Informed Consent: Standard and Special Cases, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Research Methods in Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 2.2 Free with a free account

Informed Consent: Standard and Special Cases

Research Methods in Psychology · Chapter 2: Ethics and Integrity in ResearchSection 2.2 · lesson 9 of 9410 min · free with a free account

← Core Principles of Ethical ResearchNext lesson: Recognizing and Managing Risks to Participants →

Earn 3 college credits for Research Methods in PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 111 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Ensuring participants can make free, informed decisions about research involvement.

  • Name the eight essential elements of valid consent
  • Distinguish consent from assent with minors
  • Describe when a waiver of consent may be granted
  • Explain how capacity and voluntariness decide validity

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,267 words). Read along, or search it.

Ethics and Integrity in Research

Informed Consent: Standard and Special Cases

The previous section gave you the principles that govern research ethics. This one takes a single principle, respect for persons, and turns it into a procedure. That procedure is informed consent. Most people picture a form and a signature. That picture is wrong, and the error has real consequences. By the end you will name the eight essential elements of valid consent. You will separate consent from assent when the participant is a minor. You will describe the conditions under which a waiver of consent may be granted. And you will explain how capacity and voluntariness decide whether consent is valid at all. Those two words do most of the work in this section.

What Consent Is

A Process, Not a Signature

Informed consent is a process. A researcher provides potential participants with sufficient information about a study. Enough for them to make a free and rational decision about taking part. It is not merely a bureaucratic requirement, but a substantive ethical obligation, rooted in respect for autonomy. Recall the Belmont principle of respect for persons. Informed consent is how that principle becomes an operation. It ensures that participation is genuinely voluntary. And that it is grounded in adequate understanding of what involvement entails. Here is the sentence worth memorizing. A signed form obtained without real understanding is not valid informed consent. Consent is an ongoing process of communication and respect, not a moment at a desk.

Three Pillars

Disclosure, Capacity, Voluntariness

Legal and ethical traditions identify three conditions for valid consent. All three must be satisfied. Meeting two of the three is not partial credit. It is invalid consent. The first pillar is disclosure. All the information a reasonable person would need to decide must be provided. Purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, and alternatives. The second pillar is capacity. The participant must have the cognitive ability to understand that information. And to appreciate what it implies for their own situation. The third pillar is voluntariness, so consent must be given freely, without coercion, undue influence, or deception. Participants must feel genuinely free to decline, or to withdraw later.

The Eight Elements

What a Consent Document Must Cover

The APA Ethics Code and federal regulations specify what a consent document must contain. Eight elements, and they are a floor rather than a ceiling. First, purpose. The study's purpose, its expected duration, and the procedures to be followed. Second, risks and discomforts. Describe the foreseeable ones, whether physical, psychological, social, or economic. Notice the word foreseeable. That is a duty to anticipate, not merely to react. Third, benefits: any benefit to participants or to others that may reasonably be expected. Fourth, alternatives: disclose any alternative procedures or treatments that might benefit the participant.

The Eight Elements

The Four That Protect the Participant

Fifth, confidentiality: state how confidentiality of records will be maintained, and state its limits. Confidentiality always has limits, and the document has to say where they fall. Sixth, compensation: explain what is available, and any treatment if injury occurs during the study. Seventh, contact information: names and details for the researchers, and for the review board. Someone must be reachable to answer questions, or to receive a concern. Eighth, voluntariness: state that participation is voluntary, and that withdrawal carries no penalty. A participant who does not know they may leave is not genuinely free to stay. That completes the eight required elements, and every consent document has to carry all of them.

Children And Minors

Permission Is Not Enough

Now the special cases, beginning with children. Children below the age of majority are legally incapable of giving informed consent. So researchers must obtain parental or guardian permission before enrolling a minor. That permission alone is not sufficient. The child's own agreement must also be obtained, and it has its own name. That agreement is called assent. Assent procedures should be age-appropriate. Simplified language for younger children, more detailed explanations for adolescents. And here is the part that catches students out. A child's refusal to assent should generally be respected, even when a parent agrees. The exception is research that offers direct therapeutic benefit to the child.

Diminished Capacity

Capacity Is Not All-or-Nothing

Adults can have diminished capacity too. Intellectual disabilities, dementia, or severe mental illness. Research with these participants presents particular challenges. The central idea is one people get wrong constantly. Capacity is not all-or-nothing. It may fluctuate over time, and it varies across different kinds of decision. So capacity is assessed for this decision, at this moment, not once and forever. Researchers may need consent from a legally authorized representative. But the participant's own ongoing assent must still be sought. The representative can authorize the research. Only the participant can agree to it.

Waivers Of Consent

Four Conditions, All Required

Sometimes a review board can waive informed consent entirely. That sounds like a loophole. It is not. Four conditions must all be met. One. The research poses no more than minimal risk to participants. Two. The waiver will not adversely affect their rights and welfare. Three. The research could not practicably be conducted without the waiver. Read that third condition carefully. Inconvenient is not the same as impracticable. Four. Where appropriate, participants receive relevant information after they take part. That last condition is debriefing, and it is how disclosure eventually happens. Fail any single condition and the waiver is unavailable.

Online Research

Consent Without a Room

Internet-based research introduces problems a laboratory does not have. Researchers cannot verify a participant's identity, or their age. And without face-to-face contact, it is hard to assess understanding. It is equally hard to notice that someone has become distressed. So ethical online consent needs specific design features. A clearly formatted consent page, which participants must actively engage with first. Not a checkbox buried under a wall of text. Explicit withdrawal instructions, and age verification systems. In a room, confusion shows on a face. Online, the procedure has to do that work.

Deception

When Consent Cannot Be Complete

Some research questions cannot be answered if participants know the true purpose. In those cases, full consent is not possible at the outset. That does not make deception automatically acceptable. Researchers must justify the deception to a review board in advance. And they must provide thorough debriefing afterward. Debriefing is not an apology. It is the delayed half of the disclosure. Participants must also be given the option to withdraw their data. That option is what makes the whole arrangement defensible. Think of deception as consent deferred, rather than consent waived. The obligation to disclose does not disappear. It moves to the end.

Threats To Voluntariness

Coercion, Undue Influence, Manipulation

For consent to be ethically valid, it must be given freely. Three threats attack that freedom, and they work differently. Coercion is the use of force, threats, or punishment to compel participation. A teacher telling students their grade depends on taking part is coercion. Undue influence is the use of excessive incentives. Incentives large enough to override rational decision-making. Offering five hundred dollars to impoverished participants for a high-risk study. Notice what the problem is, and what it is not. Paying participants is legitimate. The size of the offer is what does the damage. Manipulation is distorting or withholding information to affect the decision. Understating the probability of side effects in a medical study is manipulation.

Power And Practice

Who Is Asking, and How

One threat deserves its own name, the power differential. Students recruited by their own professor. Prisoners approached by prison staff. Employees asked by their managers. None of them may feel able to decline without negative consequences. Researchers in positions of authority must actively mitigate that effect. Third-party recruitment helps, as does repeated emphasis on voluntary participation. Finally, the document itself. Use plain language, typically at a sixth to eighth grade reading level. Avoid technical jargon, and structure the document with headings and bullet points. Pilot test the materials with members of the target population before you use them. For sensitive research, offer both written and verbal procedures. And document the consent process thoroughly in the participant records.

About Research Methods in Psychology at UPI Study

Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) is a self-paced online course of 94 video lessons in 16 chapters, from the scientific method and research ethics to designs, data collection, sampling, measurement, validity, experiments, descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Research Methods vs Statistics

Why take it here

Why students take Research Methods in Psychology with UPI Study

How psychologists know what they knowResearch Methods in Psychology teaches how psychological studies are designed, run and judged: research ethics, surveys and observation, correlational and experimental designs, sampling, reliability and validity, and the statistics used to test hypotheses. It is a core course in psychology and many social-science degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Research Methods in Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Informed Consent: Standard and Special Cases

What are the three requirements for valid informed consent?
Valid informed consent requires disclosure, capacity and voluntariness, and all three must be met. Disclosure means giving the information a reasonable person needs, including purpose, procedures, risks, benefits and alternatives. Capacity means the person can understand that information and what it means for them. Voluntariness means consent is given freely, without coercion, undue influence or deception. A signed form without real understanding is not valid consent.
What is the difference between consent and assent in research with children?
Consent is legal permission, which for a minor comes from a parent or guardian, while assent is the child's own agreement to take part. Researchers generally need both. Assent should be age-appropriate, using simpler language for young children and fuller explanations for adolescents. A child's refusal should generally be respected even if a parent agrees, except in research offering direct therapeutic benefit to the child.
What should an informed consent form include?
A consent document should state the study's purpose, duration and procedures; foreseeable risks and discomforts; expected benefits; any alternative procedures or treatments; how confidentiality is protected and its limits; compensation and any treatment for injury; contact details for the researchers and review board; and that participation is voluntary and withdrawal carries no penalty. It should be written in plain language, often at a sixth to eighth grade reading level.
What is the difference between coercion and undue influence in research?
Coercion uses force, threats or punishment to make someone participate, while undue influence uses incentives so large they override rational judgment. A teacher saying grades depend on taking part is coercion. Offering $500 to people in poverty for a high-risk study is undue influence. Paying participants is legitimate; the problem is an offer large enough to distort the decision. Manipulation, a third threat, distorts or withholds information.

About the Research Methods in Psychology course

How many college credits is Research Methods in Psychology?
Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Research Methods in Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 94 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Research Methods in Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 94 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Research Methods in Psychology.

94 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Research Methods in Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →