Globalization and Organizational Behavior: Intersections and Structural Influences

UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 20.1 Free with a free account

Globalization and Organizational Behavior: Intersections and Structural Influences

Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 20: Globalization and Its Impact on Organizational BehaviorSection 20.1 · lesson 120 of 12212 min · free with a free account

← Developing Organizational Resilience Through Proactive Change Management StrategiesNext lesson: Globalization's Effects on Organizational Culture and Team Dynamics →

Earn 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational BehaviorRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 206 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Leadership and Organizational Behavior · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

Not a distant economic abstraction, but the room the work now happens in.

  • Explain why globalization is the everyday context for OB
  • Name 3 drivers and how each raises coordination demands
  • Compare the multidomestic, global and transnational structures
  • Say why a diverse workforce is both opportunity and difficulty

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,521 words). Read along, or search it.

Globalization and Its Impact on Organizational Behavior

Globalization and Organizational Behavior: Intersections and Structural Influences

Globalization can sound like a topic for an economics course rather than this one. That framing is exactly what this section is written to correct. For organizational behavior, globalization is not a distant abstraction. It is the room the work now happens in. We will define it, and name the five forces that keep driving it. Then look at how it reshapes structure, through four multinational archetypes. Then at what changes for the people inside those structures. Communication, motivation, authority, and even what a deadline means. One theme runs underneath the whole chapter. Structures and technologies set the stage. The human element decides the outcome.

The Everyday Context

Where the Work Now Happens

Start with a working definition. Globalization is the deepening interconnection of economies, organizations, and people, across national borders. Flows of goods, services, capital, information, and talent. All moving with increasing freedom and speed. Now make that concrete, because the definition alone stays abstract. A design reviewed in one country is manufactured in a second and sold in a third. A team meeting convenes participants across several time zones. And a manager's decisions ripple through colleagues who assume different things than the manager does. Different things about authority, about communication, and about time. So understanding behavior in organizations now requires understanding these forces. They shape who works together, how, and under what expectations.

Both Directions

The Intersection Runs Two Ways

The intersection between globalization and organizational behavior runs in both directions. In one direction, globalization reshapes what this field studies. The structures, the norms, and the relationships organizational behavior examines. It decides who is on the team, and what each of them assumes about work. In the other direction, behavior determines whether global strategies succeed at all. A flawless plan to coordinate across borders collapses under a simple condition. If the people involved cannot communicate, or trust one another. Or reconcile their different ways of working. So here is the claim worth remembering out of all this. The human dimension is not a soft afterthought to global strategy. It is frequently the decisive factor. A sound strategy fails if the people executing it misunderstand each other.

Five Drivers

What Keeps Pushing Integration Deeper

Five reinforcing forces have driven the acceleration of globalization. Technology and connectivity, which collapsed the cost of coordinating across distance. The progressive opening of trade, through agreements that lower tariffs and other barriers. Capital mobility, letting investment flow toward opportunity across borders. The migration of talent, moving skilled people toward where their abilities are most valued. And a measure of consumer convergence, as tastes partially align across markets. They reinforce one another, which is why they compound rather than simply adding up. Cheaper coordination makes distant suppliers viable, which deepens trade. Deeper trade attracts capital, which follows opportunity across the same borders. For organizational behavior, the practical point is about demands rather than economics. Each driver widens the range of people, places, and norms an organization must integrate. Which raises the human demands of coordination, even when the economics look straightforward.

Driver By Driver

And Why None of It Is Inevitable

Take the drivers one at a time, because each does something specific. Technology and connectivity made it feasible to run one process across many locations, in close to real time. Trade liberalization widened two things at once. The markets an organization can reach, and the suppliers it can draw upon. Capital mobility lets investment flow toward opportunity with fewer constraints than in earlier eras. Talent migration moves skilled people toward where their abilities are most valued. Consumer convergence lets organizations serve global demand with greater consistency. Now the necessary correction to all of that. These drivers do not operate uniformly, or without friction. Geopolitical tension, regulatory divergence, and periodic retreats toward protectionism all push back. Globalization is neither inevitable nor irreversible.

The Central Tension

Integration Pulls One Way, Responsiveness the Other

As organizations extend across borders, their structures evolve to balance two pressures. And those two pressures frequently pull in opposite directions. The first is the drive for global integration. It favors central coordination, shared standards, and economies of scale. The second is the drive for local responsiveness. It favors adaptation to the distinct conditions, regulations, and preferences of each market. How an organization resolves this shapes reporting lines and decision rights. And ultimately the daily experience of the people inside it. Now, there is no permanent correct answer here. The appropriate balance shifts with industry, with strategy, and with circumstance. What matters for our purposes is what the chosen structure does to people. The same structural choice can energize one workforce and frustrate another.

Four Archetypes

How Multinationals Resolve the Tension

Four recognizable archetypes describe how multinationals resolve that tension. An international structure largely replicates home-country practices abroad. It exports established ways of working, with limited local adaptation. A multidomestic structure grants substantial autonomy to local units. Each adapts to its own market, with loose central coordination. That heightens responsiveness, at some cost to consistency and to scale. A global structure centralizes decisions and standardizes practices. It maximizes efficiency and scale, treating the world as a single integrated market. And a transnational structure attempts the most demanding balance of all. It seeks global efficiency and local adaptiveness at the same time. What is distinctive about it is the direction knowledge travels. Knowledge flows in multiple directions, rather than only outward from headquarters.

What People Feel

Each Archetype Has Behavioral Consequences

Each archetype carries distinct behavioral implications, and they are worth separating. Where authority is centralized, local employees may lose autonomy, and responsiveness to their own circumstances. That has consequences for motivation and for engagement. Where authority is dispersed, local units gain ownership. But they may drift from shared identity and shared standards. And coordination across units becomes a continual challenge rather than an occasional one. The transnational ambition is attractive, and it places heavy demands on people. They must hold competing priorities in balance. And collaborate across boundaries without the simplicity of a single clear chain of command. So choosing a transnational form is not only a decision about efficiency. It is a decision about what you are asking of your workforce.

Across Borders

Familiar Topics, New Complexity

When work crosses borders, familiar behavioral topics acquire new complexity. Communication is challenging even among people who share a language and a context. Now it must bridge differences in language proficiency and in communication style. And in the unspoken conventions that govern how directness is interpreted. The same goes for disagreement, and for silence. Motivation cannot be assumed to respond to the same incentives everywhere. Authority and decision-making differ. So does conflict and how it gets resolved. Even the meaning of a deadline can differ, in ways that surprise people badly. Now the stance to take toward all of this. These are not obstacles to be eliminated. They are realities to be understood and worked with. The competent practitioner recognizes difference and suspends the reflex to judge it. That capacity is sometimes called cultural intelligence, and it is a central individual competency.

The Workforce

The Talent Pool Is No Longer Drawn by Geography

Globalization has transformed the composition of the workforce itself. Organizations now routinely employ people of many nationalities. Often working together on the very same teams. And increasingly they do so across distance, through virtual collaboration. The boundaries of a talent pool are no longer drawn by geography. Skilled people may contribute from anywhere. Which means organizations compete for talent on a global rather than a local scale. This brings both promise and difficulty, and they are inseparable. The promise is a wider range of perspectives and deeper knowledge of varied markets. Plus the creativity that often emerges when different ways of thinking meet. The difficulty is building cohesion and fairness among people who may never share a room. People who hold differing assumptions, and who see the organization only through their own location.

Motivation

Incentives Do Not Travel Unchanged

One of the most consequential intersections concerns motivation. Theories of motivation developed in one cultural setting do not transfer automatically. Because three things vary across settings. What people value. How they relate effort to reward. And what they consider a fair exchange. Take an incentive structure built around individual achievement and visible recognition. It may energize employees in a setting that prizes exactly that. And feel awkward, or even counterproductive, where group harmony is valued more highly. Recognition delivered publicly may motivate in one place and embarrass in another. Financial reward, autonomy, security, status, and belonging all carry different weights. The implication is not that motivation is mysterious. It is that managers should ask rather than assume, and observe what is actually valued. The underlying human needs may be broadly shared. The forms that satisfy them are culturally shaped.

The Decisive Element

Technology Sets the Stage; People Decide the Outcome

The same technology that drives globalization also reshapes how global work feels. Collaboration platforms, video communication, shared workspaces, and asynchronous tools. For many employees, the daily reality of global work is mediated almost entirely through screens. That mediation has behavioral consequences worth naming. Lean digital channels strip away many of the cues that aid understanding face to face. Which increases the risk of misinterpretation, especially across cultural and linguistic differences. The informal contact that builds relationships and trust must be engineered deliberately. And time-zone separation cuts both ways. It can enable continuous around-the-clock workflows, or fragment collaboration into frustrating delays. Which one you get depends entirely on how it is managed. So across all of these intersections runs a single consistent theme. Structures, technologies, and strategies set the stage. The human element determines the outcome.

About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study

Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB

Why take it here

Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study

Why people act the way they do at workLeadership and Organizational Behavior explains how individuals, groups and leaders behave inside organizations: motivation, attitudes, teams, power, conflict, culture and change. It is a core course in business administration, management and human resources programs.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Globalization and Organizational Behavior: Intersections and Structural Influences

How does globalization affect organizational behavior?
Globalization, the deepening interconnection of economies, organizations, and people across borders, changes who works together, how, and under what assumptions about authority, communication, and time. The influence runs both ways: globalization reshapes team composition and norms, and human behavior decides whether global strategies succeed. A sound cross-border plan can fail if people cannot communicate, build trust, or reconcile different ways of working.
What are the main drivers of globalization?
Five reinforcing forces drive globalization: technology and connectivity, which cut the cost of coordinating across distance; trade liberalization, which lowers tariffs and other barriers; capital mobility; talent migration toward where skills are most valued; and partial convergence of consumer tastes. The forces compound, since cheaper coordination deepens trade and trade attracts capital. Geopolitical tension, regulatory divergence, and protectionism push back, so globalization is not irreversible.
What are the four types of multinational organizational structures?
The four common archetypes, associated with Christopher Bartlett and Sumantra Ghoshal, are international, multidomestic (their term was multinational), global, and transnational. An international structure exports home-country practices with little adaptation. A multidomestic structure gives local units wide autonomy. A global structure centralizes decisions for efficiency and scale. A transnational structure seeks global efficiency and local responsiveness at once, with knowledge flowing in many directions, which places heavy demands on employees.
Do motivation theories work the same way across cultures?
Motivation theories do not transfer automatically across cultures, because what people value, how they link effort to reward, and what they see as a fair exchange all vary. An incentive built on individual achievement and public recognition may energize employees in one setting and embarrass them where group harmony matters more. Underlying needs may be broadly shared, but the forms that satisfy them are culturally shaped, so managers should ask rather than assume.

About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course

How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 122 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 122 lessons total about 21 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.

122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Leadership and Organizational Behavior →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Leadership and Organizational Behavior
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →