UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 14.1 Free with a free account
The Strategic Management Process: From Vision to Execution
Principles of Management · Chapter 14: Strategic Management and Decision-MakingSection 14.1 · lesson 95 of 11711 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Crafting Strategy: Frameworks, Models, and Business Environments →← When Workers Unite: The Role of Collective BargainingNext lesson: Crafting Strategy: Frameworks, Models, and Business Environments →
In this lesson
From vision to execution.
- Define strategy by what it excludes
- Describe the 7 stages of the strategic management process
- Test whether mission, vision, and values are doing work
- Explain why strategies fail in execution
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,490 words). Read along, or search it.
Strategic Management and Decision-Making
The Strategic Management Process
Plenty of organizations announce a strategy. Fewer actually adopt one. This section explains the difference. We'll define strategy by what it rules out, not just by what it pursues. We'll walk the seven stages of the strategic management process, and spot the two most often skipped. We'll test mission, vision, and values by whether they're doing any work. We'll look at the three levels of strategy, and how objectives cascade down from them. Then we'll spend real time on execution, the stage where most strategies fail. And we'll see a plan with six equal priorities, and a budget that never moved.
Strategy Defined
Choosing Means Ruling Things Out
Start with a definition. Strategy is the choice of where to compete, and how. One corollary follows directly. A strategy is defined as much by what it excludes as by what it pursues. Picture a plan that commits the organization to everything. Every market, every customer segment, every competitive advantage, all at once. That plan hasn't actually chosen anything. And a plan that hasn't chosen isn't a strategy at all, in the sense this section uses the word. So genuine strategy work is the work of ruling things out. Keep that test in mind. It returns at the end of this section, in a plan that chose nothing.
Figure 14.1.1
A Cycle, Not a Line
The strategic management process runs through seven stages. Environmental analysis examines the external conditions the organization operates within. Internal assessment examines the organization's own capabilities and resources. Mission and vision review revisits the stated purpose and future intent, against current conditions. Strategic issue identification names the specific questions the organization must actually resolve. Strategy formulation develops the chosen response to those issues. Implementation carries the chosen strategy into actual organizational practice. And evaluation assesses whether the strategy is producing its intended results. Figure fourteen point one point one draws this as a cycle. Evaluation feeds back into the next round of analysis. Two stages are marked in gold, the ones most often skipped in practice: mission and vision review, and evaluation. Why those two? Both require revisiting settled assumptions, rather than producing new, visible output.
Mission, Vision, and Values
Is Each Statement Doing Work?
Mission, vision, and values each have a distinct job. Mission states an organization's present purpose. Why it exists, right now. Vision states its future intent. What it's working to become. Values function as behavioral constraints. They're the boundaries within which the organization pursues both. Each should be judged by one specific test. Is it doing work? Take a mission statement that would fit any organization in the same industry, interchangeably. It isn't doing any work at all. It's decorative language, not a genuine statement of distinct purpose. The same test applies to vision and values. If either could be swapped with a competitor's statement, and no one noticed, neither is constraining or directing anything. Try it on any statement. Hide the company name, and ask whether anyone could tell whose it is.
Levels of Strategy
Corporate, Business, Functional
Strategy operates at three levels. Corporate strategy decides what businesses an organization should be in at all. Business strategy decides how it competes within each of those businesses. Functional strategy decides how each function supports the business strategy above it. That means marketing, operations, finance, and the rest. An alignment requirement runs through all three levels. A functional strategy that doesn't serve the business strategy above it undermines the whole structure. So does a business strategy that doesn't serve the corporate strategy above that. And that's true regardless of how well-reasoned each level looks in isolation. Each level can be sensible on its own, and the structure can still fail.
Objectives Cascaded From Strategy
From Strategic Choice to Frontline Goal
Strategy then translates into objectives that cascade downward through the organization. That connects directly to the goal-setting mechanics from Subchapter eleven point seven. The cascade has a specific weakness, called cascade distortion. Each level's translation of the objective above it can drift, subtly, from the original strategic intent. By the time an objective reaches a frontline team, it may bear only a loose relationship to the choice behind it. Management by objectives is the mechanism most directly built to connect strategy to individual goals. Subchapter four point four traced its origin to Theory Y assumptions about employee motivation and capability. Its failure modes are worth naming directly. Objectives set without any genuine connection to the strategy above them. Objectives that reward activity, rather than the outcome the strategy actually needs. And a review process that becomes a paperwork exercise, disconnected from real strategic conversation.
Table 14.1.1
Implementation: Where Most Strategies Fail
Here's an empirical point. Most strategies fail at implementation, not at formulation. Formulation is where the choice is made. Implementation is the harder, less visible work of carrying it into practice. Five requirements govern whether it succeeds. Table fourteen point one point one pairs each with its symptom and its fix. Clear priorities tell the organization what matters most right now. Without them, every initiative is described as equally important. The fix is an explicit ranking, naming what won't be pursued. Resource commitment backs those priorities with real budget and people, not merely stated support. Without it, budget and staffing stay unchanged after the announcement. The fix is to reallocate actual money and people. Accountable owners make a specific person, not a diffuse group, answerable for each priority. If no single person can answer for a priority's status, name one owner. Not a committee. Measurement makes progress, or its absence, visible. Without it, progress is described only in general terms. The fix is a specific, trackable measure attached to each priority. And a review rhythm keeps the organization returning to the strategy regularly. If it's discussed only once, at launch, schedule recurring reviews on a fixed calendar.
The Hardest Step
Resource Reallocation Requires Stopping Something
Of the five requirements, resource reallocation is the hardest single step. The reason is specific. It requires stopping something. Committing new resources to a new priority is comparatively easy. Taking resources away from an existing activity, one people are already invested in, is genuinely difficult. It's hard practically, and it's hard politically. That leads to an observation worth stating plainly. A strategy unaccompanied by a change in where money and people actually go is an announcement, not a strategy. If nothing about resource allocation changes after a new strategy is declared, the strategy hasn't been adopted. Not in any operational sense, whatever the announcement said. Notice the link back to the definition. Choosing means ruling things out, and reallocation is where that becomes real.
Overload and the Execution Layer
Too Many Priorities, and Who Carries Them Out
Initiative overload happens when an organization pursues too many concurrent priorities at once. It dilutes the attention, resources, and accountable ownership each one would need to succeed. The case for fewer priorities follows directly from the five execution requirements. Imagine fifteen equally weighted priorities. No organization can realistically give all fifteen a clear ranking, genuine resources, and a meaningful review rhythm. So implementation quality declines accordingly. Then there's the question of who actually executes. Middle management, introduced in Subchapter one point one, is the execution layer. It's where strategic intent meets day-to-day operational reality. Middle managers translate a stated strategy into the specific, concrete work their own teams carry out. So their genuine understanding of, and commitment to, the strategy directly determines whether implementation succeeds.
Deliberate and Emergent Strategy
When the Plan and the Outcome Differ
What an organization actually ends up doing is its realized strategy. It regularly differs from the deliberate strategy the organization originally intended. That difference isn't always a failure. An emergent strategy arises from unplanned responses to conditions the original strategy didn't anticipate. It can be a genuine, valuable adaptation, rather than a breakdown of discipline. So the practical task is to tell productive emergence apart from simple execution failure. That's exactly what the evaluation stage exists to assess. Evaluation closes the cycle, by asking whether the strategy is producing its intended results. Its findings feed directly into the next round of environmental analysis and internal assessment. A genuine review rhythm treats it as a standing, recurring practice, not a one-time closing step. That's why the figure marked evaluation as one of the two stages most often skipped, once the visible work is done.
Case Vignette
6 Equal Priorities and an Unchanged Budget
Here's a composite case, constructed for instruction. Harborline Manufacturing's leadership team approved a new strategic plan with six priorities, each presented as equally important. They ranged from a new product line, to a customer service overhaul, to a supply chain modernization effort. The following year's budget and staffing plan was finalized shortly afterward. It was essentially unchanged. Every department kept its existing allocation. No new resources were committed to any of the six priorities. Within a few months, progress on all six had stalled. Several managers privately noted they'd simply added the new priorities on top of their existing, fully committed workloads. Harborline's leadership had produced a document describing intentions. It wasn't a strategy, in this section's sense. Six equally weighted priorities meant nothing had been chosen over anything else. And an unchanged budget meant nothing had been reallocated to support any of it. Next, Subchapter fourteen point two turns to the analytical frameworks that inform the formulation stage. Environmental scanning, the five competitive forces, SWOT, and the generic competitive positions.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About The Strategic Management Process: From Vision to Execution
What are the seven stages of the strategic management process?
Why do most strategies fail during implementation rather than formulation?
What is the difference between corporate, business, and functional strategy?
What is the difference between deliberate, emergent, and realized strategy?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →