UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 6.4 Free with a free account
Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Identification, and Workplace Engagement
Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 6: Workplace Attitudes, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational BehaviorSection 6.4 · lesson 36 of 12212 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Strategies for Improving Workplace Attitudes and Organizational Commitment →← Job Dissatisfaction, Deviant Workplace Behavior, and Their ConsequencesNext lesson: Strategies for Improving Workplace Attitudes and Organizational Commitment →
In this lesson
The contributions no job description can require, and the conditions that produce them.
- Define OCB and its five validated dimensions
- Explain identification through Social Identity Theory
- Apply the Job Demands-Resources model to engagement
- Recognize the risks of over-identification
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,456 words). Read along, or search it.
Workplace Attitudes, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Behavior
Citizenship, Identification, and Workplace Engagement
Some of the most valuable things employees do are things nobody can require. Helping a colleague who is drowning. Speaking well of the firm to an outsider. Raising an uncomfortable concern that protects the organization, at personal cost. This subchapter is about that category of behavior. We will define organizational citizenship behavior, and map its five dimensions. We will look at identification, which is what happens when the organization enters your self-concept. We will use the Job Demands-Resources model to explain engagement at the job level. And we will finish somewhere unusual for a chapter on positive attitudes. With the risks of employees identifying too strongly. Because that failure mode is real, and it is rarely discussed.
Framing
The Contributions You Cannot Order
Start with the framing, because it sets up everything that follows. These contributions extend well beyond formal job requirements. Helping a struggling colleague. Volunteering for unpaid organizational tasks. Speaking positively about the organization to outsiders. Raising concerns that protect organizational interests, even at personal cost. And here is the property that makes them managerially interesting. They cannot be mandated. By definition, they are discretionary. They emerge from attitudinal and motivational conditions the organization creates. Not from direct managerial instruction. Which means the lever is indirect. You build conditions, and you wait.
Definition
What Organ Actually Defined
The formal concept is organizational citizenship behavior, usually abbreviated to O C B. Dennis Organ conceptualized it in nineteen eighty-eight. He drew on earlier work by Chester Barnard. Barnard wrote about willingness to cooperate, as distinct from formal role performance. Organ's definition has three parts, and each one rules something out. First, the behavior is discretionary. It goes beyond what is required or monitored. Second, it is not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system. Third, in the aggregate, it promotes effective functioning of the organization. Behavior that is required is task performance, not citizenship. Behavior that is rewarded is just an incentive response. And a single act of helping is invisible. The claim is about accumulation.
Five Dimensions
Organ's Validated Taxonomy
Organ identified five dimensions, widely validated in later research. Altruism is voluntarily helping other employees with work-related tasks or problems. Staying late to help a new colleague learn a complex system, for instance. Conscientiousness is going beyond the minimum in attendance, punctuality and quality. Double-checking work that only strictly requires a single pass. Sportsmanship is tolerating the inevitable inconveniences of work without complaining. Accepting a role change with good grace, and not spreading negativity about unpopular decisions. Courtesy is consulting and informing others to prevent work-related problems. Advance notice before you take an action that affects colleagues. And civic virtue is participating in and caring about organizational life beyond your role. Attending non-mandatory meetings, staying informed, and voting in team elections.
Why It Matters
Three Functions Formal Performance Cannot Serve
Why does any of this matter beyond being pleasant? At the aggregate level, citizenship performs three functions formal performance cannot. First, it is the social lubricant that lets organizational systems run smoothly. They are incomplete contracts. No job description anticipates every situation. Discretionary helping behavior fills those gaps. Second, it contributes directly to team and unit performance. Units with higher aggregate citizenship outperform lower ones on productivity and quality. And that holds even after controlling for formal task performance. That controlled comparison is the important part. This is not just people working harder. Third, it contributes to organizational resilience. High-citizenship organizations recover faster from disruption, crisis and resource constraint. Because employees fill the voids voluntarily, rather than waiting for direction.
Predictors
What Actually Produces Citizenship
So what predicts citizenship behavior? Five predictors appear consistently. Job satisfaction is first. Satisfied employees reciprocate the conditions they experience. Social exchange theory explains the dynamic. Good treatment invites return. Notice that four of the five predictors are things management controls directly. Second is perceived support. Employees who believe the organization cares reciprocate. Third is affective commitment. Attached employees protect the organization's functioning. Fourth is trust in management. Civic virtue requires confidence in the direction of travel. Fifth is transformational leadership. Leaders who inspire and develop generate more citizenship. Substantially more than transactional or laissez-faire leaders do. So citizenship is not a personality lottery. It is largely a management output.
Identification
When the Organization Enters the Self-Concept
Now to a deeper construct. Organizational identification. It is the degree to which employees define their self-concept in terms of membership. The extent to which being a member of this organization becomes part of who you are. High identification produces something researchers call a perceptual merger. The employee sees organizational successes as personal successes. Organizational failures as personal failures. And organizational interests as aligned with their own. The theoretical foundation is Social Identity Theory. It was developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner. The theory holds that individuals derive part of their self-esteem from group memberships. Particularly from groups perceived as distinctive, prestigious, and consistent with personal values. Which tells you exactly which organizations get identification cheaply, and which have to earn it.
Causes And Effects
What Builds Identification, and What It Buys
What strengthens identification, then? Organizational prestige, meaning how far the organization is respected by external audiences. Organizational distinctiveness, meaning a clear identity that differentiates it from others. Values congruence between employee and organization, and the quality of daily experience inside it. Leaders matter here in a specific way. They embody the identity. Charismatic and transformational leaders who personify the values give members a concrete exemplar. The consequences of high identification form a distinctive behavioral profile. More citizenship behavior, and civic virtue in particular. More likely to stay even when external alternatives are available. Advocacy to outside audiences, which strengthens reputation and attracts talent. And internalized organizational goals, pursued intrinsically rather than for incentives.
The Paradox
Discretionary Effort Cannot Be Commanded
Discretionary effort is the contribution beyond the minimum needed to keep your job. It is among the most valuable assets an organization has. It is also among the least manageable, and the reason is definitional. By definition, it cannot be commanded. Suppose a manager mandates citizenship, through formal requirements or monitoring. What was voluntary and intrinsically motivated becomes a compliance obligation. That destroys its discretionary character. And paradoxically it reduces the overall citizenship climate. The conditions that actually generate it are the same ones we have been building toward. Meaningful work connected to something larger than immediate task completion. Leadership that recognizes and appreciates effort beyond role requirements. A culture that models and celebrates citizenship at every level. And a climate of reciprocity, where voluntary contribution is valued and returned.
JD-R
Bakker and Demerouti's Balance
Return now to engagement, and to the job-level conditions that drive it. The most influential contemporary framework is the Job Demands-Resources model. It was developed by Arnold Bakker and Evangelia Demerouti. The model proposes that engagement is determined by a balance. Job demands require sustained physical, cognitive or emotional effort, and carry costs. Job resources are aspects that help achieve goals, reduce demands, or stimulate growth. High job resources are the primary drivers of engagement. They motivate investment directly, and they buffer the demotivating effects of high demands. Autonomy leads the list. Control over work methods, pace and schedule. It is the single most consistent resource predictor of engagement across studies. Then performance feedback, social support, and developmental opportunities. The demands that most predict disengagement and burnout are workload and emotional demands. Along with role ambiguity, role conflict, and poor work-home balance.
Integration
The Virtuous Cycle - and Its Mirror Image
Now put the three constructs together, because they are not independent. Engaged employees do more citizenship behavior. Their psychological absorption in work extends naturally to helping colleagues. Highly identified employees are more likely to be engaged. They experience organizational success as personally meaningful. And employees who regularly do citizenship behavior strengthen their identification. Because helping deepens the sense of belonging and investment. That is a virtuous cycle, and organizations that start it get compounding returns. But now read the same loop backwards, because it runs just as well in reverse. Disengagement leads to reduced citizenship. Reduced citizenship leads to weaker identification. Weaker identification deepens disengagement. So managing workplace attitudes is not a static maintenance task. It is a dynamic one, with powerful momentum in whichever direction it is already going.
The Dark Side
When Identification Goes Too Far
Finish with a risk that almost never gets discussed in engagement seminars. Identification can go too far. Researchers call it organizational over-identification. Self-worth merges with membership, so any threat to the organization feels like a personal one. Over-identified employees may suppress information that reflects poorly on the organization. They resist legitimate external criticism. They prioritize organizational reputation over ethical conduct. And note the motive, because it is not the obvious one. This is not calculated self-interest. It is genuine identification-driven protectiveness. There is a second risk, and it undercuts everything the chapter has argued for. Strongly identified employees may find it hard to raise well-founded concerns. The same identification that drives citizenship can inhibit voice. So the goal is not merely identified employees. It is critically engaged ones. People who care deeply, and express that care through honest constructive feedback.
About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Identification, and Workplace Engagement
What is organizational citizenship behavior?
What are the five dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior?
What is the Job Demands-Resources model?
Can employees identify too strongly with their organization?
About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course
How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →