UPI Study › Courses › Research Methods in Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 4.4 Free with a free account
Field Research and Observational Methods
Research Methods in Psychology · Chapter 4: Methods of Data CollectionSection 4.4 · lesson 27 of 9411 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Research Methods in Psychology.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Research Methods in Psychology
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Working with Archival Research Sources →← Content Analysis and Existing Data SourcesNext lesson: Working with Archival Research Sources →
In this lesson
Studying behavior where it actually happens.
- Define field research and its distinctive value
- Distinguish naturalistic, structured and participant observation
- Position a study on the observer-participant continuum
- Manage field notes, validity threats and field ethics
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,498 words). Read along, or search it.
Methods of Data Collection
Field Research and Observation
Most data collection happens in settings the researcher controls. Field research reverses that. The researcher goes out to where life is lived. Behavior gets recorded in classrooms, hospital wards, courtrooms and marketplaces. Anywhere the thing you care about actually happens. That change of location buys something valuable, and costs something real. By the end of this section you will be able to define field research. You will distinguish naturalistic, structured and participant observation. You will place a study on the observer-participant continuum. You will know how to take field notes that survive contact with memory. And you will name the ethical duties that come with studying people in their own settings.
Behavior In Context
The Promise and the Cost
Start with where data collection usually happens. A survey arrives in an inbox. A laboratory experiment happens in a windowless room. Both settings are convenient, and both are artificial. Field research reverses that arrangement, and sends the researcher out to where life is being lived. The promise of the move has a name, ecological validity. It is the assurance that what you observe reflects what people actually do. Not what they say they do, and not what they would do under artificial conditions. The cost is control. Real settings are messy, and behavior does not unfold to a researcher's schedule. The act of observing can also change the thing being observed. So the craft here is managing that tension openly, rather than pretending it is absent.
A Family Of Methods
Three Forms of Observation
Field research is not one technique. It is a family of them. Three forms of observation deserve particular attention. Naturalistic observation records behavior in its natural setting, without intervention. Structured observation records behavior using a coding scheme fixed in advance. Participant observation has the researcher join the group's activities while studying it. The three differ in one underlying quantity, how much the researcher intrudes. Intrusion is not automatically bad. It buys structure, comparability, and sometimes access you could not otherwise get. But every unit of intrusion spends a little of the authenticity you came for. Choosing among the three is really a decision about that exchange rate.
Watching Without Touching
Naturalistic Observation
Naturalistic observation is the least intrusive of the three. The researcher does not manipulate conditions, or prompt particular responses. Interaction goes no further than what is needed to gain access. Typical studies watch children's play in schoolyards. Or interactions in public squares, or negotiations in marketplaces. The strength is authenticity. What you see is what people genuinely do. The limitation is the mirror image of that strength. You have no control over what occurs. If the behavior you came for never happens, you have no data, and no way to prompt it. Patience is a methodological requirement here, not a personality trait.
Counting On Purpose
Structured Observation
Structured observation trades some of that authenticity for precision. Before observation begins, the researcher specifies exactly which behaviors will be counted. How each one is defined, and how often they will be sampled. Three techniques do most of the work. Time sampling records what is happening at fixed intervals. Event sampling records every instance of a target behavior. Checklist coding ticks off whether specified behaviors are present or absent. The payoff is quantitative data. Numbers you can compare across settings, or across time. The risk is deciding in advance what counts. A coding scheme captures only the behaviors somebody thought to define beforehand.
Inside The Setting
Participant Observation
Participant observation puts the researcher inside the activity. You take part in what the group does, while observing it at the same time. Anthropologists who live in a community for an extended period work this way. So do sociologists who join workplaces or social movements to study them. And ethnographers who immerse themselves in online communities. What this buys is deeply contextualized, qualitative understanding. It is the kind of understanding that only comes from being present over time. The costs are real, and they arrive in two currencies. Time, because immersion cannot be rushed. And ethics, because the negotiations get more complicated the closer you stand. You are no longer only a researcher. You are also a member of the setting.
Four Positions
The Observer-Participant Continuum
The roles a field researcher can take form a continuum. Pure observation sits at one end, and full participation at the other. The classic typology comes from the sociologist Raymond Gold. It identifies four positions along that line. The complete observer watches from a distance, with little or no contact. The observer-as-participant observes openly, interacts a little, and keeps the researcher role clear. The participant-as-observer is an active member of the setting, known to others as a researcher. The complete participant is fully embedded, with the research role hidden or secondary. Notice that the continuum is not a menu you choose from once. Modern field researchers often move along it as a study develops.
Trade-Offs
What Each Position Costs
Each position buys something, and gives something up. The complete observer gets maximum objectivity. The price is minimal access to the participants themselves. The observer-as-participant gains some access to context, with limited depth of involvement. The participant-as-observer gains rich understanding. But that researcher now influences the setting being studied. The complete participant reaches the deepest insider perspective. That position also carries significant ethical complications. Read the four roles as a ladder of exchanges. Objectivity against depth. Distance against access. Ethical clarity against ethical complication. Many researchers begin as observers, become more involved as relationships develop, then step back to analyze.
The Craft Of Notes
Field Notes Are the Data
In observational research, something strange is true of the data. The researcher produces it, by writing. Field notes are the systematic records of what was observed, heard and experienced. The quality of the eventual analysis depends almost entirely on the quality of those notes. Experienced field researchers treat note-taking as a serious craft. Four types of notes do different jobs. Jottings are brief in-the-moment captures, words or sketches. Descriptive notes are the detailed record of setting, people, actions and speech. Reflective notes hold your own thoughts, hunches, emerging interpretations and emotional responses. Methodological notes record decisions made, problems met, and changes in strategy. Now the practical warning. Memory fades faster than novice fieldworkers expect. What seemed unforgettable at noon can be vague by evening, and gone by morning. So descriptive notes get written within hours, even when that costs social effort. And keep observation separate from interpretation, so later analysis can revisit the raw record.
Validity Threats
Five Ways Field Data Goes Wrong
Field research carries its own set of validity threats. Reactivity is the first. Participants change their behavior because they know they are watched. The standard remedy is time. Extended fieldwork lets people become accustomed to the researcher. Observer bias is the second, and it sits inside your own head. Your expectations shape what you notice, and what you write down. Use multiple observers, and document the coding scheme, so the bias has somewhere to surface. Going native is the third, the occupational hazard of deep involvement. You lose analytical distance. Keep regular periods outside the field, and consult peers. Selective attention is the fourth. Important behaviors get missed for being unfamiliar or unexpected. Systematic sampling protocols help, and so does recording more than seems relevant. The fifth is limited generalizability, because one setting may not resemble another. Be explicit about the scope of your setting, rather than quietly implying it is everywhere.
Ethics In The Field
Consent Where Consent Is Hard
Field research raises ethical questions that laboratory and survey work often avoid. Three matter most, and the first is consent. In a public setting with hundreds of people coming and going, individual consent is impractical. So three questions get asked instead. Is the setting genuinely public? Do participants have a reasonable expectation of privacy? And could anyone be harmed if their behavior were recorded? Institutional review boards often approve observation in public spaces without individual consent. But formal approval is not the end of your responsibility. It is the beginning of it. The second issue is covert research, where the researcher's identity is concealed. It has produced classic studies, and it is now tightly constrained. It can be justified only when the work could not be conducted otherwise. When the topic is of clear public importance, and participants are protected from harm. Most contemporary frameworks require overt approaches, except in unusual circumstances.
Obligations And Exit
Reciprocity, and Leaving Well
The third ethical issue is the one people underestimate, relationships. Field researchers form genuine relationships with the people they study. With relationships come obligations. Ask what you owe participants in return for the access you were given. Accurate representation. Shared findings. Sometimes practical contributions to the community. Treating participants as data sources rather than as people is an ethical mistake, and a methodological one. Entering the field gets discussed constantly. Leaving it gets neglected. Someone embedded in a community for months has built relationships that an abrupt exit can damage. So plan the departure, explain the change in role, and honor the commitments you made. Now try the hard case. A researcher wants to study an online support group. Its members share a stigmatized condition, and the researcher plans to join without disclosing the role. That is covert work, in a private space, with vulnerable participants. Ask yourself what a defensible alternative would look like.
About Research Methods in Psychology at UPI Study
Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) is a self-paced online course of 94 video lessons in 16 chapters, from the scientific method and research ethics to designs, data collection, sampling, measurement, validity, experiments, descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Research Methods vs Statistics
Why take it here
Why students take Research Methods in Psychology with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Research Methods in Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Field Research and Observational Methods
What is the difference between naturalistic, structured, and participant observation?
What are Raymond Gold's four field research roles?
What are the different types of field notes?
What does going native mean in field research?
About the Research Methods in Psychology course
How many college credits is Research Methods in Psychology?
How much does Research Methods in Psychology cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Research Methods in Psychology take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Research Methods in Psychology.
94 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →