UPI Study › Courses › Leadership and Organizational Behavior › Free lessons › Lesson 2.7 Free with a free account
Developing Leadership Competencies for Organizational Success and Sustainability
Leadership and Organizational Behavior · Chapter 2: Leadership Dynamics and Power in OrganizationsSection 2.7 · lesson 12 of 12210 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Leadership and Organizational Behavior
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: The Strategic Management Process and the Four Pillars of Management →← Evaluating Leadership Effectiveness and Power Dynamics in Contemporary OrganizationsNext lesson: The Strategic Management Process and the Four Pillars of Management →
In this lesson
Frameworks, emotional intelligence, adaptive capacity, and the pipeline.
- Explain what a competency framework is for
- Name the five components of emotional intelligence
- Separate technical problems from adaptive challenges
- Build succession planning as a continuous process
Free study notes
Get this lesson's notes by email
The key points and 4 practice questions with answers, in your inbox. One email, free.
One email. Unsubscribe in one click.
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,255 words). Read along, or search it.
Leadership Dynamics and Power in Organizations
Developing Leadership Competencies
This subchapter closes the leadership chapter by asking a practical question. How does anyone actually get better at this? We start with competency frameworks, which give the effort a structure. Then emotional intelligence, which the research treats as foundational. Then adaptive leadership, which is really a way of classifying problems. And finally succession planning, which scales capability across time. One idea connects all four. Leadership capability is built through experience, not transmitted through instruction. Everything here is about designing the right experiences deliberately. And about making sure the organization keeps what it builds.
How It Develops
Not by Training Alone
Leadership competency development is a specific process. It is how individuals build, refine and expand the capabilities to lead. And it works differently from technical skill development. Technical skills can often be acquired through structured training alone. Leadership competencies need a combination of four things. Challenging experience. Reflective practice. Feedback integration. And formal learning. Notice how those depend on one another. Remove the challenging experience and the other three have nothing to act on. Remove the reflection and experience never converts into capability. This is why leadership development spending and leadership development results correlate weakly.
Frameworks
A Shared Language for Capability
A competency framework is a structured description of effective leadership. The knowledge, skills and behaviors that characterize it. And critically, in a specific organizational context. Frameworks do three jobs. They guide selection, by clarifying what qualities are actually being sought. That replaces each hiring manager's private theory with a stated one. They structure development, by giving a shared language for discussing growth. Without shared language, a development conversation cannot really happen. And they enable evaluation, by defining behavioral standards for assessment. Now go back to that qualifier, in a specific organizational context. A framework borrowed wholesale describes effective leadership somewhere else. Which, in contingency terms, is a misfit installed on purpose.
Five Domains
How Contemporary Frameworks Cluster
Most contemporary frameworks cluster capabilities into five domains. Strategic thinking is analyzing complex environments and making directional judgments. Interpersonal effectiveness is building relationships, communicating clearly and influencing others. Execution capability is translating plans into coordinated action and driving results. Talent development is identifying, developing and retaining capable people. And adaptive capacity is adjusting approach as circumstances change. Those five are not equally easy to work with. Adaptive capacity is the hardest to specify, and the hardest to test for. Which is exactly why it goes missing. Frameworks written to be easy to administer tend to leave it out. And then the organization is surprised when its leaders cannot adapt.
Development Pathways
What Actually Builds Each One
Each domain has its own development pathway, and the pathways are instructive. Strategic thinking builds through stretch assignments. Also through exposure to senior decision-making, watching judgments get made. Interpersonal effectiveness builds through three sixty feedback and coaching. And through genuine cross-functional collaboration. Execution capability builds through profit-and-loss or operational leadership roles. It also builds through participation in Management by Objectives. Talent development builds through formal mentoring, and performance management training. Adaptive capacity builds through rotational assignments and crisis leadership experience. Now read that column as a whole and notice something. Almost every pathway is an assignment or a relationship. Almost none of them is a course, which makes the earlier claim concrete.
Emotional Intelligence
A Foundational Competency Cluster
Now the competency cluster that sits underneath all the others. Emotional intelligence is the capacity to recognize, understand and manage emotions. Both one's own emotions, and those of other people. And to use them effectively in social and organizational contexts. Research over several decades has established something notable about it. Emotional intelligence is among the strongest individual-level predictors of leadership effectiveness. But read the finding precisely, because the precise version is stronger. It explains meaningful variance beyond cognitive ability and technical expertise. Beyond is the word doing the work there. The claim is not that emotions matter as well as intelligence and skill. It is that emotional intelligence predicts what those two measures leave unexplained.
Five Components
The Most Influential Model
The most influential model identifies five components. Self-awareness is recognizing your own emotional states and their impact on behavior. Self-regulation is managing emotional responses constructively, particularly under pressure. Motivation is sustaining inner drive independent of external rewards. Empathy is accurately reading and responding to the emotional states of others. And social skills means managing relationships and influencing in group settings. Those five are ordered rather than merely listed. Self-awareness is the precondition for self-regulation. You cannot manage a response you have not noticed. And empathy without self-regulation has a specific failure mode. It produces a leader who absorbs the room's anxiety and amplifies it.
Under Pressure
Where the Value Becomes Visible
The value of emotional intelligence shows up most in high-stakes situations. Which is unfortunate, because that is also when it is hardest to exercise. Leaders with strong self-regulation maintain composure and clarity of judgment. Followers depend on both during a crisis. Part of what a team is doing is reading the leader. They are looking for information about how bad things actually are. Leaders with strong empathy can assess their team's emotional state accurately. Then adjust communication and support accordingly. That prevents disengagement during prolonged periods of organizational stress. The word prolonged is doing real work in that sentence. Acute crises tend to mobilize people rather than deplete them. Extended stress is what produces disengagement, and nothing marks the day it begins.
Adaptive Leadership
Two Kinds of Problem
Adaptive leadership is best understood as a way of classifying problems. It separates two types of organizational challenge. Technical problems have known solutions. They can be resolved by applying existing expertise. Note that difficulty is not the same as adaptiveness. A technical problem can be extremely hard and still be technical. Adaptive challenges require changes in values, beliefs, habits or culture. They cannot be resolved by expertise alone. Here is the core insight, along with the standard error. Many of the most consequential challenges are adaptive in nature. But leaders often treat them as technical, applying known solutions to cultural problems. Take a manufacturer facing an automation-driven workforce transition. Choosing the systems is technical. Helping people navigate identity shifts is not.
Building It
Four Skills of Adaptive Capacity
Building adaptive capacity involves four specific skills. The first is called getting on the balcony. Step back from the immediate action to observe systemic patterns. Rather than reacting to whichever incident is in front of you. The second is identifying and managing the tension between stability and change. Every adaptive challenge contains that tension, and it cannot be resolved away. The third is distinguishing leadership from authority. So leaders do not confuse positional power with the influence adaptive change requires. The fourth is working productively with conflict. Treating it as a driver of organizational learning rather than something to suppress. The third skill is the hardest, and it is worth seeing why. Authority can order a technical fix into existence. It cannot order a change in values. So the more authority a leader has, the more tempting it is to misclassify the problem.
Pipeline
Succession as a Continuous Process
Finally, how an organization keeps leadership capability across time. Succession planning identifies and develops people who could hold critical roles later. Done well it ensures continuity and reduces leadership transition risk. It also signals to high-potential employees that the organization is invested in them. A robust process has five components. Identify the critical roles whose vacancy would disrupt performance significantly. Assess current talent against the competency requirements of those roles. Create individualized development plans for high-potential candidates. Provide stretch assignments that accelerate the relevant competencies. And review readiness regularly, as both talent and role requirements move. The failure mode is treating this as a one-time documentation exercise. Organizations that do are consistently unprepared when a transition arrives. The strongest pipelines make leadership capability an organizational asset, not an individual one.
About Leadership and Organizational Behavior at UPI Study
Leadership and Organizational Behavior (Business 206) is a self-paced online course of 122 video lessons in 20 chapters, from personality, perception and motivation to leadership and power, teams, decision-making, conflict, organizational structure, culture, ethics and change. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus All Business courses Every course with PRO →
Compare: Management and leadership courses · Foundations of Leadership vs Leadership and OB
Why take it here
Why students take Leadership and Organizational Behavior with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Leadership and Organizational Behavior carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Developing Leadership Competencies for Organizational Success and Sustainability
What is a leadership competency framework?
What are the five components of emotional intelligence in leadership?
What is the difference between technical problems and adaptive challenges?
What is succession planning?
About the Leadership and Organizational Behavior course
How many college credits is Leadership and Organizational Behavior?
How much does Leadership and Organizational Behavior cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Leadership and Organizational Behavior take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Leadership and Organizational Behavior.
122 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →