UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 14.5 Free with a free account
Tools for Sharper Decisions: Decision Trees, Payback Analysis, Simulation, and PERT
Principles of Management · Chapter 14: Strategic Management and Decision-MakingSection 14.5 · lesson 99 of 11713 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Learning from the Best: Benchmarking for Organizational Improvement →← Decision-Making Under Certainty, Risk, and UncertaintyNext lesson: Learning from the Best: Benchmarking for Organizational Improvement →
In this lesson
Decision trees, payback analysis, simulation, and PERT.
- Construct and interpret a decision tree
- Apply payback and simple investment comparison
- Describe simulation and network scheduling
- Explain why explicit assumptions are the real value
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,824 words). Read along, or search it.
Strategic Management and Decision-Making
Tools for Sharper Decisions
Most management decisions get argued out in conversation, with the key assumptions left unspoken. This section introduces five tools that force those assumptions onto the page. We'll start with the decision tree, its four elements, and the rollback calculation that solves it. We'll see what a tree reveals that discussion misses, and why sensitivity analysis beats a single answer. Then we turn to money and time. Payback analysis, the time value of money, and break-even analysis. After that come simulation and network scheduling, including the critical path and PERT. We'll compare all five tools side by side, then name the thread that runs through them. And we'll close with a payback comparison that chose the wrong equipment.
The Decision Tree
4 Elements, Solved Right to Left
A decision tree maps a sequence of choices and uncertain events, using just four elements. Decision nodes are drawn as squares. They mark the points where the decision-maker actually chooses. Chance nodes are drawn as circles. At a chance node, something uncertain happens. Each possible result there carries an estimated probability. Branches are the paths connecting the nodes. And payoffs are the values attached to each final outcome, at the far right of the tree. The tree is solved by a procedure called rollback, which works from right to left. At each chance node, you calculate an expected value, weighting each payoff by its probability. At each decision node, you choose the branch with the higher rolled-back value. That value then carries backward, and stands in for the whole subtree behind it. Notice the direction. You read a tree forward in time, but you solve it backward.
Figure 14.5.1
A Launch Choice at Harborline Manufacturing
Figure fourteen point five point one shows a product launch choice at a fictional firm, Harborline Manufacturing. The figures are illustrative, constructed for this exercise. The decision node offers two branches. Launch a new product, or keep the current one. If the firm launches, a chance node follows. Demand will be either high, or low. High demand has a probability of zero point six, and pays four hundred twenty thousand dollars. Low demand has a probability of zero point four, and pays ninety thousand dollars. Now roll it back. Zero point six times four hundred twenty thousand is two hundred fifty-two thousand. Zero point four times ninety thousand is thirty-six thousand. So the launch branch is worth two hundred eighty-eight thousand dollars. On the keep branch, the market holds with probability zero point seven, paying two hundred ten thousand. Or it erodes, with probability zero point three, paying one hundred forty thousand. That rolls back to one hundred forty-seven thousand, plus forty-two thousand. One hundred eighty-nine thousand dollars. At the decision node, rollback keeps the higher value. Launch is preferred, and comfortably so.
Why Draw the Tree
What a Tree Makes Visible
Why draw a tree at all, rather than just talk the decision through? Because a tree makes three things visible that an unstructured discussion usually doesn't. First, it shows the sequence. Which choice comes before which uncertain event resolves? In conversation, that ordering is usually left implicit. Second, it shows where new information arrives. A chance node marks the moment an outcome becomes known. That outcome could then inform a later decision. Third, it shows the value of an option that keeps a later choice open. Flexibility itself has value. Unstructured discussion tends to discount it, or overlook it entirely. A tree also invites sensitivity analysis. At what probability does the preferred branch change? A single point answer rests on one set of assumed probabilities. Sensitivity analysis asks how far those probabilities would have to shift before the recommendation flips. That's usually more useful than the point answer alone. It tells the decision-maker how confident she needs to be in her estimates, before trusting the tree.
Payback Analysis
How Fast the Money Comes Back
Payback analysis asks a simple question. How long does it take to recover an investment? Here's an illustration, with figures constructed for this exercise. An investment of two hundred thousand dollars returns fifty thousand dollars a year. Its payback period is four years. The appeal is genuine simplicity. It's easy to calculate, and easy to communicate. But payback carries two serious defects. First, it ignores everything after the payback point. Picture an investment recovered in three years, that produces nothing afterward. By payback alone, it looks identical to one recovered in three years that earns strongly for another decade. Second, it ignores the timing of cash within the payback period. One investment returns most of its cash in year one. Another returns most of it in year four. By this measure, the two look identical. Yet the earlier cash is genuinely more valuable.
The Time Value of Money
A Later Dollar Is Worth Less
The time value of money is introduced here as a concept, rather than a calculation. It holds that a dollar received later is worth less than a dollar available today. There are two reasons. A dollar in hand now can be invested, and grow. Waiting for it gives up that opportunity. And a dollar promised later carries genuine uncertainty. It may not arrive as expected. That's exactly why payback's second defect matters. Early cash really is worth more than late cash. Discounted approaches exist to deal with this. They reduce future cash flows to their present value, before investments are compared. We name them here by their underlying logic, without computing them in worked detail. One boundary is worth stating plainly. Nothing here is investment advice. Applying this to an actual investment would need professional financial guidance, which this course doesn't provide.
Break-Even Analysis
Where Contribution Covers Fixed Cost
Break-even analysis starts by separating two kinds of cost. Fixed cost doesn't change with output volume. Variable cost does. Contribution is what each unit sold adds toward covering fixed cost. It's calculated as the price, minus the variable cost per unit. The break-even volume is the output level where total contribution exactly equals fixed cost. At that point, there's neither profit nor loss. Here's an illustration, again with figures constructed for this exercise. A product carries one hundred thousand dollars in fixed cost, and a contribution of twenty dollars per unit. Divide the first by the second, and it breaks even at five thousand units. Now the genuinely useful step. Don't treat that result as an answer in itself. Treat it as a question. Is five thousand units actually achievable, in the real market this product will be sold into?
Simulation
A Distribution, Not a Point
Simulation takes a different approach to uncertainty. It represents a system whose inputs are uncertain, then runs that system many times. Each run draws different plausible values for the uncertain inputs. The result isn't a single point estimate. It's a distribution of outcomes. That's something a single calculation can't provide. One calculation gives the one outcome that a single set of assumed inputs would produce. Simulation gives a genuine sense of the range of results, and how likely each one is. But here's the trap. A simulation's output is only as good as what goes into it. It depends on the assumptions built into the model. Run it on poorly chosen inputs, and you get a confidently detailed distribution. That distribution may still surround the wrong answer. Detail is not the same thing as accuracy.
Network Scheduling
The Critical Path, Slack, and PERT
Network scheduling maps a project as a set of activities, connected by dependencies. A dependency says which activities must finish before others can begin. The critical path is the longest path through that network, and it determines the project's overall duration. Any delay on the critical path delays the entire project. Activities off the critical path carry slack. They can be delayed somewhat, without affecting the overall finish date. So slack shows a manager where there's room to maneuver. The critical path shows where there's none. PERT stands for the Program Evaluation and Review Technique. What sets it apart from a simple network diagram is its use of probabilistic time estimates. Each activity gets a probabilistic estimate, rather than a single fixed duration. So the project's overall duration can be expressed as a range, rather than one certain date. This connects directly to the Gantt chart, from Subchapter three point four. A Gantt chart displays a schedule visually, along a timeline. A network diagram makes the dependency structure and the critical path explicit, in a way a timeline view doesn't.
Table 14.5.1
5 Tools Side by Side
Table fourteen point five point one sets the five tools side by side. For each one, it asks what question the tool answers, what it needs, and where it falls short. The decision tree asks which sequenced choice maximizes expected value. It needs decision points, chance probabilities, and payoffs. Its weakness is probabilities that may not be well supported. Payback asks how quickly the investment is recovered, from the initial cost and expected periodic returns. It ignores value after payback, and the timing of cash within it. Break-even asks at what volume the product stops losing money. It needs fixed cost, variable cost, and price per unit. It says nothing about whether that volume is achievable. Simulation asks what range of outcomes is plausible, and how likely each one is. It needs a model of the system, and assumed distributions for its uncertain inputs. So it's only as reliable as the assumptions built into it. Network scheduling asks for the shortest possible project duration, and where schedule risk is concentrated. It needs activities, dependencies, and time estimates. And it assumes all of them are correctly specified.
The Common Thread
Every Tool Makes Assumptions Explicit
Step back from the individual tools, and a common thread appears. It accounts for most of their actual value. Each one makes assumptions explicit. A decision tree forces specific probabilities and payoffs onto the page. Without it, those numbers stay implicit, buried somewhere in the conversation. A break-even calculation forces a specific fixed cost, variable cost, and price onto the page. A simulation forces specific input distributions onto the page. Here's the counter-intuitive part. Stating an assumption precisely enough to put it into a tool is a discipline. And that discipline is often worth more than whatever number the tool finally produces.
Case Vignette
The Shorter Payback That Cost More
Here's a composite case, constructed for instruction. A capital planning team at Harborline Manufacturing compared two equipment investment options. It used payback analysis, and nothing else. Option A recovered its cost in two years, and was selected on that basis. Option B took three and a half years, and was set aside as the apparently weaker choice. A later, fuller review told a different story. Option A's equipment had a short remaining useful life after its two-year payback. It earned little afterward. Option B was slower to pay back. But it kept generating strong returns for many years beyond that point. Over the equipment's full working life, Option B produced a substantially higher total return. The payback-only comparison ignored everything after each payback point. It treated a fast but short-lived return as superior to a slower, far more valuable one. Comparing the full return over each option's working life would have picked Option B from the start. Next, Subchapter fourteen point six closes the chapter with benchmarking. That means comparing an organization's own performance and practice against a deliberately chosen external reference point.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Tools for Sharper Decisions: Decision Trees, Payback Analysis, Simulation, and PERT
How do you solve a decision tree?
What are the main weaknesses of the payback period method?
How do you calculate the break-even point?
What is the difference between the critical path method and PERT?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →