paternalistic, or even manipulative. Contemporary psychology often substitutes the term influence, or change. The ethical boundary itself is clear enough. Techniques that help people achieve their own goals are appropriate. Managing anxiety, quitting smoking, improving sleep. Techniques used to manipulate people against their interests are not. Notice that the technique can be identical in both cases. What differs is whose goals are being served. The American Psychological Association, and similar bodies worldwide, set the requirement. Any application of psychological knowledge must respect autonomy and transparency. And informed consent, which later chapters take up in detail.
One Trajectory
The Four Goals in Sequence
The four goals are not alternative paths. They are cumulative stages. Consider the development of effective treatments for clinical depression. It reads as a single trajectory through all four. The first stage is description. Surveys document the prevalence, duration, and symptom profile of major depression. The second stage is prediction. Longitudinal studies identify risk factors, which may be genetic, social, or cognitive. The third stage is explanation. Experimental and neuroscientific research uncovers cognitive mechanisms, such as rumination. The fourth stage is influence. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, pharmacology, and behavioral activation programs. Four stages, and every one of them depended on the stage before it.
Skipping Stages
Each Goal Earns the Next
Which raises an obvious question. What happens if you skip a stage? Skipping stages produces shaky foundations. An intervention designed without proper description may target the wrong phenomenon. One designed without prediction may be applied to the wrong population. And one designed without explanation may appear to work, then fail when conditions change. Read that third failure again. It appears to work. That is exactly what makes it hard to catch. With no known mechanism, you cannot say where the effect should hold. So you cannot tell in advance which change will break it. Each goal earns the right of the next.
Broader Purposes
Beyond the Four Goals
The classical four describe what research tries to achieve about its subject matter. But research also serves broader purposes, at the level of the discipline itself. Theory development is the first. A single study may extend an existing theory to a new population. Or test a counter-prediction made by a rival theory. Or identify the boundary conditions under which a general principle fails. Methodological innovation is the second. Improved measures, refined paradigms, validated statistical techniques. Tools imported from other fields, including computational modeling and machine learning. Social betterment is the third. Reducing suffering, increasing opportunity, informing policy, advancing justice. And the fourth is education, because misunderstood or sensationalized research can cause harm.
Power And Duty
The Responsibility of Influence
One last responsibility, and it follows directly from that fourth goal. The goal of influence places real power in the hands of psychologists. Knowledge of persuasion, compliance, conditioning and cognitive bias can help people. The very same knowledge can be used to exploit them. Techniques that motivate adherence to medical regimens also work on consumer purchases. And on political opinions. The method does not settle the ethics. The purpose does. Codes of professional ethics, institutional review boards, and ongoing public discussion are the safeguards. They exist so that psychological knowledge serves human flourishing rather than its opposite. So carry one question into every study you read from here on. Not only what design is being used, but which goal is being served. It prevents a common mistake. Demanding causal explanation from a study designed only to describe.
About Research Methods in Psychology at UPI Study
Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) is a self-paced online course of 94 video lessons in 16 chapters, from the scientific method and research ethics to designs, data collection, sampling, measurement, validity, experiments, descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Research Methods vs Statistics
Why take it here
Why students take Research Methods in Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Research Methods in Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About The Goals and Purposes Behind Research
What are the four goals of psychology?
Does prediction in psychology require knowing the cause?
What does control mean as a goal of psychology?
How did depression research move from describing the disorder to treating it?
About the Research Methods in Psychology course
How many college credits is Research Methods in Psychology?
How much does Research Methods in Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Research Methods in Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Research Methods in Psychology.
94 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →