UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 11.1 Free with a free account
Group Formation, Types, Member Qualities, and Behavioral Influences
Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 11: Work Teams, Group Dynamics, and Team PerformanceSection 11.1 · lesson 62 of 12210 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Group Size, Roles, Perceptions, Expectations, and Conflict Dynamics →← Building Communication Frameworks That Support Organizational Goals and CultureNext lesson: Group Size, Roles, Perceptions, Expectations, and Conflict Dynamics →
In this lesson
How groups form, what holds them together, and why the informal ones matter most.
- Distinguish formal from informal groups
- Trace Tuckman's five stages of development
- Explain how norms form and get enforced
- Name the qualities of effective members
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,370 words). Read along, or search it.
Work Teams, Group Dynamics, and Team Performance
Group Formation, Types, Member Qualities, and Behavioral Influences
Groups are among the most fundamental social units in any organization. Some are formed deliberately by management. Others emerge naturally among employees. Both kinds shape how work actually gets done. They shape how decisions are made, and how individuals experience their working lives. This section examines how groups form and develop over time. It distinguishes formal from informal varieties, and the informal ones will surprise you. It looks at what qualities make an individual an effective contributor. And it identifies the behavioral forces that influence how groups operate. Those forces are norms, cohesion, and the wider social dynamics around them. Understanding what separates an effective group from a dysfunctional one is foundational. It is foundational for managers, team leaders, and human resources professionals alike.
Foundations
The Most Fundamental Social Unit
Start with why groups deserve a chapter of their own. Almost no organizational work happens through individuals acting alone. It happens through groups, formal and informal, overlapping constantly. So a manager who understands individuals but not groups understands half the system. Groups shape how work gets done, which is the obvious part. They shape how decisions are made, which is less obvious and more consequential. And they shape how individuals experience their professional lives. That third one determines whether people stay, and how much they give. We will cover formation and development, then norms and cohesion. Then the qualities of effective members, which is where selection decisions live. Each of these is a lever a manager can actually move.
Formal Groups
Created on Purpose, With Boundaries
Organizations give rise to two broad categories of groups. Formal groups come first, and they are the visible half. They are deliberately created by management to accomplish specific tasks or fulfill defined roles. Project teams and departmental units are formal groups. So are committees and task forces. Three features characterize them. They have clear membership boundaries, so it is knowable who is in and who is not. They have designated leadership, so somebody is formally responsible. And they have explicit performance expectations, stated rather than inferred. Those three features are what make formal groups manageable. They are also exactly what informal groups lack, which is the next problem.
Informal Groups
The Ones Nobody Designed
Informal groups emerge spontaneously, from shared interests, proximity, or personal affinity. They are not part of the official organizational structure at all. And yet they wield considerable influence over what happens. Informal groups can reinforce formal organizational goals. They can also quietly undermine them, and usually nobody notices which is occurring. They provide emotional support to their members. And they serve as channels for information flow that bypass the formal hierarchy. Managers who ignore informal groups are regularly surprised. They are surprised by resistance, and by coalitions they did not know existed. Effective leaders take a different view. Informal groups are resources to understand, not threats to suppress. Aligning informal norms with organizational goals dramatically improves morale and voluntary compliance.
Tuckman
Five Stages of Group Development
The most widely cited framework for group development is Tuckman's stage model. It was originally proposed with four stages. Forming, storming, norming, and performing. A fifth stage, adjourning, was added later to account for group dissolution. In forming, members orient themselves and rely heavily on the leader. Behavior is polite and guarded, because nobody yet knows what is safe. In storming, conflict emerges over roles and methods. There is emotional tension, and power struggles surface. In norming, the group reaches consensus on norms and roles, and trust starts to build. In performing, productivity is high, roles are flexible, and leadership is shared. And in adjourning, the task completes, the group disbands, and members process its ending.
The Leader's Job
A Different Role at Every Stage
The leader's job changes at every stage, which is the model's practical payoff. During forming, provide direction and structure. The group cannot yet supply those for itself, and pretending otherwise stalls it. During storming, facilitate open dialogue and mediate conflicts. Notice the instruction is not to prevent conflict, which would only delay it. During norming, step back and encourage shared ownership. This is where many leaders fail, because the group is finally easy to lead. Continuing to direct at this stage prevents the group from ever owning its own norms. During performing, delegate, and turn your attention to external challenges. The team can run itself, so the leader's value moves to its boundary. And during adjourning, acknowledge contributions and manage the transition deliberately.
Regression
The Model Is Not a Ratchet
One important caution about the model. Groups do not always progress linearly through these stages. The sequence is a description, not a schedule. Several things can send a group backward. Membership changes can, and so can new challenges. So can shifts in the wider organizational context. A newly merged team is the clearest example. It can regress from performing all the way back to storming. Members renegotiate roles and relationships that had already been settled. And here is the part managers most often misread. The individuals have not become less capable. The group has become a different group.
Norms
The Rules Nobody Wrote Down
Norms are the shared expectations and informal rules governing behavior within a group. They cover an enormous range of things. Meeting punctuality and communication style are the obvious ones. How disagreements get handled is less obvious and more powerful. So is what level of work effort the group considers acceptable. Norms emerge through four routes. Explicit statements, where someone says out loud how things are done here. Critical events, where a significant incident establishes what happens in that situation. Precedent-setting behaviors, where the first time something is done becomes the way it is done. And member characteristics carried in from prior group experiences. That fourth route is why a new hire can shift a norm without ever discussing it.
Enforcement
Approval, and Its Absence
Groups enforce their norms through social pressure. On one side there is approval, acceptance, and praise. On the other side there is ridicule, exclusion, and ostracism. Neither side requires any formal authority to operate. The strength of enforcement depends heavily on group cohesion. Tighter-knit groups tend to enforce their norms more vigorously. Which is excellent news, or very bad news, depending entirely on the norm. So managers must be attentive to which norms actually prevail. Counterproductive norms are the ones to watch for. Consider a norm like, do not raise problems in front of the boss. That can persist for years after the original context that produced it has disappeared.
Cohesion
The Force That Keeps People In
Cohesion is the set of forces keeping members attracted to and engaged with a group. High cohesion correlates with several outcomes managers want. Greater member satisfaction, and more frequent communication. Lower turnover, and stronger compliance with the group's norms. So more cohesion is always better. Except that it is not. Cohesion is not uniformly beneficial, and this is the important qualification. Consider a highly cohesive group whose norms contradict organizational goals. That group will work energetically against those goals. It will do so with unusual coordination, persistence, and mutual support. Cohesion amplifies whatever the group already believes. It does not choose the direction, which is why norms have to be managed alongside it.
Building Cohesion
Five Factors That Pull a Group Together
Five factors reliably increase group cohesion. Similarity in values, attitudes, and background among members. Shared threats, or competition from outside the group. A history of past successes and positive experiences together. Small group size, which enables frequent and meaningful interaction. And physical proximity, with regular face-to-face contact. Two of those five cut both ways, and are worth flagging. Similarity builds cohesion by narrowing the range of perspectives in the room. That is the same mechanism that produces blind spots later. An external threat unifies a group quickly, and pushes it toward defensiveness. Neither factor is free, and a manager choosing them should know what they are buying.
Member Qualities
What Makes Someone Good at Group Work
Finally, the individual level. Not everyone is equally suited to group work. Research consistently identifies a cluster of five qualities. Interpersonal sensitivity is the ability to read emotional cues and respond appropriately. It ranks among the most important qualities in the whole cluster. Team orientation is the willingness to subordinate personal ego to collective goals. Communication competence covers more than clear expression. It includes active listening, and the ability to give and receive constructive feedback. Reliability means consistently delivering on commitments. That builds trust, and it reduces the coordination overhead that drags groups down. Adaptability lets members shift roles and revise expectations. It lets them recover from setbacks without destabilizing everyone around them.
About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Group Formation, Types, Member Qualities, and Behavioral Influences
What is the difference between formal and informal groups in an organization?
What are Tuckman's stages of group development?
What are group norms, and how do they develop?
Is high group cohesion always good for performance?
About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course
How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →