UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 16.3 Free with a free account
Going Global: How Businesses Expand Beyond Home Markets
Principles of Management · Chapter 16: Global Management and Cultural DiversitySection 16.3 · lesson 106 of 11713 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Running the International Firm: Smart Strategies and Common Traps →← The Global Manager's Toolkit: Traits That Travel WellNext lesson: Running the International Firm: Smart Strategies and Common Traps →
In this lesson
How businesses expand beyond home markets.
- Describe the modes of international market entry
- Explain the trade-off between control, commitment, and risk
- Connect an expansion to the driver behind it
- Select an entry mode for a described situation
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,692 words). Read along, or search it.
Global Management and Cultural Diversity
Going Global
A company that wants to sell abroad faces a choice that comes before almost anything else. How, exactly, does it get in? This section sets out the modes of international market entry, arranged from low commitment to high. We'll look at the three variables that separate them. Control, commitment, and risk. Then we'll weigh each mode's strengths against the problem it carries. We'll ask what an expansion is actually for, and how quickly organizations now go global. We'll cover the five factors that decide which mode fits, and the exit decision almost nobody plans. And we'll finish with a joint venture whose two parents couldn't agree.
Entry Modes, Low to High
From Exporting to Full Ownership
Organizations enter international markets through a range of modes, running from low commitment to high. Exporting sits at the lowest end, and it comes in two forms. Indirect exporting works through an intermediary. Direct exporting is managed by the organization itself. Licensing grants another party the right to use the organization's intellectual property, for a fee. Franchising grants something more complete. A whole operating model, brand and system included, in return for fees and royalties. Contract manufacturing has a local firm produce the organization's product, to its specification. A joint venture creates a new entity, jointly owned with a local partner. A strategic alliance is a cooperative arrangement between independent organizations. Unlike a joint venture, it doesn't necessarily create a new jointly owned entity. And at the highest end of commitment sits the wholly owned subsidiary. It's established in one of two ways. Acquiring an existing local operation, or greenfield investment, building an entirely new one.
3 Distinguishing Variables
Control, Commitment, and Risk
Three variables distinguish these modes from one another. Control over operations and brand describes how much direct authority the organization keeps. Resource commitment describes what the mode demands. Capital, management attention, and organizational investment. And exposure to risk describes how much the organization stands to lose if the venture fails. Here's the general pattern, stated directly. Control and commitment rise together. Risk exposure rises with commitment too. But the risk of losing control falls. Take the two ends of the range. Exporting risks very little capital. It also offers correspondingly little control over how the product is presented and sold. A wholly owned subsidiary exposes considerably more capital. In exchange, control stays fully in the organization's own hands. So there's no free option. Each mode trades capital at risk against control kept.
Figure 16.3.1
Control Against Commitment
Figure sixteen point three point one plots the entry modes on two axes. Resource commitment runs along the bottom, and control runs up the side. The positions are illustrative. They show the shape of the pattern, not precise measurements. Think of them as the full range of options open to a company like Harborline Manufacturing. The modes fall along a rough diagonal. Toward the lower left, exporting and licensing need little commitment, and grant correspondingly little control. Toward the upper right, the wholly owned subsidiary needs substantial commitment, in exchange for full control. The most telling part of the picture is the corner where nothing sits. No mode offers the combination of high control and low commitment at once. That empty corner is the whole trade-off in a single image. Control is something an organization pays for.
The Low-Commitment Modes
Reach Without Much Control
Now to each mode's specific strengths and weaknesses, starting at the low-commitment end. Exporting carries low commitment, and low control over how the product is presented and sold abroad. It also creates genuine dependence on the intermediary handling that presentation and sale. That dependence is greatest under indirect exporting, where an outside trading company manages most of the process. Licensing and franchising offer rapid reach, with low capital investment. That's because the local licensee or franchisee supplies most of the capital, and the local operating effort. But both carry a standing problem, and it has two parts. The first is quality control. The licensor or franchisor doesn't operate the local business directly. So it has to rely on contract terms and monitoring to maintain standards. The second is the risk of creating a future competitor. The local partner gains direct exposure to the organization's method, and may eventually apply it independently. So what separates the two? Franchising offers greater operational control. That control is typically enforced through a more detailed, closely monitored operating system than licensing provides.
The High-Commitment Modes
Shared Ventures and Full Ownership
A joint venture brings three benefits. Local knowledge, shared risk between the partners, and regulatory access. That last one matters in markets that legally require local participation. Against those benefits sits a genuine governance difficulty. Two parents, with different objectives, must jointly direct one entity. That misalignment is the most common cause of joint venture failure. It's a structured conflict between two organizations, the kind the approaches in Subchapter twelve point five are built to address. A wholly owned subsidiary offers full control, paired with full exposure to the venture's risk. Acquisition buys speed, and an existing position in the market. The price is genuine integration difficulty, including the challenge of integrating two cultures. Greenfield investment lets the organization design from scratch, building exactly the operation it wants. Its price is time. A new operation takes considerably longer before it's actually up and running.
Table 16.3.1, Part 1
The 4 Lower-Commitment Modes
Table sixteen point three point one brings eight entry modes together in one place. For each, it gives the control, commitment, and risk, and the situation the mode suits. Start with the four lower-commitment modes. Exporting, indirect or direct, is low on all three variables. It suits testing a market with minimal capital at risk. Licensing is low on control and commitment, with low to moderate risk. It suits rapid reach, where local capability is already available. Franchising moves up to moderate control, for low to moderate commitment, and moderate risk. It suits rapid reach with a replicable, closely specified operating model. Contract manufacturing is moderate across the board. It gives access to local production capability, without owning it.
Table 16.3.1, Part 2
The 4 Higher-Commitment Modes
Now the four higher-commitment modes. A joint venture shares control, for moderate to high commitment. Its risk is shared, but real, and it suits markets that require local participation, or deep local knowledge. A strategic alliance also shares control and risk, at moderate commitment. It suits cooperation on a specific capability, without full integration. The two wholly owned routes both mean full control, high commitment, and high risk. What separates them is the situation. Acquisition fits when speed, and an existing market position, are the priority. Greenfield fits when a fully customized operation is worth the additional time. So read the table from right to left. The last column is where the decision actually happens. The first three columns describe the price. The last one says when it's worth paying.
What Expansion Is For
4 Drivers of Internationalization
The entry mode tells you how an organization goes abroad. It doesn't tell you why. A more useful framing identifies what the expansion is actually for. There are four drivers. Market seeking pursues access to new customers. Resource seeking pursues materials, labor, or capability that aren't available at home. Efficiency seeking pursues a lower-cost way of producing what the organization already makes. Strategic asset seeking pursues capability, technology, or position, wanted for its own strategic value. Why is this framing more useful than the mode alone? Because two organizations can choose the identical entry mode, for entirely different underlying reasons. Imagine one joint venture chasing new customers, and another chasing a cheaper way to produce. The same yardstick can't judge them both. Understanding the actual driver clarifies what success would even mean, for that specific expansion.
The Pace of Expansion
Step by Step, or Global From the Start
Organizations also differ in how quickly they internationalize. The traditional pattern is sequential. An organization expands gradually, market by market. It often moves from lower-commitment modes toward higher-commitment ones, as it gains experience. The experience from earlier markets is what makes the deeper commitment seem justified later. But here's the observation worth noting. Many organizations now skip that sequence. They internationalize from inception, entering multiple markets essentially from the start of their existence. These are called born-global organizations. The pattern is most common where the product or service doesn't need accumulated local experience. The sequential pattern assumes that experience is necessary. For some products, it simply isn't.
Choosing a Mode
5 Factors, and the Exit Nobody Plans
Five factors determine which mode actually fits a given situation. Market size and growth influence how much commitment is justified. Regulatory requirements can mandate a specific mode, such as a joint venture, regardless of what the organization would otherwise prefer. The organization's own resources and experience constrain what it can realistically execute well. The need to protect proprietary capability pushes toward higher-control modes. That applies where intellectual property, or method, is genuinely at risk of leaking to a partner. And the speed required pushes toward faster modes, such as acquisition over greenfield, when time genuinely matters more than customization. One decision is rarely planned at entry at all. That's the decision to exit. Market conditions, competitive position, or strategic priorities can all change enough to make exit the right call. Picture a joint venture or acquisition, entered with no thought to how the stake could later be unwound. That organization has far fewer good options than if exit had been considered, even briefly, at the start.
Case Vignette
Two Parents, Two Different Objectives
Here's a composite case, constructed for instruction. Harborline Manufacturing entered a new market through a joint venture with a local partner. Two things motivated it. The partner's local knowledge, and a regulatory requirement for local participation. The venture agreement specified ownership shares and profit distribution in detail. But it never addressed how the two parents would resolve their sometimes differing priorities. Within a year, the two parents were in a genuine standoff. Harborline wanted to reinvest the venture's early profits into expanded capacity. Its local partner wanted to distribute those same profits as dividends. Neither expectation was unreasonable on its own terms. But the agreement offered no defined process for resolving the disagreement, and operations stalled for months. The governance question had never been settled at entry. That's the most common cause of joint venture failure. The detailed ownership and profit terms had addressed the wrong problem. What the venture needed was a defined process for the disagreements that were always going to arise. Next, Subchapter sixteen point four turns from entering a market to running an international operation once it's established.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Going Global: How Businesses Expand Beyond Home Markets
What are the main modes of entering an international market?
What is the difference between licensing and franchising in international business?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of an international joint venture?
How does a company choose the right international entry mode?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →