Why People Work: Content Theories vs. Process Theories

UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 11.1 Free with a free account

Why People Work: Content Theories vs. Process Theories

Principles of Management · Chapter 11: Motivation in the WorkplaceSection 11.1 · lesson 62 of 11712 min · free with a free account

← Explaining the Leader: The Attribution PerspectiveNext lesson: Great Expectations: The Pygmalion Effect in Management →

Earn 3 college credits for Principles of ManagementRecommended for credit by NCCRS · Business 101 · self-paced · one payment, lifetime access
Enroll in Principles of Management · $250 →Download the syllabus (PDF)

In this lesson

What people want, and how wanting turns into effort.

  • Define motivation and its 3 components
  • Separate motivation from ability and opportunity
  • Distinguish content theories from process theories
  • Match a motivational question to a type of theory

Transcript

Everything said in the video, section by section (1,549 words). Read along, or search it.

Motivation in the Workplace

Why People Work: Content Theories vs. Process Theories

Why do people work hard? And when they don't, what's actually wrong? This section opens a chapter on motivation, and it lays the groundwork for everything after it. We'll define motivation precisely, as three separate components. We'll see why motivation is only one of three factors behind performance. Then we'll split motivation theories into two families. Content theories ask what people want. Process theories ask how motivation works. We'll look honestly at what a manager can and can't influence. And we'll end with a manager whose well-meant bonus changed nothing.

Motivation Defined

Direction, Intensity, Persistence

Motivation is the set of forces that account for the direction, intensity, and persistence of a person's effort toward a goal. Each component is distinct. A manager can affect all three, but by different means. Direction is what a person chooses to put effort toward in the first place, among the many things she could focus on. Intensity is how much effort she applies, once she's chosen a direction. Persistence is how long she sustains that effort, in the face of difficulty, delay, or setback. Why separate them? Because the fix depends on which one is failing. A highly motivated employee, working hard on the wrong priority, has a direction problem. Not an intensity problem. An employee who starts strong and gives up at the first obstacle has a persistence problem. More intensity wouldn't fix that. Lumping all three together as motivation hides which lever a manager actually needs to pull.

The Performance Equation

Motivation Is Not the Whole Story

Motivation isn't the whole story behind performance. It isn't the same thing as ability. Ability is a person's capacity to perform a task, given adequate skill and knowledge. And performance depends on a third factor, opportunity. That's the availability of the resources, information, and conditions a person needs to actually apply her motivation and ability. Roughly speaking, these three combine by multiplication, not by simple addition. That matters a great deal. If any one of the three is near zero, performance is near zero, no matter how strong the other two are. Picture a highly motivated, highly skilled employee working without the equipment she needs. She'll still perform poorly. And no increase in her motivation will fix a problem that's really about opportunity.

Figure 11.1.1

One Weak Factor Sinks the Product

Figure eleven point one point one shows the equation for an employee at a fictional company, Harborline Manufacturing. Motivation, times ability, times opportunity, gives performance. Here, the shortfall has been traced to one component, ability. Motivation is adequate. Opportunity is adequate. Yet performance is low, because ability is deficient. That's the multiplicative relationship at work. Strength elsewhere can't compensate for a genuine gap in one factor. This has a direct diagnostic consequence, developed fully in Subchapter thirteen point four, on performance management. A performance shortfall must be diagnosed before it's treated as a motivation problem. The same visible symptom, underperformance, can come from a deficiency in any of the three. And the correct response differs sharply, depending on which one is failing. Apply an incentive to an ability or opportunity problem, and you waste the incentive. The real cause stays untouched.

Content Theories

What Do People Want?

Motivation theories fall into two families. The first is content theories. Content theories address the question of what people want. Which needs actually drive behavior? And what can an organization provide to meet them? Maslow's hierarchy of needs is the foundational content theory. This course covered it fully in Subchapter four point three, so it's referenced here rather than restated. The remaining major content theories are covered in full in Subchapter eleven point three. They are Herzberg's two-factor theory, and Alderfer's revision of the hierarchy. And McClelland's three acquired needs. All of them share one focus. They're about the needs themselves, and what might satisfy them.

Process Theories

How Does Motivation Work?

The second family is process theories. They ask a different question. Not what people want, but how motivation actually operates. How does a person decide where to direct effort? And what determines whether that effort persists? Equity theory, covered fully in Subchapter eleven point four, addresses how people judge fairness. Expectancy theory, in Subchapter eleven point five, addresses how people calculate whether effort is worth exerting. Reinforcement theory, in Subchapter eleven point six, addresses how consequences shape future behavior. And goal-setting theory, in Subchapter eleven point seven, addresses how the structure of a goal affects the effort directed toward it. Notice that none of these names a particular need. They describe the machinery that turns any need into sustained effort.

Table 11.1.1

2 Traditions Compared

Table eleven point one point one compares the two traditions directly. Content theories ask what people want, and which needs drive behavior. The managerial lever they identify is what the organization offers. Pay, recognition, growth, and security. That tradition includes Maslow, in Subchapter four point three. And it includes Herzberg, Alderfer, and McClelland, in Subchapter eleven point three. Process theories ask how motivation works, and how effort is directed and sustained. Their lever is how an offering is arranged and delivered, so that it actually changes behavior. That tradition includes equity, expectancy, reinforcement, and goal-setting. Those run from Subchapter eleven point four through eleven point seven.

Why Both Are Needed

What to Offer, and How to Offer It

So which family is right? Both. They're complementary, not competing. It's the same sense in which the modern schools of management, compared in Subchapter five point one, were complementary lenses. Content theories say what to offer. They identify the needs worth addressing in the first place. Process theories say how to arrange the offering, so it actually changes behavior. The right reward, offered the wrong way, can fail to motivate, even when it targets a genuine need. That means offered unfairly, unpredictably, or disconnected from effort. So a manager who knows only content theory may offer the right thing badly. A manager who knows only process theory may arrange an offering elegantly, around the wrong thing entirely. This section also introduces a distinction developed fully in Subchapter eleven point eight. Intrinsic motivation arises from the activity itself. Extrinsic motivation arises from a separable consequence attached to it. Content theories touch it by asking which needs the work itself satisfies. Process theories touch it by explaining how an external reward can, under specific conditions, affect intrinsic motivation, for better or worse.

Beyond General Theory

People Differ, and Situations Matter

A genuine limitation runs through every theory in this chapter. Call it the individual difference problem. The same provision motivates one person, and leaves another entirely unmoved. A public award. A flexible schedule. A challenging assignment. Any of these can even leave someone mildly resentful. So no general theory can be applied confidently to a specific person, without knowing something about her own needs and preferences. The chapter returns to this with McClelland's needs profile, in Subchapter eleven point three. But not every determinant of motivation is about the person at all. Job design, how a job's tasks and structure are arranged, is taken up in Subchapter eleven point nine. Autonomy, how much genuine decision latitude a role carries, comes in Subchapter eleven point ten. And the manager relationship itself shapes motivation, beginning with the Pygmalion effect in Subchapter eleven point two. These situational factors matter, because they're more directly within an organization's control than anyone's personal disposition.

An Honest Limit

What a Manager Can Actually Influence

Here's an honest observation, stated outright rather than left implicit. Much of what determines motivation at work is structural, not interpersonal. Pay level. Job design. The fairness of a promotion process. The resources available to do a job. These are set by policy and structure, well above any individual manager's authority to change alone. So a manager's influence is real, but bounded. It's concentrated in how she applies the structure she's given. It's in the relationship she builds. And it's in the process levers this chapter develops. Fairness, expectation, consequence, and goal structure. It isn't in redesigning the pay scale, or reallocating resources, on her own.

A Diagnostic Sequence

3 Steps Before Any Fix

So given a motivation problem, where do you start? This section's framework gives a three-step diagnostic sequence. First, rule out ability and opportunity, using the performance equation. A motivational fix can't repair a skill gap, or a missing resource. Second, if motivation really is the deficient factor, ask what kind of problem it is. Is it about what's being offered? That points toward a content-theory diagnosis. Or is it about how it's being offered? That points toward a process-theory diagnosis. Third, apply the specific theory that fits the diagnosis. Each one is covered in the subchapters ahead. The order matters. Skipping the first step is exactly how well-meant fixes go wrong.

Case Vignette

Owen Offers an Incentive That Changes Nothing

Here's a composite case, constructed for instruction. Owen supervised a small technical support team. One otherwise reliable team member had recently been assigned to a new software platform. She began consistently missing her call-resolution targets. Owen read the shortfall as a motivation problem. He introduced a bonus tied to resolution speed, confident it would close the gap. Performance didn't improve. If anything, she seemed more anxious during calls, and her resolution times stayed essentially flat. Then Owen reviewed her call recordings directly, for the first time, rather than only her output numbers. He discovered she'd never received proper training on the new platform's troubleshooting workflow. She was doing her genuine best, with a tool she didn't yet know how to use. It was an ability problem, and training was the only real fix. The bonus, aimed at adequate motivation, had nothing to work with. Next, Subchapter eleven point two opens the specific theories, with the Pygmalion effect.

About Principles of Management at UPI Study

Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.

Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →

Why take it here

Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study

The core of every business degreePrinciples of Management covers how organizations plan, organize, lead and control their work. It is a core course in business administration and management degrees, and the base for later courses in leadership, organizational behavior and strategy.
Credit at a fraction of the priceThe same 3 credits can cost $750 or more at a US college. Here it is one payment, self-paced, with lifetime access.
Finish your degree soonerTransfer credits reduce the courses you still owe, so you can graduate earlier or lighten a heavy semester.
Strengthen an applicationA completed college-level course on an official transcript shows admissions and scholarship committees you can do the work.
Study on your own scheduleNo start dates, no deadlines. Watch the lessons, practice, and take the final when you are ready.
130,000+students helped with college creditsACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Where the credit goes

Universities that work with NCCRS

Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.

Thomas Edison State UniversityThomas Edison State UniversitySigned partnerUniversity of the PeopleUniversity of the PeopleSigned partnerCharter Oak State CollegeCharter Oak State CollegeSigned partnerStrayer UniversityStrayer UniversitySigned partnerColumbia Southern UniversityColumbia Southern UniversitySigned partnerIndiana TechIndiana TechSigned partnerPenn StatePenn StateWorks with NCCRSSouthern New Hampshire UniversitySouthern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRSSUNYSUNYWorks with NCCRS +many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →

Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.

FAQ

Questions students ask us

About Why People Work: Content Theories vs. Process Theories

What are the three components of motivation?
Motivation is the set of forces that account for the direction, intensity, and persistence of a person's effort toward a goal. Direction is what she chooses to work on, intensity is how hard she works, and persistence is how long she keeps going despite setbacks. Separating them matters because the fix depends on which component is failing.
How do motivation, ability, and opportunity affect performance?
Performance depends on motivation, ability, and opportunity combined roughly by multiplication rather than addition. If any one factor is near zero, performance is near zero no matter how strong the others are. A highly motivated, skilled employee without the equipment she needs will still perform poorly, so a shortfall should be diagnosed before it is treated as a motivation problem.
What is the difference between content and process theories of motivation?
Content theories ask what people want, meaning which needs drive behavior; examples include Maslow, Herzberg, Alderfer, and McClelland. Process theories ask how motivation works, meaning how effort is directed and sustained; examples include equity, expectancy, reinforcement, and goal-setting theories. The two are complementary: content theories say what to offer, and process theories say how to arrange the offering.
Why doesn't offering a bonus fix every performance problem?
A bonus targets motivation, but underperformance can also come from low ability or missing opportunity. If an employee was never trained on a new system, an incentive has nothing to work with and may even add anxiety. Managers should first rule out ability and opportunity, then ask whether the motivation issue concerns what is offered or how it is offered.

About the Principles of Management course

How many college credits is Principles of Management?
Principles of Management (Business 101) carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
$250, paid once, with lifetime access: all 117 video lessons, a practice quiz after each, the graded work and final exam, and an official transcript when you finish. Students who want several courses choose UPI Study PRO instead.
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
UPI Study has signed partner agreements with universities such as Thomas Edison State University, University of the People and Charter Oak State College, and works with universities such as Penn State, SNHU and SUNY. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities. Use "Find my college" on this page to check yours.
How long does Principles of Management take?
It is self-paced with no deadlines. The 117 lessons total about 24 hours of video; most students add reading and practice time and finish in a few weeks to a few months, on their own schedule.
How are the exams done?
Quizzes and assignments are online in the course. The final exam is taken online with proctoring; a person on the UPI Study team checks assignments, usually within two days.
How do my credits reach my college?
When the course shows 100% complete, request the official transcript from your dashboard. It is sent to the college you name, and you can send it to more than one. Check your college first with "Find my college" on this page, or ask Athena.

Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.

117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.

Enroll in Principles of Management →Download the syllabusEvery course with PRO →
Principles of Management
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →