UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 12.3 Free with a free account
Channels That Carry Meaning: Interpersonal, Nonverbal, Written, and Oral
Principles of Management · Chapter 12: Communication and Financial ControlSection 12.3 · lesson 75 of 11713 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Moving Information Effectively: Organizational Communication Strategies →← Anatomy of a Message: The Communication Process ExplainedNext lesson: Moving Information Effectively: Organizational Communication Strategies →
In this lesson
Interpersonal, nonverbal, written, and oral: how the medium shapes the message.
- Explain channel richness and its 4 criteria
- Match a channel to a message
- Weigh nonverbal, written, and oral limits
- Select a channel for a described message
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,705 words). Read along, or search it.
Communication and Financial Control
Channels That Carry Meaning
The same words can land very differently, depending on how they're delivered. This section is about channels, the media that carry organizational communication. We'll look at channel richness, and the four criteria that measure it. We'll rank seven channels from richest to leanest, and learn the matching principle that pairs a message with its channel. We'll look at nonverbal communication, and correct a finding that gets misquoted constantly. We'll compare written and oral communication, and see when a conversation should be confirmed in writing. And we'll see why the channel you choose is itself a message. Then a case from Harborline, where a restructuring was announced by email.
Channel Richness
How Much Meaning a Channel Can Carry
Channels differ in speed, reach, permanence, and their capacity to carry nuance. In nineteen eighty-six, the management scholars Richard Daft and Robert Lengel gave that last quality a name: channel richness. Richness is a channel's capacity to convey meaning, and it's assessed against four criteria. First, a rich channel handles multiple cues at once. Tone, expression, gesture, and words together, rather than one in isolation. Second, it provides immediate feedback, so misunderstandings can be cleared up in real time. Third, it carries personal focus. The message feels directed at this receiver, rather than generic. Fourth, it uses natural language, rather than formal, stripped-down text. Face-to-face communication scores highest on all four. That makes it the richest channel available. Formal written broadcast communication scores lowest on all four. It's the leanest. But richer isn't automatically better. That depends on the message, as we'll see.
Table 12.3.1
7 Channels, Richest to Leanest
Table twelve point three point one ranks seven channels, from richest to leanest. Face-to-face offers the fullest real-time exchange, with tone, expression, and immediate back-and-forth. It has no permanence unless it's separately recorded. It suits ambiguous, emotionally loaded, or highly consequential messages. Video approximates much of that, while allowing distance. It's recordable, and suits rich exchange across locations. The telephone keeps vocal tone and immediacy, but loses visual cues entirely. It suits urgent or nuanced messages with no visual need. Live chat is real-time exchange in text. It's fast, but stripped of vocal and visual nuance. It's logged, which makes it good for quick coordination with a written trace. Email is asynchronous and permanent, and it can reach one recipient or many at once. It suits routine updates that need a record. Formal written documents, like policies, reports, and contracts, offer the greatest permanence and precision. The cost is that there's no real-time exchange at all. And they're slow to produce. Broadcast communication, like a company-wide announcement or newsletter, reaches the widest audience at the same moment. But it allows essentially no individual adaptation, and no immediate feedback. So it suits uniform, low-ambiguity information for a large audience.
The Matching Principle
Fit the Channel to the Message
The matching principle says a message's channel should fit its nature. Ambiguous, emotionally loaded, or highly consequential messages need rich channels. They benefit from real-time clarification, from tone, and from personal presence. Routine, unambiguous messages are carried efficiently by lean channels. They need none of that. A rich channel would just consume more time than the content warrants. Ignore the principle, and two specific errors follow. The first is delivering difficult news through a lean channel. Think of a layoff, or a major negative decision, announced by broadcast email. That strips away exactly the tone, clarification, and presence that difficult news most needs. It frequently reads as careless or cold, regardless of what the sender actually intended. The second error runs the other way: spending rich-channel time on routine information. A full meeting to share what could have been a short email wastes the scarce, expensive time a rich channel requires.
Matching in Practice
4 Messages, 4 Channels
Figure twelve point three point one matches four described messages to their channels, and shows what a mismatch costs. A layoff announcement belongs face-to-face. Delivered through a leaner channel, it feels cold and careless. Distrust grows, and rumor fills the gap. A routine status update belongs in an email. Calling a meeting for it instead wastes a room full of people's time, on information a message would carry fine. An urgent safety concern calls for a phone call, or an in-person conversation. A leaner channel risks a delayed reply, or a message that goes unread until it's too late. A policy reference detail belongs in a formal written document. Without one, no durable record exists for anyone to consult later. Notice that the cost of a wrong choice isn't uniform. A mismatched layoff announcement damages trust. A mismatched routine update simply wastes time.
Nonverbal Communication
Meaning Beyond the Words
Nonverbal communication carries meaning through channels other than the words themselves. It has several specific components. Tone and paralanguage cover how something is said. Pitch, pace, and emphasis, independent of the words. Facial expression, posture, and gesture carry visible emotional and attitudinal signals. Proximity, meaning physical closeness or distance, signals something about the relationship, and about formality. And use of time communicates too. Punctuality, response speed, and how long someone is kept waiting. Those say something about priority and respect, independent of anything actually said. Two cautions apply to all of these signals. First, nonverbal cues are systematically over-interpreted. A single gesture or expression is often read as more meaningful, or more deliberate, than it really was. It may simply reflect fatigue, distraction, or an unrelated concern. Second, nonverbal signals are highly culture-dependent. What a gesture, a distance, or a silence means varies across cultures. Subchapter sixteen point six develops this, in cross-cultural management. That's consistent with this course's standing caution. No cultural framework predicts a specific individual's behavior.
A Misquoted Finding
What Mehrabian Actually Studied
One finding about nonverbal communication is quoted constantly, and it deserves to be stated accurately. In the late nineteen sixties, the psychologist Albert Mehrabian published research on how people judged a speaker's feelings and attitudes. The conditions were narrow. Specifically, they involved a mismatch between the spoken words and the tone of voice. Within that narrow context, he reported a specific breakdown of how much weight words, tone, and facial expression carried. The problem is what happened next. The finding is routinely applied far beyond the conditions Mehrabian actually studied. It's often repeated as a sweeping claim that the overwhelming majority of all communication, of any kind, is nonverbal. The accurate statement is much narrower. The research concerned communicating feelings and attitudes, in the specific case where words and tone conflict. Not communication in general. Treating it as a universal ratio for all communication badly overstates what the original research established. It's a useful reminder that a famous claim can travel much further than the evidence behind it.
Written Communication
Permanent, and Toneless
Written communication's defining characteristic is permanence. And that's both an advantage and a risk. As an advantage, it creates a durable, checkable record that can be referred back to, without depending on memory. As a risk, a poorly worded message persists exactly as written. It can be reread and reinterpreted indefinitely, with no chance to clarify the tone or intent behind it in the moment. Writing also lacks tone entirely, and that produces a well-documented pattern of misreading. A neutral written message is often read as colder, more curt, or more critical than the writer intended. That's because the reader's mind supplies a tone the text itself doesn't specify. And readers under stress, or already uncertain about the relationship, tend to supply a negative tone rather than a neutral one. That's why writing demands a particular discipline: writing for a reader who can't ask a question. No real-time clarification is available. So the writer bears the full burden of anticipating and resolving ambiguity before the message is sent, not after.
Oral Communication
Fast, Flexible, and Unrecorded
Oral communication offers speed, feedback, and adaptability. A conversation can be redirected, clarified, or adjusted in real time, as it unfolds. Against that sits the absence of a record. Once spoken, an oral exchange exists only in each person's memory. Memory is imperfect. And two people's memories can diverge, without either of them realizing it. That's where the recordkeeping consideration comes in. It tells you when to follow a conversation with a written confirmation. Confirm in writing wherever a future dispute about what was actually agreed would be costly. And wherever the two parties' memories are likely to diverge on a specific detail. The follow-up can be brief, even a short confirming message. It keeps the real-time advantages of the conversation, and adds back the permanent record that talk alone can't provide.
Beyond the Single Message
Asynchronous Work, and the Channel as Message
Distributed and flexible working arrangements, covered in Subchapter eleven point eleven, increase reliance on asynchronous communication. That means messages sent and received at different times, rather than in real time. By necessity, it shifts communication further toward leaner, written channels. And that makes the writing discipline we just covered considerably more consequential. A poorly written asynchronous message can't rely on an immediate follow-up conversation to repair the confusion it creates. One last point closes the topic of channels. The channel a sender chooses is itself a message about the content's importance, entirely independent of the words. Delivering something in person says it was significant enough to deserve real time and attention. Choosing a lean, impersonal channel for genuinely important news says the opposite. Whether intended or not, it says the news didn't warrant that investment.
Case Vignette
A Restructuring by Broadcast Email
Here's a composite case, constructed for instruction. Facing a significant departmental restructuring, Harborline Manufacturing's regional director announced it in a single, carefully worded, company-wide email. The reasoning made sense. Everyone would receive exactly the same information, at exactly the same time. There'd be no risk of inconsistent messaging across different conversations. The reaction was immediate, and considerably more negative than the substance of the restructuring seemed to warrant. Employees felt a significant, personally consequential change had been delivered with no more care than a routine policy update. And anxious speculation filled the gaps the brief email left unaddressed. That's the finding from Subchapter twelve point one. Uncertainty gets filled with the worst plausible explanation. The director's goal of consistency was reasonable. But it was pursued at the cost of the richness a consequential, emotionally loaded message required. Department-level meetings, with real-time questions, would have been a better match. Paired afterward with a written summary, they'd keep the content uniform, and add back clarification and personal presence. Next, Subchapter twelve point four widens the lens, to the directions information flows, and the formal and informal networks it travels through.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Channels That Carry Meaning: Interpersonal, Nonverbal, Written, and Oral
What is channel richness in communication?
How do you choose the right communication channel for a message?
Is most communication really nonverbal, as Mehrabian's research is said to show?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of written versus oral communication?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →