UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 5.3 Free with a free account
Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Risk-Taking Behaviors in Organizational Contexts
Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 5: Personality, Behavior, and Decision-Making in OrganizationsSection 5.3 · lesson 29 of 1229 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Risk, Certainty, and Decision-Making Implications of Personality in Organizations →← Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Organizational ApplicationsNext lesson: Risk, Certainty, and Decision-Making Implications of Personality in Organizations →
In this lesson
The Dark Triad at work, and why culture decides how far it goes.
- Define the three Dark Triad traits precisely
- Explain the curvilinear narcissism-effectiveness relationship
- Connect personality to organizational risk appetite
- Use culture design as a risk management tool
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,083 words). Read along, or search it.
Personality, Behavior, and Decision-Making in Organizations
Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Risk-Taking
So far the personality traits we have studied were broadly neutral. This subchapter covers traits that are not. Researchers call them the Dark Triad. Machiavellianism, narcissism, and subclinical psychopathy. The purpose here is diagnostic rather than moral. These traits are overrepresented in some leadership roles. Which makes recognizing them a practical skill for succession decisions. We will also cover risk appetite, and how it varies by personality. And we will end with the most actionable finding of all. Culture determines how far any of these traits actually go.
The Dark Triad
Three Traits, One Common Core
Not every personality trait linked to workplace outcomes is socially desirable. Researchers have identified a cluster called the Dark Triad. The three share a common core of callousness and interpersonal manipulation. Machiavellianism. Narcissism. And subclinical psychopathy. That word subclinical is doing important work in the definition. Each of these occupies subclinical ranges. They are not clinical disorders, and should not be described as such. But they exert measurable effects on how people navigate organizational life. Which is why organizational behavior studies them at all. Ordinary employees and executives, behaving in patterned ways.
Why Study It
Recognition, Not Condemnation
Be clear about what studying these traits is for. It is not about condemning individuals. It is about equipping organizations to recognize certain behavior patterns. Patterns that harm colleagues. That distort decision-making. And that create real ethical risk for the organization. There is one further reason this matters more than it might seem. High scorers are disproportionately represented in some leadership roles. Which makes this knowledge especially relevant to succession planning. And to executive assessment. In other words, it matters most exactly where the consequences are largest.
Machiavellianism
Strategic Manipulation
Start with Machiavellianism, named after Niccolo Machiavelli. His political philosophy emphasized pragmatic, ends-justify-means tactics. Tactics for acquiring and maintaining power. In personality research, high scorers are called High Machs. They are characterized by a cynical worldview. By a willingness to deceive and manipulate others. By a focus on personal gain. And by low emotional involvement in their interactions. In the workplace, this is associated with superior performance in some roles. Negotiation, competitive sales, and political maneuvering. Contexts where strategic deception can yield short-term advantage. But High Machs also exploit co-workers and erode psychological safety. And they are linked to unethical decisions and counterproductive work behavior.
Signatures
What a High Mach Looks Like at Work
There are recognizable behavioral signatures worth knowing. Selective disclosure of information, for strategic advantage. Building alliances for instrumental rather than relational purposes. Avoiding commitment to positions that might constrain future options. Being skilled at appearing cooperative while pursuing self-interest. And engaging in impression management across hierarchical levels. Those last two together explain a common organizational puzzle. The behavior supervisors observe differs systematically from what peers experience. Peers and subordinates see one person. Managers see another. And only one of those two versions reaches a performance review. Which is why supervisor ratings alone are a weak detector here.
Narcissism
An Inverted U
Narcissism, in its subclinical form, has a specific profile. An inflated sense of self-importance. A strong need for admiration, and a sense of entitlement. Together with limited genuine empathy for others. Research on narcissism produced one of the field's most interesting findings. The relationship with leadership effectiveness is curvilinear. It follows an inverted U shape. More narcissism helps, until quite suddenly it does not. At moderate levels, the traits look like confidence and charisma. And like the vision-setting that followers find genuinely compelling. Moderately narcissistic leaders take the bold moves transformation requires. At high levels, the same trait undermines effectiveness entirely.
Three Levels
What Each Level Produces
Compare the three levels directly. Low narcissism produces deferential and possibly indecisive leadership. The likely outcome there is underutilized potential. Moderate narcissism produces confident, visionary, charismatic behavior. That is often effective leadership. High narcissism produces grandiose, exploitative and defensive behavior. The outcome is team dysfunction and ethical risk. At high levels the failure modes are specific and worth naming. Leaders become poor listeners. They struggle to develop talent, because others' success threatens them. They make grandiose decisions without adequate analysis. And they react destructively to criticism. That second failure is the quiet one, and it shows up only over years.
In Teams
Credit, Blame, and Information
In teams, narcissism has two characteristic behaviors. Claiming disproportionate credit for shared successes. And deflecting blame onto others during failures. The team-level consequences follow directly from that pair. It creates resentment. It erodes psychological safety. And it discourages the information-sharing teams depend on. Research also finds a clear performance pattern. Narcissistic team members outperform others where individual visibility matters. And they underperform on collaborative, interdependent tasks. Which has an uncomfortable implication for how work gets assigned. The assignment structure partly determines whether the trait looks like talent.
Psychopathy
The Rarest and Most Disruptive
The third element is subclinical psychopathy. It is characterized by impulsivity and fearlessness. By cold affect, and by charm. It is the rarest of the three, and potentially the most disruptive. Research by Babiak and Hare, published in two thousand six, examined this directly. They identified organizational psychopaths in corporate environments. And they found a consistent pattern in how those individuals operated. Skilled at impression management with supervisors. While mistreating subordinates and peers. Their charm and boldness can initially be mistaken for leadership potential. Which makes them particularly difficult to identify during selection. In an interview, the trait presents as exactly what the interview is looking for.
Risk
Who Takes Which Risks
Risk appetite is how far someone seeks or avoids uncertain outcomes. And it varies substantially across personality profiles. High Machs, and those low in conscientiousness, take more operational risk. Particularly when they perceive a personal advantage in it. Narcissistic individuals show a more selective pattern. They take more risk in domains tied to status and recognition. But they may avoid risks that threaten their self-image. Sensation-seeking is a related trait, with a different profile again. It predicts entrepreneurial risk-taking and innovation behavior. And willingness to challenge established processes. Note that risk tolerance itself is not the problem here. Managed well, it is a genuine organizational asset. Unchecked, it contributes to ethical violations, misconduct and safety incidents.
Culture
Amplifier or Attenuator
Finally, the most actionable finding in this subchapter. Organizational culture significantly moderates how these traits express themselves. Some cultures amplify them. Cultures rewarding individual performance metrics above everything else. Cultures that tolerate political maneuvering. And cultures that fail to establish psychological safety. Other cultures attenuate the same traits in the same people. Cultures emphasizing collective accountability. Using transparent processes, and reinforcing ethical norms with structural controls. The stakes are concrete. Counterproductive work behavior rises. So does workplace bullying, and the risk of financial misconduct. And voice behavior gets chilled across the organization. Which is why culture design is itself a risk management tool.
About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Risk-Taking Behaviors in Organizational Contexts
What is the Dark Triad of personality?
What is Machiavellianism in the workplace?
How does narcissism affect leadership effectiveness?
How does organizational culture affect dark personality traits at work?
About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course
How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →