Behavior-Based Theories: Equity Theory, Vroom's Expectancy, and Reinforcement Theory

UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 9.3 Free with a free account

Behavior-Based Theories: Equity Theory, Vroom's Expectancy, and Reinforcement Theory

Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 9: Theories of Motivation and Their Organizational ApplicationsSection 9.3 · lesson 49 of 12211 min · free with a free account

← Needs-Based Theories: Herzberg's Two-Factor, Alderfer's ERG, and Acquired NeedsNext lesson: Goal-Setting Theory, Self-Determination Theory, and Cognitive Evaluation Theory →

Earn 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational BehaviorRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 206 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Leadership and Organizational Behavior · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Not what people need, but how they think and what consequences teach them.

  • Diagnose inequity and its restoration strategies
  • Apply the VIE model as a diagnostic
  • Distinguish the four reinforcement contingencies
  • Choose a reinforcement schedule deliberately

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,445 words). Read along, or search it.

Theories of Motivation and Their Organizational Applications

Behavior-Based Theories: Equity, Expectancy, and Reinforcement

The theories in the last section explained motivation through internal drives. People have needs, and needs produce behavior. This section takes a complementary route, and it is a more actionable one. Behavior-based theories ask how people think, and how experience shapes what they do next. Three of them dominate the tradition. Adams' Equity Theory, which is about perceived fairness. Vroom's Expectancy Theory, which is about a chain of beliefs. And Reinforcement Theory, which is about consequences. Each examines the cognitive or environmental mechanism through which motivation actually operates. That focus on mechanism is what makes them practical. You can change a mechanism. You cannot easily change what someone needs.

A New Lens

From Needs to Behavior

Begin with what unites these three theories. None of them asks what an employee wants in the abstract. Each asks what the employee is currently perceiving, believing, or experiencing. Equity Theory looks outward, at how someone's deal compares to other people's. Expectancy Theory looks forward, at whether a chain of consequences is believed. Reinforcement Theory looks backward, at what previous consequences have already taught. Those three directions cover most real motivation problems between them. And each one localizes the problem somewhere you can reach. A comparison can be reframed. A belief can be corrected with evidence. A consequence can be rescheduled. That is a very different position from being told an employee has unmet esteem needs.

Equity Theory

Fairness Is a Ratio, Not an Amount

Stacy Adams proposed Equity Theory in nineteen sixty-three. His argument was that employees are not motivated solely by absolute levels of reward. They are motivated by the perceived fairness of their situation relative to others. The mechanism runs on a ratio, and the ratio has two sides. Inputs are what the employee brings. Effort, skill, experience, and loyalty. Outcomes are what the employee receives. Pay, recognition, and advancement. Individuals assess that input-to-outcome ratio for themselves. Then they compare it to the ratio of a relevant referent. That referent might be a colleague, or an industry peer. It might even be the employee's own past experience, which is easy to forget. When the comparison reveals inequity, the individual feels psychological discomfort, and moves to restore balance.

Restoration

Six Ways People Rebalance the Ledger

Restoring balance can happen in six different ways. The employee can reduce inputs, working less and investing less effort. They can seek increased outcomes, requesting a raise or demanding recognition. They can cognitively distort the comparison, reframing the referent as not really comparable. They can change the referent altogether, and compare to a different person or standard. They can leave the situation, by resigning or transferring. Or they can act to change the referent's own inputs or outcomes. Every one of those restores equity, from the employee's point of view. Now count them from the organization's point of view. Four of the six are pure loss, and two of those four are almost invisible. Reduced effort and quiet cognitive reframing do not file a complaint or hand in a resignation.

Three Conditions

Under, Equal, and Over

There are three equity conditions, and each produces a characteristic response. Underpayment inequity is when my ratio falls below the referent's. The likely response is to reduce effort, or to seek higher outcomes. Equity is when my ratio equals the referent's, and behavior is simply maintained. Overpayment inequity is when my ratio sits above the referent's. That third condition surprises people, because being over-rewarded is also uncomfortable. The likely response is to increase effort, or to reframe the comparison. Look carefully at those two options, because they are not equally costly. Increasing effort is expensive. Deciding the comparison was never fair is free. That asymmetry is why over-reward rarely produces the sustained extra effort managers hope for. Under-reward, by contrast, produces its response reliably.

Implications

Why Generous Pay Can Still Demotivate

Equity Theory has serious implications for compensation design and promotion processes. It matters for recognition programs too. Here is the finding that catches organizations off guard. Even objectively generous pay packages can generate demotivation. That happens whenever employees perceive them as unfair relative to peers. The absolute number is not what the employee is computing. But there is a lever available, and it is cheaper than raising everyone's pay. Transparency about how decisions are made is called procedural fairness. Procedural fairness can partially compensate for outcome inequity. Employees who understand and trust the process are more tolerant of unfavorable outcomes. So an organization that cannot pay everyone more can still explain itself honestly, and that buys real tolerance.

Expectancy

Vroom's VIE Model

Victor Vroom introduced Expectancy Theory in nineteen sixty-four. It is a cognitive model of motivation built on three components. They are abbreviated as the VIE model. Expectancy is the belief that effort will lead to performance. In an employee's own words, if I work harder, I will meet my targets. Instrumentality is the belief that performance will lead to outcomes. If I meet targets, I will receive a bonus. Valence is the value the person places on that expected outcome. The bonus matters to me. Now notice that all three are beliefs, not facts about the reward system. A perfectly fair bonus scheme that nobody understands has an instrumentality problem, not a fairness problem.

Multiplication

Why the Weakest Link Decides

The structure of Vroom's model is where its power comes from. Motivation is a multiplicative function of the three components. Motivation equals expectancy, times instrumentality, times valence. If any one component is zero, overall motivation collapses. Suppose the employee does not believe effort leads to performance. Motivation is zero. Suppose they do not believe performance leads to reward. Motivation is zero. Suppose the reward simply is not worthwhile to them. Motivation is zero again. And the strength of the other two components makes no difference whatsoever. That is what a multiplication does, and it is not how managers usually think. Most improvement efforts assume the components add up, so more of anything helps. They do not add. Motivation problems have a location, and everything away from it is a distraction.

Diagnosis

Fixing the Component That Is Actually Broken

So the multiplicative structure converts directly into a diagnostic procedure. Find the weakest link, then fix that one. If expectancy is low, provide training, resources, and clear performance standards. The employee does not currently believe that effort will convert into performance. If instrumentality is low, make the reward system transparent and consistently applied. The employee does not believe performance will convert into reward. If valence is low, go and understand individual preferences. Not all rewards motivate equally, and the reward on offer may simply not be wanted. The instruction underneath all three is to identify the weakest link before designing anything. Most failed motivation programs are well-executed fixes. They were just aimed at a link in the chain that was never the problem.

Reinforcement

Behavior Is Shaped by Its Consequences

The third behavior-based theory takes an entirely different posture. Reinforcement Theory is rooted in B. F. Skinner's operant conditioning framework. Its claim is behaviorist and blunt. Behavior is shaped by its consequences. Unlike Expectancy Theory, it does not model internal mental states at all. It focuses on observable behavior and environmental contingencies. That refusal to look inside the head is a feature, not an oversight. It means the theory can be applied without knowing what anyone is thinking. Four types of contingency govern behavior under this framework. And here is the observation that should make managers uncomfortable. In organizational settings, all four of them occur constantly. Very often they occur without any deliberate design at all, which means something is always being taught.

Four Contingencies

Adding and Removing, Increasing and Decreasing

The four contingencies divide along two dimensions. Are you adding something, or removing something? And are you increasing the behavior, or decreasing it? Positive reinforcement adds a desired stimulus to increase a behavior. A bonus for exceeding targets is the obvious example. Negative reinforcement removes an aversive stimulus, and it also increases behavior. Removing close supervision after consistent performance is a good organizational example. Punishment adds an aversive stimulus to decrease a behavior. A written warning for a policy violation does that. Extinction removes a reinforcing stimulus to decrease behavior, such as ignoring disruption until it stops. Note carefully that negative reinforcement is not punishment. Both reinforcements increase behavior.

Schedules

When You Reward Changes What You Get

The last piece is timing, and it is more powerful than most managers expect. Reinforcement schedules are the timing and frequency with which reinforcement arrives. Their effects on behavior persistence are well documented. A variable ratio schedule delivers reinforcement after an unpredictable number of responses. It produces the most persistent behavior, and the greatest resistance to extinction. Unpredictability, not generosity, is what makes a behavior durable. A fixed interval schedule delivers reinforcement at regular time intervals. It produces performance spikes just before the interval ends. And it produces dips immediately afterward. You have almost certainly seen that pattern in an organization that relies on annual reviews. The scramble in the final quarter is not a coincidence. It is the schedule working exactly as designed.

About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study

Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB

Why take it here

Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study

Why people act the way they do at workLeadership and Organizational Behavior explains how individuals, groups and leaders behave inside organizations: motivation, attitudes, teams, power, conflict, culture and change. It is a core course in business administration, management and human resources programs.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Behavior-Based Theories: Equity Theory, Vroom's Expectancy, and Reinforcement Theory

What is Adams' equity theory of motivation?
Stacy Adams' equity theory, proposed in 1963, says people are motivated by the perceived fairness of their rewards compared with others, not by absolute reward levels. Employees compare their ratio of inputs, such as effort, skill, and experience, to outcomes, such as pay and recognition, with that of a referent. When they sense inequity, they may reduce effort, ask for more, reframe the comparison, change referents, try to change the referent's situation, or leave.
How does Vroom's expectancy theory explain motivation?
Victor Vroom's 1964 expectancy theory says motivation equals expectancy times instrumentality times valence. Expectancy is the belief that effort will lead to performance, instrumentality is the belief that performance will lead to a reward, and valence is how much the person values that reward. Because the terms multiply, if any one is zero, motivation is zero. Managers should find the weakest link and fix it, rather than strengthening a link that already works.
What is the difference between negative reinforcement and punishment?
Negative reinforcement increases a behavior by removing something unpleasant, while punishment decreases a behavior by adding something unpleasant. In reinforcement theory, based on B. F. Skinner's operant conditioning, removing close supervision after consistent good work is negative reinforcement, and issuing a written warning for a policy violation is punishment. Positive reinforcement, such as a bonus, adds something desirable to increase behavior, and extinction removes a reinforcer to decrease it.
Which reinforcement schedule produces the most persistent behavior?
A variable ratio schedule, which delivers reinforcement after an unpredictable number of responses, produces the most persistent behavior and the greatest resistance to extinction. Unpredictability, not generosity, is what makes the behavior durable. A fixed interval schedule, which reinforces at regular time intervals, produces bursts of performance just before each interval ends and dips right afterward, the pattern often seen in organizations that rely on annual reviews.

About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course

How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 122 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 122 lessons total about 21 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.

122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Leadership and Organizational Behavior →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Leadership and Organizational Behavior
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →