UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 13.3 Free with a free account
The Negotiation Process: A Five-Step Framework and Practical Applications
Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 13: Conflict Management and Negotiation in OrganizationsSection 13.3 · lesson 79 of 12211 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Building Conflict-Resilient Organizational Cultures and Teams →← Conflict Resolution Strategies and Third-Party Interventions in OrganizationsNext lesson: Building Conflict-Resilient Organizational Cultures and Teams →
In this lesson
Why preparation beats nerve, and interests beat positions.
- Work through the five steps of a negotiation
- Define BATNA and use it to set your walk-away point
- Separate positions from underlying interests
- Distinguish distributive from integrative negotiation
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,640 words). Read along, or search it.
Conflict Management and Negotiation in Organizations
The Negotiation Process: A Five-Step Framework
Negotiation has a reputation problem. People imagine nerve, and force of personality. The research says something much less glamorous, and much more useful. Negotiation is a disciplined process, and preparation beats bravado almost every time. This subchapter builds a five-step framework you can apply to anything. A vendor contract, a budget allocation, a dispute between two of your people. Along the way we will cover the single most useful concept in the field. Your best alternative to a negotiated agreement, usually called your batna. We will separate positions from interests, which is where most value gets unlocked. And we will look at common tactics, and the one response that works against all of them. That response, unsurprisingly, comes back to preparation.
Framing
A Discipline, Not a Gift
Start with the definition, which is broader than most people assume. Negotiation is the process by which two or more parties work toward an agreement. Parties with some shared interests, and some opposing ones. Both halves matter. It is not a contest of nerve, and it is not a gift for the naturally persuasive. It is a disciplined process that can be learned and improved. And treating it as a sequence of deliberate steps does two things. It removes much of the anxiety, and it dramatically improves outcomes. The framework applies to a vendor contract, or a budget, or a team dispute. Each step builds on the one before it. And skipping a step almost always shows up later, as a weaker agreement.
The Framework
Five Steps, From Prep to Follow-Through
Here is the whole framework in one view. Five steps. Preparation, where you clarify goals and research the other side. Opening, where you build rapport and frame the issue. Bargaining, where proposals are exchanged and interests are probed. Closing, which converts agreement into specific written commitments. And implementation, which tracks whether those commitments are actually honored. The order is not decorative. Each step depends on the one before it. A weak preparation step cannot be repaired by clever bargaining later. And a vague close cannot really be repaired at all. Note that two of the five happen away from the table. Preparation before, implementation after. Most people think of negotiation as only the middle three. That is the error.
Steps One And Two
Preparation and Opening
Step one is preparation, and here is the claim that makes it matter. The outcome of a negotiation is usually determined before anyone sits down. Preparation means clarifying your own goals and priorities. It means researching the other party's likely interests and constraints. And it means defining the range of outcomes you would accept. Two concepts anchor it. Your reservation point is the worst deal you would still accept. Your target is the ambitious but realistic outcome you are aiming for. Knowing both keeps you from drifting into a deal you will later regret. Step two is the opening, and it sets the tone for everything after. Skilled negotiators spend the first few minutes building rapport, before substance. The opening also frames the conversation, and framing shapes what follows. A shared problem to solve invites cooperation. A hard demand invites a counter-demand.
Steps Three To Five
Bargaining, Closing, Implementation
Step three is bargaining, and it is the heart of the process. Proposals and counterproposals get exchanged. The key habit is probing for interests beneath stated positions. More on that shortly. Step four is closing, which converts agreement in principle into specific commitments. Written ones. And this guards against a very costly kind of ambiguity. The ambiguity that arises when parties assume they agreed on more than they did. A good close restates exactly who will do what, and by when. And how success will be measured, so both sides leave with the same understanding. Step five is implementation, because an agreement is only as good as its execution. It tracks whether commitments are honored, and addresses problems as they arise. And it preserves the relationship for future dealings. Negotiators who follow through build a reputation that makes the next deal easier.
BATNA
Where Negotiating Power Actually Comes From
Now to the most useful single idea in negotiation. Your best alternative to a negotiated agreement. Batna, for short. Your batna is what you will do if this particular negotiation fails. Your fallback. Here is the relationship that matters. The stronger your batna, the less you need this deal. And the more freely you can walk away from an unfavorable one. A party with an attractive alternative negotiates from a position of calm strength. A party with no alternative is tempted to accept almost anything. Two practical lessons follow, and the first is the one people skip. Improve your own batna before negotiating, not during. Line up another supplier. Cultivate a second candidate. Develop an in-house option. Second, estimate the other party's batna, because it reveals how much they need this. Much of what looks like skill at the table is patient work done in advance.
The Key Move
Positions Versus Interests
Return now to the habit that does most of the work in bargaining. A position is what someone says they want. An interest is why they want it. And an interest is often satisfiable in several ways. Here is a small example. Two managers each demand the conference room for Thursday. That is a clash of positions, and as positions it looks unresolvable. Probing reveals that one needs it only for the morning, to host a client. The other needs it in the afternoon, for a team workshop. The interests were compatible all along. Only the positions collided. Negotiators who ask why, rather than fighting over what, routinely unlock solutions. And trading on interests reveals something else useful. Issues valued highly by one side often matter little to the other. Which creates room for trades that expand the total value available.
Two Types
Distributive and Integrative
That expansion points to a distinction worth getting right. Negotiations fall broadly into two types, and confusing them is expensive. Distributive negotiation treats the value at stake as a fixed pie to be divided. Whatever one side gains, the other loses. Haggling over the price of a one-time purchase is the classic case. Integrative negotiation seeks instead to expand the pie. Through trades and joint gains, so both parties do better than a simple split. The mindsets differ, and so does information sharing. Guarded, against open and exploratory. The core question differs. How do we split this, against how do we both gain. In practice, most real negotiations contain both elements. Even an integrative partnership eventually reaches a distributive moment. So enlarge the pie first, then claim a fair share, without poisoning the relationship.
Tactics
Three You Will Meet, and One Response
Negotiation involves predictable tactics, and recognizing them removes much of their power. Anchoring is stating an ambitious first number to pull the outcome your way. It works because subsequent discussion tends to revolve around that opening figure. A negotiator who sees it coming does not accept an extreme anchor as a fair start. And they do not react with outrage, which just wastes the moment. Instead they re-anchor with a justified figure, and steer back to objective criteria. Two other familiar tactics. The appeal to a higher authority. That is claiming you cannot agree without approval from someone not present. And the deadline, real or manufactured, used to pressure a hasty concession. The constructive response to all of these is identical. Stay anchored to your preparation, return to interests and fair standards. And remember that your batna, not their pressure, defines what you should accept.
Fair Standards
Something Neither Party Controls
That mention of fair standards deserves its own treatment. When parties disagree about what a fair outcome even looks like, appeal outward. Objective standards can break an impasse without either side feeling defeated. Market rates, appraisals, precedent, benchmarks. Reference points no party controls. Framing a proposal in those terms shifts the conversation. From a contest of wills, to a shared search for a defensible result. And there is a relational benefit beyond the immediate deal. When an outcome can be justified by something outside the negotiators themselves. Then the party who concedes more does not have to feel they simply lost. They yielded to a fair standard, which preserves dignity. Before any significant negotiation, be able to answer five questions. Target and reservation point. Batna. Their interests. Standards. And possible trades.
Emotion And Trust
The Part the Numbers Do Not Cover
Negotiation is often portrayed as a purely rational exchange. Emotion sits at its center. Frustration, fear of being exploited, and the desire to save face shape behavior. Frequently more than the numbers do. So a negotiator who presses only on logic runs into a wall. Even a strong argument fails to move a counterpart who feels disrespected, or cornered. Acknowledging the other party's concerns often unlocks movement. And note the important qualifier. Even when you cannot actually meet those concerns. Trust is the currency that makes integrative negotiation possible. Parties who trust each other share information more openly. Which is precisely what lets them discover the trades that expand value. Trust is built incrementally. Small commitments kept. Transparency about real constraints. And a refusal to exploit a momentary advantage in a way that damages the relationship.
Complications
More Parties, Mandates, and Life Inside a Firm
Two complications, and then the point that matters most for organizational life. The framework assumes two parties, but many negotiations involve several at once. Multiparty negotiations are harder. Coalitions form, and possible trades multiply. And an agreement acceptable to most parties may still be blocked by one. So map each party's interests and alternatives first, or an unseen alliance blindsides you. The second complication is negotiating as an agent, on behalf of others. The agent must reconcile what they represent with what is achievable at the table. And must be clear in advance about the limits of their own authority. Confusion there produces agreements that collapse when stakeholders refuse to ratify. Now the organizational point. Inside a firm, the parties keep working together. Which tilts internal negotiation strongly toward the integrative end. A manager negotiating a budget with a peer cannot afford a scorched-earth victory. In the long arc of organizational life, a negotiator's reputation is their most valuable asset.
About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About The Negotiation Process: A Five-Step Framework and Practical Applications
What are the five steps of the negotiation process?
What is BATNA in negotiation?
What is the difference between positions and interests in negotiation?
What is the difference between distributive and integrative negotiation?
About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course
How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →