When Workers Unite: The Role of Collective Bargaining

UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 13.12 Free with a free account

When Workers Unite: The Role of Collective Bargaining

Principles of Management · Chapter 13: Human Resource ManagementSection 13.12 · lesson 94 of 11714 min · free with a free account

← Paying for Work: Understanding Compensation and Total RewardsNext lesson: The Strategic Management Process: From Vision to Execution →

Earn 3 college credits for Principles of ManagementRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 101 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access

In this lesson

The role of collective bargaining.

  • Describe the legal framework for collective representation
  • Explain the bargaining process and its 3 kinds of subject
  • Explain what a collective agreement actually changes
  • State the competing positions on representation fairly

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,748 words). Read along, or search it.

Human Resource Management

When Workers Unite

So far, this chapter has treated the employment relationship as something the employer largely sets on its own terms. Collective bargaining changes that. This section covers the legal framework that governs collective representation, and who it covers. We'll walk through the bargaining process, and the three categories of bargaining subjects. We'll focus on what a collective agreement actually changes. It's the structure of the relationship, not just its terms. We'll cover grievances, arbitration, and impasse. We'll state the competing positions on collective representation fairly, at full strength. And we'll see a non-union employer caught out by a protection it didn't know applied.

The Legal Framework

The National Labor Relations Act of 1935

The legal framework starts with the National Labor Relations Act of nineteen thirty-five, the principal federal statute here. It establishes three employee rights. The right to organize. And the right to bargain collectively, through representatives of their own choosing. And the right to engage in concerted activity, for mutual aid or protection. That last right holds the crucial point. It's worth stating directly, because it's so often missed. The concerted activity protection applies whether or not a union is involved at all. Two or more employees jointly raising a concern, about pay, scheduling, or working conditions, are protected. That holds even with no union present, and no organizing effort underway, as Subchapter thirteen point six introduced. It catches employers who discipline employees for jointly raising a complaint, even if neither one ever mentioned a union.

Administration and Coverage

The NLRB, and Who the Act Leaves Out

The National Labor Relations Board, known as the NLRB, administers the Act. It handles two distinct types of case. Representation cases address whether and how employees will be represented by a union, including the election itself. Unfair labor practice cases address alleged violations of the Act's rights and prohibitions. Either an employer or a union can bring one against the other. The Act's coverage also carries specific exclusions. And the result deserves direct statement. A substantial share of the workforce sits entirely outside this framework. Supervisors are excluded, because they manage on the employer's behalf. Independent contractors are excluded, because they aren't employees at all, in the Act's sense. Agricultural laborers and domestic workers are excluded too. Public sector employees are covered instead by separate federal or state laws, specific to government employment. And employers covered by the Railway Labor Act fall outside it. That separate statute governs rail and airline labor relations.

Obligations and Rights

What Employers May Not Do, and What Employees May Do

The Act sets out categories of prohibited employer conduct. They're stated as legal obligations, not as tactics to be worked around. An employer may not interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees exercising their organizing and concerted-activity rights. It may not dominate, or unlawfully assist, a labor organization. It may not discriminate in hiring, discipline, or other terms of employment, based on union activity or support. It may not discriminate against an employee for filing a charge, or giving testimony, under the Act. And it may not refuse to bargain in good faith with a union that represents its employees. The corresponding employee rights deserve equal care. Employees may organize, join or assist a labor organization, and bargain collectively through chosen representatives. They may engage in other concerted activity, for mutual aid or protection. And, with equal legal standing, they have the right to refrain from any of these activities.

Union Structure

3 Levels, With Authority Closest to the Local

Unions are typically organized across three levels. The local represents employees at a specific workplace, or within a specific geographic area. It's generally where day-to-day representation, grievance handling, and workplace-level negotiation actually happen. The national body, sometimes called the international, coordinates across many locals. It sets broader strategy, and often supports bargaining with larger employers. A federation is a coalition of multiple national unions. It coordinates on shared political and policy interests, across the labor movement more broadly. So where does authority sit? Over day-to-day representation, it generally sits closest to the local level. The national and federation levels provide broader coordination and support, rather than direct workplace representation.

Figure 13.12.1

The Bargaining Process, Stage by Stage

Collective bargaining moves through several stages. Preparation gathers data and sets priorities, before any proposal is exchanged. Proposals are the initial positions each side puts forward. Negotiation is the sessions and trade-offs that follow. Tentative agreements are reached issue by issue, as negotiation proceeds. Once enough of them exist to form a complete proposed contract, the full package is assembled. Ratification is the union membership's vote on whether to accept that package. And administration is the ongoing application of the agreement once it takes effect, including the grievance machinery. Figure thirteen point twelve point one puts preparation at the very start, and for good reason. It's the stage that most determines the outcome. A party that enters negotiation without solid data and clear priorities is at a genuine disadvantage. And that holds however skillfully the later stages are handled.

Bargaining Subjects

Mandatory, Permissive, and Illegal

Bargaining subjects fall into three categories. Mandatory subjects are wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. They must be bargained over if either party raises them. Neither side may refuse to discuss one. Permissive subjects may lawfully be proposed and discussed. But neither party can insist on one to the point of impasse. A party may raise it, but can't hold the entire negotiation hostage to it. Illegal subjects can't lawfully be agreed to at all, however willing both parties might be. Agreeing would itself violate the law. Then there's the duty to bargain in good faith. It requires both parties to meet at reasonable times, and genuinely confer over mandatory subjects. What it doesn't require matters just as much. Neither party has to agree to any specific proposal, or make any particular concession. The duty governs the process, genuine engagement rather than mere pretense. It doesn't govern the outcome.

The Analytical Core

An Agreement Changes the Structure, Not Just the Terms

Now the analytically important part of this section. A collective agreement changes the structure of the employment relationship, not merely its specific terms. It changes three things. First, terms become jointly determined, and they're enforceable through a grievance procedure. Without an agreement, the employer sets terms unilaterally, with no structured internal mechanism to contest them. Second, just cause generally replaces at-will employment, connecting back to Subchapter thirteen point six. Under at-will, either party can end the relationship for any lawful reason, or no reason at all. Under a collective agreement, discipline and discharge typically require the employer to demonstrate an actual, legitimate cause. That cause is assessed against a standard the grievance and arbitration process can independently review. Third, seniority becomes an allocation principle. Layoff order, shift assignment, and vacation selection are typical examples. A non-union workplace would typically leave those entirely to managerial judgment. The agreement replaces that discretion with an objective, agreed rule, based on length of service.

Table 13.12.1

6 Decisions, Before and After Representation

Table thirteen point twelve point one shows six employment decisions, before and after representation. Termination, in a non-union workplace, is governed by at-will employment, subject to statutory exceptions. In a represented workplace, it requires just cause, reviewable through grievance and arbitration. Layoff order moves from managerial judgment to seniority, typically, as an agreed allocation principle. Shift assignment moves from managerial discretion to seniority, often, under the agreement's terms. Pay rates, without a union, are set unilaterally within the employer's own structure, as in Subchapter thirteen point eleven. Under an agreement, they're jointly negotiated, and fixed for the contract term. Discipline for a rule violation moves from the employer's own policy and discretion, to the agreement's just cause standard. And workplace complaints move from whatever process the employer provides, to a formal grievance procedure, with arbitration as a backstop. Across all six, the pattern is consistent. Unilateral discretion gives way to agreed, reviewable rules.

Grievances and Impasse

Enforcing the Agreement, and When Talks Stall

A grievance is a formal complaint that the employer has violated the collective agreement's terms. Most agreements set up a structured, multi-step process for resolving one. If it's unresolved at earlier steps, it typically ends in grievance arbitration, introduced in Subchapter twelve point six. A neutral arbitrator interprets what the existing agreement actually requires, in the specific disputed instance. That independent review is what makes the just cause standard enforceable, rather than merely aspirational. Impasse is the point at which good-faith negotiation has genuinely reached deadlock. Neither party's position is expected to move further through continued bargaining alone. Its consequences are named here only by category. Under specific conditions, an employer may implement its last, best, and final offer. That applies on mandatory subjects, once genuine impasse is reached. And economic weapons become available to each side. A strike, where employees collectively withhold their labor. And a lockout, where an employer collectively withholds work. Each is governed by its own specific legal requirements, which this course doesn't develop further.

Competing Positions

The Case For and Against, Stated Fairly

Collective representation has competing positions, and both deserve their strongest form. The case for it makes three claims. First, it corrects a genuine imbalance in bargaining power, between an individual employee and an organization. Second, it improves information flow. It gives employees a structured, protected channel to raise concerns collectively, concerns an individual might fear raising alone. Third, its just cause and grievance machinery provide a genuine check against arbitrary treatment. The case against extensive collective representation makes two claims. First, it reduces organizational flexibility. Jointly negotiated, fixed terms are harder to adjust quickly as conditions change. Second, it constrains the ability to reward individual contribution. Seniority-based allocation and standardized pay leave less room for individually tailored reward, the kind Subchapter thirteen point eleven covered. This course takes no position on where that balance should be struck.

Case Vignette

A Non-Union Employer Disciplines a Joint Complaint

Here's a composite case, constructed for instruction. A fictional retail chain had no union presence anywhere in its workforce. At one location, two employees jointly approached their store manager with a shared concern. An unpredictable scheduling practice was making it hard for both of them to arrange reliable childcare. The manager saw the joint approach as something close to insubordination. In the manager's view, two employees were banding together to challenge a management decision, instead of raising concerns separately. So the manager issued formal written warnings to both, citing a general policy against organizing against company decisions. That reasoning reflected a common misunderstanding. The two employees had engaged in exactly the protected concerted activity the National Labor Relations Act covers. They jointly raised a shared workplace concern, for their mutual aid. The absence of any union had nothing to do with it. The discipline exposed the company to an unfair labor practice charge it would never have faced, had the manager understood the protection. That closes the chapter on human resource management. Chapter fourteen turns to strategic management and decision-making, where workforce capability shapes which strategies an organization can execute.

About Principles of Management at UPI Study

Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Why take it here

Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study

The core of every business degreePrinciples of Management covers how organizations plan, organize, lead and control their work. It is a core course in business administration and management degrees, and the base for later courses in leadership, organizational behavior and strategy.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About When Workers Unite: The Role of Collective Bargaining

What rights does the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 give employees?
The National Labor Relations Act gives covered private-sector employees the right to organize, the right to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and the right to engage in concerted activity for mutual aid or protection. Employees also have an equal legal right to refrain from these activities. The Act is administered by the National Labor Relations Board, which handles representation cases and unfair labor practice cases.
What is the difference between mandatory, permissive, and illegal subjects of bargaining?
Mandatory subjects, such as wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment, must be bargained over if either side raises them. Permissive subjects may be proposed and discussed, but neither party can insist on one to the point of impasse. Illegal subjects cannot lawfully be agreed to at all, even if both sides are willing, because the agreement itself would break the law.
How does a collective bargaining agreement change the employment relationship?
A collective bargaining agreement changes the structure of the relationship, not just pay and hours. Terms become jointly determined and enforceable through a grievance procedure, just cause generally replaces at-will employment for discipline and discharge, and seniority becomes the rule for decisions like layoff order, shift assignment, and vacation selection. In short, unilateral managerial discretion gives way to agreed, reviewable rules.
Can a non-union employer discipline employees for complaining together about working conditions?
Generally no, because the National Labor Relations Act protects concerted activity whether or not a union is involved. When two or more covered employees jointly raise a concern about pay, scheduling, or working conditions, that is protected activity. An employer that issues warnings for such a joint complaint can face an unfair labor practice charge, even if no one ever mentioned a union.

About the Principles of Management course

How many college credits is Principles of Management?
Principles of Management (Business 101) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 117 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Principles of Management take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 117 lessons total about 24 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.

117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Principles of Management
3 credits · NCCRS
Enroll →