UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 8.1 Free with a free account
Employee Motivation Strategies and Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Reward Systems
Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 8: Employee Motivation, Rewards, and EmpowermentSection 8.1 · lesson 43 of 12212 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Employee Empowerment, Involvement Programs, and Their Impact on Performance →← Applying Perception and Attribution Insights to Improve Organizational OutcomesNext lesson: Employee Empowerment, Involvement Programs, and Their Impact on Performance →
In this lesson
Why motivation is a system to be designed, not a lever to be pulled.
- Separate needs, drives and goals
- Diagnose motivation with expectancy theory
- Contrast intrinsic and extrinsic rewards
- Design rewards that do not backfire
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,501 words). Read along, or search it.
Employee Motivation, Rewards, and Empowerment
Employee Motivation Strategies and Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Reward Systems
Almost every organization has a theory of motivation buried inside its pay system. Most of those theories are far too simple. Motivation is the engine of organizational performance. It determines how much effort people invest, and how creatively they approach problems. It determines how long they persist when the work turns difficult. Despite decades of research, motivation stays one of the most mismanaged parts of organizational behavior. It gets reduced to incentive schemes that address a narrow slice of what actually drives effort. So we build the framework properly. Needs, drives and goals first. Then the process theories that explain how motivation works. Then intrinsic and extrinsic rewards, and the strange way they interact. That interaction is where the surprises live.
Foundations
Needs, Drives, and Goals
Start with a definition you can actually use. Motivation is the set of forces that initiate, direct, and sustain behavior over time. Three concepts carry the explanation. Needs, drives, and goals. Needs are internal states of deficiency that create tension. They are psychological or physiological imbalances, and behavior aims at restoring equilibrium. Drives are the energizing forces that need states generate. A drive points behavior at whatever will satisfy the need. Goals then channel that drive toward a specific outcome. Goals supply the direction and the persistence, which raw drive does not. Keep the three separate, because each fails differently. A manager who mistakes a missing goal for a missing need will design entirely the wrong fix.
Content Theories
Three Attempts to Name What People Need
The oldest motivation theories try to name what people actually need. Abraham Maslow proposed five universal need categories. Physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualization. Lower-order needs take precedence over higher-order ones until they are satisfied. Clayton Alderfer condensed that hierarchy into three overlapping categories. Existence covers physiological and safety needs. Relatedness covers the social and esteem needs that involve other people. Alderfer made two changes that matter. Need categories can be active at the same time. And frustration of a higher-order need causes regression to a lower-order one. David McClelland dropped the universal hierarchy altogether. He argued that individuals differ in the relative strength of three acquired needs. Those needs are achievement, affiliation, and power. Those profiles predict occupational preferences, managerial styles, and responses to incentives.
Goal-Setting
Specific and Challenging Beats Vague and Easy
Goals deserve their own theory, and they have one. Edwin Locke and Gary Latham built goal-setting theory. It is among the most extensively validated theories in organizational behavior. Specific, challenging goals consistently outperform vague or easy goals. But two conditions have to hold. Employees need the capability to pursue the goal, and they must accept it as legitimate. Strip either condition away and the effect disappears. Research suggests the most motivating goals share four further qualities, captured as HARD. Heartfelt means the goal connects to something the employee genuinely cares about. Animated means they can vividly imagine achieving it, and what would follow. Required means the goal feels genuinely necessary, rather than optional. Difficult means it stretches them past their comfort zone, which is what triggers real effort.
Expectancy Theory
Motivation as a Chain That Multiplies
Content theories tell you what people want. Process theories tell you how wanting becomes doing. Victor Vroom's expectancy theory is the most influential of them. It says motivational force is a multiplicative function of three beliefs. Expectancy is the perceived probability that effort will lead to performance. Instrumentality is the perceived probability that performance will lead to outcomes. Valence is the subjective value the individual places on those outcomes. Now notice the word multiplicative, because it does all the work here. If any one of them is zero, overall motivation is zero. It does not matter how strong the other two are. That has an uncomfortable managerial implication. Strengthening a link that was already strong buys you nothing at all.
The Diagnostic
Three Questions for Any Motivation Problem
Expectancy theory earns its keep as a diagnostic tool. Faced with any motivational problem, ask three questions in order. First, the expectancy gap. Does the employee believe working harder will actually improve performance? If not, the cause may be a skill gap, or inadequate tools. It may equally be role ambiguity, or poor task design. Second, the instrumentality gap. Does the employee believe better performance will be recognized and rewarded? If not, the reward process needs transparency, consistency, and a real link to performance. Third, the valence gap. Does the employee actually value the rewards being offered? If not, the reward menu has to reflect individual preferences: money, recognition, development, or flexibility. Each gap has a completely different remedy. Raise a bonus when the real problem is expectancy, and you have paid to strengthen the one link that was never broken.
Equity Theory
People Compare Before They Calculate
There is a second process theory, and it explains something bonuses often get wrong. Stacy Adams's equity theory says people are not motivated by absolute levels of reward. They are motivated by the perceived fairness of their reward against a comparison standard. Employees continuously monitor their input-to-outcome ratio. Inputs are effort, skill and experience. Outcomes are pay, recognition and advancement. Then they compare that ratio to relevant comparison others, such as colleagues, industry peers, or internal benchmarks. Perceived inequity motivates behavior aimed at restoring equity. There are four routes back. Reduce inputs, or seek increased outcomes. Change the comparison referent, or in extreme cases, exit the relationship entirely. And inequity runs in both directions. Under-reward is the common case. Over-reward registers too, though less often.
Intrinsic Motivation
When the Work Is Its Own Reward
Now the distinction this section is built around. Intrinsic motivation is engagement in an activity for its own sake. The activity is inherently interesting, enjoyable, or personally meaningful. Intrinsically motivated employees work because the work itself rewards them. It produces a sense of mastery, or connects to a purpose they find meaningful. Self-Determination Theory gives the most comprehensive account of this. Edward Deci and Richard Ryan proposed that three psychological needs sustain intrinsic motivation. Autonomy is the experience of acting from genuine choice. Competence is the experience of effectiveness and mastery. Relatedness is the experience of meaningful connection with others. Support all three and you get internalized, autonomous motivation. Frustrate them and you get compliance-based motivation, or no motivation at all.
Extrinsic Rewards
Five Currencies and What Each One Costs
Extrinsic motivation runs on separable external consequences. Pay, bonuses, promotions, recognition programs, and status symbols. It also includes avoiding negative consequences, such as reprimand or job loss. Extrinsic rewards attract and retain employees, and signal what the organization values. They also get critical but unrewarding tasks completed reliably. The real question is not whether to use them. It is how to design them. Fixed financial rewards, like base salary, attract people but cannot differentiate performance. Variable financial rewards create a performance-contingent incentive. Their risk is crowding out intrinsic motivation, and narrowing focus onto measurable metrics. Recognition communicates appreciation and satisfies esteem needs, but fades if it turns formulaic. Developmental rewards support competence and growth, and they build organizational capability. Flexibility rewards directly support the autonomy need, though operations may not always allow them.
Overjustification
The Reward That Destroys the Motive
Here is the finding that overturns most managerial intuition. It is called the overjustification effect. Introduce an external reward for an activity that was already intrinsically motivating. Intrinsic motivation can fall. Employees end up less interested than they were before the reward existed. The mechanism is a shift in the perceived locus of causality. Before the reward, the explanation is, I do this because I find it interesting. After the reward, it becomes, I do this to get the reward. Then remove the reward, and motivation may drop below its original baseline. Deci, Koestner and Ryan studied this directly. Tangible, expected, contingent rewards reliably undermined intrinsic motivation. That is exactly the reward type most organizational incentive schemes use. And the effect held across a wide range of tasks and populations.
Integration
Match the Reward to the Task
So what should a manager actually do with that? The answer is not to abandon extrinsic rewards. It is to match the reward strategy to the characteristics of the task. Take routine, low-complexity work first. Intrinsic motivation is naturally limited there. Well-designed extrinsic rewards can direct and sustain performance effectively. Nothing gets crowded out, because there was nothing there to crowd out. Now take complex, creative, knowledge-intensive work. Autonomy, mastery and meaningful purpose are the primary levers. Extrinsic rewards play a supporting role, and must avoid controlling creative behavior. For that kind of work, verbal recognition and informational feedback are the safer currency. They carry information about competence without controlling behavior, so they do not trigger overjustification.
Individual Differences
No Single Motivational Profile
One last variable, and it is the one managers most often ignore. People differ in motivational orientation. Some employees are predominantly intrinsically oriented, seeking work that is inherently interesting and meaningful. Beyond a threshold of perceived fairness, financial incentives move them relatively little. Others are more extrinsically oriented. They are motivated by tangible outcomes, and prefer clarity about how performance connects to reward. Effective managers diagnose the profile in front of them, then adapt. They do not assume everyone responds to money. And they do not assume everyone is seeking meaning at work either. Which brings us back to the central claim of this section. Motivation is not a single lever to be pulled. It is a multidimensional system to be designed.
About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Employee Motivation Strategies and Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Reward Systems
What is the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation?
What is the difference between needs, drives, and goals in motivation?
What types of extrinsic rewards do organizations use?
When do extrinsic rewards work best?
About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course
How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →