Foundations of Non-Experimental Research, Explained

UPI Study › Courses › Research Methods in Psychology › Free lessons › Lesson 5.1 Free with a free account

Foundations of Non-Experimental Research

Research Methods in Psychology · Chapter 5: Non-Experimental and Correlational ResearchSection 5.1 · lesson 29 of 9411 min · free with a free account

← Working with Archival Research SourcesNext lesson: Survey Approaches and Respondent Behavior →

Earn 3 college credits for Research Methods in PsychologyRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Psychology 111 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

How researchers learn from variables they cannot manipulate.

  • Define non-experimental research and why it is essential
  • Contrast experimental and non-experimental designs
  • Identify the four families of non-experimental method
  • Evaluate rigor without random assignment

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,405 words). Read along, or search it.

Non-Experimental and Correlational Research

Foundations of Non-Experimental Research

Most of what social science wants to know cannot be assigned to people. You cannot randomly allocate someone a childhood, a gender, or a country of birth. So this chapter opens with the methods built for exactly that problem. Non-experimental research measures variables as they naturally occur. It does not manipulate them, and that single difference changes everything downstream. By the end of this section you will define non-experimental research, and say why it is essential. You will contrast it with experimental work across several methodological dimensions. You will name the four families of non-experimental design. And you will judge the rigor of a study, one with no random assignment to lean on. That last skill separates a careful reader from a credulous one.

Why We Need It

The Variables You Cannot Assign

Start with an impossible thought experiment. Suppose you could randomly assign any person to any condition you liked. If that were true, the experimental method would answer almost every question in social science. But human life resists manipulation. We cannot ethically assign children to experience neglect. We cannot randomly select citizens to live in poverty. We cannot manipulate someone's gender, or their country of birth. And some variables are simply already finished. Childhood experiences, prior schooling, generational change. All of them happened before the researcher arrived. Here is the uncomfortable part of that list. Most of the variables that matter most to social scientists fall into exactly these categories.

A Different Family

Not Weak Experiments

Non-experimental research exists because of those constraints. Rather than manipulating variables, the researcher measures them as they naturally occur. Then examines the relationships among them. The trade-off is real, and worth stating bluntly. Non-experimental designs cannot, on their own, establish causation. But they can describe reality, predict outcomes, and identify patterns experiments cannot reach. Without them, large swathes of human experience would simply be invisible to science. Now the framing error to avoid. Non-experimental research is not weak experimental research. It is a different family of methods, built for different purposes. Asking it to establish causation is like asking a microscope to show galaxies. Both are excellent instruments. Each is built for a different scale of question.

The Defining Feature

Measurement, Not Manipulation

So what exactly is the dividing line? One feature separates non-experimental from experimental research. The absence of manipulation. In an experiment, the researcher decides who receives which condition. Then assigns participants to those conditions at random. In a non-experimental study, the researcher takes the world as it is. Measuring people, settings, behaviors or events, without intervening to alter them. That one difference propagates through every other dimension of the design. The independent variable is measured rather than manipulated. Random assignment is not available at all. Control of extraneous variables becomes statistical or design-based, rather than active. Causal inference weakens, while ecological validity often improves. And ethical reach broadens, because any naturally occurring variable becomes fair game.

Four Families

One Category, Several Methods

Non-experimental research is one category, but it is not one method. Four families cover most of the work done in this tradition. Survey research, correlational research, observational research, and archival or ex post facto research. What they share is that nothing gets manipulated. What differs is where the data come from. Surveys ask people. Observation watches them. Correlational work examines how measured variables move together. Archival work reads records that already exist. Keep the four in mind, because the rest of the chapter unpacks them one at a time. Two of them, surveys and correlation, take up most of this chapter.

Survey And Correlational

The First Two Families

Take the first two families in a little more detail. Survey research uses standardized self-report instruments to gather data from samples. From those samples it draws inferences about populations. Surveys are non-experimental because the researcher does not manipulate the variables of interest. Respondents simply report their own attitudes, beliefs and behaviors, as those already exist. Section five point two examines survey approaches and respondent behavior in depth. Correlational research measures two or more variables in the same participants. Then examines whether those variables are statistically associated. The strength and direction of the association are summarized by a correlation coefficient. Sections five point three through five point six develop that approach in detail. It matters because it can find relationships between variables experiments cannot manipulate.

Observational And Archival

The Second Two Families

Now the other two families. Observational research systematically records behavior as it naturally occurs, without intervention. It is especially valuable when self-report is unreliable. Or when the researcher needs to study behavior in context. Child development in classrooms, for instance. Consumer behavior in retail spaces. Archival research uses preserved records instead of fresh data collection. That lets it reach questions about the past, or about populations nobody can directly access. Ex post facto research means, literally, after the fact. It compares groups that already differ on some pre-existing characteristic. Students from different school systems, or patients with different diagnoses. In every one of these cases, the researcher measures variables they had no part in producing.

Not A Fall-Back

Five Circumstances That Demand It

It is tempting to treat all of this as a fall-back for when experiments are inconvenient. That reading is wrong. Five circumstances make a non-experimental design the only defensible option. First, the variable cannot ethically be manipulated. Childhood trauma, exposure to violence, severe illness. No ethical study could create those deliberately. Second, the variable already exists and cannot be assigned. Gender, age, ethnicity, country of origin, native language. Third, the phenomenon is too large or too rare for experimental study. National attitudes, generational change, the effects of major historical events. Fourth, manipulation would alter the very phenomenon of interest. Naturally occurring social interaction stops being natural the moment you stage it. And fifth, when the researcher needs ecological validity above all else.

Strengths, Part One

Ethical Reach and Realism

Turn now to what these designs are actually good at. The first strength is ethical reach. Non-experimental methods can study variables that nobody could ethically manipulate. Without them, we would know nothing about the long-term effects of abuse. Nothing about the experience of grief, and nothing about the predictors of suicide. Each of those is a question science would otherwise have to abandon. The second strength is ecological validity. This work takes place in real settings, or uses data drawn from them. So its findings tend to generalize more readily to the world outside the laboratory. A study of actual classroom behavior reveals dynamics an artificial task cannot. Ecological validity is exactly what tight laboratory control tends to trade away.

Strengths, Part Two

Scale, Scope, and Discovery

The third strength is scale and scope. Non-experimental designs frequently support much larger samples than experiments. And much longer time-frames. A national survey may include tens of thousands of respondents. Archival research can trace patterns across centuries. No experiment runs for a century, or covers a whole nation. That scale supports questions experimental work simply cannot reach. The fourth strength is hypothesis generation. Non-experimental research often produces the hypotheses that experiments later test. Finding that two variables are correlated is frequently the first step. The next step is investigating a possible causal mechanism experimentally. So the two traditions are not rivals. They feed each other.

Judging Quality

Five Criteria for Rigor

Now the hardest question in this section. How do you judge quality? Non-experimental research cannot rely on the inferential power of random assignment. So rigor has to come from somewhere else. Five criteria supply it. Sampling quality. Was the sample chosen in a way that supports the intended generalization? Measurement quality. Are the variables measured with reliable and valid instruments? Statistical control. Are potential confounding variables identified, measured, and adjusted for? Temporal structure. Does the design let you even ask which variable came first? Replication and triangulation. Is the finding consistent across studies, methods, and populations? Notice how much of that list applies to any study at all. Random assignment was never the whole of methodology. It was one tool among several. Run these five criteria over any correlational headline you meet this week.

The Standard Is Shared

Rigor Without Experiments

End with the claim this section most wants you to hold. A well-designed non-experimental study can produce stronger knowledge than a poorly designed experiment. Random assignment is powerful, but it is not magic. It does not rescue a study from biased sampling, weak measurement, or careless analysis. The standards of rigor differ across the two traditions. The demand for rigor is identical. Try that idea on a concrete case. A researcher claims students who use a particular tutoring service get better grades. The data come from a non-experimental survey. Name two variables that could confound the claim, and say how you would adjust for them. If you can do that, you have understood what this section is for.

About Research Methods in Psychology at UPI Study

Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) is a self-paced online course of 94 video lessons in 16 chapters, from the scientific method and research ethics to designs, data collection, sampling, measurement, validity, experiments, descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Psychology and social science courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Research Methods vs Statistics

Why take it here

Why students take Research Methods in Psychology with UPI Study

How psychologists know what they knowResearch Methods in Psychology teaches how psychological studies are designed, run and judged: research ethics, surveys and observation, correlational and experimental designs, sampling, reliability and validity, and the statistics used to test hypotheses. It is a core course in psychology and many social-science degrees.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Research Methods in Psychology carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Foundations of Non-Experimental Research

What is non-experimental research in psychology?
Non-experimental research measures variables as they naturally occur rather than manipulating them, then examines the relationships among them. Because nothing is manipulated, random assignment is unavailable, and confounds must be handled statistically or through design. On its own it cannot establish causation, but it can describe reality, predict outcomes, and study variables such as gender, childhood experiences, or country of birth that cannot be assigned.
What are the main types of non-experimental research?
Four families cover most non-experimental work: survey, correlational, observational, and archival or ex post facto research. Surveys ask people to report their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. Correlational studies measure two or more variables in the same participants and test whether they are associated. Observational research records behavior as it naturally occurs. Archival research uses existing records, and ex post facto research compares groups that already differ.
What are the strengths of non-experimental research?
Non-experimental research has four main strengths: ethical reach, ecological validity, scale, and hypothesis generation. It can study variables no one could ethically manipulate, such as abuse, grief, or the predictors of suicide. Because it takes place in real settings or uses data drawn from them, its findings often generalize more readily beyond the laboratory. It can include tens of thousands of respondents or span centuries of records, and its correlations often supply the hypotheses that experiments later test.
How do you judge the quality of a non-experimental study?
Without random assignment, rigor comes from five criteria. Check sampling quality, meaning whether the sample supports the intended generalization. Check measurement quality, meaning reliable and valid instruments. Look for statistical control of identified confounding variables. Consider temporal structure, meaning whether the design shows which variable came first. Finally, look for replication and triangulation across studies, methods, and populations. A well-designed non-experimental study can outperform a poorly designed experiment.

About the Research Methods in Psychology course

How many college credits is Research Methods in Psychology?
Research Methods in Psychology (Psychology 111) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Research Methods in Psychology cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 94 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Research Methods in Psychology take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 94 lessons total about 16 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Research Methods in Psychology.

94 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Research Methods in Psychology →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Research Methods in Psychology
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →