Workplace Perception, Impression Management, and Attribution Theory

UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 7.1 Free with a free account

Workplace Perception, Impression Management, and Attribution Theory

Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 7: Perception, Attribution, and Cultural Dynamics in OrganizationsSection 7.1 · lesson 38 of 12210 min · free with a free account

← Strategies for Improving Workplace Attitudes and Organizational CommitmentNext lesson: Attributional Biases and Cultural Perceptions of Time and Power →

Earn 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational BehaviorRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 206 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Leadership and Organizational Behavior · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

How people construct the workplace they think they are observing.

  • Trace the three stages of the perceptual process
  • Identify five impression management tactics
  • Apply Kelley's covariation model to workplace behavior
  • Explain why attribution accuracy drives management effectiveness

Free study notes

Get this lesson's notes by email

The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.

One email. Unsubscribe in one click.

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,264 words). Read along, or search it.

Perception, Attribution, and Cultural Dynamics in Organizations

Perception, Impression Management, and Attribution

Every interaction at work is filtered through perception. What employees see and conclude about colleagues and conditions shapes what they do. It shapes their behavior more powerfully than objective reality alone does. So this chapter starts with the machinery of perception itself. We will trace the three stages of the perceptual process. We will look at impression management, and the five tactics people use. We will build attribution theory from Heider through Kelley. And we will end on why attribution accuracy is a management competence. Because the cause you assign to a problem determines the fix you prescribe. Get the cause wrong, and every subsequent decision inherits the error.

Starting Point

Everything at Work Is Filtered

Begin with a definition, and then the one word inside it that matters. Perception is the psychological process of selecting, organizing and interpreting information. The purpose is to construct a meaningful picture of the world. And the key word is active. Perception is not a passive recording of reality. It is a construction. It is shaped by prior experience, and by current motivation. By emotional state, and by cultural background. And by cognitive shortcuts that let the mind process information efficiently. Those shortcuts are not defects. Without them you could not function. But they are the reason two honest people can watch the same meeting and disagree.

The Process

Three Stages, Three Chances to Go Wrong

The perceptual process unfolds in three stages. In the selection stage, individuals attend to certain stimuli and filter out others. The filter runs on salience, novelty, and personal relevance. In the organization stage, selected stimuli are structured into recognizable patterns. That structuring uses mental frameworks called schemas. A schema is a template, built from prior experience, for interpreting new information. In the interpretation stage, organized patterns are given meaning. Meaning drawn from existing beliefs, expectations and experiences. Now notice what this three-stage structure implies. Each stage introduces its own potential for error. A schema makes perception fast, and it makes it wrong in predictable ways.

Below Awareness

What a Manager Is Actually Doing

In organizational settings these stages run continuously. And they run largely below conscious awareness, which is what makes them dangerous. Take a manager observing an employee's behavior. She is not simply recording facts, although it feels exactly like that from inside. She is selecting which behaviors to notice. She is organizing them into a pattern. This person is disengaged, perhaps. And she is interpreting that pattern through her previous experience of similar situations. Three constructive acts, none of them deliberate. So when she later reports what she saw, she is not being dishonest. She is reporting a construction, and experiencing it as an observation. That distinction is the whole practical point of studying perception.

Selective Attention

Systematic Blind Spots

The first stage deserves its own name, because its effects are so systematic. Selective attention is the tendency to focus on salient, novel or personally relevant stimuli. And to ignore information that does not meet those criteria. In the workplace this produces predictable blind spots. Managers may notice employee errors more readily than successes. Team members may attend to evidence confirming their existing impression of a colleague. While quietly dismissing evidence that would disconfirm it. The consequence for performance management is serious. When evaluators attend selectively, their assessments become unreliable. Not because they are dishonest, but because the filter builds an incomplete picture. One organizational response is training managers in structured observation. Another is behavioral anchoring, which ties ratings to specific observed behaviors.

Impression Management

Managing How You Are Seen

Now turn the lens around. People do not only perceive. They arrange to be perceived. Impression management is the effort to influence how others perceive you. Some of that effort is conscious. A good deal of it is not. In organizational settings it is pervasive, and it runs in three directions. Employees manage upward, toward supervisors. They manage laterally, toward peers. And they manage downward, toward subordinates. The self-presentation is tailored to the relationship and to the context. Most people would not describe themselves as doing this. But researchers have cataloged the tactics, and they are recognizable in any workplace.

Five Tactics

The Catalog, and What Each Costs

There are five common impression management tactics. Ingratiation means making oneself likeable, through flattery, agreement and favor-doing. It is typically used to manage upward, and overused it reads as sycophantic. Self-promotion means drawing attention to one's competencies and achievements. Its natural home is performance reviews and job applications. Overused, it reads as arrogant. Exemplification means demonstrating dedication through visible effort and sacrifice. Think project deadlines and team settings. Overused, it reads as performative. Supplication means presenting oneself as needy, to elicit assistance from others. It shows up in negotiation and resource requests, and it undermines credibility. And intimidation means projecting toughness or authority to discourage challenge. It appears in conflict situations, and it damages relationships. Every tactic on that list has a legitimate version and a corrosive one.

The Ethics

Not All of It Is Manipulation

It would be easy to read that catalog as a study in workplace cynicism. That reading is wrong, and it is worth correcting directly. Not all impression management is manipulative. Presenting oneself clearly and professionally is impression management. So is communicating achievements to decision-makers who would otherwise not know them. That is not vanity. Invisible work is often unrewarded work. So is adapting your communication style to the audience in front of you. All of these serve legitimate organizational functions. The ethical concern arises at one specific point. When the management becomes deceptive. That is, when the image projected is fundamentally inconsistent with performance reality. So the tactic is not the problem. The gap between image and reality is.

Attribution

Heider's Central Question

The last piece of this subchapter is attribution, and it is the most consequential. Attribution theory examines how individuals explain the causes of behavior. Their own behavior, and other people's. When we observe someone acting, we instinctively generate a causal explanation. Did they behave that way because of something about them as a person? Or because of the situation they were in? That is an internal cause versus an external cause. Fritz Heider established the foundations of attribution theory. He identified this internal-external distinction as the central dimension of causal attribution. Harold Kelley later refined it into something operational. He specified the three criteria people actually use to decide between internal and external.

Covariation Model

Kelley's Three Criteria

Kelley's three criteria are consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus. Consistency asks whether the person behaves this way repeatedly. Distinctiveness asks whether the person behaves this way only in this situation. Consensus asks whether other people behave the same way in this situation. Now the decision rules, which combine the three. High consistency, low distinctiveness, low consensus predicts an internal attribution. Read that combination slowly, because it is the important one. The person always behaves this way, uniquely, when others do not. That combination is what licenses a conclusion about the person. High consistency, high distinctiveness and high consensus predicts an external attribution. The situation is causing the behavior. And low consistency, with variable distinctiveness and consensus, points to a circumstantial cause. Contextual, and one-off.

Why It Matters

Attribution Decides the Intervention

Why does any of this matter to a working manager? Because attribution determines the intervention. Consider one missed deadline. Manager A attributes it to the employee's lack of effort. An internal attribution. Manager B attributes the same missed deadline to an unrealistic workload. Or to inadequate resources. An external attribution. In the first case, the recommended response is motivational, or disciplinary. In the second, it is structural, or about resources. Same event. Opposite prescriptions. And only one of them can be right. So the accuracy of performance attributions drives management effectiveness directly. Systematic attribution errors lead to misdiagnosed performance problems. They lead to inappropriate interventions, and outcomes that damage careers. They damage organizational performance too. The next subchapter examines those errors in depth.

About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study

Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →

Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB

Why take it here

Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study

Why people act the way they do at workLeadership and Organizational Behavior explains how individuals, groups and leaders behave inside organizations: motivation, attitudes, teams, power, conflict, culture and change. It is a core course in business administration, management and human resources programs.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Workplace Perception, Impression Management, and Attribution Theory

What are the three stages of the perception process?
Perception unfolds in three stages: selection, organization, and interpretation. In selection, people attend to some stimuli and filter out others based on salience, novelty, and personal relevance. In organization, the selected information is structured into patterns using schemas, mental templates built from prior experience. In interpretation, those patterns are given meaning from existing beliefs and expectations. Each stage can introduce errors, which is why two honest observers can see the same event differently.
What are the main impression management tactics?
Five common impression management tactics are ingratiation, self-promotion, exemplification, supplication, and intimidation. Ingratiation uses flattery and favors to be liked. Self-promotion highlights achievements and skills. Exemplification shows dedication through visible effort. Supplication presents oneself as needy to get help. Intimidation projects toughness to discourage challenge. Each can be used legitimately, and impression management becomes unethical when the image projected is fundamentally inconsistent with actual performance.
What are Kelley's three criteria for attribution?
Harold Kelley proposed that people judge whether behavior has an internal or external cause using consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus. Consistency asks whether the person acts this way repeatedly, distinctiveness asks whether they act this way only in this situation, and consensus asks whether others act the same way. High consistency, low distinctiveness, and low consensus point to an internal cause; high consistency, high distinctiveness, and high consensus point to an external one.
What is selective attention in the workplace?
Selective attention is the tendency to focus on stimuli that are salient, novel, or personally relevant and to ignore information that does not meet those criteria. At work it creates predictable blind spots: a manager may notice an employee's errors more readily than successes, and teammates may attend to evidence that confirms their impression of a colleague. Training in structured observation and behavioral anchoring, which ties ratings to specific observed behaviors, makes evaluations more reliable.

About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course

How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 122 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 122 lessons total about 21 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.

122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Leadership and Organizational Behavior →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Leadership and Organizational Behavior
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →