Recognizing and Managing Risks to Participants, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Research Methods in Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 2.3 Free with a free account

Recognizing and Managing Risks to Participants

Research Methods in Psychology · Chapter 2: Ethics and Integrity in ResearchSection 2.3 · lesson 10 of 9410 min · free with a free account

← Informed Consent: Standard and Special CasesNext lesson: Maintaining Ethical Standards in Practice →

Earn 3 college credits for Research Methods in PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 111 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Identifying, assessing, and minimizing harm across all research contexts.

  • Categorize the types of risk research can pose
  • Apply the concept of minimal risk correctly
  • Conduct a systematic risk-benefit analysis
  • Identify vulnerable groups needing extra protection

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,195 words). Read along, or search it.

Ethics and Integrity in Research

Recognizing and Managing Risks to Participants

The last two sections covered ethical principles, and informed consent. This one is about harm. Specifically, how to see it coming, and how to keep it small. Risk in psychology is a much wider category than most students expect. It is not mainly about physical injury. By the end you will categorize the types of risk research can pose. You will apply the concept of minimal risk correctly. You will conduct a systematic risk-benefit analysis on a proposed study. And you will identify the groups that require additional protections. Those groups need protection because of capacity, or because of circumstance.

The Obligation

Knowledge Does Not Justify Harm

A defining obligation of ethical research is protecting participants from harm. Knowledge creation is a legitimate goal, but it cannot justify exposing human beings to unnecessary risks. Nor to risks that are disproportionate, or inadequately communicated. Now notice what is missing from that sentence. There is no exception carved out for important research. The obligation to protect is not conditional upon scientific importance. No research question, however significant, justifies unnecessary risk. The obligation breaks into three practical tasks. Identify the full range of potential harms, assess them systematically, and implement safeguards.

Six Kinds Of Harm

Risk Is Rarely Only Physical

Risks in psychological research are rarely limited to physical harm. The field studies cognition, emotion, behavior, and social experience. So psychological, social, and economic harms are often the more salient ones. Physical risk is bodily harm from procedures. Blood draws, sleep deprivation, exposure to allergens. Psychological risk is emotional distress, anxiety, or trauma re-activation. Trauma interviews, failure feedback, exposure to disturbing stimuli. Social risk is damage to relationships, social standing, or community membership. Think of a study that discloses stigmatized attitudes to third parties. Economic risk is financial loss, or loss of employment. Legal risk is exposure to liability arising from disclosures made during research. And privacy risk is violation of privacy, confidentiality, or a person's sense of dignity.

Minimal Risk

A Threshold, Not a Guarantee

One phrase does an enormous amount of administrative work. Minimal risk. Federal regulations define it precisely, as the probability and magnitude of harm anticipated in the research. Not greater than those ordinarily encountered in daily life. Or during routine physical or psychological examinations. This threshold determines the level of review a study requires. So getting it wrong has procedural consequences, not just ethical ones. And here is the standard misreading. Minimal risk does not mean zero risk. It means the risks are comparable to everyday activities, like completing a questionnaire.

Weighing It Up

Six Factors in a Risk-Benefit Analysis

Ethical review requires weighing potential harms against potential benefits. This is where students want a formula, and there is not one. The analysis is not a precise mathematical calculation. It is qualitative judgment, guided by six named factors. Probability of harm. Severity of harm. Reversibility. Breadth of impact. Vulnerability. Scientific value. None of them is scored, and none outranks the others by rule. They are simply the things a reviewer is obliged to think about explicitly. Writing them down is what turns a hunch into a defensible judgment. Take them in two groups of three.

Likelihood And Severity

Probability, Severity, Reversibility

Probability of harm asks how likely it is that harm will occur. But likelihood alone never settles the question. Even a small probability of serious harm may be unacceptable. Severity of harm asks how serious the harm would be. Irreversible or severe harms require greater justification, while mild, transient discomforts require much less. Reversibility asks whether the harm can be reversed or treated. Temporary distress is generally more acceptable than permanent harm. These three interact, so judge them separately, and then together. A rare but catastrophic harm can outweigh a common but trivial one.

Who And How Many

Breadth, Vulnerability, Scientific Value

Breadth of impact asks how many people are at risk. Studies affecting hundreds require more scrutiny than small, closely monitored groups. Vulnerability asks whether participants have reduced capacity to protect themselves, and if so, heightened scrutiny is required. Scientific value asks how important the knowledge to be gained really is. Greater value may justify greater risk. And that is the sentence people quote without its second half. Greater risk is justifiable only once risk is minimized to the lowest feasible level. Importance never substitutes for minimization. You earn a risky study by first making it as safe as it can be.

Safeguards In Advance

Reduce the Risk Before You Start

Researchers are obligated to implement all feasible safeguards before a study begins. Three of the standard strategies do their work in advance. Pilot testing comes first. Run a small study to identify unforeseen risks before full-scale data collection. Pilots exist to find the problems the protocol did not predict. Second, stopping rules: pre-specify the criteria that trigger early termination if participants show distress. A rule decided in the moment is not a stopping rule. Pre-specification is exactly what makes it protective. Third, data security. Encryption, anonymization, and access controls protect participant privacy.

Safeguards In Flight

Protection Does Not End at Recruitment

Protection does not end once data collection starts. For lengthy or high-risk studies, convene an independent monitoring board. A data safety monitoring board reviews participant safety data as the study runs. It reviews welfare while there is still time to act on what it finds. Debriefing protocols come afterward. Plan comprehensive sessions to address any negative effects after participation. And prepare referral resources in advance. Lists of professional support services, counseling and medical, for distressed participants. A referral list assembled after someone becomes distressed is already late. Every one of these safeguards is written before a participant is recruited.

Vulnerable Populations

Who Needs Enhanced Protection

Certain groups are considered vulnerable in research contexts. They are at heightened risk of harm, or have reduced capacity to protect themselves. Research involving these groups requires additional ethical safeguards. Children and adolescents have limited legal capacity to consent. They also carry developmental vulnerability. So parental permission and age-appropriate assent are both required. Pregnant women form a category because risks may extend to the fetus. Special regulations apply to studies involving pregnancy. Prisoners live inside a coercive institutional environment. That environment may compromise voluntariness, whatever the consent form says. Prisoners have also been historically subjected to exploitative research.

Vulnerable Populations

Capacity, Money, Crisis, Power

Four more groups complete the list. Persons with cognitive impairments have reduced or fluctuating capacity to consent. They require enhanced procedures, and often a legally authorized representative. Economically disadvantaged persons may be unduly influenced by financial incentives. They may lack alternatives that reduce the perceived need to participate. Individuals in crisis are vulnerable for a different reason. Acute psychological distress can impair decision-making capacity, and it also increases their vulnerability to harm. Students and employees face a power differential with researcher-authority figures. That differential may compromise the voluntariness of their consent. So one label covers two different problems, reduced capacity and constrained choice.

Before You Submit

A Risk-Management Checklist

Risk management is a central pillar of ethical research practice. Before a proposal goes to review, work through a short checklist. Has the vulnerability of the participant group been explicitly identified and justified? Have additional consent and assent procedures been implemented as appropriate? Is the level of risk minimized to the greatest extent feasible? Are referral resources and support services in place, and genuinely accessible? Has the review board been given a detailed justification for including this group? Are stopping rules in place if participant distress is detected? The summary is short. Identify every foreseeable harm, and assess it against the benefits. Then build robust safeguards, and give vulnerable populations heightened attention throughout.

About Research Methods in Psychology at UPI Study

Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) is a self-paced online course of 94 video lessons in 16 chapters, from the scientific method and research ethics to designs, data collection, sampling, measurement, validity, experiments, descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Research Methods vs Statistics

Why take it here

Why students take Research Methods in Psychology with UPI Study

How psychologists know what they knowResearch Methods in Psychology teaches how psychological studies are designed, run and judged: research ethics, surveys and observation, correlational and experimental designs, sampling, reliability and validity, and the statistics used to test hypotheses. It is a core course in psychology and many social-science degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Research Methods in Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Recognizing and Managing Risks to Participants

What does minimal risk mean in research?
Minimal risk means the probability and magnitude of harm expected in a study are not greater than those ordinarily met in daily life or during routine physical or psychological examinations. It does not mean zero risk. Completing a questionnaire is a typical minimal-risk activity. Whether a study counts as minimal risk matters procedurally, because it determines the level of review the study requires.
What types of risk can psychology research pose to participants?
Psychology research can pose physical, psychological, social, economic, legal and privacy risks. Physical risks include blood draws or sleep deprivation; psychological risks include distress or reactivating trauma; social risks include damage to relationships or standing; economic risks include financial or job loss; legal risks arise from disclosures made during research; and privacy risks involve breaches of confidentiality or dignity. Psychological and social harms are often the most relevant.
Who are considered vulnerable populations in research?
Vulnerable groups include children and adolescents, pregnant women, prisoners, people with cognitive impairments, economically disadvantaged people, individuals in crisis, and students or employees recruited by people with authority over them. Some are vulnerable because of reduced or fluctuating capacity to consent, others because their circumstances constrain free choice. Research with these groups requires additional safeguards and a clear justification for including them.
What safeguards protect participants in a risky psychology study?
Key safeguards include pilot testing to find unforeseen risks, pre-specified stopping rules that end participation if distress appears, and data security such as encryption, anonymization and access controls. For lengthy or high-risk studies, an independent data safety monitoring board reviews safety during the study. Debriefing sessions and referral lists for counseling or medical support should be prepared before any participant is recruited.

About the Research Methods in Psychology course

How many college credits is Research Methods in Psychology?
Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Research Methods in Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 94 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Research Methods in Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 94 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Research Methods in Psychology.

94 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Research Methods in Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →