UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 15.2 Free with a free account
Empowerment, Hackman and Oldham's Job Characteristics Model, and Job Redesign
Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 15: Job Design, Enrichment, and Contemporary Work TrendsSection 15.2 · lesson 93 of 12210 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Contemporary Challenges, Trends, and Enrichment, Enlargement, and Rotation Strategies →← Job Design Essentials, Behavioral Approaches, and Interdisciplinary PerspectivesNext lesson: Contemporary Challenges, Trends, and Enrichment, Enlargement, and Rotation Strategies →
In this lesson
Turning a broad philosophy into something a manager can measure and change.
- Name the 5 core dimensions and 3 psychological states
- Compute and interpret a Motivating Potential Score
- Apply the 5 implementing concepts to a real role
- Explain why enrichment is not one-size-fits-all
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,440 words). Read along, or search it.
Job Design, Enrichment, and Contemporary Work Trends
Empowerment, Hackman and Oldham's Job Characteristics Model, and Job Redesign
The behavioral approach told us that work itself can motivate. It did not tell us which parts of a job do the motivating. This section fixes that, with the Job Characteristics Model. Hackman and Oldham built it, and it has anchored job design for decades. You will meet five measurable dimensions of any role. Three psychological states those dimensions produce. And a scoring formula that turns the whole thing into a number. Then five concrete moves for raising that number. We finish with the qualification most people skip. Enrichment does not land the same way on every person.
The Gap
From Philosophy to Diagnosis
Start with the gap the model was built to close. The behavioral tradition argued that work itself can motivate. But it left a practical question unanswered. Which specific features of a job actually produce that motivation? And how would a manager measure them? Hackman and Oldham answered with a structured framework. It identifies five measurable features of any role. It links them to three internal psychological experiences. And it connects those experiences to motivation, satisfaction, and performance. That is why the model lasted. It turned a philosophy into a diagnosis. You can measure a role with it, and then change the role.
Core Dimensions
The Five Measurable Features
Here are the five core dimensions. Learn the names precisely. Skill variety is the degree to which a role draws on a range of different abilities. The opposite is a single repeated motion. Task identity is completing a whole, identifiable piece of work from beginning to end. Not an isolated fragment of somebody else's product. Task significance is the degree to which the work visibly affects other people. Autonomy is the freedom to schedule the work and decide how to carry it out. Feedback is the last one, and it is narrower than people assume. It means doing the job itself yields clear information about your performance. Without waiting for a supervisor to report it back to you.
The Chain
Dimensions, States, Outcomes
The model is a chain, and the order matters. Five core dimensions sit at the front. They feed three critical psychological states in the middle. Those states then drive the outcomes at the end. High internal motivation, strong performance, satisfaction, and lower turnover. Now notice which dimension feeds which state. Variety, identity, and significance together shape how meaningful the work feels. Autonomy, on its own, shapes how responsible the worker feels for outcomes. Feedback, on its own, shapes how clearly the worker understands results. Each psychological state has its own structural source. That mapping is what makes the model usable as a diagnostic tool.
Psychological States
The Model Works Indirectly
Here is the subtle claim at the heart of the model. Core dimensions do not motivate directly. They work by producing internal experiences, and those experiences carry the effect. The first is experienced meaningfulness, the sense that the work counts and is worth doing. It is fed by skill variety, task identity, and task significance. The second is experienced responsibility, the sense of personal accountability for results. It is fed by autonomy alone. The third is knowledge of results, an accurate and ongoing sense of how you are doing. It is fed by feedback alone. When all three states are present at once, the model predicts a strong package of outcomes. High internal motivation, strong performance, satisfaction, and lower turnover and absenteeism.
Making It Quantitative
The Motivating Potential Score
To make the model quantitative, the authors built a single index. They called it the Motivating Potential Score. The dimensions are deliberately not weighted equally, and that is the interesting part. The three meaningfulness dimensions are averaged together. Then that average is multiplied by autonomy, and multiplied again by feedback. Because autonomy and feedback are multiplied rather than added, they behave like gates. A near-zero score on either one collapses the entire score toward zero. Think about what that structure is saying. A role with no discretion and no signal about results cannot motivate. It does not matter how meaningful the work is in principle. Meaning alone cannot motivate if responsibility and knowledge of results are missing.
Worked Comparison
Two Roles, Rated 1 to 7
Work through two roles, each rated on a scale from one to seven. Role A is narrow. Variety two, identity two, significance three. Its autonomy is one, and its feedback is two. Role B is enriched. Variety, identity, significance, and autonomy are all six, and feedback is five. Average Role A's meaningfulness dimensions and you get about two point three. Multiply by autonomy of one, then feedback of two. The score is four point seven. Role B averages six, times six, times five. One hundred eighty. The two roles differ only moderately on the averaged dimensions. Yet their scores differ by more than a factor of thirty. The gap comes almost entirely from autonomy and feedback. A manager reading those numbers knows exactly where to intervene.
Empowerment
Where the Decision Rights Sit
Autonomy has a practical name inside organizations. Empowerment. It means giving workers genuine authority to make decisions within their domain. Solving a customer problem on the spot. Adjusting a process, or allocating their own time. Rather than routing every choice upward for approval. Notice that this is not a slogan about attitude. Empowerment is a structural change in where decision rights sit. If the rights do not move, nothing has been empowered. Job redesign is the act of reworking an existing role to raise its motivating potential. You do that by strengthening the weakest dimensions the model identifies. So the diagnosis tells you what to fix, and redesign is the fixing.
Implementing Concepts
Five Moves a Manager Can Make
The model becomes practical through a short list of implementing concepts. Five of them recur often enough to name individually. Combining tasks means stitching fragmented operations into one larger piece of work. That raises both skill variety and task identity. Forming natural work units means one person owns a coherent body of work. A set of clients, a product line, a region, rather than a random slice. Establishing client relationships puts the worker in direct contact with the customer served. Vertical loading returns responsibilities that had drifted upward to supervisors. Scheduling, quality checking, and choosing the method. Opening feedback channels lets performance information flow back from the task itself. The discipline here is that each move targets a named dimension and a named state.
Leverage
Which Move Buys the Most
Not all five moves are worth the same. Combining tasks raises variety and identity. Forming natural work units raises identity and significance. Both of those target experienced meaningfulness. Vertical loading raises autonomy, and targets experienced responsibility. Opening feedback channels raises feedback, and targets knowledge of results. Establishing client relationships is the outlier, and the highest-leverage move. It raises variety through new interpersonal demands. It raises autonomy through the discretion to manage the relationship. And it raises feedback through the direct response of the person served. Three dimensions, and all three psychological states, from one change. That is why so many redesigns begin there. Vertical loading is the move managers resist most, because it means giving up control. Yet it is the only concept that directly produces experienced responsibility.
Growth-Need Strength
Enrichment Lands Differently
Now the qualification that most summaries of this model leave out. Not everyone responds to an enriched job in the same way. The model names the moderator. Growth-need strength. That is the strength of a person's desire for growth, achievement, and challenge at work. A worker high in growth-need strength thrives when variety and autonomy increase. They convert those features into strong internal motivation. A worker low in growth-need strength may experience the same enrichment as pressure. They may prefer a more predictable role with clearer boundaries. So enrichment is not a universal good to be applied uniformly across a workforce. A redesign that delights some workers may overwhelm others. A manager who ignores this can damage morale while believing they are improving it. Mature practice offers growth to those who want it, without forcing it on those who do not.
Conditions And Limits
A Lens, Not a Law
Individual differences are not the only condition on success. Enrichment works only when the surrounding organization supports it. Workers need the knowledge and skill to handle the expanded responsibilities. Otherwise new autonomy becomes a source of anxiety rather than motivation. The context must also tolerate the discretion being granted. A supervisor who second-guesses every decision negates the vertical loading on paper. And the organization must accept a temporary dip in efficiency while people learn. Treat that dip as an investment, not as a failure. The model has real limits too, and a thoughtful practitioner holds them in view. It relies heavily on workers' own perceptions of their roles. Its scoring weights are a useful convention, not an exact law of motivation. And it centers the individual role, saying less about team and social context. None of that discredits the model. It marks the boundaries where the model is reliable.
About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Empowerment, Hackman and Oldham's Job Characteristics Model, and Job Redesign
What are the five core job dimensions in Hackman and Oldham's Job Characteristics Model?
What are the three critical psychological states in the Job Characteristics Model?
How is the Motivating Potential Score calculated?
What is growth-need strength in job design?
About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course
How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →