Globalization's Effects on Organizational Culture and Team Dynamics

UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 20.2 Free with a free account

Globalization's Effects on Organizational Culture and Team Dynamics

Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 20: Globalization and Its Impact on Organizational BehaviorSection 20.2 · lesson 121 of 12212 min · free with a free account

← Globalization and Organizational Behavior: Intersections and Structural InfluencesNext lesson: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategic Responses to Globalization in Organizations →

Earn 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational BehaviorRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 206 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Leadership and Organizational Behavior · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

A vocabulary for difference - and the discipline to hold it lightly.

  • Distinguish the convergence and divergence views
  • Describe cultural dimensions and how each affects behavior
  • Explain why diverse teams land at the extremes, not the middle
  • Name the practices that make a global team work

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,527 words). Read along, or search it.

Globalization and Its Impact on Organizational Behavior

Globalization's Effects on Organizational Culture and Team Dynamics

This section is about culture, and about the teams that have to work across it. It hands you a genuine tool, and then spends real effort warning you about that tool. The tool is a set of cultural dimensions for describing how societies differ. The warning is that the same dimensions become prejudices when used carelessly. We will also settle a long-running debate. Is globalization making cultures more alike, or do deep differences persist? Then we turn to global teams, which concentrate everything into one setting. There is a striking finding waiting there. Diverse teams tend to perform either better or worse than homogeneous ones. They rarely land in the middle, and what decides which way they go is leadership.

Culture Foreground

Two Cultures Acting at Once

When organizations operate across borders, culture moves from the background to the foreground. National and regional cultures shape the assumptions people bring to work. How they understand authority. How they communicate with one another. How they relate the individual to the group. And how they respond to uncertainty, and to time. Now layer the organizational cultures we studied earlier on top of those. What you get is a genuinely complex interplay. A person's behavior reflects both the society they come from and the organization they belong to. For a global organization, understanding that interplay is essential rather than optional. Because practices that feel entirely natural in one setting can read very differently elsewhere. As confusing, as disrespectful, or simply as ineffective.

Converging?

A Long-Running Debate With No Clean Winner

There is a long-running debate about whether globalization is making cultures more alike. Take both sides seriously, because both have real evidence. The convergence view points to shared technology and common business practices. To global media, and to the spread of similar products and management ideas. It concludes that cultures are gradually drawn toward a common pattern. So organizations everywhere will eventually operate in broadly similar ways. The divergence view counters that the deepest cultural values are formed over generations. Those values are remarkably stable, and they resist the homogenizing pull of global commerce. On this account, surface similarities mask enduring differences in how people actually think. The most useful position lies between the two poles, and it is quite specific. Convergence appears strongest at the surface, in visible practices and consumer goods. Divergence persists at the deeper level of values and basic assumptions, which change slowly if at all.

Crossvergence

The Practical Synthesis

That middle position has a name. Crossvergence. It recognizes that global and local influences blend together. Producing hybrid patterns that are neither purely global nor purely traditional. So you now have three positions to keep straight. Cultural convergence is the view that global forces draw cultures toward a common pattern. Cultural divergence is the view that deep values remain stable and resist homogenization. Crossvergence is the blending of the two into hybrid patterns. What follows practically for an organization is a kind of double expectation. Expect convergence in some domains. And respect persistent difference in others. The error is assuming that an exported practice will be understood and valued everywhere. Valued in the same way it is valued at home, which is rarely how it works out.

A Vocabulary

Two Dimensions to Start With

To work across cultures systematically, you need a vocabulary for describing difference. One influential framework identifies several dimensions along which societies vary. Start with two of them. Power distance describes how far less powerful members accept, and expect, unequal power. High power distance settings treat hierarchy as natural and unremarkable. Low power distance settings expect more egalitarian relations, and more consultation. The second dimension is individualism versus collectivism. It captures whether people see themselves primarily as independent individuals. Or as members of cohesive groups to whom they owe loyalty. The value of having any vocabulary at all is that it replaces vague intuition. Explicit dimensions can be discussed, compared, and anticipated in advance.

Four More

Extending the Picture

Four further dimensions extend the picture. One contrasts assertive, achievement-oriented values with cooperative, quality-of-life values. That dimension describes differing societal priorities rather than differing abilities. Uncertainty avoidance describes a society's tolerance for ambiguity. And its preference for rules and structure as ways to manage the unknown. A long-term versus short-term orientation contrasts two focuses. One on future rewards, perseverance, and thrift. The other on the present and the past, including tradition and immediate results. And a final dimension contrasts relatively free gratification of human desires. With restraint, regulated by strict social norms. One caution applies to all six. No society is captured fully by any single score.

Use With Care

The Same Tool Can Become a Prejudice

Frameworks like this carry both value and risk, and the risk is serious. Their value is that they replace vague intuition with dimensions you can discuss. That helps people prepare for differences rather than being blindsided by them. Their risk is stereotyping, and it takes three recognizable forms. Treating a national average as if it described every individual. Ignoring the wide variation that exists inside any society. Or using the dimensions to pigeonhole colleagues rather than to understand them. So say this precisely. Cultural dimensions summarize average tendencies across large populations. They never predict how a particular individual will think or behave. Individuals routinely depart from their own society's central tendency. Used well, the dimensions are a starting point for curiosity and adaptation. Used poorly, they simply become a new set of prejudices with better footnotes.

Global Teams

Where the Promise Concentrates

Teams of members from different cultures are now a common vehicle for global work. They concentrate both the promise and the difficulty of globalization into one setting. The promise is substantial, and it has four parts. A wider pool of knowledge than any single culture supplies. Exposure to multiple markets. A broader range of problem-solving approaches. And the creative friction that can arise when different assumptions meet and combine. Research and experience suggest that diverse teams can outperform homogeneous ones. Precisely because their differences expand the range of ideas considered. But notice the condition attached to that claim. They outperform when they function well. That clause is doing an enormous amount of work.

The Difficulty

The Same Differences That Fuel Creativity

The difficulty is that the very differences fueling creativity can impede coordination. Communication suffers first. Members differ in language proficiency, and in the conventions governing directness. They also differ on turn-taking, and on how silence should be interpreted. Trust then forms more slowly, across both cultural and physical distance. And here is the corrosive part. Misunderstandings are more easily attributed to character, or to ill intent. Rather than to the differing norms that actually caused them. Distance adds its own burdens on top of all that. Time-zone separation complicates real-time collaboration. The absence of informal contact weakens relationships that were never strong to begin with. And lean channels strip away the cues that aid mutual understanding.

Better Or Worse

Rarely the Middle

Which brings us to the most distinctive finding about diverse teams. They tend to perform either better or worse than homogeneous ones, rarely in the middle. And the outcome depends heavily on how well the team is led and structured. That distribution is worth sitting with, because it changes what kind of question this is. It is a leadership question, not a staffing question. A homogeneous team is the safer bet, with a lower ceiling. A diverse team is a higher-variance bet whose result is decided by the work of integration. With deliberate attention, the diverse global team is one of globalization's genuine gifts. Without it, the same diversity becomes friction, miscommunication, and underperformance. So the difference lies less in the composition of the team. It lies in the deliberate work of integrating it.

What Helps

Four Practices and One Leadership Job

Several practices help global teams realize their potential rather than founder. Establish shared goals and explicit working norms early. That gives members a common reference that transcends their own differing defaults. Clarify expectations about communication, about decision-making, and about availability. Availability matters especially across time zones, where assumptions silently diverge. Invest deliberately in relationship-building and trust. Those form far less spontaneously across distance, so they need scheduling rather than hoping. And surface cultural differences openly, rather than pretending they do not exist. That lets the team turn difference into a resource, and prevents quiet misattribution. Leadership matters especially here, in a specific way. Leaders must ensure quieter or less linguistically advantaged members can actually contribute. And structure interaction so that distance does not silence anyone.

Talking And Disagreeing

Where Difference Most Often Causes Harm

Communication deserves particular attention, because it is where difference causes most harm. Cultures differ in how directly they express disagreement, criticism, and refusal. In some settings a clear and explicit no is expected, and respected. In others, direct refusal is avoided as discourteous. There, the real message must be read from softening, from indirection, or from what is unsaid. So a manager accustomed to directness may hear agreement where none was intended. And a manager accustomed to indirection may experience direct feedback as needlessly harsh. Neither style is superior. Each is simply easy to misread by someone using the other. Cultures also differ in how much meaning sits in explicit words versus surrounding context. And in conventions around silence, interruption, eye contact, and relationship versus task focus. In conflict, a disagreement is worsened by differing assumptions about how to disagree. So agree early and explicitly on how your team will surface and address problems. Rather than leaving each person to follow their own cultural default.

About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study

Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB

Why take it here

Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study

Why people act the way they do at workLeadership and Organizational Behavior explains how individuals, groups and leaders behave inside organizations: motivation, attitudes, teams, power, conflict, culture and change. It is a core course in business administration, management and human resources programs.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Globalization's Effects on Organizational Culture and Team Dynamics

What is crossvergence in cross-cultural management?
Crossvergence is the blending of global and local influences into hybrid cultural patterns that are neither purely global nor purely traditional. It sits between the convergence view, which says global forces draw cultures toward a common pattern, and the divergence view, which says deep values stay stable and resist homogenization. Convergence tends to appear in visible practices and consumer goods, while deeper values and assumptions change slowly, if at all.
What are Hofstede's cultural dimensions?
Geert Hofstede's framework describes six dimensions on which societies differ: power distance, individualism versus collectivism, masculinity versus femininity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term versus short-term orientation, and indulgence versus restraint. The scores summarize average tendencies across large populations and do not predict how a particular individual will think or act. Used carefully, they help people prepare for differences; used carelessly, they turn into stereotypes.
Do diverse teams perform better than homogeneous teams?
Diverse teams tend to perform either better or worse than homogeneous ones and rarely land in the middle. Their differences widen the range of knowledge and ideas, but they also strain communication, slow the growth of trust, and make misunderstandings easier to blame on character. Whether a diverse team excels depends largely on leadership and structure, so results come from deliberate integration, not just from who is on the team.
How can leaders help multicultural global teams work well?
Leaders help multicultural teams by setting shared goals and explicit working norms early, clarifying expectations about communication, decision-making, and availability across time zones, and scheduling relationship-building because trust forms slowly at a distance. Surfacing cultural differences openly prevents misattribution. Teams should also agree on how to raise disagreement, since some cultures expect a direct no while others signal refusal indirectly, and quieter members need structured ways to contribute.

About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course

How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 122 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 122 lessons total about 21 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.

122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Leadership and Organizational Behavior →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Leadership and Organizational Behavior
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →