UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 6.5 Free with a free account
Strategies for Improving Workplace Attitudes and Organizational Commitment
Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 6: Workplace Attitudes, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational BehaviorSection 6.5 · lesson 37 of 12212 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Workplace Perception, Impression Management, and Attribution Theory →← Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Identification, and Workplace EngagementNext lesson: Workplace Perception, Impression Management, and Attribution Theory →
In this lesson
Five categories of intervention, and what determines whether each one works.
- Apply the Job Characteristics Model to job redesign
- Distinguish effective recognition from performative recognition
- Name the leader behaviors that build psychological safety
- Align enacted culture, not just espoused values
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,460 words). Read along, or search it.
Workplace Attitudes, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Behavior
Improving Workplace Attitudes and Commitment
Everything in Chapter Six so far has been diagnostic. What attitudes are, how they form, what they produce when positive or negative. This final subchapter is prescriptive. What do you actually do? The answer is more substantial than managers usually assume. We will work through five categories of evidence-based intervention. Job redesign, recognition, psychological safety, manager development, and culture. For each one we will ask the same three questions. How does it work, what is the evidence, and what makes it fail in practice. That third question matters most, because most of these interventions are attempted badly. And a badly attempted intervention is often worse than none at all.
From Analysis To Action
How Much of This Is Actually Controllable
Begin with a fair question. How much of an employee's attitude is even controllable? Some individual variation reflects stable dispositions that are hard to change. That is true, and it is often used as an excuse. But the preponderance of evidence points the other way. Organizational and managerial practices are powerful determinants of workplace attitudes. They largely decide whether employees feel satisfied, committed and engaged. Or dissatisfied, alienated, and withdrawn. Five categories of intervention carry most of that evidence. Job redesign. Recognition and reward practices. Psychological safety. Managerial practice development. And organizational culture alignment.
Job Design
Hackman and Oldham's Causal Chain
Start with the work itself, because it is the most durable lever. One of the most robust findings in job satisfaction research concerns intrinsic characteristics. Variety, significance, autonomy, identity, and the feedback the work provides. These are among the strongest and most sustainable drivers of positive attitudes. Hackman and Oldham's Job Characteristics Model gives the theoretical foundation. It proposes a causal chain in three links. Jobs high on five core characteristics produce three critical psychological states. Those states are experienced meaningfulness, experienced responsibility, and knowledge of results. And those states in turn generate high internal motivation, satisfaction, and performance. The chain matters more than the list. You do not change attitudes by changing job features directly. You change them by changing the psychological states those features produce.
Five Characteristics
What Each One Buys You
Take the five core characteristics one at a time. Skill variety is the degree to which a job requires different skills and abilities. It increases experienced meaningfulness, and prevents boredom and cognitive disengagement. Task identity is completing a whole, identifiable piece of work with a visible outcome. It increases the sense of accomplishment, and connects effort to outcome. Task significance is substantial impact on the lives of others, inside or outside the firm. This one generates the strongest meaningfulness response, because it links work to purpose. Autonomy is freedom and discretion in scheduling work and determining procedures. It produces felt responsibility, and it is the most consistent predictor of satisfaction and engagement. And feedback from work means the job itself tells you how you are doing. That generates knowledge of results, which enables self-correction and mastery.
Redesign
Three Ways to Change a Job
The model implies three families of redesign intervention. Job enrichment increases the motivating potential of a job. By adding skill variety, task significance, autonomy, or feedback. Job rotation moves employees among positions. That increases variety, and develops broader perspective. Job crafting is different in kind, and it is the most promising of the three. Employees proactively modify their own tasks, relationships, and cognitive framing. The goal is to increase personal meaningfulness. Crafting is promising for two reasons. It uses knowledge of themselves no manager has. And it preserves their sense of agency, itself a critical driver of satisfaction. Enrichment and rotation are done to the employee. Crafting is done by them.
Recognition
The Most Underused Tool a Manager Has
The second lever is recognition, and it is genuinely undervalued. Recognition is acknowledgment of contributions in a way that communicates their value. Employees across industries, cultures and career stages place enormous value on it. In surveys of motivational factors, it often ranks above compensation. And yet the same research shows it is chronically under-provided. The majority of employees report they do not receive adequate recognition. Many report that weeks or months pass between meaningful recognition events. Four properties make it work. It is specific, naming what was done and why it mattered. It is timely, occurring as close to the behavior as possible. It is authentic, reflecting genuine appreciation rather than compliance with a program. And it is appropriately visible. Public praise amplifies impact, for people who want it. Some employees find public recognition embarrassing, so calibrate to the person.
Pay And Praise
Recognition Is Not a Substitute for Pay
There is a persistent misconception worth dismantling here. The belief that compensation drives attitudes, and recognition can substitute for pay. The research gives a more nuanced picture, in three parts. First, pay perceived as unfair is a powerful dissatisfier. Below market, or inequitable relative to peers, it erodes positive attitudes. And no amount of recognition compensates for sustained pay inequity. Second, beyond a threshold of perceived fairness, more money buys diminishing returns. The relationship between pay level and satisfaction flattens once fair-pay expectations are met. Third, recognition operates through entirely different psychological mechanisms. Communicating value, social belonging, and appreciation. Because the mechanisms differ, the two are not substitutable. Both are necessary. Neither is sufficient on its own.
Psychological Safety
Edmondson, and What Leaders Actually Do
The third lever is psychological safety. It is the shared team belief that it is safe to take interpersonal risks. Speaking up, sharing half-formed ideas, acknowledging mistakes, challenging assumptions. Amy Edmondson's research makes a claim stronger than comfort. Psychologically safe teams are not merely nicer places to work. They perform better. Because their members share information, surface problems, and engage in learning behaviors. Those behaviors are what sustained high performance actually depends on. And safety is primarily determined by leader behavior, which makes it actionable. Be approachable and available, so concerns look likely to be heard rather than dismissed. Explicitly invite input rather than waiting for volunteers. Respond to bad news with curiosity and problem-solving, not blame. Model fallibility, by acknowledging your own mistakes and uncertainties. And thank people for raising concerns, even when the concern turns out to be unfounded.
Manager Development
The Highest-Return Investment Available
The fourth lever is the manager, and it may be the highest-return investment available. The supervisor-employee relationship is among the strongest predictors of satisfaction. Also of organizational commitment, and of voluntary turnover. Three behaviors carry most of that effect. Individualized consideration means genuine interest in each employee's goals and needs. Their strengths, their developmental needs, their life circumstances. And adapting the management approach accordingly. That is not favoritism. Fair treatment is not the same thing as identical treatment. The second behavior is fairness in day-to-day decisions. Perceived unfairness is the single most damaging managerial behavior for employee attitudes. Assignments, recognition, feedback, and the quality of interpersonal treatment. Third is developmental investment. Stretch assignments, shared networks, candid feedback, advocacy.
Culture
Enacted Values, Not Espoused Ones
The fifth lever is culture, and it is the hardest to move. Culture is the shared values, norms and assumptions defining how things are done. Employees whose personal values align with enacted organizational values report higher satisfaction. Higher affective commitment, and stronger organizational identification. The operative word in that sentence is enacted. Values stated in a mission document, and contradicted by daily behavior, do damage. They generate cynicism and distrust, which is unusually difficult to reverse. Culture change is slow, difficult, and it frequently fails. It fails because it is attempted through communication campaigns rather than behavioral change. Genuine change means changing the daily practices and the decision criteria. And changing which behaviors get recognized, and which get sanctioned. Leaders who want that shift have to begin with their own behavior, visibly and consistently.
The Short List
Five Evidence-Based Practices
Pull the five categories into a prioritized list. One. Enrich job content, by increasing autonomy, significance, variety and feedback. Those are the intrinsic motivators that generate sustainable satisfaction. Two. Implement specific, timely, authentic recognition as a daily habit. As a habit, note, and not as a periodic program. Three. Build psychological safety through curiosity-oriented, blame-free responses. To mistakes, and to concerns. Four. Develop managerial capability in consideration, fairness, and developmental investment. Those behaviors are the ones most directly linked to subordinate satisfaction and commitment. Five. Align enacted culture with employee values. By changing behavioral norms and decision criteria, and not merely the language.
Measurement
Closing the Feedback Loop
One thing remains, and it is the piece organizations most often get wrong. Improvement requires ongoing measurement, not just intervention. You cannot manage what you do not measure. And undiagnosed attitude problems compound, because attitudes spread. Dissatisfied employees influence colleagues through social information processing. Regular surveys, annual or pulse, give the diagnostic data you need. But their effectiveness depends on one thing above all. The credibility of the organization's response to the data. Survey and then fail to act, and participation collapses. Act, but fail to communicate what you did, and it collapses just as fast. Best practice closes the loop explicitly, in four moves. Share the results transparently. Acknowledge the most pressing concerns. Commit to specific actions. And follow up in the next cycle to see whether they worked.
About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Strategies for Improving Workplace Attitudes and Organizational Commitment
What is job crafting?
What makes employee recognition effective?
Can recognition replace a pay raise?
How can leaders build psychological safety on a team?
About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course
How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →