UPI Study › Courses › Principles of Management › Free lessons › Lesson 6.8 Free with a free account
Culture as a Force: How Shared Values Shape Change Outcomes
Principles of Management · Chapter 6: Leading Organizational ChangeSection 6.8 · lesson 32 of 11713 min · free with a free account
Free preview
Create a free account to keep watching
It takes a minute and costs nothing. Your free account unlocks all of Chapter 1 and 3 more lessons of Principles of Management.
Lesson complete
Earn the 3 college credits for Principles of Management
Enrolling adds a quiz after each lesson, the graded work and the official transcript. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
Next lesson: Dividing the Work: Specialization and the Logic of Labor →← The Learning Organization: Building Capacity for Continuous RenewalNext lesson: Dividing the Work: Specialization and the Logic of Labor →
In this lesson
How shared values shape change outcomes.
- Define culture and distinguish it from climate
- Describe how culture is transmitted and assessed
- Explain why culture decides change outcomes
- Explain what actually changes a culture
Transcript
Everything said in the video, section by section (1,701 words). Read along, or search it.
Leading Organizational Change
Culture as a Force
This section closes the chapter on change, and it takes up the force that most often decides how change turns out. That force is organizational culture. We'll define culture through three levels, and see why the gap between two of them is so revealing. We'll separate culture from climate, which is easy to confuse with it. We'll look at how culture is passed on, and how it can be assessed. Then we'll see why culture is the reason so many change efforts fail. And we'll finish with what actually changes a culture, and how long it really takes.
3 Levels of Culture
What Happens When Nobody Is Directing
Organizational culture is the shared assumptions, values, and artifacts that determine how an organization behaves when nobody is directing it. It's the pattern of behavior that persists without anyone enforcing it, moment to moment. It has simply become how the organization operates. Culture is best understood through a three-level model. Artifacts are the visible level. That means physical spaces, documented policies, observable behaviors, and symbols that anyone entering can see directly. Espoused values are the stated level. That's what the organization says it values, in mission statements, stated principles, and the reasons people give for how things are done. Underlying assumptions are the level that's taken for granted, and rarely put into words at all. They're the deep, often unconscious beliefs about how things actually work. And they shape behavior, regardless of what the espoused values claim.
The Diagnostic Gap
What You Reward Beats What You Say
The most diagnostically useful fact about these three levels is a gap, one that often opens between the second and the third. What an organization actually rewards reveals its underlying assumptions far more reliably than what it states. Take an organization that genuinely believes, and sincerely states, that it values collaboration. Meanwhile its promotion decisions consistently favor individual achievement over collaborative contribution. When that gap exists, the promotion pattern is the more accurate guide to the actual culture. Not the stated value. And here's the part worth holding on to. This gap is not necessarily evidence of hypocrisy. Often it shows that nobody has examined the distance between what's said and what's rewarded, at least not closely enough to notice it. That's useful to know, because it changes the conversation from blame to diagnosis.
Culture Against Climate
2 Different Things, on 2 Timescales
Climate is distinct from culture, and it's easy to confuse the two. Climate is the current, measurable perception of the work environment. How satisfied people report feeling right now. How supported they feel this quarter. And climate changes considerably faster than culture does. A single new leader, a single difficult project, or a single round of layoffs can shift climate within weeks. Meanwhile, the underlying assumptions that make up culture typically persist across those events, largely unchanged. That has a practical consequence for anyone reading a survey. An organization can show a genuinely poor climate reading in one period, while its deeper culture stays stable. Or it can show a temporarily improved climate, without any change to the assumptions driving behavior. The two measure genuinely different things, on genuinely different timescales.
Where Culture Varies and Comes From
Subcultures and the Founder's Shadow
A large organization rarely has one single, uniform culture. It has several subcultures, varying by function, by site, and by profession. An engineering function and a sales function often develop meaningfully different assumptions. They differ about risk, about communication style, and about what counts as good work. Those differences are shaped by what each function actually does, day to day. This matters for change, because a change designed around one subculture is often rolled out uniformly. And it may fit poorly in the subcultures it wasn't designed for. Culture also has an origin worth knowing about, which is the founder and leader effect. A founder, or an early, influential leader, typically has an outsized effect on how culture forms. Their assumptions about risk, about people, and about what counts as success, shaped the earliest decisions. Those assumptions often persist long after that person's direct involvement has ended. That's true even as the stated values and formal artifacts evolve considerably. So a change that runs against a founder's original assumptions can meet resistance, even though no one present is consciously defending them. The assumptions persist on their own, without any single person actively upholding them.
Transmission
How Culture Passes Itself On
Culture is transmitted through several channels, all operating together. Stories that circulate about the organization's past. Rituals that mark and reinforce what matters. Symbols, and language. What gets attention from leaders. What gets rewarded. How crises are handled. And who gets promoted. Of all these, the last three are the strongest signals. What gets rewarded, how crises are handled, and who gets promoted. They're the strongest precisely because they're the hardest to fake, or to state insincerely. Espoused values can be written down and repeated easily. But a promotion decision, a crisis response, and a reward allocation are concrete actions. They reveal what the organization actually prioritizes, when something genuinely has to give.
Table 6.8.1
Each Level, and the Assumption It May Contradict
Table six point eight point one takes each level of culture and shows how it can contradict itself. At the artifact level, picture an open-plan office with no walled executive offices. It implies an espoused value of equality and openness across levels. Yet decisions may still be made in closed, senior-only side conversations. At the espoused-values level, picture a mission statement emphasizing collaboration. It states a commitment to teamwork over individual achievement. Yet promotion and bonus criteria may still reward individual output almost exclusively. At the level of underlying assumptions, look at who is actually consulted before a major decision is finalized. That reveals whose judgment the organization genuinely trusts. And it can contradict a stated value of broad employee voice, if consultation is in fact narrow. In each row, the visible or stated version points one way. The practice underneath points another.
Why Change Efforts Fail
3 Responses, None of Them Adoption
Now to the main argument of this section. Culture is the reason change efforts fail. A change that contradicts an underlying assumption meets one of three characteristic responses. None of them is genuine adoption. First, it may be absorbed. It's quietly reinterpreted until it fits the organization's existing logic, instead of altering that logic. Second, it may be worked around. People continue their previous practice in day-to-day reality, while formally acknowledging that the change exists. Third, it may be formally adopted, and informally ignored. The change is implemented on paper. A new policy is published, a new system goes live. But actual behavior continues almost entirely unaffected, beneath that formal surface. This is the deepest version of the invisible-components problem introduced in Subchapter six point two. A change can fully succeed at the visible level, and never reach the level where real behavior is generated.
Figure 6.8.1
A Harborline Change Meets an Assumption
Figure six point eight point one shows a proposed change at a fictional firm, Harborline Manufacturing. The change meets an underlying cultural assumption. From there, it diffuses into the three outcomes we've just named. On one path, it's absorbed, re-explained until it fits the old logic. On another, it's worked around, quietly bypassed in day-to-day practice. On the third, it's adopted on paper, and ignored in practice. The point to notice is that none of the three paths is genuine adoption. Each is a different way the organization absorbs the change, without the underlying assumption itself shifting. And each of them can be mistaken for success, as we'll see when we come to timescales.
Assessing Culture
4 Methods, Each With Real Limits
So how do you assess a culture? There are four methods, and each has real limits. Instrument-based measurement uses a structured survey designed to surface cultural dimensions. It offers scale, and comparability across time or across units. But it only captures what respondents are willing and able to articulate. And assumptions are, by definition, often not consciously examined. Observation captures actual behavior directly. The cost is that it's time-intensive, and limited to whatever the observer happens to witness. Artifact review examines physical spaces, documents, and symbols. It's relatively fast and low-cost. But you have to interpret the artifacts correctly, without direct access to the assumptions that produced them. Finally, there's the examination of decisions. That means looking closely at what the organization actually chose, in specific, consequential instances. Especially promotion, crisis-response, and reward decisions, the strongest transmission signals. It offers unusually direct evidence of underlying assumptions. Its cost is that you need access to decisions detailed and consequential enough to be genuinely revealing.
Changing Culture
Behavior First, Not Values Statements First
The central, well-supported finding on changing culture runs against the approach many organizations reach for first. Culture follows changed behavior and changed consequences. It doesn't precede them. Culture-change programs that start with a values statement generally fail. They publish new principles, and expect behavior and assumptions to follow. But a stated value sits at the espoused level, and espoused values don't reliably reach underlying assumptions on their own. That's true however sincerely they're written, and however widely they're communicated. What actually moves culture is changing what is measured, what is rewarded, and who is promoted. Those are the same strongest transmission channels from earlier, now used as levers, not just signals. They connect back to the people target, and the alignment requirement, from Subchapter six point two. Change them concretely, and sustain the change long enough to be believed. That eventually produces new stories, new informal expectations, and, gradually, new underlying assumptions. And the honest timescale for that is years, not quarters. Organizations frequently underestimate it badly. An organization that expects culture change on a quarterly timeline will likely mistake absorption, a workaround, or paper adoption for genuine success.
Case Vignette
What Harborline's Promotion Decisions Actually Said
Here is a composite case, constructed for instruction. Harborline Manufacturing's leadership published a widely communicated statement. It committed the organization to collaborative, cross-functional teamwork. Several executives described a genuinely sincere conviction that siloed departments were holding the organization back. A year later, an internal review looked at promotion decisions across the same period. Every promotion to senior individual-contributor and management roles had gone to people whose cases rested on individual achievements. A personally led project. A personally closed account. A personally authored improvement. No promoted employee's case cited meaningful cross-functional collaboration as a significant factor. The espoused value had been sincere, and widely communicated. But a whole year of promotion decisions revealed the underlying assumption. Individual, attributable achievement was still what the organization genuinely rewarded. And employees, watching who actually advanced, drew the accurate conclusion, whatever the published statement said.
About Principles of Management at UPI Study
Principles of Management (Business 101) is a self-paced online course of 117 video lessons in 17 chapters, from the classical schools and the four management functions to leadership, motivation, change, human resources, strategy and ethics. It carries a NCCRS credit recommendation for 3 semester credits.
Every lesson transcript is free on pages like this one, and the videos are free with a free UPI Study account. Enrolling adds a practice quiz after each lesson, the graded work and final exam that earn the credit, lifetime access, and an official transcript on completion. UPI Study has helped over 130,000 students with college credits. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Enroll now → Course details Download the syllabus Every course with PRO →
Why take it here
Why students take Principles of Management with UPI Study
Where the credit goes
Universities that work with NCCRS
Principles of Management carries a NCCRS credit recommendation. These universities work with NCCRS; some are UPI Study's signed partners. ACE and NCCRS have over 2,100 cooperating colleges that will consider accepting credits; the final decision is with the universities.
Thomas Edison State UniversitySigned partner
University of the PeopleSigned partner
Charter Oak State CollegeSigned partner
Strayer UniversitySigned partner
Columbia Southern UniversitySigned partner
Indiana TechSigned partner
Penn StateWorks with NCCRS
Southern New Hampshire UniversityWorks with NCCRS
SUNYWorks with NCCRS
+many more cooperating universitiesFind my college →Find my college → Not listed? Ask Athena in the corner of this page, or book a 15-minute call.
FAQ
Questions students ask us
About Culture as a Force: How Shared Values Shape Change Outcomes
What are the three levels of organizational culture?
What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate?
How is organizational culture transmitted to employees?
How do you change an organization's culture?
About the Principles of Management course
How many college credits is Principles of Management?
How much does Principles of Management cost and what is included?
Which universities accept UPI Study credits?
How long does Principles of Management take?
How are the exams done?
How do my credits reach my college?
Ready for the full course? Earn 3 credits in Principles of Management.
117 video lessons, a quiz after each one, and the graded work that earns the credit. Recommended for credit by NCCRS.
3 credits · NCCRSEnroll →