UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 12.1 Free with a free account
Management by Message: Why Communication Drives Everything
Principles of Management · Chapter 12: Communication and Financial ControlSection 12.1 · lesson 73 of 11712 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Anatomy of a Message: The Communication Process Explained →← Work on Your Terms: The Rise of Job FlexibilityNext lesson: Anatomy of a Message: The Communication Process Explained →
In this lesson
Why communication is most of a manager's work, not a side skill.
- Define communication, and why understanding is the key word
- Explain communication's role in each management function
- Describe the consequences of communication failure
- Find the communication component in a management problem
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,675 words). Read along, or search it.
Communication and Financial Control
Management by Message: Why Communication Drives Everything
Most management problems arrive with a label: a motivation problem, an attitude problem, a resistant team. This section asks how often the real problem is something else. Communication. We'll define communication precisely, and find the one word in that definition that matters most. We'll see why communication isn't a skill that supports management work. It's most of the work itself. We'll trace it through each management function, and name the four purposes it serves. We'll look at what failure costs, and why organizations chronically under-invest in it. Then we'll treat silence as a message, set out three obligations every manager carries, and see why repetition isn't redundant. And we'll end with Priya, who announced a decision, and misread the reaction.
Defined Precisely
Transfer, and Understanding
Start with a precise definition. Communication is the transfer and understanding of meaning between people. The operative word there is understanding. A message that's transferred but not understood has accomplished nothing. That's true however clearly the sender believed she spoke, and however carefully the message was worded. Think about how much of organizational life could fail that test. A memo sent. A meeting held. An instruction given. None of these is communication, in the full sense this course uses, just because it happened. It counts only if the meaning the sender intended actually arrives, intact, in the receiver's mind. That shifts the responsibility. Sending is something you do. Understanding is something you have to check.
Mintzberg (1.3)
Not a Supporting Skill: The Work Itself
Henry Mintzberg observed what managers actually do all day. Subchapter one point three covers his research in full. He found that managers spend the large majority of their working time in verbal, communicative activity. Conversations. Meetings. Calls. Not solitary analysis, and not paperwork. The implication is worth stating precisely. Communication isn't a skill that supports management work, sitting alongside planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. It isn't a separate competency at all. For most of a manager's actual day, communication is the work. So hours spent in conversation aren't time taken away from managing. For the most part, they are the managing.
Function by Function
Every Function Runs on Communication
Each of the four management functions, from Subchapter two point one, depends on communication in a specific way. Planning requires gathering information from the people who hold it. Once a plan is set, it requires conveying direction to the people who need it. Without that, objectives get set with no shared understanding of the plan. Organizing requires defining roles and reporting relationships clearly, so people know what's theirs to decide, and whom they answer to. If that's missing, the result is confusion about who does what, and who decides. Leading operates entirely through communication. There's no leadership act, whether directing, motivating, or resolving a conflict, that isn't some form of message passing. Without it, no influence reaches the people actually doing the work. Controlling needs two things. Standards communicated in advance, so people know what they're measured against before they act. And variance communicated in time to act. A deviation reported too late to correct has lost most of its value. Notice the pattern. Each failure is a communication failure, but a distinct one, tied to what that function specifically needs.
4 Purposes
What Communication Is For
Inside an organization, communication consistently serves four distinct purposes. Control communication directs and constrains behavior. Think of a policy, an instruction, or a formal reporting requirement. Motivation communication builds commitment and effort. It clarifies goals, provides feedback, and offers encouragement, in the sense developed throughout Chapter eleven. Emotional expression lets people voice frustration, satisfaction, or concern. It serves a genuine social function, independent of any task content. And information for decision making supplies the facts a person needs to choose well, whether it flows up, down, or across. A single message frequently serves more than one of these at once. So why separate them? It helps a manager notice when a message aimed at one purpose is undermining another. The classic case is a control message, delivered so bluntly that it damages motivation.
The Consequences
What Failure Actually Costs
Communication failure isn't vague. It produces specific, traceable consequences. Decisions get made on wrong information, when what reached the decision-maker was incomplete or distorted on the way. Work gets duplicated or abandoned, when two people or teams didn't know what the other was doing. Errors cluster at handoffs. Those are exactly the points of interdependence that Subchapter seven point one says need deliberate coordination. A handoff is nothing more than a communication event, between two specialized parts of a process. Disengagement follows when people stop receiving the information and explanation that would otherwise sustain their commitment. And there's a specific safety consequence in operational settings. A genuine concern isn't raised by the person who noticed it. Or it's raised, but never received by someone positioned to act on it. In safety-critical work, that gap can be the entire distance between a near-miss and a serious incident.
An Asymmetry
Why Organizations Under-Invest
Communication's effects show a specific asymmetry, and it's worth naming directly. It closely resembles the visibility problem Subchapter two point two identified for leadership. When communication succeeds, it's invisible. A well-understood instruction simply produces the intended result. There's nothing remarkable to notice. When it fails, the failure usually gets blamed on something else. A motivation problem. An ability gap. A difficult personality. It's rarely traced back to a breakdown in how information moved. That asymmetry is exactly why organizations chronically under-invest in communication. Its successes go uncredited. Its failures go undiagnosed. So there's never any visible evidence to justify the investment it actually deserves.
Table 12.1.1
Finding the Communication Component
Table twelve point one point one puts this to work on six described problems. Each has a communication component, and an alternative explanation worth considering too. A new policy is ignored within weeks. It was announced once, without repetition, or any explanation of its reasoning. The alternative reading is that employees are simply resistant to change. Two departments each think the other owns a recurring task. Role boundaries were never communicated at the handoff. Or one department is being deliberately uncooperative. A safety near-miss recurs, months after it was reported. The report never reached anyone positioned to act. Or staff have become careless. A team seems disengaged despite adequate pay and workload. Direction and reasoning are rarely explained. Or it lacks intrinsic motivation. A project misses what the client wanted. Requirements came from one rushed conversation, never confirmed. Or the team lacks technical skill. And leaders are surprised by a problem the frontline knew about for months. Upward messages were filtered at each level. Or staff withheld it. Because of the asymmetry, the alternative explanation tends to be the one reached for. The table's discipline is to weigh both.
Silence
Silence Is Also a Message
Silence is not the absence of communication. It's a message in its own right, and a reliably interpreted one. Picture a manager who says nothing about a pending reorganization. Or a delayed decision, or an unresolved concern. People don't conclude that nothing is happening. The consistent finding connects to change communication, covered in Subchapter six point three. An absence of information is interpreted as bad news. Uncertainty gets filled, by default, with the worst plausible explanation, not a neutral one. So a manager's silence is never actually neutral in its effect. Whatever she intended by staying quiet, her team has already supplied a meaning. And by default, it's the worst plausible one.
The Manager's Obligations
3 Obligations That Follow
Three specific obligations follow from everything so far. The first is to explain the reasoning, not only the decision. Subchapter eleven point four's organizational justice findings already established why. How a decision is explained affects acceptance more than the decision itself does. The second is to close the loop when someone raises something. That means responding, even briefly, to a concern or suggestion someone brought forward. Remember the finding about silence. No response to a raised issue gets read as dismissal. The third is to communicate the same message consistently across audiences. A manager's account of a decision shouldn't shift meaningfully depending on who's asking. Inconsistency, once noticed, damages trust in every future message she sends.
Sent Is Not Received
Repeat, Then Diagnose
A persistent gap separates what a manager believes she has communicated from what has actually been received. That gap is exactly why repetition is necessary, rather than redundant. A message stated once, however clearly, competes against everything else a listener is paying attention to. Some portion of any audience won't fully absorb it on first hearing. That connects to channel effectiveness, covered further in Subchapter six point six. A manager who says something once, and considers it communicated, has made a specific mistake. She's confused her own act of sending with the far less certain fact of the message landing. Which brings us to the practical skill this section builds. It's diagnostic. Many problems described as motivation or attitude problems are, on closer look, communication problems wearing a different label. So before accepting that a team is unmotivated, resistant, or disengaged, ask a direct question. Were the direction, reasoning, and feedback that make engagement possible ever clearly communicated to them in the first place?
Case Vignette
Priya Reads the Reaction Wrong
Here's a composite case, constructed for instruction. Priya is a department head at a fictional logistics company. She announced a significant change to her team's scheduling process, in a brief email. It stated clearly what would change, and when it would take effect. She was confident it needed nothing further. The reaction was immediate, and largely negative. To Priya, the pushback felt like straightforward resistance to the new schedule itself. So she prepared to defend the decision's merits more forcefully. But her announcement had left something out entirely: why the change was happening. It never named the operational problem the change was meant to solve, or the reasoning behind this solution over another. A colleague pointed this out, and Priya followed up with the missing explanation. Much of the resistance softened noticeably. And the schedule itself didn't change at all. The opposition had never really been about the decision. It was a response to being told what, with no explanation of why. That's exactly the gap a manager is obligated to close. Next, Subchapter twelve point two opens the mechanics, with the communication process itself: its seven components, and the barriers at each one.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Management by Message: Why Communication Drives Everything
What is the definition of communication in management?
Why is communication so important for managers?
What are the four purposes of communication in an organization?
Is a manager's silence a form of communication?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →